/tk/ - Tickling

>>12848

As per the request of our almighty overlord, continued from >>12849

>More than one person can disagree with your views.

>>I'll bet!

>>… except they didn't, here, is the thing.

I disagreed. The other guy disagreed. That makes two of us. You just got pissy.

Your only argument against him were "I wanted to shit in your mouth" and "Someone else whined at me in another thread" and "I don't see how you can make that comparison!" without even coming up with actual counter-points. And that anon thought your reply was so retarded he had to call it that twice. Why did you get defensive. Do you need to show no two people could possibly disagree with you? Even if he was samefagging, which he's explained he wasn't, it still wasn't case to use your mod authority on him.

But no, you actually had to show to the world no two people could ever call you a moron. Which would be understandable. Guy got to you and you had no arguments. It was a moment of weakness.

Only then you go and do it AGAIN, this time connecting him to a post he'd made on a whole other thread!

In any decent board on 8chan the anons would be railing against such a gross abuse of mod powers. Of course, /tk/ is not a decent board, so most won't mind. Many will even commend you for your bitch-ass actions.

>>And it was funny watching a guy who would then devolve into "What, can't make a good point about my argument huh?!"

Well, you couldn't. But I like how you're making his point overly-emotional to imply he was somehow wrong.

>>immediately just pretend he was a third party.

Which he didn't. If he'd say "Wow, that guy is right, you're a moron!" you'd have a point. But he didn't, so you don't.

>>I've been on imageboards for a long time

Doesn't show.

>>and do you know what's a time tested and beloved tradition on them? Retard baiting.

Explains all the butthurt around here, doesn't it?

>>What exactly is your problem? "Hey what whoa hold on you're not supposed to know he was samefagging what the fuck?!"? That's the beef? I was just supposed to keep it kayfabe?

Or maybe I have the, not histerically emotional but actually reasonable, objection that you're not supposed to show other anons' posts at the drop of a needle. There are cases where accessing people's posts is not only useful, but advised! Raids from other boards and chans, pedo-posting, rampant shilling…

Defending your precious feefees is not one of them. Preferably, you won't even look at post histories unless there's a need. And if there is a need, you're supposed to just ban the guilty party with no fuss. Posting the histories for everyone to see? Just to calm your bruised ego? Sure, convince yourself you're in the right.

>>Let's talk more about it here! I'll even drop the username, keep it nice and respectful! Though keep in mind I'm still going to be able to see IPs…

Ooh, threats! Such respect. You really are a standup guy. Or, well, you can pretend rather well. Kinda. Not really. We can pretend you can pretend.

>>12852

>>As did, apparently, two other people.

a.k.a. "I know what you are, but what am I?"

>>Yeah, he said in credibly retarded things and explained as such.

He made valid point and you failed to respond to them. And even if they had been so retarded, why stoop down to his level? As a mod and local e-celebrity, don't you believe you should be better example?

>> I don't know why you're trying to do this "Ah, but wait! I too disagree! YOU'RE THEORY IS DEBUNKED!"

All-caps to show how anal-devastated I am, of course.

I don't have any emocional investment in your retardation, your logic just didn't sit well with me. I called you out.

>>Pics related.

Oh my, I had no idea IDs existed. Thank the heavens for you, almighty overlord, what would I do without your invaluable lessons? :^)

Those boards have IDs because they needed it. Comes with the popularity and the importance. As I mentioned last threads, there's uses for them. Raids, shilling, pedos….

Are you comparing those boards, their number of posters and their needs to /tk/? You wish.

Either way, the argument is moot. IDs only work in one thread, as I assume you know. You still linked the indentity of an anon across threads. And even in-thread, mods (good mods) don't tend to go into a thread and show images of post histories. But I guess you're special, so you deserve to be the exception.

I actually meant to ask last thread, but here is good too. Why haven't you made IDs a thing here? We already have a ridiculous number of namefags, and you're ass-ravaged if someone replies to the same post twice. It's really stupid to add IDs to such a small board, but it does seem like something you'd have done already.

