>>269310
> comedy movies aren't supposed to be funny
Genius logic right there.
> You didn't even need 1 joke per scene because they were movies first, and the goal of a movie is to have a narrative.
No, the movie IS the narrative. And you need creative, well timed humor to make a good comedy, which is not the case of Ghostbusters. Guess now you will say that action movies don't need good action.
> Ghostbusters "not funny" nature is a matter of it not being a modern comedy and not existing to throw out as many jokes as possible in every scene because it is catering to an audience of 80 IQ brown people who keep Hollywood afloat.
No, the "not funny" nature is a matter of it not being funny. Also, back to stormfront.
> Liking Ghostbusters isn't nostalgia. Not liking it is a modern bias that prefers lolsorandumb garbage that is frenetic and unwatchable if you are a sober adult.
Not liking Ghostbuster is mere a result of disliking boring, unfunny movies. This has nothing to do with the era the movie was released. Stop blaming modern movies for its blandness, if modern movies were good Ghostbusters would still be meh.