The Rules of /trollnrx/
1) No flooding this board with Genophilia-esque spam. E.g: "love your race, stop white genocide."
Daily Reminder that Bibi is the original Trump
He is, objectively.
Meet Jim Donald's wife: Margaret Donald
Her Flickr account:
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/13639096@N06/sets/
Some bio:
http://powcs.med.unsw.edu.au/people/dr-margaret-donald
She's from Sydney, like Jim. Welcome, internet.
Bryce Laliberte on immigration
https://amtheomusings.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/family-immigration-and-conservatives/
"I don’t do much blogging about these sorts of political issues, I don’t talk about things like the GOP primaries or piddling liberals, but this is the kind of thing that has come to my heart recently. I’ve been giving more thoughts on issues like gay marriage and immigration, and the article happens to touch on an intersection of these issues, in a tangential way but significant way.
Conservatives typically have these views; they are pro-family/pro-marriage and opposed to gay marriage, while also being very antagonistic to immigration. I don’t really identify as conservative (nor do I identify as liberal), but I think this article actually illustrates a serious problem with the confluence of these views. If one is going to be very antagonistic to immigration, the breaking up of families is a natural result. But aren’t conservatives supposed to be pro-family? It seems that the pro-family position of the conservative would lead to them being very welcoming of immigrants; the majority of immigrants are poor, Christian men and women who are also very interested in the concerns of the family and opposed to government meddling in families.
Liberals have co-opted the cause of immigration in their liberal way (i.e. rather than reforming immigration laws, they just prefer to welcome illegal immigrants, which is problematic itself) in order to benefit their own causes, which is rather mystifying when it comes down to it. Most immigrants hold conservative values; they are opposed to abortion and gay marriage. They are strongly Christian. Even if they might be less consistently conservative where it comes to other issues of domestic and foreign policy, there’s no reason to believe that they might not be welcomed into the country and the conservative political position if only conservatives would welcome them with open arms. Instead, conservatives have been the enemy of poor immigrants who just want to benefit of America’s wonderful freedom, opportunity, and living standard (which, I will note, would not come at the expense of Americans already living here), corralling them into the liberal political position because the liberals are willing to throw them a bone once in a while.
So, if anything, it seems that the conservative position would imply a very strong pro-immigration position. We should be welcoming of immigrants, we should make it so much easier to become an American and benefit of its freedoms and societal values.
But, so the conservative might object, immigrants bring their own values which aren’t necessarily assimilatable to our own.
I think this is rather overblown. If anything, the worse values come out of immigrants precisely because those who hold law-abiding values aren’t welcomed, leaving us with those who don’t care so much about obeying the law. If there were more law-abiding citizens in the immigrant populations, then there would be better values expressed in the immigrant subcultures.
Further, I believe that when someone is more welcoming, their guests will show more respect. Being much more welcoming to immigrants might not only make those who are already immigrating more likely to become useful and productive members of our society, it might help to convince many others who would like to immigrate, bringing with them their own conservative values that you’d think conservatives would value.
Instead, conservatives prefer to push out immigrants who bring with them their pro-family values, and we break up their families. Why? It makes no sense. This demonstrates that there is a possible pro-immigration position rooted in conservative values which is beneficial to conservatives in politics. So you’d think it should be adopted."
Bryce Laliberte is an anti-White CUCK.
Nyan Sandwich / Warg Franklin (Doxxed As Wolf Tivy): Autist, PUA, Divorcee, Mentally Ill
A Literal Sperg-PUA rules NRx. Reality is better than all parodies.
>I can’t rationally believe that the actual universe actually contains an actual powerful god. That would cause me to mispredict on matters like evolution and history, and would cause me to reach out for His help where in reality there is nothing, and thus fail to help myself. But maybe I can believe in or at least tolerate a Glorious Christian God loitering around in the realm of myth that gives meaning and spiritual context to our lives.
