[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/tv/ - Television and Movies

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Rules Baneposting Film Star Wars Actresses

File: 1458578507238.png (980.92 KB, 709x1000, 709:1000, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.280507

>tfw I've seen Die Hard 26 times

My dad would always put it on around Christmas. I think I've actually seen Star Wars fewer times than I've seen Die Hard.

 No.280509

>>280507

>I think I've actually seen Star Wars fewer times than I've seen Die Hard.

Good. Die Hard's actually a good movie.


 No.280510

File: 1458578666499.jpg (22.65 KB, 220x340, 11:17, 220px-Trading_Places.jpg)

same here for trading places

every christmas eve, always


 No.280513

>>280507

What made this movie great was the balanced pew-pew, survival, and one liners ratio. Flicks these days are all about pew pew and kewl martial arts so they don't have much impact on the audience anymore.


 No.280520

>>280513

It was a well structured film. Most action movies these days have absolutely no semblance of structure at all.


 No.280541

>just 26 times

what a pleb


 No.280570

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>280513

>Flicks these days are all about pew pew and kewl martial arts

Badly done martial arts, at that.


 No.280749

>>280570

I was going to post that. Pew pew and martials arts would be fine for a movie if they were atleast cool.


 No.280799

>>280749

john wick did it really well


 No.280918

>>280799

No it didn't, John Cuck is an overrated flick. The fights lasted too long, too pretty, and the cinematography was awful, like a generic hollyjew film. Die Hard didn't have any pretty martial arts, they were more realistic and fast and the shots make all the actions look clear..


 No.281156

>>280918

all standards for movies being good have been nuked. i liked it as eye candy because that's the best we can hope for anymore.


 No.281183

>>280509

Star Wars is good, it's the sequels that are inferior.


 No.281256

>>281183

ESB is a pretty good sequel.

Better than, say, Aliens or T2.


 No.281257

the original trilogy of star wars was ok, but terribly overrated

all the rest is pure shit


 No.281262

>>281256

It's good, but tries to turn camp into grim mcedge


 No.281264

File: 1458661522074.jpg (21.26 KB, 330x199, 330:199, ewok_line-thumb-330x199-73….jpg)

>>281256

Terminator series only got better with 2 and 3.

>>281257

Every Star Wars movie ever was made for the kids that dragged their parents into the theater to see it. Of course they're all going to say that their first one was the best one. We already went over this in the 90's with the Ewoks.


 No.281266

File: 1458661641746.jpg (17.66 KB, 224x225, 224:225, 1402934197820.jpg)

>>281264

>and 3


 No.281269

File: 1458661932276.jpg (69.95 KB, 634x422, 317:211, article-2350976-1A8FE4FF00….jpg)

>>281266

Well - for me T3 was when I was a directionless emo faggot just like John Connor, so… again the Ewoks.


 No.281270

>>281264

Terminator sequels are all shitty summer action flicks. The first one is the only one that matters.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]