/thirdpositionist/ - Third Positionist Politically Incorrect

CPUSA - NSM merger?

>>401

Yeah, it was a half-baked answer to a half-serious question

>>401

>>400

I get the point he's making. Even if the NSM is a bunch of degenerate posers who don't know anything about economics aside from "muh free market".

>>399

Looks like they have a website but it's an absolute fucking mess. I'd be surprised if they were even active.

http://kwk2005.narod.ru/

If someone were to ask me "What political group in the USA has the absolute lowest chance of ever gaining any political power" this would be my answer.

>>407

That's true and also extremely unfortunate.

>>406

That's a literal joke, just read the thing

>>409

On the bright side, multiculturalism is becoming less popular every day and socialism is becoming more popular every day. The only problem is that most socialists are in favor of multiculturalism and most people against multiculturalism are in favor of capitalism.

However, Whichever side wins, we still gain some sort of victory. On one hand, if the far right comes into power we might be able to rid our selves of the mud invasion. If the far left comes into power we might be able to rid ourselves of capitalism.

With that said, even though our ideas aren't popular right now. (because people don't think objectively) That doesn't mean our ideas won't be popular in the future.

Look at the Sweden Democrats, they are economically left wing but are trying to stop the Muslim invasion. Hopefully we could get a party like that in the United States sometime within the next decade or so.

>>412

>On the bright side, multiculturalism is becoming less popular every day and socialism is becoming more popular every day. The only problem is that most socialists are in favor of multiculturalism and most people against multiculturalism are in favor of capitalism.

This is true

>However, Whichever side wins, we still gain some sort of victory. On one hand, if the far right comes into power we might be able to rid our selves of the mud invasion. If the far left comes into power we might be able to rid ourselves of capitalism.

Or each side keeps neutralizing the other. I do believe HBD, and that societies are projected by the races staffing them. Something like socialism will take a high trust, high time preference, creative, egalitarian and individualistic (in terms of avoiding the terminal clan nepotism of the Third World) folk to succeed.

At the same time, fostering our racial community means dropping the capitalist morals, which are detrimental to it so long as the profit motive does not align with the needs of the folk 100% of the time. Being anti-SJW or "colorblind" isn't enough; a fully nationalistic outlook is required.

That means there is no substitute for birthing a movement, and propelling it to success.

>>413

>Or each side keeps neutralizing the other.

Maybe, although one side or another is bound to gain power in the long run. This trend can be seen in modern American politics with Trump and Sanders. Not to mention the fact that these guys are just a taste of what's to come. Future candidates in future elections will be even more extreme.

>HBD

Uhh, I don't know that acronym.

>societies are projected by the races staffing them

Elaborate further?

>Something like socialism will take a high trust, high time preference, creative, egalitarian and individualistic (in terms of avoiding the terminal clan nepotism of the Third World) folk to succeed.

True. Cooperatives are the best way to give people a taste of socialism, it's also the best way to gain people's trust once they see how well cooperatives work.

>At the same time, fostering our racial community means dropping the capitalist morals, which are detrimental to it so long as the profit motive does not align with the needs of the folk 100% of the time.

I agree, capitalism has been the number 1 enemy of racialism, however that still doesn't mean that racialist capitalists don't exist. (quite the contrary) They're mostly just misguided on economics.

>That means there is no substitute for birthing a movement, and propelling it to success.

I agree with this as well, however I also feel that beggars cannot be choosers. We need to use incrementalism to achieve our ends. Right now our two best choices are Sanders and Trump. Admittedly, they're both shit, however we have something to gain from either of them getting elected.

If Trump is elected, he might enact racialists policies which I think people will like, especially since it will lower crime rates in the long run. However, his economic policies will continue to piss a lot of people off. That will work out in our favor since it will make people hate capitalism even more.

If Sanders is elected, he might make it easier for people to form cooperative economies. I know people will love that, especially since everyone would like to be a partial owner of the company that they are working for.

However his racially egalitarian views won't make things any better. If anything they will stir up more racial tensions since he will be seen as "taking sides" in the coming race war. Not to mention the fact that the BLM protesters have already started to make the left hate blacks.

>>414

>Uhh, I don't know that acronym

Human Biodiversity, the assertion that race has a defining biological presence, not only physically but also in terms of mentality and behavior as well

>Elaborate further?

Along the lines of HBD, once you accept that different races exhibit different average characters of intelligence and behavior, ypu see that majority and historically white/black/etc. societies are not simply products of luck or affluence or power. The race of the inhabitants is the soil from which the culture grows out of, and the cultural character of the people constrains the societal possibilities which the factors of luck/affluence/power/etc. then finish.

>>414

>Uhh, I don't know that acronym

Human Biodiversity, the assertion that race has a defining biological presence, not only physically but also in terms of mentality and behavior as well

>Elaborate further?

Along the lines of HBD, once you accept that different races exhibit different average characters of intelligence and behavior, ypu see that majority and historically white/black/etc. societies are not simply products of luck or affluence or power. The race of the inhabitants is the soil from which the culture grows out of, and the cultural character of the people constrains the societal possibilities which the factors of luck/affluence/power/etc. then finish.

National Bolshevism is Russian autism.

There's an RL Italian party. I forget their exact name tho. I had a pic of them but I can't seem to find it now.

>>536

Here's some info

Its Movimento Sociale Eurpeo

http://www.demotix.com/news/2235843/extreme-right-party-movimento-sociale-europeo-rally-rome#media-2235832

They seem to drop off the earth post-2012 IDK what happened to them.