/tk/ - Tickling

As a suggestion to most of you guys, if you're bored of tickle art and the way it's going, or you don't like the way an artist's art looks, then don't spend the time talking about it here on a board that most of the artists haven't even heard about and will probably never see. Go to those artists and suggest some ideas, tell them what you're thinking, give truthful commentary instead of "good job" or "nice work" on their pics. Make an active contribution for change. Complaining about it here does nothing to solve the issue, and only makes it worse over time. The artists can't improve their craft or the quality of the tickling art community if the issues aren't brought to their attention. They'll just continue to do what they always do, because few people are speaking up.

>>4911

>give truthful commentary instead of "good job" or "nice work" on their pics

Honestly this one does hit home, there have been quite a few times where I thought something was off on a picture or thought that overall it was kind of bland, but kept quiet and only focused on what I have liked about the piece so as not to give offense.

Stuff like content though I feel like to an extent I don't have the right to say anything about since I'm not paying them to draw.

Post moar yenny

>>4912

It varies from artist to artist, but if you commented a flaw on a work I did I would consider this as positive feedback. Maybe even appreciate that more than you telling me the best parts of it. That would mean there's place for improvement.

But again, that depends from each person. My suggestion is to try to do that as most polite as possile, and after that repeat or not depening on their reaction.

>>5540

Not knowing how an artist will react really is the tricky part, especially if you're anxious and would like to remain on at least neutral terms with said artist. Your suggestion however is one I'll try to keep in mind, at least for the artists I think I've a better understanding of.

>>5615

Talking about artists reusing the same positions, or people asking for the same exact thing from different artists?

>>5615

I won't denny that most of the time I use pictures and photos as references for my drawings (and I usually give credit for it) but this is going a bit too much I think…

>>5616

Yeah, the second one. Commissioners who are pretty much just asking someone else to draw the same picture.

>>5619

It is what it is, some people just want instant gratification and have the means to obtain it with no consideration.

>>5679

Wtfeather had a similar problem. Don't know if eh still does.

Sometime I just wish artist would take 5 to 3 and not overdue It. But, even then work sometimes get unfinished. Understand life and all. But, I know a artist with a hand problem who gets stuff done faster,.

>>5683

CefPromo apparently went through a mental breakdown or something and just up and left everything for a while, and assuming it was irl problems I didn't want to be a dick about it, but when you're all better go work o the shit you've already been paid for. That's still real life money I had to work an actual job for to hand over, don't jerk me around.

>>6305

I asked him just to give the money back, not convinced he's actually going to give it, but I've been patient enough for about a year now. First it was finished and he just kind of forgot whose it was, then he's "just finishing it up", NOW he's just getting around to it? What the shit.

>>6306

The fact that they want to say that about PayPal processing when you can legitimately pull up a transaction record is fucking hilarious. This isn't receipts for the tax man, the site keeps a log of all this stuff.

Artists who pull this shit are garbage, and since they get the money, people have to treat them so delicately so they don't just off and run with it.

I feel like chesh has stopped caring

the cell shading and thick, black, untapered lines just feel lazy

It feels like he puts more effort in his nightmare fuel manips

Like I understand you're a busy guy, you have a wife and kid, etc, but it feels like you're just going through the motions on these drawings, like you don't even really want to draw them

>>6510

A while back me and some of the "big name" DA guys got together to collaborate on an RPG, just sat around in a Skype room and kicked ideas and stuff back and forth, and a few times he would mention he preferred the manip stuff to the art by far. I wouldn't go so far as to say he's 'forcing' the drawings, but I think he enjoys the comparable freshness of the creepy shit.

Last I actually talked to him he was getting a loooooot of hours at a new job where he was making quite a bit more an hour, so I'd imagine that his art as a whole isn't nearly the priority it once was.

>>6510

I can say that guy wants to draw them, it's just that the end game is how much he can make to supplement his income, something I would do in his shoes as well. It's about who pays to do what. The manipulations are simply fun things done on the side; they engage and make it so his degree skills don't get rusty.

