[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / hisrol / imouto / just / pdfs / tacos / vg ]

/tv/ - Television and Movies

Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

/bane/ /film/ /strek/ /sw/ /waifuist/ /wooo/ Combined Rules

File: 0643cdfed0f2f3e⋯.jpg (22.94 KB, 300x450, 2:3, 1448031461684[1].jpg)


This "movie" is fucking garbage


You can have long quiet scenes that are both good and bad. Just because its long doesnt automatically make it good fucking hell.


A competent director would have directed those scenes in a way that doesn't put a hyperactive 5 year old to sleep. It's just shitty film making, no excuse.


Fuck off. Before Sunrise was litterally just two people walking around a city, talking and it wasn't boring for a second. You know why? BECAUSE IT HAD A COMPETENT DIRECTOR!


So it's confirmed the drugs have destroyed your brains. 2001 fans are literally DUDE WEED LMAO tier





Nice argument



My God, it's full of retard



Elaborate, faggot



the movie isn't garbage, you're just being reactionary to the consensus of teenage pretention that it is one of the best films ever made.

No actual film buff thinks that,. but they also don't feel like the movie is garbage or that it isn't a magnificent feat for 1968.

Also, the scene where David Bowman destroys HAL is top kino. ADHD millennials just can't relax and take it in for what it is, not what it would be for today's standards.


I saw it for the first time several years ago and concluded that it could pass for a good horror film, and I kinda believe that's partially what Kubrick was going for. I wasn't a big fan of the exasperated ending, and I would have preferred if it ended shortly after David enters void and we were left to wonder what would happen to him. Still, I didn't hate the ending.


File: eedc953979eb6bd⋯.png (114.84 KB, 696x288, 29:12, full.png)


Wrong. It's full of something else…….




You suck


>Just because its long doesnt auto blah blah

Kubricks direction is god tier

>a competend director would have directed those scenes in a way that doesnt put a hyperactive 5 year old to sleep


>before sunrise

Linklater is total fucking garbage

film is perhaps the best scifi film ever still


I think it's an excellent movie but I can understand not feeling that way at the beginning. I saw it in theaters as a child for some anniversary they we're having and fell asleep about 30 minutes in (I was maybe 7-8 and hadn't slept well).

It still stands as one of the most stylish and we'll made Masonic allegories out there.


OP is 100% right, and all the film majors itt are autistically screeching at him on taxpayer money.



nice self-bump OP



>no argument: the post




OP you need to learn how to dissect cinema



>A competent director would have directed those scenes in a way that doesn't put a hyperactive 5 year old to sleep.

Movies for competent adults shouldn't pander to the lowest common denominator. If you want to watch something that was made for hyperactive 5 year olds, go turn on Cartoon Network.


File: af931cc38fdb521⋯.png (4.68 KB, 377x91, 29:7, Screenshot_10.png)


nice cuckchan meme, fag



nice reddit screenshot fag


File: 3fb127a0fb1e0b6⋯.png (942.1 KB, 864x759, 288:253, 1499277746401[1].png)


>Kubricks direction is god tier

I guess plagiarism is considered good by todays standards



kubrickfags BTFO


overated trash



kubrick went for some hardcore show-don't-tell here.

if you read the book it makes perfect sense. and if you watch it you see that kubrick went close.

but if your movie has to come out with a written guide, dictionary or in this case a novel, there is definitely something wrong.

it's nice he tried, though.



read the book.

btw hal is not the point of the movie. the monkeys smashing shit with bones are the point of the movie.




But those shots on the left are dogshit. You need to go back to cuckchan.



go back to 4cuck, you pretentious edgelord


File: e6fd91fa4eef451⋯.jpg (68.14 KB, 491x700, 491:700, Solaris.jpg)


I agree, pic related is a much better movie. Tarkovsky > Kubrick.



>the movie isn't garbage, you're just being reactionary to the consensus of teenage pretention that it is one of the best films ever made.

Nah fam, the movie is pretty pretentious and boring. The commentary may have felt deep at the time but it has been redone and overdone so many times that it has little to offer a modern viewer other than an urge to go do something else.



