File: 1449049763254.png (131.73 KB, 900x1345, 180:269, for_science_by_girzim21-d3….png)
3ac46f No.13286
How many tulpae do you all have?
You don't need to put names down, I just want your gender and then how many of each gender tulpae you have.
You know, for science.
I'll start.
I'm male, i have 5 male and 3 female tulpae.
a58311 No.13288
I have 1 female Tulpa.
That is half as many threads you made.
06893c No.13290
3 cute girls living in my head.
95e9c8 No.13291
>>13288
8chan has been pretty glitchy. Recently it's even been hard to tell, sometimes, if a post has been discarded by the slow server, or if it has been registered, but is rather not displaying fsr.
>>13290
Really? Isn't it a little crowded? Isn't it hard to really get to know each of them?
dfb773 No.13292
2 tulpas
1 masculine and 1 feminine, although both are sexless
fc579a No.13294
I'm female, I have one male tulpa.
9c77ef No.13299
Male, I have 1 female tulpa, but she often splits into 3 different bodies and controls them all simultaneously. I have no idea how she does it but when she splits they can have distinct personalities too. So I don't know whether to count this as 1 or 3. She embraces her multiplicity but she likes it to be known that she's ultimately one person.
23ab9b No.13301
I'm male, 1 female Tulpa.
No offense to anyone having more than one of course but I don't understand people having say more than 3 Tulpas (I've seen some with 7 or even 9).
3 really is the maximum I think I/we could "manage". It'll probably not happen though. My Tulpa and I talked about this a few times and from the look of it we'd rather stay together anyway. On the other hand we have a bunch of servants we're using for various things, but they're not sentient and we're careful to not let them be.
Who knows though.
06893c No.13302
>>13291
Not really. Two of them entertain each other which leaves me with Slutty McSlut on the left here. As for getting to know them, it's sort of a continuous thing, but I feel like I've gotten much more familiar with them over the past few years.
3707c2 No.13303
I am male. I have two female tulpas and one male.
The two younger ones usually keep to themselves, but my eldest (female) is active a lot of the time.
95e9c8 No.13311
>>13301
>On the other hand we have a bunch of servants we're using for various things
Neato. Like what?
>>13302
>which leaves me with Slutty McSlut on the left here
It's hard to imagine myself really having an intimate or meaningful relationship with someone who could fit into what I assume is an anime-like archetype of that type. In the sense that, while in anime it's easy to represent someone as being a personality-caricature of this, that, or the other, in real life individuality is more complicated than that; you can't get away with some of the things you 'can' in anime. Because once you remove the fantasy element, things become 'too real;' things aren't as cute, simple, or pretty as they can be portrayed as when they don't have to function in a longterm reality context. For example, in anime, tsundere is cute and silly. But the second you have a real person try and emulate that archetype, it's just not cute anymore, because there is this whole other dimension of their person behind it, which motivates that behavior. So, I've felt like, if I tried to create a tulpa of that type, it would be hard to believe in it, because I would always be seeing contradictions in the personality concept. This explanation has been alot wordier than I thought it would be, but do you see what I'm saying? How do you cope with that?
97b206 No.13315
>>13292
I wanted to make tulpa without sex,so i am wondering,does your tulpas divert from sexless concept?
dfb773 No.13316
>>13315
I don't follow. Could you rephrase?
I meant that they have no genitalia or any other explicit sexual characteristics, but one acts definitely 'yin' and the other definitely 'yang', to put it in tao terms.
06893c No.13321
>>13311
I don't really see them as caricatures anymore, even if they used to be like that years ago. My girls are all unique multifaceted people with their own likes/interests/hobbies, which is mostly thanks to me giving them a lot of opportunity to find out for themselves what they enjoy and giving them space to go do it.
When I was younger they weren't so complex, and I guess I thought of the whole tulpaforcing thing as escapism rather than creating a sentient being in your head or whatever. So they fit into all these anime archetypes or whatever pretty easily.
9c77ef No.13323
File: 1449179000885.jpg (778.55 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, split_personality_by_chiha….jpg)
>>13311
For me, there is a solution of sorts. My tulpa "pretends" as though she has certain personalities. While she technically has a inner true personality (kind, sweet, loving, smart), she likes to act out different exaggerated anime-like behaviors, such as tsundere, overly cutesy, etc. Sometimes it's necessary to ask her to be serious for a second and put away her act, but most of the time it's perfectly fine to role play like this. She's a fantastic actor, beyond human capabilities i'd say, and it's really easy to get lost in the different personalities she explores. Some might feel that it's not as genuine or appealing this way, but to me I like to see it as though she's exploring different sides of herself for fun. Not like she's pretending to be something she isn't. She wouldn't act out a personality unless some portion of her wanted to. Hope this sorta helps. I don't know how easy it would be to recreate a tulpa with the intention of her being passionate about acting like this, but maybe just keeping it in mind might be enough to make it work.
b80c6b No.13328
>>13321
>which is mostly thanks to me giving them a lot of opportunity to find out for themselves what they enjoy and giving them space to go do it.