But as for the actual, like, quality of work and that? I don't see that shit at all. I think a lot of his work pops and is really well done. Acting like he is mailing it in when people clamor for poser art and some of the shit on here is LOL.

Been a week, no refund, blocked from communicating. Anyone wanna say something?

>>6549

And this is why I rarily commission anyone who is high tier in the tickling community now in days. And stick to people who rarily get commissioned or know thier limits.

>>6550

Truth be told I'd considered him a (very good, mind you) mid tier. Not quite that upper level. And paid for 3 commissions upfront and gave the guy a year to do something with them with the hopes he'd pull through.

Like >>5679 is probably my favorite tickle pic in a long time, I like nearly everything about it, but it's not like the dude was a "Come out of nowhere and blew everyone away with his talent" like Kidetic.

Who I HAVE commissioned before and DID deliver in a timely manner. Despite having at the time been known for being 'picky and douchey' in regards to his commission work.

>>6563

and it's stuff like this why I've taken a habit of scheduling private/public art streams so the client can watch their art getting done. Once they see it's done, they pay so I can send them the full resolution.

If they try to weasel out of paying, I can withhold the image, keep the sketch and turn it into a YCH or do something else with it with my own characters so the work isn't a complete waste.

I've grown to hate taking payment in advance because I potentially end up forgetting who already paid and by having the money already, I develop guilt the longer I take to deliver what they paid for.

But that's my current general process on doing things after doing commissions for so long… so far it's been working well.

>>6551

you know what? fuck it

I use to respect his wishes of not touching his art, but if he's gonna burn peoples asses like this..

post his uncolored work in here. I'll do a better job at it than he will. And for free.

>>6575

oh, sure, give me the most clusterfuck one with the most characters

I'll see what I can do

>>6566

You know It is almost a running gag by this point when you can tell what a person is spending their money on by the simple of fact of how they work and the top speed.

People, who actually live off commissions to a point work really,hard to get them done fast.

People,who don't live on them.Work slower.

Which is fine.

However, I think we get to a point where "I have a life." Slowly turns into "Fuck you nerd. I don't have to be your art monkey no more."

And I think that is where problems start to get summoned and the "Us vs them" starts boiling up.

Their is a odd irony however. That the people who no longer need salvation thou commission tend to have larger prices and tend to be the first to summon a defense when people called them out for bad work eritic.

Their is also a comedy to assume the people who pay you to do the art don't have a life. And that is a feeling get a lot of the time. (Even,in moding, and so on) Of this weird Ryan elitist smell.

And once again. I tell them I took business and they still chew me out.

>>6586

it's not hard to realize when it comes to money and being paid to do something, you're kinda obligated to follow through with what you agreed to be paid for.

busy or not, if the client's patience runs out, the least you can do is to refund the money given if to at least save face and not risk your reputation getting ruined as being an untrustworthy artist.

There's a community within the furry fandom (which I feel might be beneficial to spread out to other fandoms with artists who take commissions) called Artists Beware, which warn which artists you should be apprehensive to do business with if they treated any of their clients badly http://artists-beware.livejournal.com/

>>6583

Speaking of getting your shit together, James I saw your post on that little wanna-be crusader "MrCleans" page. I get the guy is a bit of an asshole, but how you went after him was just shameful and utterly disgusting. Calling him out for having "autism" just cause the guy's a prat is just shameful and downright disgusting! We're not 4chan, we should be handling these things in a civilized and respectful manner, not going out and insulting people with a dis-ability by comparing them to some asshole like that.

For shame! I thought better of you!

>>6633

Yeah, fair enough. I'll stop.

>>6634

Good man! It's alright voicing your opinion towards him, just try to be more tasteful and respectful when doing it. Otherwise you just give guys like him fuel for their little crusages

>>11404

I've noticed this forever.

He's one of the laziest artists out there, I'm amazed people commision him at all.

