>>210spic here
>inb4 >>>/dol/Wouldn't your image go against the purpose of this board?
>Capitalism TL;DRIn Capitalism, personal freedom are maximized, this extends to how the product and trade of both labor and production. This however has a LIMIT. The more orders of magnitude regarding resources and production a person controls, the more unbalanced the system becomes. Notice that the problem is NOT inequality, rather how different agents end up in a situation where their relationship becomes unbalanced. Furthermore, there is a LIMIT of people and resources available, while the system Capitalism has been great in allowing for more resources to be created via innovation, ultimately it's the previous point of LIMIT which gives rise to more problems regarding wealth.
>Communism TL;DRCommunism comes from "communis" meaning universal or common. The purpose is that it targets one of the main LIMITS of Capitalism (which is as your image shows) is that those that own the resources and means of production end up with profits regardless if they did any work. This however is myopic in the owners usually have to deal with both risk and strategy, HOWEVER Communism can also be competent in this… by allowing the working class to partake directly in the labor of resources and productions. Notice that Communism is does NOT creates a class-less society, it simply solves one LIMIT of Capitalism in which people who are perceived as not laboring as hard as the working class, can "spread the profits" more "justly". This however highlights another thing about Communism which is very ANTI-Socialist, there is no bureocracy or governmental agent. The whole purpose of Communism is to NOT have one person getting shekels for nothing, however Socialist states do EXACTLY that! Socialist states need to spread the wealth, but what if some people refuse? They need to send the police or military. Who pays for them? The people. One of the main LIMITS of Communism is the Law of the Commons, another is the constant care NOT to create a position where there is an "unjust ratio" between wealth and labor.
>Socialism TL;DRThis system is very complex because by nature it is a confusion. Sociali
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.