>>this here though is a normal thing for someone to say. Gotcha.

Kill yourself? On a chan? Yes. I see it every day. Multiple times in the same thread, often. I guess chan culture still hurts your feelings too much. There's a cure for that, but it involves you hanging yourself.

>>You're literally demonstrating you don't know how to greentext…

Does it trigger you? :^)

>>"Point and laugh at the stupid shit this kid says" is more or less one of THE most well known things these boards do.

You understand some basics so well and other so poorly.

>>your entire beef is that I broke bro code by embarrassing him .

My entire beef is that you're a bad mod.

>>being so enraged he had to make two "THAT'S STUPID KILL YOURSELF GODDAMN RETARD!"

Again with the all-caps. Does it sooth you to imagine everyone who disagrees with you literally crying as they type their posts?

>> That is a pathetic thing to do and I will at the drop of a hat out you when you do it, full stop.

Even when it doesn't matter? Or maybe just when people use it on you?

>>You are absolutely pathetic if you're seriously upset that it should be considered a "valid tactic" and I'm taking it away from you.

Yes, I'm very upset you might unmask my evil deeds. You're my world, James! Why do you hurt me so…

Drats, now no one will ever be able to samefag on /tk/ ever again. If only there was a way to change your IP…. or a need to….

>>12851

The best part about this is the wall of text trying to defend his personal honor and channess without realizing the utter depth of his self parody.

You're a grade A turpentine drinking retard. You spend paragraphs crying about patreon like the worst spurned lover. You post dumb opinions and try to act like you're constructing intentional logical fallacies and sweat bullets when you realize it's failing.

Keep writing walls of personal defense. You're the most unique and special snowflake ever..as well as soft as puppy shit.

>>12861

You don't know what a wall of text is, do you? Do you have trouble reading a few lines of text? You can just ignore the argument, or even the whole thread, if it annoys you so.

As for the paragraphs about Patreon, that wasn't me, that was the other guy.

>>You post dumb opinions and try to act like you're constructing intentional logical fallacies and sweat bullets when you realize it's failing.

Yes, I'm the retard here. Read your own words one day.

And also, I'm not defending myself. I'm attacking James. Pay attention, Meangry. Speaking of

>>You're the most unique and special snowflake ever

Says the namefag.

>>12864

>You can't keep whining "ass-ravaged!"

To be honest, I keep writing that because you were insulted that I dared imply the other guy had offended you. You might have had a point about me being upset if he'd been me, but as that's not true (and you can check that),I really don't have a reason to be upset, do I?

>>since you're trying to try and make it look like you're casually getting one over on someone who's very mad

Casually? I'm fapping while writing this. Thanks for helping me go longer, btw.

Also, I don't think you're very mad. I think you WERE very mad at the other guy, but not at me.

Also also, I never called myself a pro. I'm not. I've never even owned a board here. I just think you're doing things wrong.

>> I felt it necessary to make an example of him.

But why?

>>and your approach to trying desperately to spin it as everyone else being upset over it is funny.

Not everyone else. You. And only in the past tense.

The administrator will probably see this anyway, after all these posts and the dedicated thread. But you're right, he'll probably take your side. I don't think I'll convince anyone, I just wanted to voice my opinion.

>>I'm more than interested in hoping you keep trying, though

Likewise.

James has done some nice stuff, but I'm going to have to concur that I think he overstepped his bounds to an extent.

>>12843

True, MTJ is the biggest purveyor of tickle comics and honestly they have a few artists who are exclusive to them whose work I like, some of whom no longer seem to do work for them. The rest were basically tickle artists who already had a name for themselves. Will also agree that for the most part the content was okay at best, but worse compared to what LOZ has been cranking out for the past year or longer for only $5.

I also have to agree with your anonymous assertion, more and more this place has felt more like a DA board and less like something akin to /d/ or 4chan.

Oh, cool, it's a conversation about what a chan board is supposed to be, done by people who care way too much about chan culture.

Space cadet fever is running wild.

>>12868

4chan has a culture that some of us, myself included, like for the freedom it gives and the circlejerking it seeks to quash.