>>11410

It is weirder when you consider I paid with those with points (DA dollars),but as soon as he started getting real money how he preformed changed greatly.

WTFeather started off/is primarily a furry artist though, right? Seems like he mostly does Manimals and wanted to branch out into people, but still wants to be mostly a furry guy so kind of figured out how to do human anatomy in a very basic way and just does the same thing over and over.

>>11404

WTFeather draws well enough, especially in the foot department, but I too have noticed a lot of their art repeating itself in a few areas.

>>11421

>Hell, maybe a lot of the commissions he gets are just like "pls tickle X character" without any real specifications

Wouldn't surprise me

>>11404

>>11410

>>11423

Similar to Umojar, a deluge of uninspiring, pedestrian commissions results in the stagnation of another decent artist.

>>11421

Now this is the good shit.

Where has this been, waiting to come out?

>>11426

He posted it on his tumblr. I think it was posted a day or two ago, and he said it'd be done soon.

>>11424

Fetish wise at least. Not sure I'd really say Umojar has stagnated as far as non-fetish art goes.

I end up vindicated; NoPromo/CEFlex/whatever the fuck his name was apparently bailed with peoples money.

http://jonantk.deviantart.com/

According to archive one of the last comments he got was, you guess it, not delivering content he'd been paid for way in advance!

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FckOYtCz3X4J:jonantk.deviantart.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

I wish I had saved those bullshit "I'm being taken advantage of by greedy commissioners!" journals he made after I put him on blast, the dude had to have gotten away with a couple hundred dollars from a lot of people.

>>12057

And this is why i commission people only after I see they have done commissions in a timely matter and actually close them.

If you have a paypal and that is hwo you paid him. You could find his email or whatever is needed and well..I am not saying blacklist his ass via paypal.but..

That being said, it is a running gag by this point that people who pull the "But comissioners" card, tend to act like dead beats.

>>11420

>WTFeather draws well enough, especially in the foot department

What the fuck no.

His toes are gigantic and the proportions are bad, they should not look like that.

>>12489

Eh, they look all right to me, never said they were my favorite.

>>12483

James, you obviously have the wrong guy! /s

Did you ever actually get any commissions from him?

>>12516

No, tho crazy enough the first time I exposed him someone else refunded me on his behalf. Still, I'm sure he made off with well over a few hundred dollars from people.

>>3550

>Personally I'm fine with LOZ keeping it clean. I mean, I certainly don't mind some kinky stuff, but when I buy tickle porn I expect to see some tickling.

>In fact, my main concern with LOZ is that the tickling often feels like an afterthought in his work. Like, you'll see some vines in the approximate vicinity of some girl's belly or armpit and you assume that it's tickling her because she's smiling, but there never seems to be any cases of real tickle torture going on. Sometimes it's implied to be going on off screen but when we get to watch the action it never seems to be any worse than a couple of magical feathers teasing the girls' skin.

Given how much he is into the damsels being in distress you'd think he'd put more effort into making the situations his characters find themselves in more, y'know, distressful.

>>12545

Technically DiD can encompass a lot of things, from what I've seen the people who actually go for life threatening situations are a niche. Can't recall how the rest breaks down between people content with a girl just being tied up and a girl tied up with the insinuation that something bad is going to happen.

LOZ definitely seems to fall on the lighter side of things where he likes bondage, but nothing much darker. So as far as tickling is concerned he is never going to go full torture.

>>12547

Yeah, I know and understand that LoZ isn't all that into heavier stuff, but I'm still always rather dissapointed when I buy a comic of his that has been advertised as containing tickle fetishism and then it always feels like the tickling is an afterthought.

But really, what all this stems from is that I think that LoZ all in all does a great job and that he has some really hot tickle victims in his roster, but it almost never ever seems to end up as good as it could have been. Syrielle, for example, is one of my personal favorite tickle torture victims of all time and yet it seems that she almost never gets it, and when she does it always never seems to be for more than a two or three panels in the entire issue. Issue 7 had a bit more than that, but that was also advertised as a Syrielle issue, and sure there are some number of panels where she is getting tickled, but the number where she's actually acting like it tickles and isn't just annoying is far less than that.

