[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/tot/ - toddlercon

For the deviants that other deviants look down on

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1425173682538-0.png (469.42 KB, 1240x605, 248:121, 1405636374381.png)

File: 1425173682538-1.png (1.39 MB, 1240x738, 620:369, 1421103500615.png)

0d19de No.213

So this is a thread I was planning on making for a little while, though I forgot if this were a topic of discussion somewhere on /loli/ at some point. I'm sure it's been talked about at some point on other places like halfchan however

Basically, what age do you consider to be the cutoff between things like loli and toddlercon? How far does the grey area extend in terms of what age the loli might look, or does it usually just depend on the pic itself and not what age the loli probably is? Like could a loli who's about say, 6 years old on the picture chart be considered a grey area between toddlercon and loli depending on how the pic is done or drawn?

This is mainly just an opinion thread where I want to generate discussion and hear people's opinions on this and have a back and forth thing going on, so I'm not trying to sound like this thread is meant to imply a hard limit should be set on what stuff can be posted here and what should go on /loli/.

Also, while we're on the subject of age, how do you guys feel about babycon, or basically pics of younger toddlers? How young is too young for you, or do you not draw an age limit (like any loli is a good loli)? If you're not into babycon, what's the cutoff limit of age or appearance for you? Perhaps similar to how there's eventually a cutoff between toddler and general loli as the age gets older? Am interested to hear everyone's opinions, at least those who visit this board. I didn't know how the regulars and lurkers would have felt with me making a thread like this on /loli/, though the admin there is a cool guy but I wanted to start a discussion here we toddlercon bros could have between ourselves. Perhaps discussions like these would give more reason for people to come to this board for both pics and discussion.

As for my own opinions on these things, I'd say somewhere around age 5 or so is where the cutoff begins (so my opinions on age differ from the 2nd pic), though that could extend to 6 with some pics. It doesn't generally change what pics I consider toddlercon and how I sort my loli and all that, cus everyone's cutoff point or grey areas are different, but I'd say anything 4 and under is definitely toddlercon, while 5 is the cutoff point grey area where those not into toddlercon in general might still like some loli pics at that age range.

As for minimum age limits, I suppose I don't technically have any though some age ranges on the chart like 0 and 1 have so little content out there to begin with that I may not see myself saving pics like that often, and usually my guideline is If I feel I can fap to it, then I save it. If not, then I'll probably pass on it at the time. So I guess you could say babycon is something I like but it just depends on the quality of the pic like toddlercon and loli. Plus most things like non-lewd or reaction/meme images I come across tend to be up in the loli range anyway, so toddlercon age loli tends to be fap material for me, though there's definitely a cuteness and sexy factor involved with that when it comes to toddlercon compared to other fetishes of mine. I can save a more detailed explanation of those things for another thread though.

d16bd1 No.304

Hey man, cheers for the thread.
I agree more discussion threads on this board would be awesome.

For me, tod starts at around 3 and the cut off is usually 5 sometimes 6. No older than 6 though. Loli starts right at 6 all the way to 13ish. After than its teen.

Babycon is 0-3 and it really depends on the artist. Most of the time I don't find it particularly appealing. But some artists are just really good and can draw a good babycon pic and I would find it appealing. But generally speaking I don't care for it too much.

0d19de No.307

File: 1425581941898-0.jpg (178.39 KB, 1000x1343, 1000:1343, 4366170.jpg)

File: 1425581941898-1.png (339.27 KB, 810x900, 9:10, 40669605.png)

File: 1425581941898-2.png (371.05 KB, 740x740, 1:1, 45876263.png)

File: 1425581941898-3.jpg (248.73 KB, 1200x879, 400:293, 40771058.jpg)

File: 1425581941898-4.jpg (469.99 KB, 1000x1450, 20:29, 1410681279484.jpg)

>>304
Hi there, nice to see someone chime in.

Interesting babycon goes all the way up to 3 with you, though I guess again that's the thing with all these loli grey areas is that there's hardly a single right or wrong answer, as the person who made that 2nd pic infographic stuff believes the cutoff for toddler in general to be around 3 and that loli starts after that (maybe they just see babycon/borderline babycon as toddler content instead).

But anyway I figured I'd go ahead and ask since you said babycon just depends how its drawn whether you like it or don't. Of the pictures posted which I feel fall into babycon, which one would you say looks the most appealing (or arousing) to you, at least for you personally? That is if you don't find them all either appealing or unappealing, or some tie for first, etc. I suppose I ask this because a good number of the babycon pics I have saved I feel are arousing and well drawn, and the stuff I tend to not be aroused to I don't save in the first place so I'm not sure if some of the things or features of some artists who'll actually draw it end up turning some of those who enjoy loli/todderlcon off from babycon age pics. Essentially, the market of artists who'll actually go so far to draw babycon or toddlercon being nowhere high in number as those who'll draw general loli or hentai. I definitely know there are a lot of loli artists japanese or western that if they did draw toddlercon/babycon I would probably find most of them to be great fap material, but that's just me cus some artists just don't draw certain things or have limits so we'll never know I guess. Or maybe it's because no one commissions a lot of artists out there for toddlercon aged pics, who knows I suppose.

But anyway, pics related for the question I asked earlier. Let me know which one(s) you find most arousing of those if at all, just curious how you and others on here might think compared to what I find arousing about such a young age.

I could definitely post more pics than 5 for curiosity's sake, but I think limiting it to 5 with some differing pics and artists is good to go now. For reference I happen to find all 5 of the pics arousing and fappable.

d16bd1 No.310

to be honest I find non of those particularly arousing, and I can't explain why.

And yes, todcon/babycon artists are quite scarce unfortunately. It is quite niche, but I don't know why. I wonder why not many people like tod/babycon, is it because the stigma, people look down for some reason at it, or is it genuinely because there are so few people who find it attractive.

Anyway, heres a pic of babycon that I do find arousing. Again, I don't know specifically why it does but the art style is good. >>51

a772bf No.315

>>310
I think there are two possible answers to this
1. there is just something wrong with our brains, we really are oddball freaks
2. there are a LOT of people in the world with this attraction, but most hide it

207985 No.369

File: 1428214960840.jpg (171.7 KB, 827x650, 827:650, image.jpg)

To me it is about looks and art style.

A character could be drawn in chibi/puni plush style, or be from another race or even not human at all.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]