[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / cafechan / clang / doomer / mde / rtd / vg ]

/v/ - Video Games

Vidya Gaems
Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<BOARD RULES>
[ /agdg/ | Vidya Porn | Hentai Games | Retro Vidya | Contact ]

File: 88b4568e9d598e1⋯.jpg (45.27 KB, 600x300, 2:1, Hentai-School-Life[1].jpg)

File: 8e9d7aab26763d5⋯.jpg (34.2 KB, 600x318, 100:53, Food-Girls[1].jpg)

File: bebf724fdbc16aa⋯.png (19.22 KB, 586x296, 293:148, ClipboardImage.png)

22c3c8  No.15975296

A lot of these games Valve is censoring don't even have lolis ,anymore and some don't even have porn but they're still going crazy with this shit. At this rate, shit like Senrans and stuff might be at risk soon in the future.

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/hentai-school-life-banned-from-steam-no-reason-given/74873/

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/food-girls-all-ages-steam-release-indefinitely-delayed-due-to-valve/74838/

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/moe-reversi-banned-from-steam-but-valve-doesnt-provide-reason/74819/

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/my-erotic-summer-banned-from-steam/74797/

https://archive.fo/4bbeU

(Unfortunately archive is timed out for me right now so here's the webarchives versions of the other links)

https://web.archive.org/web/20190110062830/https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/food-girls-all-ages-steam-release-indefinitely-delayed-due-to-valve/74838/

https://web.archive.org/web/20190110062952/https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/moe-reversi-banned-from-steam-but-valve-doesnt-provide-reason/74819/

https://web.archive.org/web/20190110063057/https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/my-erotic-summer-banned-from-steam/74797/

All of this shit happening just this week alone, let alone what's been happening over last month and the month before that. Things are only getting worse it seems.

I hope any of you faggots who trusted Valve realize what you're doing and support alternatives and buy directly from the developer when possible. Or just pirate everything, at least that way you're not actively contributing to this cancer.

This is a very sneaky way of doing things. There won't be a fuss if they attack developers under the radar, and they can keep going until things get worse and by the time they get to the things more people care about, it will be too late and they'll have taken away everything and had ample precedent to point to that nobody bothered to give a fuck about.

845f05  No.15975310

I've had Steam uninstalled for a long time now, and I don't really have any reason to ever install it again. I'd be fine if my whole library got revoked, because it would turn mere indifference into righteous wrath. Fuck Gayben and all of his cronies. Hope that fat fuck chokes on a gummy dragon dildo.


f85a02  No.15975317

File: 8407a9ea9b857db⋯.png (463.95 KB, 640x480, 4:3, JJ thinking.png)

>>15975296

>I hope any of you faggots who trusted Valve realize what you're doing and support alternatives and buy directly from the developer when possible.

Might as well link some of them: >>15970181

>>Operating Systems

<<AROS: http://aros.sourceforge.net/

<<BSD (Net: https://www.netbsd.org/ Open: https://www.openbsd.org/ DragonFly: https://www.dragonflybsd.org/ )

Figured this should be included, just in case

>>Marketplace

<<Game Jolt: https://gamejolt.com/

<<OpenBazaar: https://openbazaar.org/

<<Playism: http://playism-games.com/

<<Top Hat Store: https://shop.tophat.studio


4f31c7  No.15975319

File: 674a263a72d2341⋯.jpg (25.96 KB, 255x191, 255:191, loli kyonyu.jpg)

That's sick lolicon filth and you know it.


22c3c8  No.15975331

>>15975317

Don't forget MangaGamer, NekoNyanSoft, Fruitbat Factory and to a slightly lesser extent JAST USA and DLsite/DMM (DMM being the much more adult/less censored version iirc; plus they advertise here which few companies would bother to do)

https://www.mangagamer.com/

https://jastusa.com/

https://nekonyansoft.com/shop

https://sites.fastspring.com/fruitbatfactory/product/buy

https://www.dlsite.com/eng/

https://games.dmm.com/


aa3a42  No.15975332

File: 42264e91ed851d3⋯.png (195.86 KB, 400x480, 5:6, 42264e91ed851d38581f4ce90e….png)

>still trying to salvage Valve instead of moving on


a94a2c  No.15975337

>I hope any of you faggots who trusted Valve realize what you're doing and support alternatives and buy directly from the developer when possible.

That's a good start, but realisticly it's not going to stop censorship. As long as steam is the largest digital distributor in the world developers will continue changing their games in order to be allowed on steam. And buying it directly from the dev probably won't help either, most devs don't want to bother with different versions for different platforms


178c2b  No.15975339

File: 55b04504f76df5b⋯.jpg (1.07 MB, 2400x1472, 75:46, firstamendpic-WikimediaCom….jpg)

Valve's private platform, Valve's rules. If they want to rule with an authoritarian iron fist, that's their prerogative.

This is why the only way to get the most out of your First Amendment rights, you'll need make your own website and give the game out for free. I say free because payment processing companies like Visa or MasterCard DO have an agenda against creators of "problematic" sexy games. And on the PC platform (not gatekept like the platforms of Steam, Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, etc), your website can distribute whatever the confines of the law allows. Unfortunately, even then, your domains (handled by the private ICANN corporation that can still deplatform people) or protection against DDoS attack (like how CloudFlare barred the DailyStormer from using its services) can still be jeopardized.

Even so, a game developer who makes and distributes free PC games on his own website is about as free as you can get nowadays. Freer than other options, anyways. To believe that Valve will uphold libertarian First Amendment levels of free speech is a foolish idea you got to stamp out of your head. When it comes to artistic freedom, you can't trust a private company to defend it. Only yourself.


f85a02  No.15975341

File: 71d37d4d02e998e⋯.png (69.83 KB, 880x880, 1:1, marsh_vs_alabama.png)

>>15975339

The "free market" doesn't apply to monopolies.


22c3c8  No.15975348

File: 3890787266c2f32⋯.png (90.54 KB, 1297x469, 1297:469, ClipboardImage.png)

>>15975337

Yeah, I'm aware of this. I can understand why devs have to censor for Steam and I'm not going to begrudge them for releasing on that platform, but if anyone actually cares about censorship, they should go to where they can buy the games uncensored from.

>>15975339

They're pretty much a de facto monopoly for PC gaming in the west. Different rules can apply to them, and regulations should obviously apply to monopolies if you aren't an extremely obtuse "its not censorship if the government is doing it" SJW or "Monopolies have the right to censor you" Ancap

Regulations should generally be avoided, but sometimes they might be necessary, especially in the case of monopolies.


78f8c7  No.15975351

File: e7095111da7ebec⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 145.89 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, ss_48a4389082376f110cfe091….jpg)

>>15975296

>getting worse and worse with censorship

You sure about that?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/542200/Animal_Lover/


4f31c7  No.15975353

>>15975341

So in essence, you're claiming moderation of any forum open to the public is a violation of the US constitution then?


aa3a42  No.15975355

>>15975341

Monopolies only exist because of lazy retards who want the cheapest shit at any cost, as ironic as that sounds.

In terms of videogame markets, nobody goes to alternatives and it's very hard to tell people to go there because there's no games there. Developers have to start getting their heads out of their asses and spread their games over multiple services instead of just the most popular one, it's THEIR fault that alternative stores aren't worth paying attention to for both consumers and creators.


f85a02  No.15975357

File: 48cac568b40cb4d⋯.jpg (194.9 KB, 1224x1445, 72:85, you better not be.jpg)

>>15975353

Where's does that jump in logic even come from?


22c3c8  No.15975359

>>15975353

What kind of ridiculous conclusion did you draw that from?

The key word there in that post is monopoly. a few social media giants controlling the vast majority of all communications would count as monopolies or oligopolies and would therefore feasibly count as doing something akin to that. If you get censored by Facebook, its a lot different than being censored by some podunk forum especially when there are plenty of others with similar amounts of people, and getting censored by Facebook.

>>15975355

People ended up creating their own disaster with Steam, yes. The curse of convenience and all.

Keep in mind though that Steam didn't reveal its maliciousness and cancer till a while later, and if a company has money to burn to destroy its competition, it can draw people in using tactics like that.

Walmart crushed much of its competition doing such a thing.

Its just a shame that there wasn't any large enough players to step up while Steam was growing to challenge them. Instead we end up with this disaster.


6814df  No.15975360

File: 9276ca0a6b25576⋯.jpg (154.65 KB, 723x1105, 723:1105, yareyare.jpg)

>>15975296

It's almost as if claiming they won't moderate titles nor adult titles came back to bite the on the ass when they got adult titles.


213040  No.15975377

>>15975296

>literally just lewd porn.