It isn't in any shape or form.




t. Linklater pretentious pleblord



> No




The film is a clinic in good use of sound effects, special effects, sound editing, editing, soundtracks, cinematography, direction and tone.



oh good for you. and how was it? I hope it was fucking good because it's useless now isn't it?



I don't know what you are talking about. It's still one of the best films you can watch.


File: 19ba22cf9f83ac7⋯.png (1.99 MB, 1680x756, 20:9, 2001.A.Space.Odyssey.1968.….png)

Does the moon have enough gravity to let you pour a drink?



As far as takes that are directly comparable go, those are about as far apart as you can get.


>people unironically enjoy a movie that was a shit together cover to fake moon landings

christ /tv/, will you never stop



Heres your reply



they were in a shuttle with artificial gravity for that scene



thanks fam


File: e471e3d0a35d0d0⋯.jpg (604.09 KB, 1400x748, 350:187, 2001 - Space Station.jpg)


But all scenes with artificial gravity have rotating structures, which is scientifically correct. That shuttle has nothing like that.


Kubrick's best film is still Dr. Strangelove



the shuttle also spins, in that exact scene, there is a perspective shot of the space station being still, because the shuttle and station sync up movement



no question



When the kubrickfag is shown the truth, he regresses and autistically yells "CUCKCHAN"



Kubrick has never made a good film.


tark is a hark



Moon? Yes.




File: 77e5f32439c404b⋯.png (118.22 KB, 597x432, 199:144, thatsass.png)

it really is ass




And me.


File: 29e140f2bbdf59f⋯.png (9.14 KB, 418x239, 418:239, Screenshot_11.png)





All me but with different VPN's.


File: 75f52864ceed025⋯.png (6.26 KB, 395x121, 395:121, Screenshot_12.png)


I've always thought the final act of 2001 the film was so nonsensical that it ruins what was otherwise a fine production up to that point. And this is coming from a big Arthur C. Clarke fan. Kubrick just hit up a ton of acid and shat all over his film at the end.



This. 2010 may not be quite as ambitious but it has some great themes and it communicates them clearly.



You know what? this is actually quite convincing



>thinking (You)s are server side




That image is from cuckchan



If you don't get the last 10 min you are a brainlet.



So are you, Zach.

Kubrick is a hack:



That's a badge of honor coming from you since you are wrong about everything. Tarkovsky is a psuedo hack.



File: d17f31986c20c36⋯.jpg (84.19 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 3fe042fd461875a89598a1ac39….jpg)






File: e6758a65df2dc8f⋯.png (257.41 KB, 333x400, 333:400, ClipboardImage.png)


this is an attention seeking namefag



>zach misusing t.

nothing new here






This is just embarrassing, Zachary.



>thinks Tarkovsky isn't a hack

>thinks Kubrick is

You are an infant.


Kubrickhaters have nothing to say whine about Zach now. Can't make this shit up.



I'm seriously considering handing you over to that roastie lolcow site and making your illusions that roasties are on your trail real.



go back to /leftypol/, commie


New poster here….. why can't you stay on topic?



Because you can't have proper discussion if lolcows are pushing their retardation and not getting called out for it.


File: 8de5b0bcac9988a⋯.jpg (498.94 KB, 1446x1058, 723:529, maxresdefault.jpg)









This post is even more cringeworthy than the one below it and that's saying something.



yeah mang I'll throw up the SO2001 OST any time just to jam out cause its soooo gooood

or not


File: fffb18fb60607dd⋯.png (104.05 KB, 418x627, 2:3, ClipboardImage.png)


Hi faggot



Based. I hadn't seen your post and I was already calling out Kubrick as a hack and lashing out on Zach lol.



I thought Satan worshippers seek truth, why do they deny the greenpill? Or is this just your form of psychological operations?



You are new. Image boards tend to be someone posting a topic and then an ensuing free for all, much like real conversations except with more random malice.



Satan = ignorance you dumb mundie




male undie?



Satan = you


The greenpill is for cucks

t. ironpilled titan




someone dug deep for a synonym to normie, apparently


> Not taking the iron pill




Ironpill: arrogance

Greenpill: Humility

I'm susceptible to growth, you are spiritually constipated.