Not necessarily saying that either of those two is not or is present, but hopefully you can see why some of us would view the gradual moving away from such a culture as not being a good thing.

>>12867

>more like a DA board and less like something akin to /d/ or 4chan.

The /d/ that more or less became entirely unusable due to "several dozen people" all anonymously sperging out and keeping their temper tantrums from having any kind of threads from being able to thrive? People have still been attempting to restart those and have been for a while, they die long before the post limits now and there's a reason for that.

It's a shame some of you feel like "chan culture" is being compromised, but I mean it's not like you can't just go back to the classic board and do it up proper and leave all the "sensitive" types here to circle jerk, it looks like a handful have actually been trying to do just that. And it doesn't appear to really work.

Just popping in to say that acting like this board is bad is fucking retarded because this is the first piece of drama we've had.

It's pretty much a porn posting board with some happy conversation on it.

If you stop having your bitchfest everything will go back to normal. This is by no means a 'bad board'.

>>12885

It's even contained, when it happened on "the good board", the entire ticklefag thread was ruined and would go get ruined in every other restarted thread after. Here, it's in like one or two threads.

>>12881

Perhaps I should have just said 4chan instead of also specifically referencing /d/. I will note however that the foot threads on /d/ get along swimmingly, people post things that others might not be into and yet no one throws a tantrum.

It's for that reason that I don't really care to start the threads up on /d/, at most if I see one I may try to keep it from falling off the page, but ultimately such threads having nothing to offer to me personally since they're usually low on conversation and high on dumping images.

Once again, I didn't really say that circlejerking is going on, nor did I call anyone here sensitive. I just expressed my views on some things I saw as troubling, not because of how they currently are, but because of what they could ultimately lead to.

Original other anon here who was arguing here, though I'm sure the faggot will call me out for that anyway since he's a big mod man who has made it his mission tracking down every post I've made on this board and associating it with me.

I already ceded the battle to Lord James, Grand Poobah of /tk/, but I feel like since this got its whole own thread I should have some input.

James, until your recent antics I didn't have anything against you personally, I wasn't a fan of your work at all(in fact it's the polar opposite of my taste for the most part - hot damn your games are cringefests in all aspects), but I bore you no ill will. I even tried to give you website advice before that you didn't listen to and haughtily derided, which you called me out on.

As the other guy in this thread has been saying, hurling insults and posting smug images doesn't really count as winning an argument, much less so does it even count as an argument. Even funnier and more ironic how you then tried to show how angry you thought you were making me, even though I remained comparatively collected in my tone as opposed to your vitriolic profanity filled responses. I'm assuming I hit a nerve because you were planning on making a Patreon to fund your garbage and I insulted it, so you took it as some kind of a personal affront?

Oh, and I seriously doubt you've been on imageboards for a long time as you claim, you come off as a normalfag who only got seriously into this kind of thing recently.

>>12935

Oh, and even better is how you know your behavior was wrong and abusive of your mod power, as evidenced by your turning off your trip(though you tried to play this off patronizingly and sarcastically), and you saying that you could have deleted my posts/banned me(HEY GUYS, I DID THIS SHITTY THING, BUT I'TS TOTALLY OK BECAUSE I COULD HAVE DONE THIS EVEN MORE SHITTY THING!).

Yes, James, banning me and censoring speech because you don't like it, on 8chan, a website that bills itself as a bastion of free speech, is totally reasonable and you're a fair and good saint for not doing it, instead taking away anonymity, another pillar of its values.

And golly, you're really hurting my feelings posting that image of me "samefagging". Again, you're such a badass for calling me out on it, I think I might cry.

You really belong don't belong here, and the person who made you a mod should be taken out and shot.

>>12936

>HEY GUYS, I DID THIS SHITTY THING, BUT I'TS TOTALLY OK BECAUSE I COULD HAVE DONE THIS EVEN MORE SHITTY THING!

