No.5353
Dark souls seems like it plays double the speed now.
No.5354
>>5353
Did they double the FPS and forgot to fix the problems that caused for Dark Souls 2?
No.5355
>>5354
There were problems in DS2?
No.5357
>>5355
If you played Dark Souls 2 in 60 fps then your weapons would lose durability faster and enemy animations were faster than intended.
No.5358
>>5357
Then why would you play it in 60fps?
How is it the games fault that you're autistic?
No.5359
No.5360
>>5359
There wasn't any?
Are you thinking of DS1?
No.5361
Outside of graphics I can't think of a single problem I had with the game.
No.5362
>>5360
What about every boss being absolute garbage.
No.5363
>>5358
I didn't play it at all, I just point out the problems the game have/had because it's fun.
Remember when people were getting banned in the game and every From Software fanboy went "F-f-fucking Steam, it's all your anti-cheat's fault!" even though no other game had this problem.
No.5364
>>5362
We are talking about technical standpoint not the game itself.
The game ran perfectly and it was smooth.
>>5363
People with vac bans weren't allowed to play, I don't see the issue here either.
LOADS of people deserved bans because LOADS of people were cheating in the game.
No.5365
Cheaters are mainly the best reason to buy it for console.
roughly half of the goddamn souls community are a pack of cheaters.
No.5366
>>5364
They're both still problems and the main reason I remember them is because of the responses they got from From drones.
>The bans are Steam's fault!
>The fps bugs is the engines fault!
>The game being not as good as the others is the B team's fault!
>My From Senpai can't do no wrong!
I don't think buying it on any system will help me avoid that cancer.
No.5367
>>5363
>Remember when people were getting banned in the game and every From Software fanboy went "F-f-fucking Steam, it's all your anti-cheat's fault!" even though no other game had this problem.
That didn't happen, unless you're referring to people using graphics modifiers.
No.5368
>>5366
You're gonna have to explain how From Soft can ban someone in steam?
That jurisdiction is Valve and Valve alone.
Also you seem like a retard just regurgitating /v/'s shitpost.
No.5369
Game even had VAC that wasn't working, everyone was laughing at it and later got removed from the store page.
No.5370
>>5369
It did work, but all it did was stop people who had previous vac bans from playing it.
They never vac banned anyone as far as I'm aware since everyone and their dead mother was cheating.
No.5371
>>5347
Seems pretty stupid, anyone who would pre-order phantom pain likely already has ground zeroes
No.5372
>>5356
Oh shit is that bloodbourne side step at 1:34?!
No.5373
>>5372
Doubt it.
Also side stepping only works if you're locked into the enemy, none of those encounters looked as if he was locked on so there is still chance of side stepping being in the game.
No.5374
>>5367
That is what I'm referring to and it did happen.
There were many fingers being pointed, but you can clearly see that the From Drones were pointing them at Valve.
>>5368
I'm pretty sure From Software can discuss with Valve what's considered a cheat or not.
No one else but me makes this point as far as I know, I regurgitate myself.
No.5375
>>5373
That's clearly a side step after he recovers from the ground.
No.5376
>And for those who hated Bloodborne’s dodge-stepping, Dark Souls 3 features the usual dodge-rolling of other Souls games.
Nope, you get no side stepping, deal with it.
No.5377
>>5374
>I'm pretty sure From Software can discuss with Valve what's considered a cheat or not.
That is not how vac bans work.
No.5378
>>5375
That was a side roll more than a side step.
His body rolled on the floor it is not a side step.
No.5379
>>5378
Nigger BEFORE that, right after he recovers from the ground.
No.5380
>>5379
SO moving to the side?
Woooow.
Like wut?
No.5381
>>5380
He jumps to the side, like a side step.
No.5382
>>5381
I think you're over analyzing this.
No.5383
>>5382
clearly a side step.
No.5384
>>5377
I don't think you know how Vac bans work either.
You're not banned from every game that's Vac secured if you're Vac banned in one of them, that only works with Source, Gold Source and maybe Unreal Engine games.
I actually had to look that up because it sounded wrong, no one who was Vac banned before wasn't allowed to play Dark Souls 2.
No.5385
>>5384
>You're not banned from every game that's Vac secured if you're Vac banned in one of them
I never said this, I was talking about DS2 SPECIFICALLY, and yes it does happen because exertfag also wasn't allowed to play the game "Depth" because of his vac ban even though the game is some indie shit.
No.5387
No.5388
>>5387
VAC banned from life
No.5389
>>5385
That first fucking example tells you how it's From Softwares damn fault!
Was Exert banned from an Unreal engine game? Depth is an Unreal Engine game and that would still make what I say true!
No.5390
Devs can easily block all VAC banned people from playing their game no matter what game they were banned in. That's what happened with Depth, they did that during the free weekend because the game had already problems with hackers.
No.5391
>>5389
I never disputed that nor do I see it as a "fault" I wouldn't want vac banned players either.
All I'm saying is that from soft doesn't give out bans its valve that does.
No.5392
>>5390
Why would getting rid of hackers in other games help with the problem of hackers in that game? Those devs just sound incompetent.
>>5391
And I said that From and Valve can probably discuss what's a cheat or not.
>Vac has been temp disabled while the from devs help figure out what prameteres vac should look for when banning.
That's so close to hitting the nail on the head that I'm considering buying lottery tickets right now.
So we're both right, they're both shit and let's leave it at that.
No.5393
>>5392
>trusting what incompetent users as dumb as you have to say
Yeah no, there is no we both are right there is a clear cut I'm right and you're stupid.
So stupid infact that steam recently implemented a system to allow devs to be able to ban users from their games, its not a vac ban but its a ban nonetheless.
Also vac bans ban you when they detect questionable software on your computer they do not ban you for what you do and how you show it off.
People can't report a vac ban to any user.
No.5394
>>5393
Says the guy using two posts to make his point.
So devs now have two ways to ban you if they don't implement their own system, great. Doesn't have to do with this topic at all though.
They ban you if they detect the questionable software is being used at the moment you're on a vac secured server or game.
No.5395
>>5394
>2 ways
Except they don't, they can game ban you but they can't vac ban you.
>they ban you
There is no "they" its complete automated you are automatically banned in an instant once it detects questionable software.
You are stupid and don't know jack shit of how these bans work, you can literally show everyone you are hacking and if your hacks are up to date and aren't on valves ban list you cannot be touched, no amount of reports, youtube videos…etc will place you as being vac banned.
Its automated if it doesn't detect anything wrong you are untouchable.
Game ban which was recently implemented is the ONLY way to get banned that a person can cast upon you but that isn't a vac ban.
I grow tired of having to repeat myself to a stupid fuck like you who's CLEARLY fucking wrong in every aspect and doesn't know jack shit.
No.5396
>making the main character left handed
Just….why
No.5397
>>5395
Fine mister literal, 2 ways people can be banned and the automated software ban you if it detects the questionable software is being used at the moment you're on a vac secured server or game.
Not when the automated software detects the questionable software as my friend with Cheat Engine on his system 24/7 can tell you. It also isn't immediately, I can bring up a bunch of "incompetent users" that tell you otherwise.
No.5398
>>5397
jipfag I'm tired of you, please fuck off back to foolz you goddamn degenerate fuckhead.
No.5399
>>5398
Still wrong, I'm not jipfag.
No.5401
No.17340
lol are you all weeb faggots? what a disappointment