File: 42f28d673366c5e⋯.png (227.84 KB, 344x781, 344:781, ClipboardImage.png)


ironpill lit is all boring alt right shit



>insulting Strauss

>insulting the music Kubrick picks for his movies

What even



Are you jordan peterson?



> I'm susceptible to growth, you are spiritually constipated.

< he said, as soy spewed from his jawls



>muh raw meat



Fuck off with that shit. Jordon Peterson is not a gnostic.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.



> muh raw meat

< mocked the soyboy as he stroked his soy soaked beard and fondled his bitchtits


File: a5c8c194565bc7d⋯.jpg (91.55 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg)


Jordan Peterson may well have sold his soul to the archons in order to have worldly fame in the last decades of his life. That's why his words fly off me, his magic is only penetrable to young, poor souls without a path, so he grooms them with his Jungian witchcraft into believing that the demiurge has our best intentions at heart.



> being stuck on music from 1968

Sorry. Let me pop in The Byrds and Jefferson Airplane, grandpa.


File: d80fcc396283f7a⋯.jpg (1.21 MB, 3888x2592, 3:2, fountain-pen-with-paper.jpg)


Name a better kino then.

protip : you cannot






He gave his daughter psych meds and espouses esoteric symbolism as mundane psychology.



>he gave his daughter psych meds

Isn't he a clinical psychologist? I don't even know why you know this or care.



He said better not inferior in every single facet.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.



Well we shall see




>I don't even know why you know this or care.

Think harder. I believe in you.



>inferior in every single facet

That would be the pretentious flick that 2OO1 is



I wonder who records these lectures?



>being stuck on music from 1968

>implying that classical music isn't timeless

>Strauss is from 1968



>t. jordan peterson



Can't really call anything pretentious when you like Tarkshit



Yes, I'm Jordon Peterson saying why Jordon Peterson is a scumbag. Brilliant detective work, genius.



>t. jordan peterson's jealous coworker





nice one, got any more jokes potterpleb?



Got any retort besides the one living in your head rent free, ruskifag?



How about the genius Tarkovsky himself calling Kubrick pretentious and him not even trying to defend himself because he knew Andrei was right?



>A pretentious faggot calls someone pretentious who is less pretentious than he is

>you post about it on a dead bongo forum



I only do it because I fully agree with his critique of Kubrick's work full of symbolism for symbolism's sake and other banal superficialities with a pretension of depth.

>For some reason, in all the science-fiction films I’ve seen, the filmmakers force the viewer to examine the details of the material structure of the future. More than that, sometimes, like Kubrick, they call their own films premonitions. It’s unbelievable! Let alone that 2001: A Space Odyssey is phoney on many points, even for specialists. For a true work of art, the fake must be eliminated.


File: b696abd345f2ae5⋯.jpg (40.65 KB, 780x413, 780:413, The_Autism.jpg)



<2001 sucks

<solaris is better

<jordan peterson

<generation gap meme



will the saga ever continue?

find out the thrilling conclusion tomorrow on….




Tarkovsky sounds like the most phony faggot ever tbh. There is depth to 2001, it's just that it's a fucking prime time space odyssey that most people don't even understand the climax of.



>most people don't even understand the climax of

Actually it succeeds at giving that impression to plebs and making them feel intelligent. The definition of pretentiousness.



He isn't Nolan, you are pretentious and upset Kubrick is more liked.



He's the Nolan of his era. Paraded around like plebs who pretended his movies were the best thing in history. Just like with Nolan.



I like most of Kubrick's films but you have to admit he really dropped the ball with 2001. Such a waste of 2/3 of a good film.



>like plebs

By plebs, typo



He also dropped the ball with FMJ and A Clockwork Orange.



What's wrong with those?




After the boot camp scenes everything goes to shit.

You're better off watching Apocalypse Now or -may God forgive me for uttering this word- Platoon.

>A Clockwork Orange

The whole thing reeks of phony and you can tell there's a bunch of scenes thrown there for shock value alone, to the point that it isn't even shocking, just crass. It was Tarantino tier.