As just an Anon reading, I assumed it was a case of: "Most mods on other sites dish out what would otherwise come across as disproportionate retribution for minor infractions or transgressions with little to no accountability to a higher authority, often on a whim and without apparent consistency with the way they enforce their judgement. You got a better deal by just being called out on your shenanigans, don't think you could just multi-post, coming off as other people and expect me to have to go through the effort of having to reply, when I can *whisper whisper* surprise post the post log of your shenanigan."

Maybe I read too deeply into that and skewed the interpretation.

>>12934

>Grand Poobah

As written by Laurent de Brunhoff.

>>12938

I hope everyone gets it out of their system complete with some good venting, and then has a nice long rest and feels better about the whole thing.

>>12937

Also laughable is how you calling me a mouth breather, maggot, retarded as shit, dopey motherfucker, 10th grader, unbelievable fucking idiot, etc, and telling me you want to shit in my mouth is perfectly OK, but me telling you to kill yourself warrants abuse of mod powers. And now you try to play it off as a joke, "hilarious". I don't see anyone laughing. You were just pissed at me.

Again, your argument boils down to "He mad guys, laugh at him!", when you're the only one who is mad here.

And when did I ever say I was from /d/?

>>12939

>As written by Laurent de Brunhoff.

It's Gilbert and Sullivan you uncultured swine.

>>12943

And by responding good-humouredly to my post, you've immediately endeared me to you, irrespective of whatever conflicts are currently being weathered by all here. Because at the end of the day, you've only got each other (while browsing here).

http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e264/Akuuji/Humor/uncultured.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz6XUyABUyM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_PGrFOcMAY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XVuPMMb_Ow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKXQQjnlUWA

>>12946

Ooooooooooh right. Ok, well, I'm accusing you from being from /d/, in addition to believing 2012 was a long time ago and that you're a seasoned e-badass.

Now respond to the rest of the post.

Yes let's take a poll of who's more mad, the person namecalling or the one who actually said this;

>the person who made you a mod should be taken out and shot

>>12949

>believing 2012 was a long time ago

You think that's bad? The recent X-Files miniseries flatly ignores the past 15 years of television history and just continues right off where the film left off.

>>12949

>let's take a poll

When we are biased, we can be led further away from the truth by exposure to information that triggers or amplifies our biases. A lot of what is read in the thread will be based on what intention the reader ascribes to each of the writers, which would distort the impartiality of the results. Methodology, such as double-blinding can help reduce the risk of biases entering uninvited into our thinking and acting.

>>12950

I'll take your word for it Jim, but I don't care about this argument nearly enough to go through the effort of using proxies to argue with you.

I'm fucking name-fagging to do the opposite of that right now for God's sake.

Nice how your previous post had nothing it it for me to respond to, because you knew you had no ground to stand on, so you now switch to accusing me of using proxies just to continue this nonsense.

>>12955

I don't fault you for that suspicion. The general idea of a person having a prior propensity towards a given act assigns them the suspicion that they would be repeat offenders. I would be remiss to say that most people would do otherwise, given your situation, and the general hostility of the conversation, which only serves to amplify the distrust. Now if you were paranoid, then it would be a different story: if he were making a sudden change in demeanour, then you would have suspicion over the sincerity of his character. So his argumentative insistence and force of personality would demonstrate a sincere singling of presumed innocence. Or he is playing at a higher level and is feigning the position of a frustrated individual, which in that case he is —– and the rambling goes on. Turtles all the way down.

Stuff happened. People would have done the same thing in your position. Don't feel too bad about it. The question is, do you feel bad enough about it to admit that you were mistaken, or, considering the position you were in, do you feel that it even warrants an apology (however begrudging given) despite the callous treatment he has given you. Though in his eyes, he expresses in his posts quite clearly that he feels that he has been treated unfairly, and that he should have been responded to according to a convention that holds an imagined precinct which he holds to a high value. Which then raises the question, should it be valued if he feels so very strongly about it?

There are lots of questions. I'm not an invested reader in this thread, but it'd be interesting to see how it gets resolved.

>>12953

>>12955

The fact that you find it so outlandish that other people could agree with me/be on my side/think that you're wrong is only a testament to your your massive, throbbing ego, paranoia(which we discussed before) and narcissism.