Hard to care.


bf4bee  No.15975384

File: 2cd3f0711d6bd14⋯.png (4.86 MB, 2595x4080, 173:272, 2cd3f0711d6bd144fe7e32f73e….png)

>>15975377

If all you're gonna say is "fuck you got mine" then shut up.


65c49a  No.15975405

File: 304445c4ec3d9b7⋯.png (351.44 KB, 680x383, 680:383, jojo references.png)

>>15975377

>implying 2D anime lewd is anywhere close 3D disgusting degeneracy.

use your brain for once, instead of just regurgitating the opinion of others.


65c49a  No.15975413

File: 5d52973071b59f1⋯.jpg (98.58 KB, 640x360, 16:9, Steam-GR-Logo.jpg)

>>15975296

what happened to "valve will address this problem next week" statement? did they ever address anything? what happened to Steam Allowing “Everything” as long as it's not illegal?


53c2c4  No.15975417

>>15975384

Nobody draws anime titties like Gaston!


030362  No.15975448

>>15975296

>Valve gets rid of degenerate weeb shit

Valve being the last bastion of actual White business confirmed


126fe5  No.15975454

>>15975448

Meanwhile AAA interracial cuckolding simulators are constantly in the highlighted games list.


21bb42  No.15975480

>>15975413

What happened is they let the specific games through that got enough attention to cause them issues, and then turned around and continued banning the ones that didn't garner enough attention.


ab7f3b  No.15975485

File: 5008aadd631c7f9⋯.png (5.12 MB, 2749x3916, 2749:3916, (C92) [KAROMIX (karory)] K….png)

>>15975296

It was never about loli or adult games being problematic to these people. Both of these are allowed so bringing up "but it didn't have loli or hentai" is irrelevant. They're allowed so that shouldn't matter.

>>15975339

What rules? There are no rules against the games they're banning. They are allowed on their platform. They're simply making up reasons to ban them though we already know this.


22c3c8  No.15975502

https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/01/d20-sweet-roll-club-ecchi-visual-novel-banned-from-steam/74885/

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST

seriously what the fuck, it's going nonstop.


2f2bf7  No.15975514

>>15975339

>If they want to rule with an authoritarian iron fist, that's their prerogative.

If they want to be plagued by an internet insurgency that sooner or later appears, that's their choice too.


22c3c8  No.15975515

>>15975348

*if its not the government doing it


65c49a  No.15975527

File: 3ef24cc9878c3ff⋯.jpg (80.9 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg)

>>15975502

jesus! this is not a respectable business is supposed to operate. can devs just go back to releasing per-censored games and then just put up the uncensor patch on DLsite or their own website/megaupload? things worked fine like that for awhile. this "new way" seems like it was just a trap for japanese developers from the start.


46a252  No.15975531

File: a26b7adf50f6d41⋯.webm (371.92 KB, 640x480, 4:3, At least it's not the gob….webm)

>>15975339

>You can't discriminate against Niggers and other assorted filth.

>You have regulations and legal codes to follow when building crap.

>You have various rules about who you hire, how long they can work, and the nature of their position.

>Private companies can do whatever they want though.

This is why lolbertarians like you are laughed at. Freedom of Association has been dead in America for 50+ years now. Smell the coffee, stop being a cocksucker for Woke Capital, and start taking shit back for folks who aren't blue haired (((she))) twinks.


7490f7  No.15975532

>>15975296

"Censorship" comes with heavy connotations as it usually involves silencing political speech.

Banning video games is technically censorship I reckon, but calling it that is being overly melodramatic. It's literally some company removing fictional cp from its platform (and frankly that doesn't bother me).

Also contrary to what some people think, Steam is not a monopoly in the game-distributing sense. Not only because they've got some shitty competitors, but also you can still purchase your shitty hentai games from other places (that is unless the developer only released its game on Steam, in which case it's their responsibility to distribute the game some other way)


ab7f3b  No.15975541

>>15975527

If anything, this is just getting smaller websites who host these type of games more coverage.


56aacb  No.15975550

>>15975532

>huge tits

>CP


56aacb  No.15975557

>>15975485

It all comes down to the Firewatch "devs" getting hired by Valve and put in charge of what's allowed on the store.


65c49a  No.15975566

File: f11ecc9b82623ff⋯.png (274.64 KB, 585x300, 39:20, game baned from steam.png)

File: 715dece31f55cc8⋯.png (400.51 KB, 1918x788, 959:394, 1446481212655.png)

File: e3b25ef46bae591⋯.jpg (45.18 KB, 400x400, 1:1, jason schreier.jpg)

File: 7da94b69ea452c3⋯.jpg (6.34 KB, 279x180, 31:20, jason schreier wife.jpg)

>>15975532

>fictional cp

Nice of you to grace us with your presence (((jason schreier))) how's your sister/wife?


bf4bee  No.15975574

File: 99f6aac04eb7fda⋯.png (2.04 MB, 2000x1128, 250:141, uncensored_neps.png)

>>15975532

>(and frankly that doesn't bother me).

It really bothers me when any steps are taken because of the recent escalation (which is ultimately what happens with all censorship) to more innocuous content. With Sony we had Omega Labyrinth Z getting cockblocked by them in US/EU (still fine in JP though) but shortly after even normal anime fanservice stuff is getting banhammered and in their own country, while Nintendo are allowing it.

That said I'm not so sure I want Steam having any more power so I'd rather they keep their dick out of my pudding and just say no 18+ games rather than this shallow pretense of "allowing" them only to then throw out what I wanted them for in the first place.


7490f7  No.15975579

>>15975550

This may be a hot take but loli with huge tits is still borderline cp imo.

I forgot to mention this other point so I may as well; even if they end up removing non-loli hentai (maybe they have), I still don't think it's a big loss. Call me a retard or whatever but I don't really think about what I wank to, and if Valve decides to remove ALL hentai games (they probably won't) I know I can still find hentai online (that is, if I were to watch/read hentai).

People bringing politics into this is also amusing to some extent. Shithole countries fight for freedom of speech & expression in order to expose their corrupt governments, whereas first worlders are complaining about cartoon porn being freedom of speech.

I mean I get that you're passionate about what you empty your spunk to, and that's fine. But making it a political issue seems very… post-modernist maybe? It's literally just some cartoon porn is an oversaturated market anyway.


126fe5  No.15975581

>>15975579

>drawings are real people

I want tumblr to leave


56aacb  No.15975583

>>15975579

>Call me a retard

Retard.


7490f7  No.15975587

>>15975581

If you read the previous reply I wrote you'll see that I called it "Fictional cp" so I didn't bother to write "fictional" again.

Literally no one is going to argue that loli is real cp roflmao. Bringing up tumblr is odd though since tumblrites do (did) like cp don't they?


695393  No.15975592

>>15975514

>an internet insurgency

how is that supposed to work


65c49a  No.15975593

File: ff54eac234d84ad⋯.jpg (16.33 KB, 600x300, 2:1, phil-fish.jpg)

>>15975557

>Firewatch "devs" getting hired by Valve and put in charge of what's allowed on the store.

its weird how much the western indie game scene steals from japan, yet they absolutely hate everything about japanese games and most anime unless it's gay shit like yuri on ice.


4fb1e4  No.15975605

>>15975579

Are you just willingly ignoring the fact that some of the games getting caught in the purge have no adult content, loli or otherwise? Not to mention it makes no difference if valve is or isn't (they are) allowed to do what they will with their platform, anyone as a customer is perfectly allowed to complain or boycott them if they refuse to provide, or in this case, gatekeep the type products the desire.


ab7f3b  No.15975615

File: 4424e04075c1314⋯.jpg (365.78 KB, 800x1131, 800:1131, 01684ec8f825f71a28fca1c823….jpg)

>>15975579

>This may be a hot take but loli with huge tits is still borderline cp imo.

Your opinion is absolutely retarded. Whatever happens to fictional characters isn't a crime because there are no real victims. Therefor it's not CP or even borderline unless you're too autistic to tell the difference between fiction and reality.

>People bringing politics into this is also amusing to some extent.

Because it's all ideological with the removal of these games. If they just set some ground rules then neither us or the devs wouldn't have to jump through hoops. It's unprofessional, inconsistent, and clearly hypocritical which is frustrating for many reasons.

>>15975587

>roflmao

You definitely sounded like you weren't from around here before but this clearly shows it. Lurk more before posting next time.


7490f7  No.15975619

>>15975605

>anyone as a customer is perfectly allowed to complain or boycott them if they refuse to provide, or in this case, gatekeep the type products the desire.

And I didn't say anything against this. You're free to do whatever you want. I'm just saying that portraying this as an issue of freedom of speech and politics is an incredible overstatement (even if it has a nugget of truth in it).

