[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/trap/ - Traps

Cute Traps & Their Admirers

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message from @CodeMonkeyZ, 2ch lead developer: "How Hiroyuki Nishimura will sell 4chan data"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1419153934644.gif (1.64 MB, 400x200, 2:1, I4B3KlE.gif)

403f4d No.3944

how do you feel about those that might be called chasers?
i'm not 100% sure how to define a chaser, i guess the simplest way would be to say its someone who really likes traps, but it often seems to be used in a derogatory manner, as if the only reason theyd be interested in traps is because they're traps, or because they have a dick.

what do you guys think?
have you ever had to deal with a chaser in real life or otherwise?
how do you define a chaser?
do you think its bad to be a chaser?

chaser general

4d0872 No.3958

i think that the exoticism tied to traps is currently inescapable.

Lets be real, physical attraction is pretty important in like 99% of relationships, and if someone is attractive in a rare/unconventional way, then of course it's going to be part of the physical experience.

To that end, there's nothing inherently bad about wanting someone just for their looks. Yeah, it's shallow, and you probably shouldn't be in a relationship with someone who is shallow.

If we're talking about chasers who are just abusive, assholes, creeps, or a mix of any of them, then I mean, they're just abusive/asshole/creepy guys/girls, and the label of chaser should take a back seat to that.

9d6c8c No.3970

>>3944
To me it's the same as being attracted to anything, the problem with any kind of "chaser" is just that because they fetishise it they can be a bit weird.
If some guy comes on to me because I'm a trap and launches in to boy pussy this and what he wants to do to my asshole that, I'm not bothered by the fact he's probably a chaser, I'm bothered by the fact he's creepy and overly sexual. Hell I'd chase traps since they're usually fuckin cutie, I'm way more interested in dating a trap than a usual guy it's just I try not to come on too strong or give off the "I literally only want you for your looks which I have such a huge fetish for that I'm just gonna be a massive creeper" vibe

c86837 No.3988

I don't mind being a fetish object. It can be fun.

And it's not like the dating pool for traps is large. So it comes with the territory.

But there are those that take it WAY too far WAY too early.

Like "Please be my Mistress and whip me into submission, then take my boy-pussy virginity!" Woah woah woah, how about I learn your name first?

Gives me the "I'm going to wake up without my kidneys" vibe.

b7dab5 No.4043

I think it's missuses a lot. I am attracted to traps but not exclusively. It's kinda the way I have a thing for blonds but that doesn't get me called a chaser.

403f4d No.4052

File: 1419812825032.png (25.4 KB, 254x233, 254:233, 5a77dcb1730523f8e149763b12….png)

it seems like it gets frowned upon to like traps for having dicks, but gosh dangit, i cant help that i prefer my chicks to have dicks, and its not like i would like her any less as a person or partner if she was born with a vagina, or if she decided to get one later.

9eb0f0 No.4073

>>4052

You always hears that from the post-ops and wannabe post-ops. What's funny is when they try to imply the man is gay because he likes her dick.

There's a Howard Stern clip where he brings in a bunch of transsexuals, and one is real snotty about guys love her cock while saying they were straight. She had a great sarcastic line, which was "Straight? Yeah, straight for the dick!"

>>3944

I honestly get tired of traps whining about chasers. Each one has a different interpretation.

If they are upset that guys only want to fuck them and not date or be in a LTR with them, that is a fair complaint. I want to be in a LTR with a trap myself.

If they dislike the fact that I'm particularly interested in transsexuals, then they're not being realistic. The reality is that someone who prefers traps to regular girls is going to be a lot more supportive and committed, and have fewer cowardly moments.

If they are upset that guys like their dick too much as they don't want it themselves, then I don't want to be involved with those pre-ops anyway.

Some traps seem to only want to bottom. I am fine with that personally, but it would be a disconnect with a lot of guys who are interested in them, and I have seen Youtube videos of them whining that guys want to get fucked by them. Just say sweetly that it's not your thing rather than call them chasers.