And calling me mad in every post isn't going to make it so.

Why is it that you think being mad is such an insult? Everyone gets mad sometimes.

And I'm pretty sure that most chans have a list of proxies that are blocked, as far as I know they block all public proxies/known TOR nodes.

>>12957

It's not that I agree with you.

I'm not exactly on your side.

I'm not on your side.

I just have this bad habbit where I slip into someone else's shoes, and the way I see it, you're in a situation where, as far as I've read – and stand to be corrected on any point raised! –, "you feel that you've been dealt with unfairly, and that the conduct of the other participant had dealt out what you perceive to be undeserved and underhanded treatment."

If I was in your situation, I would have guilt tripped him like a weasely mofo (re: I would have spoken with him in private and shared my grievances, and hoped to come to some kind of reconciliation.)

>>12957

>And I'm pretty sure that most chans have a list of proxies that are blocked, as far as I know they block all public proxies/known TOR nodes.

James has been very good with that. It USED to be blocked, and then he might have enabled it or there had been changes. Made it easier viewing the site when travelling a while back. (There are places where 8ch is arbitrarily blocked or has issues loading up, as in the text comes up but not the images.)

>>12935

>sensible chuckle.gif

I uploaded all the episodes for the first season in one of the previous threads on /tk/.

>>12959

OK detective, let's see the whopper of an image pastiche you've prepared to show the world how you think I'm using proxies to argue with you. I guess you're not totally useless, I learned something from you: I wasn't previously aware of the detailed analytics mods apparently have access to.

Oh, and I was the one who said I'd let you have the victory and stopped posting last thread, and instead of leaving it at that you created this whole new "Bitch Box" thread to continue this ordeal.

>>12961

Guilt tripping is not really my style, and it only works if the other party admits to wrongdoing, which ol' James hasn't.

Nor is confronting an asshole in private instead of calling him out for all to see, I'd rather air my dirty laundry in public if you know what I mean.

>>12963

>Do you know what usually causes that?

>Proxies…

Please explain to me, oh knowledgeable one, how proxies, and not 8chan's shitty software(which I'm sure many other people can attest to) cause this.

>>12959

>It's less of "getting mad!" being the problem, but more what you're mad about, and your response to those emotions. Which is a) a stupid reason, and b) moronic reactions. "Your videos are shit! Your games are shit! You're a normie!".

I slipped out of consciousness reading this drivel just like I did reading the post of yours that started this war, and just now mustered the confidence to finish reading it.

So it's moronic when I use personal attacks against you, but it somehow isn't when you copiously use them against me?

>>12967

OK, I'll humor you. Can you point out to me where it says, "this is this poster's first time on this board, etc"?

>Do you know what could cause such a delay between the data being submitted and the window going away? A process that should be instant? A proxy.

It could also depend on one's internet speed.

>>12963

>trying to… "help"

There's nothing more annoying than nosy busybodies trying to "help", as if they have some profound insight into resolving issues and conflicts that they themselves have no vested history of involvement in. Worse still, the way they trivialise the matter with the flippant way they treat the issue.

I really hate the kind of people who come in and try to "help". It's people like that who really need to learn the meaning of the phrase: to fuck off. Fuk 'em for their intrusiveness, and fuk 'em for their presumptions. The twats.

>>12963

>You know what Occam's Razor is?

This question is not addressed at me, but I will be a twat and answer it anyway.

Occam's razor is a principle attributed to the medieval philosopher William of Occam (or Ockham). The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. It underlies all scientific modelling and theory building. It cautions us to choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models of a given phenomenon the simplest one. In any given model, Occam's razor helps us to "shave off" those variables that are not really needed to explain the phenomenon.

The principle penalises complicated models, assigning them large probabilities only if the complexity of the data justifies the additional complication of the model.

>>12963

>this is like the third time on of your posts has been submitted twice in a row. Do you know what usually causes that?

>Proxies…

I have a simpler explication: Spelling errors. I spelt 'habit' as 'hobbit'. But I do recall double posts in the past on oldchan.