In addition calling Steam a monopoly, and that they /have to/ sell these games is idiotic at best.

>have no adult content, loli or otherwise

You mean the ecchi stuff?

>>15975615

>Whatever happens to fictional characters isn't a crime because there are no real victims.

Read the chain roflmao


65c49a  No.15975623

File: 17f83bc8cad3ece⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 6.43 KB, 313x161, 313:161, images.jpg)

>>15975587

all you of your posts boil down to moral fagging/virtual signaling. so it makes sense to call you tumblr as what tumblr does. your other "point" is "I don't care if things I don't like get banned". you don't need need 3+ posts to tell us that. glad you enjoy corporatism and hypocrisy, good for you. back to whatever cesspit you came from.


dd1c63  No.15975632

at this point what's the point even anymore. I mean why go through all this effort to DRM publish (even though actually the devs do have a choice not to include a drm mechanism in spite of "software licenses") shit for which they'll get a meager revenue share anyway? Time and time again steam deletes and censors shit for no reason, aren't these devs all tired already? They should try other platforms


7490f7  No.15975633

>>15975623

You're operating under the assumption that virtue signalling is a bad thing, whereas it evolved for a reason. To certain aspect it's a good thing because it keeps our virtues in check.

You could argue that this thread is virtue signalling because majority of the people here will keep using Steam but they just want to "signal" that they're displeased with Steam, and that's understandable.

I'm telling you that this issue isn't as much of a deal-breaker as some of you may seem to think. And it's certainly not as political as you're making it out to be. E.g calling me "corporatist"(?) because I don't care about anime porn. Surely you can see how that's out of place at best.

But I doubt that matters to you.


65c49a  No.15975636

File: e12298f55db515c⋯.jpg (104 KB, 1099x499, 1099:499, y9ceb.jpg)

>>15975619

> You're free to do whatever you want.

sounds like that pisses you off

>everything else in post No.15975619

boy I sure do love pionless semantics.


bf4bee  No.15975641

>>15975619

It matters because freedom of speech has to be largely absolute. As soon as you concede that something should be banned it opens up the can of worms of where to draw the line, and you cannot reach a concensus. The best approach is to be as liberal as possible and make people responsible for what they want to see and hear, and harden the fuck up enough to tolerate seeing what they don't necessarily want to.

Also while yes, Valve and Sony are technically allowed to decide what's on their platforms, that's actually a problem for the consumer because they are gatekeepers, especially console makers. It's also a stupid decision on their part because if you want to be the platform used for games, you must be stable. Moves like this will make developers not want to use them because what's the point if they are randomly going to decide that pretty girl tits are suddenly a no-no, and suddenly your game can't be put on there.

You don't need Usenet notation here fagboy.


65c49a  No.15975660

File: bd7d0146cdab1e8⋯.jpg (173.36 KB, 2048x1546, 1024:773, 64.jpg)

>>15975633

>You're operating under the assumption that virtue signalling is a bad thing,

because it is, it's a false moral stance made by hypocrites that use it as a weapon.

>To certain aspect it's a good thing because it keeps our virtues in check.

tell that to godless homosexual communists bent on destroying western civilization that use it as a social battering ram.

>majority of the people here will keep using Steam but they just want to "signal" that they're displeased with Steam.

assumption

>I'm telling you that this issue isn't as much of a deal-breaker as some of you may seem to think.

yes, we already know you're a hypocrite thanks

>And it's certainly not as political as you're making it out to be.

making such a statement points to you either being completely ignorant of major events from the last decade or you're willfully lying because you have an agenda

>calling me "corporatist"(?) because I don't care about anime porn. Surely you can see how that's out of place at best.

I'm calling you a corporatist because you support a corporate entities vague nonsense policy and erratic behavior, instead of the consumers (the ones actually paying for the service) but you're right corporatist probably doesn't fit you. you are likely something much worse.


f89572  No.15975661

>>15975339

>muh private company, can do whatever they want

it's not. stop spreading this garbage myth.


2f2bf7  No.15975664

>>15975592

did you pay no attention to the Umman Manda of the Internet?

Being an authoritarian is all fun and games until you get an insurgency intent on your complete destruction of brand value.


a74c9a  No.15975686

File: d7f4b45af25eded⋯.jpg (44.58 KB, 488x867, 488:867, DZvrwfRWsAAIeV_.jpg)

>>15975593

You'd think you people would've realized by now how many of those indie developers (and by extension, the usual suspects on twitter) are weebs who are embarassed that they're weebs because they largely exist within a vacuum (whether it's Something Awful or SJW-twitter) where enjoying anime, or at least without critiquing it at every turn to dissuade people from thinking you're into the wrong kind of anime (in terms of anime-related content creators, two great examples of this would be Mother's Basement (who whined about anime girls having big tits for 30-40 minutes straight) or Akidearest (who despite having a channel that is basically weebdom supreme, up to including having a japanese boyfriend (because of course) she's made videos about how anime is ~so~ sexist). It's not neccesarily always that you simply claim to love a form of media that you otherwise seem to utterly despise (although this certainly happens plenty) but rather these people largely being a bunch of lonely nerds who don't want to be cast out of the Cool Kid's Club for enjoy "schlock", and so their virtue-signalling extends not just to their politics but to their tastes as well, because if they don't incessantly show off how cool and different their tastes are, they believe they'll be thrown out - and with the usual suspects, it's highly likely they actually would be.

To use two other forms of media as an example of what I mean, it's like bragging about how you only listen to cool bands like Blasphemy and Celtic Frost when you actually have a soft spot for Slipknot, but admitting that would make people make fun of you for not being an authentic enough metalhead. It's like insisting you only like Tarkovsky and Hirozaku Koreeda because you also happen to have a soft spot for Michael Bay flicks that you're deeply ashamed of having, and so put on this mask of being 'above it', not just to convince the world around you but yourself.


7490f7  No.15975752

>>15975641

>It matters because freedom of speech has to be largely absolute

Yeah but this only applies to the American government, which still has its own exceptions. I'm no expert on American law but I believe the exceptions include (but are not limited to)

- Inciting violence

- Yelling "fire" when there is none (I don't know the legal name for this)

- Slander

- Releasing footage from private land

- Child porn

- Shit like indecent exposure I suppose

And most of Europe has these as well, plus some extras (Genocide denial, Nazi imagery, etc)

But as I said, this is the government. Steam is a company- but you've heard this defense a million times already.

>That's actually a problem for the consumer because they are gatekeepers, especially console makers.

I disagree with the sentiment that Steam is a "gatekeeper".

Sony and Microsoft can tell you to fuck off if you want to make a PS/XBOX game, but Valve can not tell you to fuck off if you intend to make a PC game. You can still distribute your games on your own, the way a lot of MMORPGs and indie games still do.

>Moves like this will make developers not want to use them because what's the point if they are randomly going to decide that pretty girl tits are suddenly a no-no, and suddenly your game can't be put on there.

Let's be real though, Valve's actions upon ecchi/hentai games won't affect 90+% of developers. And obviously Valve is okay with that >10% of developers going "oh shit, we need a backup plan and/or abandon Steam", because otherwise they wouldn't do this.

On a final note I've been getting a lot of "I'm not angry you're angry" replies. I honestly do not care if people boycott Valve over this. As I said, I don't care about 2D titties. I just find it odd that a lot of people are bringing legality onto this when Valve is clearly within its legal boundaries. You can boycott them, but having wet dreams about suing them is retarded (I'm not directing this at (you), just some of the other people that have been replying)


e41536  No.15975755

>>15975296

>moe reversi banned from steam

Let me guess, they stole hentai pics for their shovelware, then tried to play victim when their game got banned for this.


aef684  No.15975775

File: 23f97d2521cb98f⋯.png (21.95 KB, 1207x199, 1207:199, palemoon_2019-01-10_07-29-….png)

File: af1bd90040fdc30⋯.jpg (1.01 MB, 1734x1287, 578:429, Operator-chan.jpg)

>>15975752

>As I said, I don't care about 2D titties.

Says the one that believes that equates loli and child pornography.

>politics 2 strong for this case

You are partly right about this given the case and the bandwagonings anons let themselves go at times, but this incident is not isolated.

Titles worth a play would be swept up right along unless there was a big enough pushback (Hatred) and that itself is unlikely given the public of VNs are much more reduced, incurring in anons getting ticked on principle.

Also had a good laugh at how 'shitholes have actual problems' mentality: I come from such a place and can tell you censorship is a strange monster that creeps up unevenly, and the first world anon is rightfully seeing this as political given that the creator's ability to profit from their work is getting threatened left and right with pay methods getting pulled as soon as the denouncers identify services they've managed to decry and network towards away from problematic content.


bf4bee  No.15975777

>>15975752

>I disagree with the sentiment that Steam is a "gatekeeper".