Out of curiosity, in what ways did you accomplish this?
>When I was younger they weren't so complex
these_teenagers_really_tick_me_off.jpg
heh
>>13323
Very interesting. I wasn't really expecting that my disillusion could be ameliorated so thoroughly. What do you think would happen if you embarked, for a long period of time, to only interact with your tulpa in a direct way, strictly without the medium of an archetype?
9c77ef No.13330
>>13328
She would be alright i'd imagine, albeit a bit upset that she cannot express herself fully. In a way, "acting" is her true nature. She's a bundle of emotions and she loves experimenting with exaggerated archetypes. So, in a way, it "is" her personality. It's definitely a handful, but I love it thoroughly and find it extremely fun playing along. She changes forms like clothing, though she'll refer back to her "default" form if she has a serious concern. I'd say about half the time she's role playing, and the other half she's being serious with whatever is going on in my life. I might experiment with your proposal at some point but I don't think it's necessary. She's safe, loved, is given plenty of attention, and appears to be very well adjusted despite her behavior exploration.
06893c No.13332
>>13328
Make a wonderland, fill it with a bunch of shit to do and tell them to have at it. Obviously this doesn't really work unless they're already sentient, but it gets pretty good results for not a lot of effort.
06893c No.13337
>>13335
I thought his style would suit Elise well. Now I want to have someone draw Naomi, but I'm not sure who in the community can draw stuff semi-realistic without it looking like garbage.
237089 No.13347
>>13311
>Neato. Like what?
We love music, so we have a band. Two of us wouldn't do the trick so we have various members.
Other than that, we sometimes use some servants for sex, to fulfill certain sexual fantasies, etc.
32c22f No.13355
98db70 No.13362
Male 5 female tulpae
2 were accident, and 1 "came back"i'm not going to explain that one again, look through the catalog if it's still there
Why all female? cause I feel more comfortable with women than men.
Also, while i'm not happy with having so many, or even having more than 1 since i'm a monogamous person. I don't want to get rid of any of them as I feel they're equal and I enjoy their presence. Besides, they spend time with each other more so than I can spend with them, so it would be devastating for everyone to have one of their own vanish (as if that will happen) for selfish reasons
If you want more than 2-3, or even more than 1. Take it from me, don't. You won't be able to have a quality relationship with everyone. Just compromises and disappointment.
b80c6b No.13363
>>13362
Gosh Anon, what a mess. Have you considered that it might be best to delete them all and start over with one?
b80c6b No.13366
>>13355
>>13364
So why male? What are they like?
237089 No.13367
>>13362
>>13363
Create a wonderland arena and make them all fight to death until only one is left. Sit back, relax, and claim your prize once it's all over.
fc579a No.13373
>>13366
>So why male?
Guys are generally so much more chill about things, and they don't let emotions consume them like girls do. It's bad enough that I have to deal with my own ridiculous emotions, I didn't want to double that. This is also why I didn't have any female friends until 5th grade, and even then I kept wishing I was hanging out with boys instead because all the girls ever did was gossip, and gossip makes me physically sick. I know I could have made a girl tulpa that acted like a boy, but I wanted a boy cause it made me feel safer. And considering the status of our relationship I'd say it was a good call.
>What are they like?
Literal perfection at least in my eyes. Kind, caring, a bit cheeky sometimes, patient enough to deal with my bullshit. Overall, extremely helpful. I don't know where I'd be without him.
3c0ebd No.13407
I'm male. I have 3 female tulpas and 1 male tulpa. I started with one female tulpa, then I got another. The male one is an accidental carbon copy of myself that I created. Then finally, is the third female.
5c67c2 No.13410
1 good, 2 optimal, 3 is okay, 4 or more, WHY
b80c6b No.13412
>>13373
If I may ask, did you have an absent father figure in your youth?
cd4609 No.13413
>>13410
>2 optimal
Could you share your opinion on why you think so?
fc579a No.13415
>>13409
>>13412
If your intent is to be rude, I won't be talking to you anymore. But to answer your ridiculous and irrelevant question, no, I have a father who has been married to my mother for over 30 years and is a consistent person in my life. What exactly are you trying to imply here?
b80c6b No.13417
>>13415
Don't you think you're being a little touchy? You're the one who said it…
I just can't understand why some women have that whole shpeal about men. I don't see it. Men are superficial and petty, too. It's not like we're all just buddies with each other, if you haven't noticed. So I wonder where it is that you pick up these false ideals.
9c77ef No.13418
>>13417
Well I'd imagine she bases these ideals off the people she see's around her. It's entirely possible that guys just aren't that scummy wherever she lives.
>>13415
>If your intent was to be rude
He was seeing if you had "daddy issues," which are known to be particularly troublesome for women.
12c6aa No.13419
>>13410
This, your tulpas have someone else to speak or emote to, can begin having three way conversations.