>>13081

>Yeah, I know and understand that LoZ isn't all that into heavier stuff, but I'm still always rather dissapointed when I buy a comic of his that has been advertised as containing tickle fetishism and then it always feels like the tickling is an afterthought.

That's the problem with Kidetic, as well. These are artistic vanity projects and the artists aren't really thinking about an audience they are catering to as much as art they want to create. Agencies was notorious for this. He added all kinds of weird shit that he personally wanted to explore, but that generally detracted from the overall book.

>>13081

Probably because tickling is sort of an afterthought to LOZ in the grand scheme of things. Just from looking at who he associates with and talking to people, his focuses are mainly on DiD and feet, particularly of the stocking variety. He technically does say on the about page of Fantasy Frontier that it's both a DiD and tickling comic, not just the latter.

Not trying to say that he doesn't care for it at all, more that it's perhaps just an addition for him. That is why I think his tickling pictures where the ticklee isn't gagged sometimes don't turn out so great in the facial department and also why he mainly seems to make use of either fingers or magical feathers.

I've honestly never read Fantasy Frontier beyond the samples, the art books, and the sketchbooks, so I can't personally vouch for how I think it does tickling wise. I think elsewhere LOZ does mostly decent enough with the tickling, but I'll say that technically it's the feet he draws that I'm more interested in than the tickling.

>>13086

This I think may also play a part of sorts. LOZ is selling is stuff for cheap, so he obviously isn't expecting to make a living off of it. I'd assume his intention is to work with his own characters and in the process make a little spending money.

You could of course argue that is actually paying attention to his audience, like I said above, DiD is what he mostly affiliates himself with and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that those who like DiD foremost make up the biggest portion of his customer base.

>>13114

This kinda touches on the patreon thread revolving around Chesh. He popped in and mentioned that he'd like to explore one of his less well known creations, but realizes that if he's asking people to fund his art projects he has to offer what people want and not just what he wants to do. The moment money comes into it, an artist has to at least start considering his customers/donors.

>>13086

Nothin is sadder in this world than a porn writer who loses his grasp of what he is writing. Surely it's easy to lose yourself in the world you have created, especially if the story goes on for a long time, but what makes for an interesting story is rarely, if ever, the same thing that makes dicks hard.

At best you end up porn with a convoluted and meaningless plot that takes up too much space and detracts attention from what people payed to see and at worst you end up with a convulet story that includes a great deal of out of place fetish content.

>>13086

>These are artistic vanity projects

>an artist making stuff that he wants to do instead of pandering to people is a vanity project

By that logic most all non-commercial art is "vanity projects".

LoZ I've never been a fan of… Similar to what others in this thread have been saying, his work comes off as DiD/light bondage, with tickling just added in as an afterthought. Half the time the characters aren't even laughing, they just have a strained expression, which kills it for me and I'm sure a lot of others. Like why even bother?

And Kidetic? I haven't seen anything of his that was non tickling, bondage, or feet related. I'm not a huge fan of his facial style(he tends to give his females a serious case of monkey face, though recently he's been improving) and his stuff is a little childish for my tastes, but all things considered he's one of the better western artists in this fetish no question.

The thing that a few creators do that grinds my gears is trying to pander to as many fetishes as possible in an attempt at a cash grab and not doing a particularly good job of any of it. MellowTK(or whatever the fuck he calls himself now, he's deleted and remade his accounts I don't know how many times), clearly was largely into tickle stuff from the beginning(and a lot of his early stuff was pretty decent), but later when he started making games he set up a Patreon, and tried to put all these other things into his games, and not even stuff of the fairly benign variety. He put in stuff like vore, futa, etc just to pander to people so they would give him Patreon bucks, and the tickling scenes he did include would be like 3 lines of tickling, and then 100 lines of "monster slime girl mutant dickgirl rape inside a stomach" or something of that nature. I'm not one to judge people based on their sexual preferences at all, but I really don't want to see vore with my ticking. There's a pretty marked line between "tickling somebody and making them laugh", and "eating and digesting someone alive".