Technically Google Play isn't a gatekeeper either since most Android phones allow third-party stuff like F-Droid and the DMM app installer. But their sheer presence makes it almost required to be on there to sell your game digitally even if you don't agree with the platform. Not so much with regards to 18+ games since there's plenty more accepted options than that but if they pull a Sony then that's really going to hurt some of the smaller Japanese devs, and those are already suffering with the PS4.

>which still has its own exceptions.

The exceptions typically involve or very strongly correlate to criminal offenses or privacy and are sensible. This is the critical difference between lolicon and child pornography which is not demonstrated to make people more likely to fuck children and does not require that to produce it. But yes this is only true in the USA and frankly, more countries need to learn from the First and Second Amendment. Also though to learn from their horrible example that is also doesn't matter when you will get lynched for holding a problematic opinion.

>but you've heard this defense a million times already.

I've heard it but I only actually agree with it when the platforms are diverse. The current World Wide Web is disgusting in terms of its original design, because you have a few big places like Google and Facebook making up the majority of the content. Places like this barely even register.


cd7d69  No.15975790

>>15975339

You know, I know you may have a compelling argument. But I also know people who believe the things you do are also the people who would screech and moan if a competitor actually did show up and threaten your beloved brands, meaning you will not live up to your own beliefs and would wish and/or work very hard to trash any competition so that your beloved brands may keep their stranglehold on the market. So I really do not care for what you think.


9d4209  No.15975795

>>15975339

ICANN can't deplatform anybody, they don't actually control backend shit, they just set standards they have no power to actuall enforce.

That being said, domain registrars and hosts can do what you describe/are implying here.

The bottom line is that the internet is too important and too criticsl to society to just leave up to privatre corporaqtions and entities like this. There needs to be some sort of regulation that backend services can't politce content, the same way that a water or electrical company can't. There's no way that's gonna fucking happen though when we can't even get ISP's to be regulated that way, though.


aef684  No.15975800


7490f7  No.15975837

>>15975775

>Says the one that believes that equates loli and child pornography.

I've reclarified my position on this multiple times, you're practically attacking a strawman at this point.


aef684  No.15975848

File: b0b8a319674cdeb⋯.png (1.5 KB, 382x22, 191:11, japanese_drawing_bad.png)

>>15975837

Your wording stood firm though.


7490f7  No.15975864

>>15975848

Do you know what "fictional" means?


aef684  No.15975865

>>15975864

Do you know what Child Pornography means?


9a96fb  No.15975874

File: 3e6563202146a26⋯.jpg (28.22 KB, 419x610, 419:610, 3e6563202146a260c733a54792….jpg)

>>15975865

Anon are you fucking retarded? Its still child porn even if it didnt happen in real life. Its still a murder of a character even if that character doesnt exist and no one actually got murdered. This is some grade a mental gymnastics. Its fictional homosexuality but doesnt stop it from being homosexual.


aef684  No.15975888

File: c6e5f2dbdc7c3e3⋯.png (65.25 KB, 562x664, 281:332, ceos.png)

File: aad240ca92c75e4⋯.png (65.06 KB, 748x523, 748:523, cv96.png)

>>15975874

>this image again

I should've paid more attention to the filename shills callout

Anyway:

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/child-pornography

http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV96.pdf

also, you mixed up your traps speech in there at the end.


2f2380  No.15975893

>>15975888

I think that's actually not being serious, but sadly Poe's Law is in full effect these days.


9a96fb  No.15975897

>>15975888

Its still a fictional depiction of child pornography how fucking dense do you have to be to not understand this?


7490f7  No.15975911

>>15975865

If you commit a fictional crime, do you go to jail?

Of course not.

So I don't understand why you think "Fictional child porn" is the same thing as "child porn". I think adding "fictional" in front differentiates it enough, because if something is "fictional" it's not real. But apparently you think both are the same?


aef684  No.15975912

File: a01cc8c3cde898c⋯.jpg (142.19 KB, 1001x958, 1001:958, KoF_shiggy.jpg)

>>15975897

Learn2read or check my trips, faggot.


9a96fb  No.15975916

>>15975912

And it being applied to fiction doesnt suddenly negate what it represents, you stupid dense motherfucker.

Is fictional faggot porn suddenly not faggot porn?


9a96fb  No.15975918

>also checking your own digits


091667  No.15975931

File: 1bfe881bfbe5fbb⋯.png (1.02 MB, 640x719, 640:719, anniemay.png)

But the children OP! The children are being exploited!


aef684  No.15975936

>>15975911

>if something is "fictional" it's not real

>Fictional Depiction of Child Pornography

On a serious note, a depiction would consist of drawing the abuse of a child in the production of cp. But you yourself can surmise 'moral fair use' of a work with that description (concrete encased girl doujins could apply at the point we're conversing, I think she was middle school)

>>15975916

CP is about the exploitation of children. Loli and a sizeable amount of western art is not about that.


9a96fb  No.15975943

>>15975936

So you were being autistic about the technicality. So if it isnt fictional guy films children having sex then its not fictional CP. Then its just fictional child sex whoop dee doo faggot.


7490f7  No.15975945

>>15975911

> a depiction would consist of drawing the abuse of a child in the production of cp

A child being recorded and raped with his/her consent is still cp, so I don't understand where you're coming from.

Look nigger. If it's a sex-focused media, it's porn. If it has underage people in it, they're children. If they're cartoon characters, it's fictional.

Loli fictional cp. Fictional cp is not criminalised as much as cp is, since it's a "victimless crime". But legality doesn't change the fact it's fictional cp.


7d0429  No.15975953

>>15975945

>with his/her consent

Children cant consent, Jamal.


7490f7  No.15975955

>>15975953

That's why I said "Rape", habibi.


db35b1  No.15975960

video games


7490f7  No.15975962

>>15975945

meant for >>15975936

>>15975955

And to reclarify this: children can say "yes" but that doesn't mean jack shit- anyone who says otherwise is a disgusting pedo unironically.

and so whether a child is being physically/verbally abused or not does not matter in any context. it's still cp, unlike what >>15975936 implied


695393  No.15975965

>>15975960

being banned.


db35b1  No.15975969

>>15975965

>being removed from steam = being banned

epic


d2e6bf  No.15975970

>>15975339

Except they actually made a press release saying that they were changing their policies to do exactly that. I think because the filters aren't yet in place they are basically holding off and still enforcing the old code of conduct for devs.

I guess we will see in the future.


7d0429  No.15975971

>>15975969

You think these literally who developers could otherwise get even a tenth of the exposure on any other platform? I think not.


9a96fb  No.15975973

>>15975971

>Selling games didnt exist before steam


7d0429  No.15975976

>>15975973

The markets are completely incomparable now, what is your point?

If you want exposure now you go on steam, if you dont you get no exposure, its not a hard concept to grasp.


db35b1  No.15975979

>>15975971

I don't really care. Steam can suck my dick, and if they're gonna ban things they don't like it's their loss.


9a96fb  No.15975984

>>15975976

>If you want exposure now you go on steam, if you dont you get no exposure, its not a hard concept to grasp.

You you know, you can actually market your game, not just place it in a market place and have that do the marketing for you.


2f2380  No.15975985

>>15975973

Jesus you are totally missing the point. It's the same problem as the USA media concentration where the majority of TV channels are controlled by maybe 5 major corps. In Australia almost all the newspapers are controlled by two players.

With video games, Steam is THE place to get video games digitally, so if it's shutting out content, it really hurts developers who want to include it.


aef684  No.15975986

File: 0b123dc583d3581⋯.jpg (730.49 KB, 1165x1176, 1165:1176, __akitsu_maru_kantai_colle….jpg)

The best to come out of this thread would be thoughts about alternative or pay processing solid enough to withstand mass denouncement.

It's looking a bit grim since crypto has been an investor meme for over a year and a bursting bubble for some months, on top of the MasterCard and Chokepoint Operation de-platformings.

While Patreon has been happily cutting off users and the alternatives are taking hits -apparently, forgot the name of the emerging competitor: and other than that I only know of Liberapay- but open hat crowdfunding while ill suited for particular products like vidya looks somewhat solid.

This is one important aspect because decentralization isn't possible without juggling with cryptocurrencies and that's volatile on top of cumbersome (wanting to donate a 'cheers' after pirating only to find you need to put $7 in to give the guy $2)

>>15975945

Please read >>15975888 your personal opinion is yours to hold, from the get go you have tried to apply it on the actions of others.

>>15975969

>>15975979

We are gonna see some banning as far as direct advertisement and availability goes alright.

