Board owner…do you still come here? Please let me know.
>>186
Let me walk you through this slowly:
>So is this actually about freedom from heavy moderation or is it more just for anarchists?
Yes. This is not an "or" thing.
A pure anarchist board is free from heavy moderation.
>The UBF is a loose confederation of boards centred around the concept of freedom from heavy moderation.
It does not mean you must have an exact level of light moderation to get listed. Why would you think that?
>I was about to recommend /svidya/ here because it has no bullshit rules about "quality posting" or "no console wars" unlike /v/, but upon seeing /vvv/ I'm not so sure now.
If it is free from heavy moderation it goes here. Vague criteria, but is what it is. As far as I remember /svidya/ was originally "serious vidya" and had lots of rules about being on-topic, more than Mark had at the time. Now maybe both boards have changed, but if /svidya/ is still topic Nazis it probably won't get listed here.
>Does /ubf/ understand the importance of enforcing topicality on topical boards
From everything I have seen, the /ubf/ BO has no interest in your autism and wants to provide a list of boards not run by people constantly looking for things to "enforce". So if you see a banana thread and log in to ban them and say "take that shit back to /b/ faggot!", UBF probably isn't for you.
>or is it more interested in /b/ shit boards with a slice of whatever people want to talk about on the side?
Here's an idea, you could run a board for people with certain general interests while also allowing general discussion amongst this same group of people. I mean you can have what, 15 pages of threads at a time? Only the archival and OC dump boards even need that to begin with.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.