Actually I take the Tarantino-tier remark back, at least Tarantino makes enjoyable movies even if they're about the shock value.

Protip: it's related to them not pretending they're anything else.



After the stargate sequence is fantastic though, not my fault you don't understand whats going on.


No anon, he is nothing like Nolan because Nolan has to explain the endings of his movies and the middles with exposition.



>has to explain the endings of his movies and the middles with exposition

That's exactly what Kubrick does, it's all explicitly laid out for the viewer. There's no depth to his films. You don't need to think much to understand a Kubrick film.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


Couldn't be further from the truth, faglord.



>Terry Gilliam

kek, another pretentious hack

Go fap over Brazil and Harry Potter and how they are like birds of a feather, you pathetic mutt.



You're such a shitposting pleb Robertfag. You have nothing to add to the conversation. Nothing but phoniness and pretentiousness.



>some asshole on /tv/ hates Kubrick and likes Scream Queens and American Horror Story and giallo garbage



This is what happens when you bring Reddit to this site.





>samefagging this hard

>outing yourself as the ban-evading hapa you are


File: 1c75b0d4e5f6536⋯.png (237.13 KB, 1914x1667, 1914:1667, emmafag origins.png)





>trying to call out samefagging when you don't know how



>trying to deflect this much because you hate on a classic film and like Tarkovsky trash


This thread is what happens when shit tier mods don't ban the correct people like one or two Robertsniggers.



Oh I'm sure /ourmod/ will make one of those "This is Zach" posts again and those three will be in the list.



>This thread is what happens when shitposting reddit goons evade their bans




>reddit goons

I too hate "alt right" nazi /r/The_Donald reddipol posters.



The robertsdyke is buddies with our mod.



>shit befriending shit




lol, still pushing this meme?

>is buddies

I merely enjoy his kinos and happen to dislike you and other notorious shitposters that shall not be named. I also happen to like Tarkovsky and MDE. I don't have any contact with him besides what I post here that he sees.

Also pathetic samefagging in your three posts >>1276907 >>1276914 >>1276911.

Why won't you fight him, pussy?


You strawmanning as your opponent is not an argument


shhhh, no sweetie :^)



This is straw man tier bait.


I like this movie, but it's not half the movie 2001 is.



2001 is overrated but that doesn't mean it's complete shit. That being said there's no reason to discuss it anymore and it's worth watching once maybe twice. Zach is a skinny twink bitch who will never get laid because girls don't like guys who lack basic social abilities like he does



indigo pill lit is all boring wiccan garbage too


File: c6ea11044486565⋯.png (990.38 KB, 4486x2128, 2243:1064, ClipboardImage.png)





>aleister crowley


<not wiccan

can I have some of your weed bro?



>not wiccan

Exactly and I don't smoke weed it's degenerate.



how is aleister crowley not wiccan? All of that fucking garbage looks like wiccan trash

also freemasons are faggot kikes anon, get out while you can



You have to go back





How is he wiccan? Thelema is an entirely different school of thought.


I got it from 8fringe



I honestly dont know jackshit about crowley, I just know hes a hack fraud and that I'm not interested .

>woke occult lit list

>doesnt include agrippa or the picatrix



It's a nice window into where people's minds were in the 60's. It's like a travel brochure for the space age.


File: b9738260aad661a⋯.jpg (20.57 KB, 196x255, 196:255, 82774f2999619ba040b5d71896….jpg)


looking at it that way just makes me fucking depressed.



It's especially depressing if you watch 2010, and see all of the optimism of the first film give way to tension and anxiety regarding nuclear war.



And because he refuses to fight you?


File: 31d23df5143602a⋯.jpg (21.09 KB, 472x472, 1:1, 4GET.jpg)


Checking those big quads.

The only true magic is baneposting though.



There's no such thing as an iron pill you faggot


File: 38731bcaf9ca8be⋯.webm (1.08 MB, 720x1276, 180:319, manlet timeout.webm)


>t. manlet


File: 237eb516918890c⋯.png (20.83 KB, 645x729, 215:243, 237eb516918890ce7ceddb9a94….png)


>generation identity

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / hisrol / imouto / just / pdfs / tacos / vg ]