>>13123

I suppose that thinking has merit if the artist is trying to get by, but as I said I think LOZ is likely doing decently and so he is not really concerned with trying to pander, if he even has to. I've bought all of the sketchbooks LOZ has put out so far and I'd say I'm mostly satisfied on the whole.

>>13144

>and his stuff is a little childish for my tastes

Could you elaborate?

>>13144

>By that logic most all non-commercial art is "vanity projects".

Vanity doesn't have to be negative. An artist can do it because he wants to share his work. But if he's doing it for money, then he either has to cater to what his audience wants or he has to accept that he may not have as many sales if he simply produces work that he wants to do. Stay true to your artistic "integrity" or go commercial. It's a choice. Each has it's rewards and it's losses. Rarely do the two intermingle harmoniously.

>>13145

>I suppose that thinking has merit if the artist is trying to get by, but as I said I think LOZ is likely doing decently and so he is not really concerned with trying to pander, if he even has to. I've bought all of the sketchbooks LOZ has put out so far and I'd say I'm mostly satisfied on the whole.

And maybe that is that harmonious sweet spot I alluded to in an above post. Some artists can actually be paid to create what they want, because what they create is something that appeals to others. Many artists don't get that luxury because the art they want to create doesn't resonate as much as more commercial ventures they have less interest in.

>>13158

That's fair. I think one thing that has probably helped LOZ is that over the years he has managed to create characters that are aesthetically pleasing and perhaps draw on tropes or archtypes that people like. Like I've actually thought from time to time before that it could be cool to see a certain character of his in a scenario, whereas a decent amount of the time other OCs are just kind of boring and I really wish the artist would stuff with a character from something else.

>>13449

Man, Fuck Screampunk. He's no longer one of us.

I read like .5% of this absolute encyclopedia of tickling information and complaints. Here are the things I have to say.

-let's just collectively stop using feathers and stocks. IT IS OVER. WE ARE A NEW WORLD.

Let's get some full toe-tied sci-fi stocks and tentacles/brushes… completely fucking up the victim.

Also check out WTFeather's new art. It's pretty good, actually.

And where are my socks. We can do tentacles/brushes on socks right? It still works great, unlike SOME people insisting that it doesn't tickle as much. What are you tickling with, a hair?

Also don't nylons make feet MORE ticklish or something along those lines? How come we don't see art/videos of toe-tied (all ten, motherfucker. Not just the two big toes) nylon shit with brushes. I think that would capture the full insane torture in one image.

And before you say it'd rip them… it wouldn't. I've seen one years ago where all ten socked AND nylon toes were tied. It's possible, but no one everrrrr does it.

>>13509

>I agree completely, feathers suck.

>Sounds cool.

>This isn't really a complaint.

>That wouldn't really work unless the socks were really, really thin.

Dunno about the last two.

>>13449

Especially since the Patreons you support are plastered on your profile page public for all to see. I imagine some people might not want to have a nice little badge on their page that says "I Give Money Each Month To Weird Fetish Porn".

>>13449

Its funny because his art got worse and worse as time went on. Who the fuck is even paying for his shit now?

>>13512

Thin socks work great yeah

Also most things are sort of complaints here, well at least mine were

>>13525

>Who the fuck is even paying for his shit now?

All of us. Every one.

We're all paying for it.

>>13509

>let's just collectively stop using feathers and stocks. IT IS OVER. WE ARE A NEW WORLD.

There is a certain charm to feathers, but I can agree about stocks. Too often they're used with no real explanation and in settings where they don't fit.

>Let's get some full toe-tied sci-fi stocks and tentacles/brushes… completely fucking up the victim.