Anyway, these responses were cool: >>3970 >>3988

9eb0f0 No.4980

bumping to save

954c2c No.4982

I don't get it, the only reason I like traps is because they look like women, but with dicks, and I love dicks and how women look. Why do I need to be called a "chaser", the fuck does that even mean?

I mean if I wasn't interested in your cute body and dick, then I would be just straight. What's the point of labeling people chasers?

9eb0f0 No.4986

File: 1424025940470.jpg (121.25 KB, 1080x1620, 2:3, Amanda4.jpg)

>>4982

It comes off as some whiny validation thing, which I hate to see from traps. I think it's more a transsexual talking point, as they are upset that guys might like them only for the dicks that they want to remove.

If they want to lose their dick, then I'm not interested in a LTR anyway.

post-op pictured

954c2c No.4989

>>4986
Well I guess that's too bad, I would never want a trap that would remove his genitals as my friend or sex buddy anyway. If I wanted something with no penis, I would had looked at women.

I guess I'll just have to force myself to be gay then, since traps don't want to be attractive for their dicks and cute body.

3c4731 No.5266

>>4986
>I would never want a trap that would remove his genitals as my friend or sex buddy anyway.

Not even their friend? Well that's kind of harsh, isn't it? How would the presence or lack of a penis affect a friendship? If they're a chill person, they're a chill person, and I could give a fuck what's between the legs. Now, I wouldn't be interested in trying to start a LTR with a trap who wanted to remove (or didn't want to use) her junk because part of what makes a good relationship is physical attraction - and keeping/enjoying her cock would be a major + for that. If I spent enough time with her and really got to love her, then… well I REALLY wouldn't be happy with the decision - but I'd be supportive and hope she'd love me enough back to occasionally use a strap-on or a packer.

aa5cc2 No.5284

Not really a chaser but I would into a relationship with a passable trap.

As for my opinions on the operation I'm against the modern form of the operation, it's not a real treatment and honestly there is little to no sexual satisfaction remaining post op; I'd much rather suck a dick every night that can orgasm at least feel pleasure than fuck someone who is now bored and depressed over their genitals because they can feel so little and have no functional release mechanism period let alone the option of true release through prostate stimulation.

That all said, when they can transplant a 3D printed or grown vagina and uterus I would be in full support of such a procedure so long as it doesn't cost me my life's savings. Honestly if they don't have to take her dick leave that intact as possible if she's willing to be a futa.

The main issue would be politics because I'm past ego death and most traps probably couldn't stomach my opinions on social issues because I'm coming from a point of view that is as a close to objective truth that a human could achieve.

2a9bbe No.5285

>>5284
>The main issue would be politics because I'm past ego death and most traps probably couldn't stomach my opinions on social issues because I'm coming from a point of view that is as a close to objective truth that a human could achieve.

I don't know what your politics are, but you definitely should not buy into the narrative that all transgenders are these one-dimensional LGBTQIA leftist SJWs.

To give one example. James O'Meara is transgender, and a writer for Counter-Currents http://www.counter-currents.com/ Here is his blog: http://jamesjomeara.blogspot.com/

360995 No.5466

>>4989
Not all transgirls get genital dysphoria. I like feeding my partner dick all night.

2eb2a2 No.5471

I can understand that when you're transitioning, there is a period where you need to be very feminine. You're finding yourself, reassuring yourself that you really are what you are, and that you can be that well enough that other people can believe it. There's alot of insecurity to work through.

But cis women don't worry about how they enjoy sex unless they're messed up. Instead, they just DO. However it works for them. At some point, you've got to reach that level of comfort. If you don't, you're just a sissy, not a lady. And homey don't play that.

I love women, with and without dicks. But if you have one, it's there, at least for now, and there is no reason to feel bad about it feeling good sometimes.

lemme suck yo dick, grrl

2eb2a2 No.5472

>>5284

'Ay bro, I dunno where you got your info, but it's olllllld.

The current form of the op allows plenty of sexual function more often than not. I've been with a post-op, talked to a few more, and have been in relationships with pre-ops who have post-op friends. Very few negative stories among them. There are troubles, but we're getting pretty good at it.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]