>>12964

>"Know what I mean? Nudge, nudge. Wink wink. Say no more."

The Candid Photography sketch.

>>12967

>old poster

I like this one!

>>12967

>an old poster who has been here a while with no history is ALSO the same guy having this specific problem. That nobody else is having.

I was deleting and correcting mistakes in my posts. (Pedantic much. Yes.) Ctrl+F5 will remove the clutter on the screen.

I can verify to James through private correspondence my alleged identity by giving him my old tripcode password and perhaps variably agree to participate to other methods of identity confirmation .

>>12970

You're free to believe that if you wish Jim, but it's not so.

And you're giving me a mind to reset my IP address now just so you'll stop stalking me.

Just a reminder, Season 2 of Danger 5 is out and has been for a long while.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYXHzOqnMpk

This thread is not nearly as entertaining or focused as the Cheshire Train Wreck. Go back to that please.

We are clearly dealing with here, a man who believes his shit does not stink.

>>12981

Yes Jimmy, I'm really that fucking stupid that I'd use proxies when I know you can and will look at post histories and call me on it. Unlike you, I have more foresight than a cockroach.

Again, it's convenient how you're the only one who can confirm this, and you started the accusations when you were getting so angry over me and other people shutting your ass down and had nothing left to say, instead of doing it in the early stages of the thread before I had ever even appeared.

And also again, why would I do this when I said I was done in the other thread, and you made the new one? Am I such a genius intellect that I foresaw you would make a new thread instead of just accepting that I said you fucking won the argument, and I was standing by with proxies at the ready to unleash a world of pain on you, and it was part of my master plan all along?

That's some Batman-level shit, James.

lol @ all the smug.jpg pics

This thread is the dankest thread

Pls no delete adminerino

>>12983

First of all I was never trying to samefag in the first place, I shut this down as soon as you accused me of it. I only skimmed your dense, spiteful first reply to me to get the gist of it, then after going back and reading it in detail and realizing that in almost every sentence was some kind of bizarre insult, name, or threat of violence, did I comment that if it hadn't been made in jest it was disturbing.

And I actually didn't know you were a mod, since the names don't have ##MOD## next to them like they do on some other chans.

Like I said about 100 or so posts ago, you're one of those faggots who is never going to admit they're wrong and always has to have the last word in an argument, and I don't want to play this game anymore because I don't have the endurance for it.

The funniest part about this is that this originally had nothing to do with you whatsoever. I made a post detailing why so many people, myself included, hate on Patreon, in a normal tone, and you, acting like you own the place as usual, responded like I'd made a "Fuck Gardener James, Fuck Him In His Ass" thread.

And also, I never made a big deal over how I was an oldfag or whatever it is you're saying and how you were a normie. I called you a normalfag just because your behavior showed you have no respect for how chans operate, and even then I didn't use it in a particularly derisive way.

So you win again James, I used proxies twice, I was so mad I blew a gasket, nobody agrees with me and every single person in this thread is me behind a proxy, whatever you say.

I tire of this exercise in futility. I'm out again, Adios.

>>12981

P.S. I was sincerely tickled(no pun intended) you got the Chris Chan reference.

So we get a Chris Chan image drop, someone acting like motherfucking AL Pacino in Godfather Part 3 with the whole "I said you won but then you started this thread" nonsense because this guy has been anoning and on chan boards long enough that but doesn't realize the very basic principle of any of this is not giving a shit at an almost nihilistic level.

The very root of all of this came from a pair of absolute flailing dumbshit posts about Patreon. It's alright if you're not a fan of the platform. It has issues. But no. Two people went on rants about let's players and how anyone who does this wants to live life high on the hog like some kind of welfare queen…and on top of that, did a shit job of even that. The arguments were awful low rent low level shit. Don't give a shit? There's enough posts in here and in the Cheshire thread to prove that's a bold face lie. In the process, every little trick in the argument book was thrown out. None of it worked. So then it was all about whining on being bullied and how it's clear that James won't apologize for wrongdoing even though he was wrong, sulking around carrying some cross hoping someone will see this so you can then crucify yourself to try and get that hail Mary victory.