Deplatforming is done very quickly so I can't even see 'I worked on that game and you can donate to me out of your charity with no relation to that [here]'


7d0429  No.15975991

>>15975979

Except the loss is not the developer, Valve doesnt give a shit about this game that could make them maybe 10k dollars max over 10 or so years. Its chump change and thats why Valve can afford to censor these type of games.

Meanwhile the devs go from making small amount of money to none at all.


9a96fb  No.15975997

>>15975985

And you are always complaining about how Steam controls the market yet when I suggest somebody should work against that suddenly its a problem.


7490f7  No.15976000

>>15975986

>Please read >>15975888 your personal opinion is yours to hold, from the get go you have tried to apply it on the actions of others.

You don't understand. I literally am not making a legal argument. I could if I wanted to, since loli is banned in some American states and a lot of countries. But I am not.

A cartoon porn with children is literally fictional child porn. You can call it whatever you want, but in the end the content is not a matter of personal opinion. You're wanking it to cartoon children getting you-know-whatted. The simplest expression for that is "Fictional Child Porn". If you're rejecting that fact, you're in denial.

It is literally fictional child porn. You can not make an argument against that other than saying "that's not the legal definition of child porn", which is stupid. It's like saying "fictional depiction of theft is not the legal definition of thievery". Fucking obviously; that's why we call it fictional.

And as I've said; I'm not trying to make a legal argument here, so argument is irrelevant even if it were valid.

You can not come up with a non-legal argument against the fact that loli is fictional child porn.


db35b1  No.15976006

>>15976000

>getting you-know-whatted

>too afraid to say fucked

hello soy


7490f7  No.15976010

>>15976006

>not saying "children getting fucked" is being a soyboy

8ch in 2k18


2f2380  No.15976012

>>15975997

A game doesn't have to be exclusive to Steam. So given that they are the PC gaming environment, it's in everyone's interests that they are not being capricious or bad and ideologies don't matter for shit if you intend to make video games for a living.


db35b1  No.15976014


7d0429  No.15976017

>>15976010

Who else could possibly think of censoring their own words?


7490f7  No.15976021

File: c3d54a956329117⋯.jpg (19.44 KB, 456x320, 57:40, 1538677832298.jpg)

>>15976014

>18

my brain in 2k19


831bd5  No.15976023

>>15976000

>You can not come up with a non-legal argument against the fact that loli is fictional child porn.

Here's one: I'm attracted to loli, but not actual children. The reason that I am attracted to loli must therefor lie in the differences, rather than the similarities that it has to actual child porn.


7490f7  No.15976029

>>15976023

That's an argument against you being a pedo, not loli being fictional cp. What you enjoy in loli does very little to change its contents, which is essentially fictional children getting fucked (typing in bold so big boyz think im cool)


9a96fb  No.15976030

>>15976012

I'm still right though. Next time you complain about Steam remember that if not devs wont make money.


aef684  No.15976039

File: 53cff77f5f2e832⋯.png (1.41 MB, 1097x1200, 1097:1200, blonde_doremi_00.png)

File: 0e398cf6015fc6d⋯.png (1.25 MB, 1000x1200, 5:6, blonde_doremi_01.png)

File: e5a172ff24908e9⋯.png (1.14 MB, 825x1200, 11:16, blonde_doremi_02.png)

>>15976000

Doubling down on loli->child porn, oppai loli->child porn and Coming Soon: attractive looking drawings->child porn.

Nice show 000man, enjoy fighting the good fight for the collectors of realist+grotesque art that happen to have life-like children on it.

I wish I was thoroughly into loli like >>15976023 instead of just what I consider the good stuff, but useful idiots like you are one of the reasons Loli stands as a big coal mine canary.


db35b1  No.15976042

>>15976030

>OYYYY VEY STEAM DID NOTHING WRONG, STEAM IS THE ONLY REASON ANY VIDEO GAME DEVELOPER MAKES ANY MONEY!

kill yourself kike


7490f7  No.15976043

>>15976039

Slippery slope fallacy. No one is going start claiming literal adult anime shits are children just because. And people who do say that will be made fun of.

loli is child porn. Oppai loli is more of a gray area, I admit. but just because the line isn't strictly drawn doesn't mean it's moving.


831bd5  No.15976045

>>15976029

And if I can like loli and not be a pedo then loli must not be the same thing as pedo, QED.


831bd5  No.15976047

>>15976043

>No one is going start claiming literal adult anime shits are children just because.

South Korea already does that though, so I'd say there's plenty of precedent.


aef684  No.15976054

File: 45ade3c28466eda⋯.png (257.25 KB, 720x457, 720:457, smug_idol.png)

>>15976043

>Slippery slope fallacy

>No one is going start claiming literal adult anime shits are children just because

You exceed my expectations.


2f2380  No.15976059

>>15976042

That's not what he or I are saying you mouth-breather. To put it in different terms, it's like making a PC game but for Linux only because you hate Windows. You could, but the reality is that you're losing a shitload of potential customers. Steam is in a similar position as Windows.


9a96fb  No.15976060

File: 194b09007c083bd⋯.jpg (516.17 KB, 1794x1810, 897:905, 108cd916372eb149b314255298….jpg)

>>15976042

>being this fucking anxious to accuse somebody of something that you dont even read the conversation


7490f7  No.15976066

>>15976054

Not an argument


aef684  No.15976072

File: 4ae15db4d7b6641⋯.jpg (393.87 KB, 1280x1656, 160:207, StrikeWitches_smug_brown.jpg)

>>15976066

The arguments were laid out previously, you just haven't wrapped your head around them.


7490f7  No.15976079

>>15976072

>It's not fictional child porn because fictional child porn is child porn, and since this is fictional it's not child porn

Yes, you're truly a galaxy brain.

How hard is it to say "If a child is getting fucked, and that child is drawn/animated, it's fictional child porn"? You're literally coming up with excuses such as "If we call that fictional child porn, then adults getting fucked is fictional child porn as well!" or "Fictional crimes are not legal crimes, so you can not call it a fictional crime!"

Average 8chan user is a landwhale but you're truly an olympian in gymnastics.


b45fa7  No.15976080

File: e0f5f7bedd6454e⋯.jpg (11.2 KB, 225x225, 1:1, sweating dook.jpg)


b1ff07  No.15976088

File: 4381513f37a992a⋯.jpg (87.05 KB, 713x717, 713:717, 4381513f37a992a0076b01fc38….jpg)

Why does the debate always center on loli and not underage characters in general?

I don't see why pornographic representations of other underage characters like those from Evangalion or K-on for example should be for some reason exempt.


f2aafc  No.15976094

>>15975874

>>15975874

>Its still a murder of a character even if that character doesnt exist and no one actually got murdered.

>This is some grade a mental gymnastics.

The fucking irony. Where do you utter niggers come from?


7d0429  No.15976096

>>15976088

loli is a body-type, not an age.


9a96fb  No.15976099

>>15976094

>purposefully ignoring the meaning of "fiction" to repeat the same shit over and over again


2f2380  No.15976105

>>15976099

>still screeching over this triviality in terminology

Just stop already it's gotten to the point you need to go and do something else if you're that bored.


9a96fb  No.15976110

>>15976088

Because a loli always is a child' body while you can have a 10 year old that looks like a 25 year old magazine model. Thats kinda the point, the fictional age doesnt mean shit only the looks.

>>15976105

It was very much the other anon who was trying to be extremely specific even though it didnt matter.

>stop kinkshaming me


831bd5  No.15976121

>>15976110

You can't really even call it a child's body. It's child-like for anime, but anime is sufficiently different from 3dpd that they don't even share that many similarities.


56aacb  No.15976124

>>15976079

Because drawings can't be children, they're drawings.


9a96fb  No.15976132

File: 441ed7d41e0a255⋯.gif (601.39 KB, 307x500, 307:500, 441ed7d41e0a25578b1b543e5b….gif)

>>15976121

There is definitely a real life equivalent age-range of the body. I'm no expert on underage female bodies but from what I've seen its in the range between early puberty loli and borderline toddlercon lolis.


f2aafc  No.15976133

>>15976110

So what's your end-game? Are you just pointlessly arguing semantics or are you like the other fag up there screeching about how "it doesn't affect me, so I don't care if someone else gets censored so long as it isn't me"?

Your entire argument is disingenuous as fuck and it's written all over you. You intentionally are using loaded terms and thinking adding "fictional" before it is somehow a sufficient enough veil to say that apples are in fact oranges if you look at them long enough.

3DPD =/= 2D you fucking nigger.


