/trap/ - Traps

Shiiiiit . . .what was the name of that comic again?

Yeah, it sounds like it's more of a masturbation fetish for you. It will probably disappear as soon as you find a girlfriend who will take the place of fapping.

>So is it just a fetish for the rest of you guys, too?

Not for me, and definitely not for most of the guys here based on past comments.

Of course, this board is not typical. With probably 95% of the millions of guys who fap to traps, it is pure fantasy. A few of the more motivated ones will get an escort at some point, or maybe have a one-night stand.

Of the other 5%, they will consider dating traps and getting involved with one, but most of them really don't have the fortitude for it.

And then you have the 1% or 2% of guys who are very attracted to traps on some level and be in a relationship with one without giving a damn. Most of those guys will probably prefer traps.

I'm obviously guessing on these figures, but they are probably pretty close to the mark.

It's possible the the numbers match up well between traps and their committed admirers, but the fact that we're dispersed, plus games from guys who pretend to be committed only to fuck them once and leave, plus games from traps who escort and do all the stupid mental case shit you would expect from girls who prostitute.

It's a strange world, dude.

>>6202

OP here. That's part of why I'd never actively look for traps, because I'd probably be that guy who pretends to be committed (and I probably would think I was if I was horny enough) but then fuck off the next morning. If I'm going to get myself into a sexual relationship where I say I'm going to be committed after we fuck, I want to be true to my word.

Thanks for clearing that all up. I was curious to see if I was in the minority on this board in it just being a fetish.

are you me??

I think of homosexual things as being inherently childish. Most children have weird experimentation sessions with their friends or siblings that they accept and move on from as they age. A problem arises when the person is unable or unwilling to move on from these things and tries to make their adulthood all about these childish/adolescent things.

Choosing a mate that you cannot create children with is an inherently selfish relationship that gives nothing back to the world. All of your genetic potential will die with you, ending millions of years of your bloodline. To ignore this fact is to spit in the face of everyone who died so that you may live to sit here and post on the internet.

Even the ancient Greeks who loved some good 'ol fashion male on male buggery had wives and raised their children like men should. Your duty to your bloodline is to create children (not to mention any religion you might have). If anything gets in the way of that, you need to re-examine your priorities, unless total oblivion is something that sounds great, in which case you are already a biological cuckold and an intellectual and genetic dead-end.

——-
tl:dr
Having man and trap crushes is fine, but making a lifestyle out of it is not. If your desires for man-flesh disappear upon ejaculation, then all the easier it will be for you to find a woman and sire some pups.

>>6272

While I understand and respect where this sentiment comes from, human beings are not just breeding machines. A certain percentage of the population should not have kids for various reasons. They might be too old and missed their window. They might carry genes for hereditary diseases. A few of us may have had really bad childhoods or other issues where the responsibility of kids is too much for us. Some people may have genes that they even wish to die out.

There are also possibilities with surrogates. No lie, you aren't going to have a big family of surrogate kids, but if your goal was to have only one child, then surrogacy might wind up being a lot cheaper than marriage.

>>6274
I think you're mixing up "the exception" with "the standard."

>>6275

Fair point. This is not a life pursuit for the vast majority of men, nor could you expect it to be.