This on the other hand I'm not sure I get since both of of those things are quite common, almost annoyingly so.

>Also don't nylons make feet MORE ticklish or something along those lines?

For some people

Honestly it sounds like you would enjoy UKTickling's clips since they have a heavy stock and nylon focus.

>>13580

>in settings where they don't fit.

Explain.

Honestly, I'd just love to see more artists stop being pussies.

We're a fetish community that probably shares the most in common with BDSM and yet runs rampant with squeamish and sexually retarded little pantywaists who are threatened by even remotely sexual content mixed with their tickling.

There are a bunch of artists who are awesome but just play it safe way too much to cater to these spergs and never try to expand their horizons regarding kinkier content. I know obviously it's up to the artist and I'm sure a lot of them might feel it's one of those lines that if they cross then there's no turning back, but in the end this really is a fetish based around sadism and masochism. Take off the kid gloves already.

>>13589

>"….it involves children…ITS NOT SEXUAL, ITS JUST FUN!…………………………..*fap fap fap*"

>>13589

This is definitely at least partially true.

Though I personally do find a lot of fun when I'm tickling in a platonic way too. I think its a little like play-fighting, but without the pain. I'm willing to admit that might just be because I've been so exposed to it through the fetish

>>13589

Honestly, It just kind of happens. No one is sure why people end up with fetishes at all,but It happens. And they are a bitch to get rid of.

>>13589

I think this is somewhat true. I entirely prefer tickle torture over legitimate sex but don't ever try to play it off as anything but a fetish.

>>13597

>And they are a bitch to get rid of.

Aw why would you want to do something like that? Embrace your uniqueness man, this isn't some dime a dozen panty sniffing perv shit, you're into a fetish that most people have never even heard of. I mean fuck even the freaks on /d/ had no idea we were a thing at first. You have any idea how cool that actually is? It's like being part of some kind of secret exclusive club. I'm proud to be into this even with all the social awkwardness included :)

>>13600

(Cont…)

….not to mention the fact that despite it's playful undertones, there are plenty into hardcore S&M who would rather be spanked, whipped, beaten and have lit cigarettes put out on their skin than be tickle tortured…WE ARE SO MUCH MORE HARDCORE!

>>13601

Well, when you put it like that…

>>13602

DAMN STRAIGHT! Tickling Pride man. And as I always tell my girlfriend who god bless her soul is really trying to indulge me, you could be into something so much more twisted. At least tickling is s viable form of foreplay…

>>13580

Eh I guess they do sort of have a charm, and yeah I know what I described is sort of common… but such torture is not common enough, unfortunately.

And you're right. I fucking love UKtickling.

>>13584

Stocks have a certain historical quality to them that makes them feel very out of place in a modern or futuristic setting. They can also look out of place depending on what kind of cultural the setting is influenced by.

Of course you can make the argument that someone could have a pair personally made in a modern or futuristic setting or may even own a pair depending upon their proclivities, in which case I guess it comes down to personal preference. I kind of prefer seeing more makeshift bondage using items on hands compared to a type that has been manufactured.

I will say that a recent Borderlands picture CommissionKomori did had a pair of stocks that was made out of salvaged parts and which I found charming.

>>13588

>>13589

For some of us it's not safety or anything of the sort, rather we may find the sex aspect in art boring, disgusting or feel like it distracts from other things.

Those three are personally my feelings on the matter. I'm a footfag so tickling the breasts or genitals just removes focus from the former and doesn't as much if anything. Furthermore I like seeing tickling as a means of actually torturing someone and all the while having torturer engage in banter with their captive, both of which again sex will distract from since it becomes the be all end all once it takes the stage. Finally I just find the various fluids involved with sex to be disgusting to look upon and find the naked human body as drawn by many artists to usually be boring at best and grotesque at worst.

I've truly rarely seen someone try and play being a ticklefag or footfag off as some harmless quirk and not some kind of sexual preference.