7490f7  No.15976137

>>15976124

>"drawings of children aren't actually drawings of children, they're just drawings"

This board has peaked


9a96fb  No.15976141

>>15976133

My point is that its a shit fetish equivalent to faggotry and it being fictional doesnt change the fact that its shit and pedophilic.


f2aafc  No.15976146

File: 376ea5c948de434⋯.jpg (387.33 KB, 579x567, 193:189, 376ea5c948de4340511c6e36da….jpg)

>>15976141

>My point is that its a shit fetish equivalent to faggotry

Thanks for sharing your meaningless opinion. Now go back to tumblr.


7490f7  No.15976154

File: dc7d8f4953efdaa⋯.png (930.93 KB, 935x785, 187:157, 1542638679099.png)

>>15976146

>faggotry is bad

<ok then go back to tumblr


831bd5  No.15976156

>>15976132

There are similarities, but there are a lot more differences. Even anime toddlers tend to have more in common with real life adults than they do real life babies. In terms of overall shape and features, really the only thing that generally defines their age is their height and breast size.

We've all seen the graphic comparing anime faces with grey aliens. The face does not look human at all. Similarly, the proportions and outline do not match a real human. Nothing about an anime character is really human at all, we've just been told that "this is human" so many times that we believe it.


9a96fb  No.15976166

File: 2707b6af8b5bfd2⋯.jpg (59.74 KB, 788x788, 1:1, 2707b6af8b5bfd2ce1bac0e5b6….jpg)

>>15976146

or you can face the fact that your fetish is like faggotry to the non-mentally ill and you should cull your furry tier behavior

>>15976156

>Even anime toddlers tend to have more in common with real life adults than they do real life babies. In terms of overall shape and features, really the only thing that generally defines their age is their height and breast size.

Anon thats plain bullshit. Unless of course its some ultra childlike looking character adults aka moeblob garbage.

>We've all seen the graphic comparing anime faces with grey aliens. The face does not look human at all. Similarly, the proportions and outline do not match a real human. Nothing about an anime character is really human at all, we've just been told that "this is human" so many times that we believe it.

Visual liberties does not mean it lacks visual cues that make us identify what the drawing is suppose to be.


9196b3  No.15976170

Arguing about fictionalized depictions of sexualized minors being bad/wrong/immoral/dangerous is ultimately fruitless, as no scientific body has been able to test whether or not the availability of such content makes it more or less likely that someone might commit a crime against an actual adolescent. The best one could do would be to look at other fictionalized fetish porn and see whether or not its existence reinforces negative actions, and then extrapolate it to conclude that lolicon/shotacon might have a similar effect, but this too is ultimately fruitless imo, as there are far more significant factors that affect whether or not someone breaks the law or hurts another person than just what porn they look at.

Personally I don't think the existence of fictional content encourages people to seek out the fiction in real life in general. It only affects those that are already a little unstable, and realistically there's no way to avoid those outliers. Some people are just fucked in the head and you never know what's going to trigger them into action.


322238  No.15976172

>steam was never a platform for this kind of content to begin with

>YO WTF DEY CENSORING SHIEEEEEEEEET

I don't know why your so surprised.


aef684  No.15976178

File: 2b1e413eb83a23c⋯.png (393.36 KB, 1233x515, 1233:515, weeb_storefronts.png)

I can't see a good available work around for creators in a though spot, so I'm walking away with available storefronts pointed out by

>>15975317

>>15975331

pruned from image but saved for future reference: >>15975319

>>15976133

At this point it's either the demonizing of loli or the normalization of cp as umbrella term. Note how he doesn't bring up realistic/grotesque 'artistic' depiction of victims kids.

>>15976172

Things don't happen in a vacuum anon: 'The Future of Adult Games on Steam'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjd8r059m5c

https://invidio.us/watch?v=Fjd8r059m5c


f71988  No.15976179

File: d2032d0694c7826⋯.png (590.43 KB, 697x697, 1:1, d2032d0694c7826ba5bfa43421….png)

Here's a somewhat radical idea:

What if they just remove ALL games with political views and fetishes of any kind, and focus on fun video games alone?


9a96fb  No.15976185

File: c97a7813d8ad6cb⋯.png (130.14 KB, 400x300, 4:3, 538bd04c4286fa395bf90ee3c3….png)

>>15976178

>Note how he doesn't bring up realistic/grotesque 'artistic' depiction of victims kids.

What about it?


dcc73a  No.15976188

File: 9912b7a3f03de8a⋯.jpg (129.59 KB, 500x565, 100:113, Ah this makes way more sen….jpg)

>>15976141

Regardless of whether it's shit or pedophelic. There is technically a fix, see picture. As far as I know they haven't outlawed sexual depictions of midgets and dwarves (yet). If a 3DP midget can get away with it, then why not a two-dimensional fictional one?


cef379  No.15976189

File: 28f57d26550276a⋯.jpg (30.17 KB, 540x405, 4:3, 30c8cb8d5a1da76d13838048f8….jpg)


f2aafc  No.15976190

>>15976166

To quote your like-minded nigger buddy earlier: Not an argument. You still don't belong here no matter how many times you try to associate something you don't like with faggotry in a weak attempt to consensus crack.

>>15976179

Steam can't even hold itself to its own guidelines. What makes you think they can be a judge on what is fun?


9a96fb  No.15976208

>>15976190

>You still don't belong here no matter how many times you try to associate something you don't like with faggotry in a weak attempt to consensus crack.

>having to appeal to consensus to try and argue with somebody

Now that just sad.

>>15976188

> There is technically a fix, see picture

That doesnt mean shit, its still looks and represents a child, and your attraction isnt towards an arbitrary number, its towards the child-like body. You could say a busty and curvy drawn girl is 2 and doesnt change the fact you are attracted to the body not the fucking number. And i'm not talking about some direct real world implication, i'm talking about the fact that its still a shit fetish and you should be bullied for eating shit.


7490f7  No.15976209

>>15976170

Contrary to what people may think I don't care if people watch loli or not, as long as you're not hurting anyone.

I just dislike that they're in total denial. It's a simple fact that loli hentai depicts underage children in sexual situations. "Cartoon children in sexual situations" is a long ass way of saying "Fictional child porn". I don't know why someone would want to refute that when it's such a simple case.


f2aafc  No.15976224

>>15976208

>Now that just sad.

What's sad is your lack of arguments and the fact that you continue to post.


dcc73a  No.15976227

File: 829bb8e2080b06c⋯.jpg (49.18 KB, 500x374, 250:187, DcT6hoAWsAcT97x.jpg)

>>15976208

Normal sized people have sex and get married to midgets and dwarves all the are you going to call them pedophiles? (just because you don't approve of their body style?) which is kind of fuck up since those people were born that way they can't control their size. Why are you such a bigot? Here now she's a twenty-year-old dragon person. You can't possibly have any objections to that.


dcc73a  No.15976237

>>15976209

Eh, just because a character is short or has a flat chest that doesn't necessarily mean they are underage. Like a dead or alive character Marie Rose. There's tons of porn of her out there and none of its considered pedophile even though her body type doesn't necessarily look like the rest of the cast. (tall large breasted women).


0663f1  No.15976243

File: c4080f7023cf6b7⋯.png (77.53 KB, 739x686, 739:686, steam autist.png)

File: c72344b50c47b7c⋯.png (26.02 KB, 691x318, 691:318, steam autist 2.png)

File: d7dc7ca40b9d96c⋯.png (17.43 KB, 631x123, 631:123, steam autist 8.png)

File: b49da4b28d3a884⋯.png (5.13 KB, 424x56, 53:7, steam autist 7.png)

>le Facebook for video games

Who cares? just pirate all your games bro! Even if all these weebshit "games" are getting censored you can always rally the endless amounts of weebs that steam has and get them to sperg out about it. everyone knows steam cracks under pressure to do what the community wants (except for making games)


9a96fb  No.15976244

File: 6a78714dd236e45⋯.png (34.9 KB, 625x626, 625:626, 5bc.png)

>>15976224

>Dismisses all my arguments with a fallacy and then proceed to act like I'm the one without arguments.

>>15976227

>Normal sized people have sex and get married to midgets and dwarves all the are you going to call them pedophiles?

No, they are just mentally ill like you, just another type. Midgets dont look like children they look like squashed adults, loli looks like children.

> (just because you don't approve of their body style?)

That body type shows that they are inappropriate for mating, same as loli, or are the same sex body as yours.

Dont think you are clever, though.


831bd5  No.15976247

>>15976208

If I were attracted to a childlike body I would be attracted to 3dpd children. Since I'm not, that's nothing but a false equivalence.


