No.764
If you've got pics of victims tickled by robotic ticklers, post em here.
No.765
Also this proves that I don't just have furry tickles in my collection.
No.766
No.767
No.853
>>765I used to have the movie in this second picture, but I have no idea what happened to it.
Does anyone else still have this thing? It was pretty shit, but would be fun to have none the less
No.854
>>765I used to have the movie in this second picture, but I have no idea what happened to it.
Does anyone else still have this thing? It was pretty shit, but would be fun to have none the less
No.855
No.1420
No.1421
Tickle Machines? Really?
Can't you come up with ANYTHING original, creative or something not done over a million times?
No.1422
File: 1418830517489.gif (764.67 KB, 499x281, 499:281, tumblr_inline_ndu3w7gmOA1q….gif)
No.1423
>>1421Edge is strong with this one.
No.1694
anyone know where i can find the full FREE version of this tickle comic? i'd be willing to upload a tickle magnet comic in return.
No.1697
No.1708
followed link, got this pic, i think the website got removed,but thanks anyway
No.1709
maybe try saving the pics from that link to your computer then uploading them here, thnx
No.1710
>>1708no it is not. the "sad panda thing" is a "protection", you will need to follow a tutorial on how to get on the site.
try this one, or search in google if this one doesn't work :
http://forum.pururin.com/index.php?topic=377.0 No.1713
>>1712
Np man =)
No.1717
NEVERMIND, IT TOTALLY WORKED! THANK YOU SO MUCH IVE BEEN LOOKING EVERYWHERE FOR IT.
No.1723
>>1717Happy it worked for you, this comic is one of my favorites of all time, i'm sure you'll love it ^^
No.2394
File: 1424069124301.jpg (137.6 KB, 951x1000, 951:1000, preview45fc7ad61ac497ab208….jpg)
No.6039
File: 1433392094256.jpg (193.8 KB, 1156x691, 1156:691, AnthroArmadillo_pawfeather….jpg)
>>853
>>854
Sorry to bump this old ass thread, but what was the name of the movie?
Have something complicated for your time.
No.6047
>>6039
Onna no Goumon, I think? It was exactly as bad as >>853 says it is so I didn't bother keeping it.
No.6062
No.7199
And to this day I can never find a buyable copy of this.
No.7203
>>7199
Isn't it pretty lame anyway?
No.7223
No.7224
>>7223
Well,that was..disappointing.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) No.7225
>>7224
Don't be an asshole, especially when someone posts content (1 day ban)
>>7223
Thanks for the clip anon!
Post last edited at
No.7228
>>7225
well, while >>7224 did show some lack of gratitude he didn't really insult anyone…and he IS right, considering the preview pics the clip itself is very disappointing.
And just by adding something like "thanks anyway" at the end of his post it would have been a fine comment, so not really worth a temp ban in my opinion
No.7232
File: 1435916038954.jpg (1.06 MB, 2964x2179, 2964:2179, ethical_research_by_redscr….jpg)
>>7225
Get a grip, dude. There was no reason to ban that guy.
No.7242
>>7225
Is calling something disappointing seriously a bannable offense now?
No.7246
File: 1435937808517.jpg (2.61 MB, 1632x2459, 1632:2459, if (laughter=happiness) {t….jpg)
No.7249
>>7242
>>7232
>>7228
Yeah I guess you're all right. I just wanted to use my ban hammer, since it's been unused for too long! It wasn't anything serious (that's why it's only 1 day).
Just remember to be nice, especially to people who post content. If you're worried what you say might get you banned, post a picture from your collection and you won't be lol.
Post last edited at
No.7273
>>7270
Only now looking at your post history do I realize how stupid I am. Even if it was only for a day, it was too overkill to be considered a joke. I'm sorry if I came off insensitive and abrasive. I'm just amazed whenever I see how quickly people can find old footage whenever others request it. Wasn't too pleased to see it immediately met with disapproval. Still, that's no reason to ban someone, even for a day.
I'm also deleting your post because you posted a screenshot with your IP address. I don't think you want to share that.
No.7274
>>7273
Well,thank you for being the bigger man. And thank for that.
Actually watched the whole 40 mins.So much cliping..and reusing of frames.XD
No.7275
>>7274
I noticed the same, then again most hentai are the same just recycling frames for most actions.
I'm honestly not too surprised, despite seeing a low-res clip of this fetish hentai on the olden days of Kazaa and sorta wondered what else happened… and it just ended up being a whole lot of the same of that very same clip I saw back then.
…maybe I should get around to animating my own tickle fetish animation…
No.7276
>>7275
It was like forbidden fruit to me. But,It turned out err.Not moldy. Just,bland.
And yes you should. $50 says you could do a better job.XD
No.7277
>>7275
>…maybe I should get around to animating my own tickle fetish animation…
do it! it can have some…err…"recreational value"…
and new content is new content!
No.7278
>>7276
>>7277
I've already recently done a fairly adult animated commission a little while back… I'll brainstorm something since I feel like I'm back in my animation groove :3