>>13607

And there's about five million foot only tickling images for you and people like you.

As someone who equates sexy times with tickling, , I find base tickling pictures such as that to be boring, redundant, and many times, low effort. We look have our different kicks, but the idea of looking at an image after seeing them for a decade and a half with just those aspects does nothing for me.

>>13607

it sounds like your problem is with out of place props in general, not necessarily stocks.

No shit a set of wooden stocks looks weird on a space ship, but what about some shiny chrome ones with nice padding?

I mean in any case stocks aren't usually any more out of place than the tickle torture they're being used for.

>>13626

>And there's about five million foot only tickling images for you and people like you.

Likewise I feel as if I could say the same as of late, especially with certain artists who have spread into such territory and never looked back.

I guess what I took more affront to was the way your (Or that Anon's) post was worded, since it came off at least a little as wishing that artists who currently do normally non-sexual work to start doing it.

I know full well about not having certain tastes catered to as both a a foot and ticklefag with there being a few gems and the rest either bad, not to my taste, or non-existent.

Truly it may not always be the artists who are the problem, but the commissioners if they do a lot of such work, which is nothing new. It's probably doesn't help that a lot of tickle artists solely have DA accounts and thus it's a good possibility that any work they do of that nature for commissions just never gets posted for the public.

>>13629

Could be, it often doesn't help that stocks are obviously overused and in certain cases no explanation is given for their presence.

>>13630

>no explanation is given for their presence

again, no explanation is nessiserily given for the tickle torture itself either.

>>13632

Suppose that is also fair, I will note that having characters behave in manner that runs contrary to to normal personality and manner with no explanation is something I really don't care for either.

>>13633

I hear that. something every smut artist and writer has a hard time getting.

I think we've lost our dear Cheshire to the fast cash schemes; his new adoptables are uber-creepy.

>>13449

>>13525

>>13556

I love when he was outed when the /d/ threads still existed as the douche who kept trolling people by constantly trying to correct their use of the chan-ism "sauce" and responding with "source*" over and over again. Such a fucking sperg.

>>13635

He's been showing me some new C&F characters that look pretty good. Hang tight, good things are coming.

>>13641

You mean another of the 100+ characters he draws once and then we never see again unless someone commissions something involving them?

>>13643

Ok?

>>13643

I'll agree that Chesh creates a lot of one and done characters, but he's not obligated to do anything with those characters. Even his most popular/well known character, Cali, is mostly one shot pics and an unfinished comic. This new patreon thing might give him the drive to explore some universe building content. He told me a few things in confidence and I'm certainly enthusiastic about his ideas.

>>13634

Yeah, I honestly don't know what to chalk it up to other then them or the commissioner not really caring. Their thought process only getting to "This is hot" step and stopping.

I mean with vanilla porn at least half of the time you probably have plausibility, but fetishes being what they are don't give you the same leniency.

Sometimes I feel like Chesh keeps raising the bar on weirdness and is always trying to top himself. Of course I can't be sure if this is all stuff he's really into, which would make that one popular assessment of him being like a self contained microcosm of /d/ within the tickling community all the more valid or if it's more of "Hey gais! Gais! Look at how weird and edgy I am! Gais?"

>>13634

It comes from fact that they are trying to hold on to the legitimacy of being a "artist" but not actually holding themselves up to artistic standards. Or even having some sort of dignity to at least admit that they are only in it for the money/boner.

I mean come on, why is it so hard to say "I'm making this because I get a stiffy and I have shame in showing it to the world. Now start wanking"?

>>13673

the fact he made the weirdest ones yet adoptables is the weird part.

who is this weird centaur with feet for hands appealing to? who's gonna buy it and use it?

>>13702

What?

>>13681

I think both faces are okay.

>>13708

At this point I'm not sure if you just replied to me by accident or somehow missed that the current conversation between myself and another Anon was that a decent amount of artist and commissioners toss a character's personality in the trash when pictures are done of them.

>>13708

Maybe it's just me ;-;