No.494
What are some boards that have great potential to be good, but are ruined because almost no one posts there anymore?
I think
>>>/debate/ could be an excellent place to casually debate any topic
>>>/poverty/ could be an excellent board for helping average people save money and help poor people deal with being poor.
No.509
Aw, you mentioned my board :')
>>>/lang/ has unfortunately started to dwindle in activity...I always wanted a /lang/ board with images and video
similarly
>>>/spanish/ isn't doing so well at the moment, could be a good resource for people learning Spanish who want to be able to switch into English within the same board
No.512
Debating on the internet is a horrible idea. Whoever was dumb enough to create /debate/ shouldn't be trusted with moderating it.
No.514
>>>/imgbc/ - Imageboard culture
No.515
>>512>Debating on the internet is a horrible ideaWhy?
No.531
Off the top of my head... On the internet there's no time limit, which means that a debate can keep going virtually forever, until at least one of the participants gives up. The fact that you can't look the other person in the eyes and have to rely on text to communicate means that you're simultaneously more inclined to use harsh words and to misinterpret his words as harsher than he meant them to be (the same is true for your opponent).
Unlike a debate in real life, which happens in real time, a debate on the internet doesn't necessarily keep a fixed pace; there will be times where your opponent will reply to your posts almost immediately, and others where you have to wait days. All of this makes the activity of debating even more psychologically and emotionally stressful than it already is.
Add to that the fact that the participants seldom happen to be experts on the subject matter; rather, they know just enough about something to have an opinion on it and they lack a proper understanding of their opponent's position; increasingly driven by anger and a general disregard for truth, they'll twist facts to support their arguments and resort to every sophism under the sun to undermind their opponent's.
The result is often a clusterfuck of epic proportions that leaves everyone feeling frustrated and less human than they were at the beginning.
No.532
*undermine
No.607
>>>/rent/ It's a board for people renting apartments can talk about dealing with landlords, roommates, neighbors, etc.
No.612
>>607That's pretty cool. I made a couple of threads. I hope it picks up.
No.623
>help poor people deal with being poor.
Isn't that the government's job?
No.624
>>623...no? Are you a euro or Californian/NYer?
No.625
>>624I consider myself a citizen of the world.
No.626
>>625I consider you a retard, then.
No.645
No.648
>>645All those legs
I don't know if I can take it
No.655
>>>/32/ has a moderator that tries a bit too hard to be good, but so far it has quality. Mostly speculation, though.
No.658
>>>/poverty/ here, thanks for believing in me OP. We have 30 users now :3
No.659
>>>/webm/Good but not too much new content.
>>>/linux/ seems like maybe it has potential.
>>>/tmblr/Board for exposing, mocking or otherwise making fun of Tumblr idiots, SJWs that sort of thing.
That's all I can think of offhand. I'll think of more later, I'm sure.
No.661
>>659Those are all horrible ideas for boards.
>>>/webm/Too specific, doomed to obscurity.
>>>/linux/Redundant, there's already
>>>/tech/.
>>>/tmblr/Same as above, the whole of 8chan already makes fun of tumblr, and
>>>/cow/ also exists.
No.662
>>661>Redundant, there's already >>>/tech/.But on tech there is winbabbies to laugh at, a board called /linux/ implies they wouldn't be allowed. Still a horrible idea for a board, everyone knows it would be /gnupluslinux/
No.676
>>661this is why we need the ability to combine boards for the user interface. I should be able to browse /linux/ and /tech/ at the same time.
No.677
>>676how would that even work
No.678
>>677I could imagine he wants it to work like a tag-based system, where you can search for and display multiple tabs at once
Think Twitter, with its hashtags
No.680
No.681
>>680I've never browsed leddit
No.694
>>509I just became the new owner of /lang/, wish me luck
No.696
No.703
>>694I was searching for that board a couple of days ago. Add a 'language' tag to it.
No.704
>>696Thanks!
>>703Added. The current tags are "international, language, hobby, culture, learning."
No.713
>>509>similarly >>>/spanish/ isn't doing so well at the moment, could be a good resource for people learning Spanish who want to be able to switch into English within the same boardThere is
>>>/spanishclass/ and it seems reasonably populated. Not saying /spanish/ shouldn't exist but Spanish learners are covered.
No.714
>>>/jrpg/Too varied for a /vg/ thread but too dead for an entire board. Plus it's easy to talk about the topic on /v/ anyway.
Plus
>>>/vg/ isn't too busy but that's because a lot of series went and got their own board then die.
No.733
>>>/videogames
No.756
>>531I agree. Debates are really hard online, especially with Google and easily conflicting sources.
No.769
>>733Hey, I like my
>>>/videogames/. It's fun.
No.772
>>769Yeah, that's actually a really good board. It can't replace /v/, but it's a nice addition.
No.1059
I like >>>/netplus/ and >>>/late/
/late/ has posters and is alright, /netplus/ started as hardcore technology security and privacy discussions but died pretty quickly.
No.1062
>>515
Not the guy you're replying to, but internet debates that rely completely on text typed quickly is that you lose tone, inflection, etc.
Specifically chan debates are an even worse idea. Without an identity (tripcodes don't count) or any reputation on the line it takes a HUGE degree of intellectual honesty to change your opinion. Similarly, 3rd party trolls can pretty much derail any thread/debate and with no way to verify identities you have no idea who said what and what you're actually replying to/arguing against.
No.1083
The discussion about internet debating has moved to http://4-ch.net/net/kareha.pl/1443212828/l50