>If I still wanted to speculate, here are the things I think I would learn a lot from:
>Talking to lots of girls while consciously trying to apply Game principles.
http://web.archive.org/web/20140720020209/http://nyan-sandwich.tumblr.com/
Consciously apply those principles, Wolf!
>I’m trying to improve my lot with women. This is difficult because I am very shy and inexperienced with women, probably mildly autistic, and so on. Fortunately I’m very smart, able to be charismatic sometimes, not bad looking, and eager to grow as necessary. Thus I’ve decided to take the one path that seems remotely likely to net me the experienced skill and sexual market exposure required to win a quality girl: Day Game.
"Mildly." Na-ah.
>I’ve read a good chunk of Krauser and Heartiste's work, and it seems sound. To the extent that I've had the balls to apply it, it seems to basically work. Today I had a surprise opportunity that ended up going way better than expected. Allow me to relate the story:
>After spending a hot summer day in the cafe programming and watching cute girls walk by, kicking myself for my inability to approach, I made myself some dinner and wandered over to the graveyard to read in the evening sun. No intent to interact with anyone; I was looking for distraction-free isolation. Cute girls don’t prance around in the graveyard, thought I.
>A few minutes in and what do I see but two cute Korean girls. My mind was somewhere between “I’m not here to talk to girls” and “damn I wish I had the balls to stop them and chat”. I resigned myself to read my book.
>But then they escalated to literally prancing around taking pictures of each other. I struggled but eventually decided that I simply must approach. I walked over to flip the stone and see where it would go.
>Attempted standard Krauser situational opener, heavily bastardized by nervousness and lack of confidence. “Do you speak english? I saw you girls over here having all sorts of fun and just had to come see what you are doing. Where are you from? Tourists?” etc. By the time I had got there and opened, there was only the semi-cute one, absorbed in taking pictures of her very cute friend who was prancing around farther away. Between my unimpressive demeanor, her lack of confidence with english, and her absorption in taking pictures, she could only find the attention to mumble out a few semi-answers and then ignore me. I rolled off, which is code for “awkwardly stood around for a few seconds, and then lost all confidence and dignity and walked away”.
You literally apply Krauser's PUA Day Game Openers on women.
>I wandered back to a comfortable grave and sat down again to read, all while furiously running state control, congratulating myself for having taken any action at all, and assuring myself that I just had to keep it up and the successes would come. I ignored the girls and reabsorbed myself in my book, thinking that was the end of it and it was time to move on. A few minutes later I glanced up and they were walking over to where I was sitting. Nope, time for round 2.
>"Hello again", says I, with a big smirk. I forget the rest of the conversation, but I was basically a duck; acting smooth and calm sitting against a grave on the surface, while frantically scrambling to keep the conversation going smoothly under the water, so to speak. Stories, assumption stacking, jokes, open ended questions, anything to fill time, racking my brain for bits of Game wisdom to apply. Harrowing, but fun. Keeping the intent to number close in mind helped to guide it. It was surprisingly non-awkward, and total time in set was maybe 5 minutes.
>The cuter one was much more talkative, with better English, and seemed genuinely interested. It turned out she lives quite close to me. So when they expressed some desire to end the conversation, I suggested that we hang out again, and asked for her number.
>I had to write it down on my bookmark with a piece of grass because I had left my phone at home to isolate myself, and did not carry a pen. They thought my creative solution was pretty funny, and she seemed somewhat enthusiastic to have met. We’ll see where it goes.
Prediction: nowhere.
GoT
>be me
>be pretty hot
>have a really hot twin sister
> she's married to some fat fuck
> she and i have 3 kids
>the fat bastard thinks they're his
Needless anger
So I see a lot of petty squabbling about Nrx. The sole point is that this is not a demos afflicted movement.
We don't need legitimacy from the demos-addled trashy low information voters, they will always side with idiocy and sloth. Let them fall.
The anti-white idiots are against Nrx by default in any case, regardless of any purported Semitic background or interests. Let them rant and rave. This system isn't sustainable in the long-run.
Be worthy. Be better. Be ready.