9a96fb  No.15976253

>>15976247

You could say that you are only attracted to drawn men getting fucked in the ass and not real ones. Doesnt change the fact that you are a faggot.


dcc73a  No.15976257

>>15976243

The main reason to want the game is sold in America, is because America can have official uncensored hentai where as Japanese versions always have to have a mosaic or some other type of censorship, and that's lame. I doubt the American version of Bible black would have been nearly as popular if everything had been Mosaic to hell and back. Or if everything was covered by black bars


2f2380  No.15976265

>>15976257

On the other hand, decensoring sometimes reveals that the artist slacked off when drawing those parts since they only need to sorta look like a dick.


dcc73a  No.15976272

File: 30a52a7a12f0381⋯.jpg (769.05 KB, 1422x1431, 158:159, 356562.jpg)

>>15976244

Real children don't have eye sockets that take up over 40% of their skull. They also don't have tiny little non-existent noses or pointy chins. If that's what a child looks like to you that I think you have eye problems. Also don't give me your fake ass Eugenics bullshit Klaus, if you actually cared about purity as much as you say you do you wouldn't be on a video game board arguing about Japanese videogames. You'd be in the hood performing abortions 24/7 free of charge.


dcc73a  No.15976279

>>15976265

That's why uncensored hentai is a good thing. Keeps artists honest and from getting lazy with their Anatomy. Even when H artists were making OVAs in the 80s they new that one day their artwork might be shown uncensored so they actually made sure the original cells were detailed.


f2aafc  No.15976285

>>15976244

>no u dont have an argument

>when his entire shtick can be summed up with "you're basically a mentally ill faggot", again in a weak attempt to associate loli with faggotry which is more looked down upon

You're as transparent as much as you glow.

>loli looks like children

Attributing anything anime styled with terms otherwise associated with real life humans (like child porn), whether you add the word "fictional" before it or not, is either nothing but plain retardation at best, or disingenuous as fuck to further some kind of agenda at worst.

You would have had some ground for an argument if the subject matter was realistically drawn children, but it is not.


9a96fb  No.15976286

>>15976272

>eugenics

>not wanting to fuck something weird is now eugenics

Anon I…

>Real children don't have eye sockets that take up over 40% of their skull.

Its called visual cues that make you identify what the drawing is.

And again, a drawn male doesnt really look like a real male but its still faggotry if you are attracted to it.


2f2380  No.15976295

>>15976279

Sadly you're right. I have to wonder for art that is fully censored by default (non-H scenes I mean) how many artists still draw the parts or omit them.

>>15976286

>>15976285

Jesus Christ can you just get off the Internet for a bit you're going around in circles.


9a96fb  No.15976300

>>15976295

Were are going around in circles because the faggot is so deep in denial he keeps saying the same shit worded differently so I have to repeat myself.


dcc73a  No.15976307

File: fbbce8cfddb9d3e⋯.jpg (175.92 KB, 800x1103, 800:1103, hyper-realistic-pencil-dra….jpg)

File: 3d7a842b4bf0e61⋯.jpeg (5.3 KB, 212x238, 106:119, images (4).jpeg)

File: 2791df1487d4a7f⋯.jpeg (180.03 KB, 721x714, 103:102, MaTJv6ZX5EqffVvWGuiK_1082….jpeg)

>>15976286

You're the one that started mentioning what's appropriate for mating. You can't reproduce with fictional two dimensional drawings, so I'm not sure why you're even bringing up what's appropriate mating material.

>And again, a drawn male doesnt really look like a real male but its still faggotry if you are attracted to it.

There are some pretty amazing artists that can render photo-realistic man with nothing but a pencil. Denying that only continues to demonstrate your extreme lack of knowledge about anything you speak of.


0143d1  No.15976312

>>15976272

You see anon he has perfect taste and if you like anything he doesn't you deserve to be killed because everything he doesn't like is a mental illness and people with mental illnesses should be killed. This goes for videogames too so you should really change your mind avout your tastes because you're arguing with someone with perfect taste


dcc73a  No.15976313

>>15976300

The only person in denial here is you. Maybe you're the one with the attraction to Children since you apparently see them everywhere. I bet grey aliens look like children to you.


f2aafc  No.15976314

>>15976300

This discussion if you can call it that at this point goes in circles because you have nothing but non-arguments to spout.


dcc73a  No.15976325

>>15976312

I'm pretty sure that anon is just extremely solipsistic (Like a feminist) so they've deluded deluded themselves into thinking they have perfect taste. It's pretty common among the mentally ill.


2f2380  No.15976326

>>15976300

If you're just disliking loli nobody cares. If you're arguing it's equal to CP you are an idiot and few on here will agree to seeing it censored. In any case this thread also relates to adult content in general so kindly take this whole loli discussion somewhere else. It's noise.


dcc73a  No.15976337

>>15976326

That's the problem with these shills though, they want to equate any type of anime style porn or erotica with CP that's why they always bring it up. At the end of the day they just want censorship of the anime art style because they hate anime.


9a96fb  No.15976358

>>15976307

>You're the one that started mentioning what's appropriate for mating.

Because thats what sexuality is based on. If would be attracted to sumething if you didnt believe you could mate with it. But that in itself isnt eugenics.

>You can't reproduce with fictional two dimensional drawings, so I'm not sure why you're even bringing up what's appropriate mating material.

You brain doesnt know that. Thats why it still find drawings attractive.

>here are some pretty amazing artists that can render photo-realistic man with nothing but a pencil.

How does this even serve your argument? If anything it could help me. It would something I can use as a strawman, which I dont, because its a strawman.

Now tell why are you pussy-footing so hard around and avoiding to address that being attracted to drawn men is homosexual?

>>15976313

Visual cues.

Stop pretending to be retarded.

>>15976314

If they are such non-arguments why are you having such a hard time disputing them?


9a96fb  No.15976365

IS BEING ATTRACTED TO DRAWN MEN HOMOSEXUAL OR NOT?

ANSWER YOU STUPID SHIT


f2aafc  No.15976380

File: 3880c6ef6879e42⋯.jpg (53.47 KB, 463x293, 463:293, 3880c6ef6879e42a6aa7ffe0f6….jpg)

>>15976358

You have already admitted yourself to having no other end-game than to shitpost about "your taste > everyone else"

The only reason I reply is because I don't want retardation like yours to seem acceptable here.

>>15976365

>resorting to screeching


dcc73a  No.15976393

>>15976358

>Because thats what sexuality is based on. If would be attracted to sumething if you didnt believe you could mate with it. But that in itself isnt eugenics.

Homosexuals know they can't mate with each other yet they're attracted to the same sex. Your argument doesn't make any sense

>You brain doesnt know that. Thats why it still find drawings attractive.

Maybe your brain can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy but anybody with a functional piece of gray matter can deduce reality from fantasy. Do you honestly believe that human beings can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy? Stop pretending you're a neurosurgeon. You're nowhere close understanding the workings of the human brain. Just regurgitating bits and pieces of data you don't fully understand.

>How does this even serve your argument? If anything it could help me. It would something I can use as a strawman, which I dont, because its a strawman.

You're the one that said a drawing couldn't look anything like a man, that's just more proof you're wrong. Regardless functioning human brain can tell the difference between a drawing had an actual person and if you look closely you can also tell it's not a photograph.

>Now tell why are you pussy-footing so hard around and avoiding to address that being attracted to drawn men is homosexual?

When was this discussion about homosexuality? why are you so obsessed with homosexuals? and why do you keep equating drawings in the anime style to homosexuality or furries or whatever type of degeneracy you keep trying to push?

>Visual cues.

>Stop pretending to be retarded.

Visual cues are meaningless without context or actual stimuli. A healthy adult male will respond to the visual cues of an ovulating female. That's not possible with a drawing.

>If they are such non-arguments why are you having such a hard time disputing them?.

You haven't made any real arguments, you just keep making false equivalencies.


dcc73a  No.15976404

File: b5cc89840b4f796⋯.jpg (61.31 KB, 421x350, 421:350, 1491463458373.jpg)

>>15976365

What is your contexts for that question? Are we talkin about somebody who is attracted to drawings of male characters but yet not actually sexually attracted to real human men? Because if that's the case then no that person isn't gay unless they have actual sexual feelings about real human beings. There are people that are attracted to objects / Concepts so I guess I would lump them into whatever sexuality that is.


0663f1  No.15976418

File: 4f4152329ab2a08⋯.webm (2.8 MB, 494x360, 247:180, Gym Locker Room.webm)

>>15976404

>being attracted to men

>isnt gay


dcc73a  No.15976425

File: b539b51166e6235⋯.jpeg (60.7 KB, 500x507, 500:507, 5b775a4606676.jpeg)

>>15976418

Only if the character they're attracted to is gay.