Also still at the point where you can't leave anyone out.
After that it's just diminishing returns.
Though I hear your wonderland npcs become tulpas whether you try to or not after years, so you end up having a tulpa army anyway.
a2b1f1 No.13420
>>13417
It sounded a lot like you were implying I had daddy issues. Maybe I was being a little touchy, but the way you worded your question came off as rude to me. Sorry if I took it the wrong way.
And basically what >>13418 said, most guys I've interacted with are nice and treat everyone around them nice. At least when they are "rude" it's just sarcastic teasing that doesn't actually mean anything. When a woman is rude they usually mean it, even if they are joking. This is just all in my experience though, I don't know about your interactions with men and women. So these ideals aren't "false" to me.
>>13418
I knew that he was implying that, I just asked him because I wanted to know if he meant it as an insult or not.
cd4609 No.13421
>>13419
>Though I hear your wonderland npcs become tulpas whether you try to or not after years, so you end up having a tulpa army anyway.
I've had the same servants for over a year now and none of them appear sentient in any way. They never surprise me or appear out of nowhere, there is only my Tulpa's aura near me throughout the day.
My point is if you're careful this shouldn't normally happen. Now if you're interacting with them a lot and on a daily basis then yes… but in this case wouldn't that make them Tulpas to begin with? Where is the line in the end?
b80c6b No.13422
>>13420
>It sounded a lot like you were implying I had daddy issues.
I wasn't "implying" anything. I was asking, literally as politely as I could, if your Dad fucked up.
> At least when they are "rude" it's just sarcastic teasing that doesn't actually mean anything. When a woman is rude they usually mean it, even if they are joking.
Yet it can't be said that sadism itself is a trait localized to women in particular. I think this is mostly all just in your head.
5ede32 No.13423
>>13422
Why though? Curiosity? How is this informative relevant to you? I'm genuinely curious.
Even if it is in my head then that doesn't make it any less real to me. It's the way I see the world because of my experience and I can't change the fact that I think men are generally nicer than women. I'm not sayong there aren't mean men or nice women out there, because I've experienced that as well, but I'm literally just generalizing here. Why do you feel the need to convince me that men can be sadistic too, anyway? I'm aware of it, but why are you telling me this?
b80c6b No.13426
>>13423
I just don't really understand it, and I don't like it. You're free to endure whatever delusions you wish.
15d0ea No.13437
>>13426
Translation: you could be fucking boys like me instead of your tulpa who you're legitimately happy with. GRR!! WHY WOMEN NO WANT MY DICK?!
b80c6b No.13439
>>13437
Funny, but girls without tulpas say this same general thing, like I mentioned. So you're kind of missing the point, there, tootz.
>>13434
Cheers
15d0ea No.13440
>>13439
Yeah, I bet you're awfully tired of women missing your "point." Jeez, that must be so frustrating for you.
cd4609 No.13441
>>13439
Gosh fuck off already.
b80c6b No.13442
>>13440
Prostitutes are usually not expected to be particularly bright, so not really, no. But, seriously…
>>13441
After you, m'lady.
3c0ebd No.13445
>>13442
>>13441
How about we all just chill out and stop arguing?
cd4609 No.13453
>>13442
>you do not share my narrowed opinions on women so you must also be one
b80c6b No.13454
>>13453
Yea, I surmised after the fact.
>narrow minded
I can't even imagine. Are you not reading the thread?Are you in your [spoiler]teens?[/spoiler]
cd4609 No.13455
>>13454
>projecting your own traumas on others
>avatar fagging
>ad hominem
>are u a teen
How rotten is your ego? You have to be the most pathetic person I've had the chance of coming across on this board.
b80c6b No.13456
>>13455
>>ad hominem
>you have to be the most pathetic person I've ever seen
Do you see why this is contradictory?
I don't mean to enrage you with the teenager remark. That was an honest question, hence the spoilers. And if you would contain your vitriol about it…
That being said, you just, really sound like a righteous, idealistic teenager to me, who doesn't really know anything, if your main interpretation and criticism of what I'm doing is it being "narrow minded," whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean here.
>projecting your own traumas on others
I can't say this isn't quite possibly a factor. But if that's the case, however, you certainly are unduly hateful about it. It leaves one in a position where they might question your motives.
cd4609 No.13457
>>13456
>to enrage you
Is this also how your egocentric mind conveniently chose to project our exchanges?
b80c6b No.13459
>>13457
Either way, it doesn't absolve you from behaving better than what you're doing.
cd4609 No.13460
8deadd No.13707
Male here with 1 male tulpa in gay relationship
189319 No.13837
1961e3 No.14093
>>13286
Male
2 female tulpae and 1 male tulpa
35fc45 No.14144
87fbf0 No.14194
>>13286
I haven't been here in ages, most of you probably already know who I am by the sheer number anyway (if you don't then you're a newfag) but I'm a dude with 11 tulpas, 1 of which is male and 10 of which are female.