It didn't happen.

In the process, much lolcowing was had. This whole thread is James parrying and riposting you into oblivion, to the point where you cry about how you couldn't get a fair trial in the court of public opinion. It's probably because you have a lot of shit opinions of the world and are so sensitive you can't handle any criticism, which makes the whole genesis that much richer.

>>12979

>I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he's created a psychological dossier on me based on my post history

Isn't that what I did, but after a lot fewer posts, like a lot fewer and ended up missing the mark by a long-shot? Which I am sorry for doing btw. I shouldn't have done that. I'm also sorry for involving myself in your stuff.

>>12986

I would like to acknowledge that while it's rude of me to have been posting here despite having no involvement with what's going on – and apologise for it –, I also what to take the time to openly acknowledge that making the image name "implying.jpg" improves your reaction image all that much more. Niccccce!

>>13003

The best parts of this posts, the presentation, and just the whole thing pretty much. Cohesive Summery & Ad Libs/10.

No idea what's going on but looks like 4Chan was right about _ the whole time. No wonder the terrible person got his commission revoked, lol.

Seems I was right that James was a cancerous faggot.

>>14232

How so, cuck?

>>14234

Not him, but your spamming this week is getting a little obnoxious

>>14235

>your spamming this week

Explain what you think "spamming" is, guy who has never posted on this board before today.

>>14236

Been here from day 1 since feetschan shut down, thank you.

I'm referring to the fact that within the last week you've started three troll threads with the same purpose.

Also your personality has gone from genial adult who provides high quality content with a level head to a high schooler trying to get a rise out of people by making ludicrous statements the like of "Hitler did nothing wrong" because some people gave you shit in the tread that started all this /tk/ shit posting.

>>14237

>Been here from day 1 since feetschan shut down, thank you.

I'll bet.

>I'm referring to the fact that within the last week you've started three troll threads with the same purpose.

Posted twice, this second one is to continue where the first thread was going while not making it obvious "It's epic ween trolling!" before it actually happens.

>making ludicrous statements the like of "Hitler did nothing wrong" because some people gave you shit in the tread that started all this /tk/ shit posting.

Which is… what? Making fun of someone who declared (and got 0 support in, by the way) I should not be "the representative of the board"? Give me specifics, not "Well it's kinda like this other thing generally considered to be bad…". The last thread actually had someone raging about 'white knights' because the blithering nonsense they were posting got absolutely no support, how is making fun of nerds "shitposting"?

>>14239

Did you get bit by Kujman or something?

This is getting kinda scary.

>>14245

> "ur a spammer!"

> show me where

> "… S-shut up… Kujman!"

Well shit son, you sure showed me.

>>14246

Well given the frequency, tone, and content of your recent posts(and call me crazy here) it seems pretty apparent that no amount of reason or evidence is going to have an affect at this moment.

Now I' know I'm just making assumptions based on past experiences here, but it seems like the amount of time it'd take for me to screencap your posts for your wacky statements regarding your 250 dollar splurge, and subsequent screen caps of the catalog and specific threads to show he volume of shit posting having occurred, is not going to be worth it, since up to this point you've refused to accept any criticism or respond to any valid arguments.

It just seems like a waste of time. And yeah, if you want screencap that last post with early Quinn and put it next to a Kuj post and compare quality and content. Do my job for me.

>>14247

>Well given the frequency, tone, and content of your recent posts(and call me crazy here) it seems pretty apparent that no amount of reason or evidence is going to have an affect at this moment.

so you totally could, but just won't. Right.

And the rest of the post is literally what I said before; you feel as though you should be free to say whatever, but any response (of which, because what you say is incredibly stupid, will be mockery) is supposed proof in snd of itself that you're correct.

Do you know what "Kafka trapping" is?

>>14239

shut up retard

>>14288

What's wrong fella, not approving of how I'm representing ya?

>>14289

no ;[

>>14290

Maybe if you pepper in some dated chanisms I'll reconsider my stance.