Towergirls rewrite Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:23:37 3581dd No. 147
If any of you are looking for something to do then how about we make a SFW rewrite of towergirls based on this old template?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:35:18 c0f0e1 No. 151
Wouldn't it be better to edit the completed chart? I think an anon was already doing that but I don't know if he ever succeeded or gave up. Either way he didn't share IIRC
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:38:32 3581dd No. 152
>>151 >Wouldn't it be better to edit the completed chart? Thats what I was planning on it's just that this version has a lot of the text and info I want to include.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:43:41 be74d1 No. 155
These were the ideas I had earlier. It's been pointed out to me that the unit for skeleton is too vague and the unit for boy doesn't match her power score.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:44:19 be74d1 No. 157
>>155 And by skeleton I mean the exoskeletal insect.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:50:59 3581dd No. 158
>>155 For insect i think the one on OPs chart is good enough
Whats out of whack for boy princess again?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 19:59:57 be74d1 No. 159
>>158 The chart I built "Angry Rabble" from made a big deal about how his army was weak, but in the current version of the game he's 2 power, which is stronger than kobold and the same as goblin.
It just needs to be upped a tiny bit.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 20:04:59 3581dd No. 160
>>159 How about endless mob?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 20:15:52 be74d1 No. 161
>>160 Since Endless Legions needs to go, I dig it. I don't want to reuse adjectives at all, if I can help it. Although I might reuse nouns, like giving Human Princess "Veteran Knights" and Knight Princess gets "Champion Knights" (another suggestion I got previously)
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 20:40:33 3581dd No. 164
>>161 How about undead hordes for skeleton?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 20:47:25 be74d1 No. 165
>>164 Her kingdom's got 4 power and her card specifically calls out her "terrifying" army. Maybe I play too many war games but I don't associate "horde" with "terrifying" at the first glance, even undead.
What really needs fixing is the insect.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 21:08:06 751b33 No. 170
>>151 I actually am. A lot of it is actually really easy.
We just have to chop off everything below the dotted line in most cases.
For some, like mouse princess, more indepth work is required.
A word changed here and there.
Things like that.
Ant princess for example with the pheremone gland can just give you enormous cellular regeneration.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 21:10:48 751b33 No. 171
File: 1427404248271.png (5.74 MB, 1696x8686, 848:4343, cyoa_towergirlsremasteredd….png )
>>170 an incomplete template
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 21:44:57 3581dd No. 182
>>171 I was thinking of completely getting rid of dowry's and companions and deities and replacing them with something like in the OP
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 21:57:59 c0f0e1 No. 184
>>182 Those are pretty iconic though, at least the dowries are. They're in the original chart. You can always re-purpose any of the raunchier ones if needed.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:01:12 751b33 No. 185
>>182 yeah, taking
>>184 's side on this.
Those are iconic features.
We should keep them as much as possible.
Perhaps replace the kinks and lust bonuses with kingdom modifiers though? Like the neutral companions have?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:21:00 1439e4 No. 199
Why would you want to make Towergirls boring?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:29:45 3581dd No. 202
>>199 Why do you want to keep towergirls a cissexist boys club?
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:32:19 1439e4 No. 203
>>202 Oh boy here we go. Thanks for this Gats.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:32:35 c0f0e1 No. 204
>>202 I'm fine with sfw rewrites but…
Please tell me that was ironic.
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:37:33 3581dd No. 206
>>204 Shitlord
spoiler Of course spoiler
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:38:16 3581dd No. 207
>>206 Wow I fucked that up
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:40:24 c0f0e1 No. 208
Anonymous 03/26/15 (Thu) 22:53:38 3581dd No. 211
>>208 Yes thank you I realize my error
Anonymous 03/27/15 (Fri) 11:04:58 0a23e7 No. 442
Honestly, a good compromise would be to shift it from a lust stat and overt sexual things to, instead, the more vague 'fertility' rating and options.
Anonymous 04/03/15 (Fri) 16:54:12 a2af71 No. 2608
Is the board always this slow?
Anonymous 04/03/15 (Fri) 17:24:18 c0f0e1 No. 2612
>>2608 It all depends on OP or anon providing content otherwise the thread dies (and by extension the board) dies for a little while.
Anonymous 04/03/15 (Fri) 18:23:00 a2af71 No. 2618
>>2612 Ah, OK. Do people post more in a certain place? There's a /tg/ thread, right?
Anonymous 04/03/15 (Fri) 18:38:29 c0f0e1 No. 2619
>>2618 Yeah but it's also slow if no one brings in some kind of content. It can go fast or slow depending on how many people are lurking and how much OC is posted.
Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 00:03:31 e15619 No. 3102
>>185 I know this is really late, and really half assed. But what if you rebranded the lust gifts into love ones and if we are trying to keep this as iconic as possible we should keep the kinks, but edit them so they are sfw, because the kinks were something that told you a fair amount about the princess.
Granted not in gen i And I think the best way to try and tackle this is to go down the line and 'censor' every princess individually.
>>171 Although I think this guy had about the right idea, but was a little arbitrary in what he intended to remove. Particularly sense he didn't check the pluses for puffy orifice, but cut a curse from a zombie about wanting to bite others. We can still keep some of the naughtiness
Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 13:19:39 556802 No. 3274
>>147 >>442 I agree that there should be a toned down version, but I disagree with removing things like the lust stat. I think that while the lewd version has become its own thing the not so lewd version can be better because it is broader and would therefore have more applications. My point is to let people focus on what ever they want rather than be like the current version that is only focused on sexuality. Achieving this shift of the focus from the lewd stuff does not have to mean removing everything lewd. Some princesses are inherently sexual so I think the thing to do is something like to lower the content rating by one grade (AO to M) or leave a little bit to the imagination.
Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 15:29:03 556802 No. 3286
File: 1428420543670.jpg (430.16 KB, 3808x2500, 952:625, A_History_of_Madeira,_1821….jpg )
What I would like to see is a fusion of the old chart in OP's post and the new one. Bring in the new layout and princesses but revise some information (but not changing it beyond all recognition). Basically have two charts with one being lewd and one being not so lewd, and besides that only some minor differences to accommodate that shifted focus.>dislikes: bustas >Mount: a litter / sedan ottoman (like pic related but raised, more comfy, and more Persian looking) >Power: Heat control (either exhaust an enemy or make them hot in another way) >minion: Big muscly fan waving "eunuchs" (but they have bulges) >dislikes: being seen >export: jobs done clean >likes: water >dislikes: staying in one place >power: supernatural navigation >mount: camel >power: can heal wounds >mount: rhinoceros beetles, flying squirrel, or some kind of bird (depends on how big fairies are) >dislikes: beans >likes: sculpting >likes: helium-3 or gold >dislikes solar storms and space junk >mount: levitating disk >power: superior technology >minion: personal assistant bot model CR-0WN (there is a comic where she puts her secretary bot on her head) >dislikes: cold hands >likes: dicks >dislikes: bigotry/being called a slut (if it means no dicks) >worship: dicks >dislikes: garlic >likes: raiding >mount: bear >export: pain >minion: berzekers >mount: cloud >power: SSS rank kung-fu >mount: flying carpet >power: magic (duh) >power: dwarfen beard
Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 15:57:40 556802 No. 3291
>>3286 I forgot the mention; the inclusion of a magic stat would be great.