0663f1  No.15976431

File: d90db5ffedff753⋯.jpg (18.82 KB, 475x325, 19:13, 1398749545078.jpg)

>>15976425

>Its only gay if the balls touch


653b2d  No.15976437

>>15976425

I have nipples greg, can you milk me?


dcc73a  No.15976442

File: d543a3f5f32a71b⋯.jpg (90.44 KB, 849x1200, 283:400, b379e73ee55c741be4ff981aca….jpg)

>>15976431

Only if those balls themselves are attached to a gay person. (Otherwise How would all DP porn not be considered gay?)


9a96fb  No.15976446

File: 2a97cd8cee62064⋯.png (91.7 KB, 237x287, 237:287, 2a97cd8cee620642231e5a3f33….png)

>>15976393

>Homosexuals know they can't mate with each other yet they're attracted to the same sex.

Their brain is unable to tell. Thats why its a mental illness. Its doesnt matter if they can logically deduct so. Their underlining sexuality still thinks they can mate with other men. You are basically saying that sex doesnt exist for reproduction.

>Maybe your brain can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy but anybody with a functional piece of gray matter can deduce reality from fantasy. Do you honestly believe that human beings can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy? Stop pretending you're a neurosurgeon. You're nowhere close understanding the workings of the human brain. Just regurgitating bits and pieces of data you don't fully understand.

As I said it doesnt matter if you can logically deduce so. Sexuality is controlled by signifiers and cues that drawings still meet. You can't just say "im not attracted to X", you are either biologically programmed so or you condition yourself to be so(fetishism).

>You're the one that said a drawing couldn't look anything like a man

Except I never said so. I was merely taking your argument and applying it to male fictional characters.

>When was this discussion about homosexuality? why are you so obsessed with homosexuals? and why do you keep equating drawings in the anime style to homosexuality or furries or whatever type of degeneracy you keep trying to push?

Because its very much applicable to your argument and you are still avoiding it.

>Visual cues are meaningless without context or actual stimuli.

Any kind of cue can provoke a response, thats why people find specific body parts attracted even without the context of the rest of the body being shown. And is very much possible with drawings.

>you just keep making false equivalencies.

That you are incapable of disputing.

>>15976404

>Because if that's the case then no that person isn't gay

Finally you admit to your full fledged delusion. Homosexuality is the attraction to people of the same sex. What you identify as a man is the combination of various qualities (hair, bodyshape, skin, muscle, male genetalia). He may not be a man fucker, but he is definitely a homosexual. The same way you might not be a child fucker, but you are definitely a pedophile.


dcc73a  No.15976457

File: b5e844ecd5077f0⋯.jpg (67 KB, 516x729, 172:243, 7cb1b543a627c4148b8236dc4b….jpg)

>>15976437

>men can technically lactate

>although scientists still aren't entirely sure why men have nipples


f85a02  No.15976460

File: a58e38a4f950101⋯.png (10.04 KB, 779x793, 779:793, statue of loli.png)

>>15976170

>no scientific body has been able to test whether or not the availability of such content makes it more or less likely that someone might commit a crime against an actual adolescent.

EXCEPT DENMARK ACTUALLY DID JUST FUCKING THAT!!!

https://archive.fo/qejpJ

cphpost.dk/news/national/report-cartoon-paedophilia-harmless.html

>Cartoons and drawings depicting paedophilia do not encourage people to commit child sex offences in real life, a report by experts who treat sexual problems concludes.


9a96fb  No.15976465

>>15976460

Got a link to the actual study mate? Or are you just gonna take the goberment's word on it?


f85a02  No.15976474

File: 16250d39e22bd80⋯.png (128.1 KB, 1024x1169, 1024:1169, P4Bd3dfsChasd.png)


d5d128  No.15976475


09e23a  No.15976476

File: 6bec229616ff885⋯.jpg (72.84 KB, 675x900, 3:4, hang_in_there.jpg)

>>15975296

those tits in first pic are disgusting


b59540  No.15976480

>>15976457

>although scientists still aren't entirely sure why men have nipples

I was certain it was a leftover from early development stages where the cells multiplying don't check for XY or XX chromosomes so men end up with nipples and women with clits.


9a96fb  No.15976482

>>15976474

And tell me what would be the rape rates if it wasnt for shitskin? Or considering the fact that Japanese people would hide it because of their culture as to not be shamed?


831bd5  No.15976485

>>15976482

Everyone says that, but are you insinuating that others would instead choose to flaunt it, especially when it could so easily be blamed on the protected minorities?


b59540  No.15976487

>>15976482

> Or considering the fact that Japanese people would hide it because of their culture as to not be shamed?

FUCKING EPIC, BRO

<Low crime rates mean the police and central statitistics office is in on it, my shithole is 100% transparent and honest tho, BBC told me so.


5a3b15  No.15976488

>>15976482

>Japanese people would hide it because of their culture

If it's purely cultural, then why are the rates going down in Japan while the country is becoming more westernized? Wouldn't it be the opposite, or at least constant?


f85a02  No.15976501

File: bde8bfd9f799989⋯.png (505.85 KB, 860x655, 172:131, Freedoms sexually.png)

>>15976482

>Arrival of the Internet: More Porn, LESS Rape

>The Czech Republic: More Porn, LESS Rape

>Denmark: More Porn, LESS Rape

>Japan, China, Hong Kong: More Porn, LESS Rape

>Compared with Most Men, Rapists Consume LESS Porn

https://archive.fo/BFJRL

>Does pornography breed rape? Do violent movies breed violent crime? Quite the opposite, it seems.

https://archive.fo/FbVX0

>The bottom line on these experiments is, “More Net access, less rape.”

>…

>Next, violence. What happens when a particularly violent movie is released? Answer: Violent crime rates fall. Instantly.


0663f1  No.15976504

File: ea100cc553148a2⋯.gif (1.41 MB, 300x250, 6:5, Str8 boys.gif)

>>15976442

DP porn is both gay and cuckoldry


0663f1  No.15976512

File: 25b76f652607692⋯.jpg (39.03 KB, 272x324, 68:81, 1307985422165.jpg)

>>15976482

>BUT MUH PAKIS

Everytime, the only stats being reported are white because they dont report paki rapes you bongoloid


9a96fb  No.15976520

>>15976512

Or they just dont put them down as pakis. Considered that?


f85a02  No.15976526

>>15976520

>Or they just dont put them down as pakis.

Oh, yeah, I forget that the Bongs put the Rapefugees down as ASIANS.


f85a02  No.15976530

File: 7679c9c87416a98⋯.png (32.08 KB, 806x420, 403:210, How the Web Prevents Rape.png)

File: 1eb9b27a57b1cfa⋯.png (19.93 KB, 679x203, 97:29, More porn, LESS rape.png)


67db84  No.15976539

File: 0a4c7b9ae8ed8c3⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 8.1 KB, 183x275, 183:275, brazzerfootball.jpg)

>>15976476

>>15975296

>those tits in first pic are disgusting

They are indeed. I guess only the football-tards like them. probably because it give them spares? …


dcc73a  No.15976567

File: 1110f347ce5c32e⋯.gif (522.25 KB, 245x245, 1:1, tumblr_ol6yzxuifp1s8nccpo2….gif)

>>15976446

>Their brain is unable to tell. Thats why its a

>mental illness. Its doesnt matter if they can logically deduct so. Their underlining sexuality still thinks they can mate with other men. You are basically saying that sex doesnt exist for reproduction.

The general consensus on /pol/ is that homosexuality is a choice or a learned behavior that can be further enhanced through sexual trauma or social pressure. You seem to think it's some type of brain disorder i.e. born with it. Where's your data back this up?

>As I said it doesnt matter if you can logically deduce so. Sexuality is controlled by signifiers and cues that drawings still meet. You can't just say "im not attracted to X", you are either biologically programmed so or you condition yourself to be so(fetishism).

Fetishes can exist independent of sexuality though,

>Because its very much applicable to your argument and you are still avoiding it.

You haven't explained it all how it's connected you just keep making inferences.

>Any kind of cue can provoke a response, thats why people find specific body parts attracted even without the context of the rest of the body being shown. And is very much possible with drawings.

People also find cars attractive and clothing, what exactly is your point?

>That you are incapable of disputing.

It's hard to dispute something when there's nothing to dispute. You haven't brought anything new to the argument that feminists didn't bring up in the 1960s. You still haven't proven your case why this content should be censored and banned/destroyed and outlawed.

>Finally you admit to your full fledged delusion. Homosexuality is the attraction to people of the same sex. What you identify as a man is the combination of various qualities (hair, bodyshape, skin, muscle, male genetalia). He may not be a man fucker, but he is definitely a homosexual. The same way you might not be a child fucker, but you are definitely a pedophile.

Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Let's say somebody is attracted to a fictional drawing of a dragon. Then let's copy that drawing and say one copy is a female and the other copy is male yet they look identical. If that person is still attracted to the drawing regardless of its gender. They just like the look of that dragon or car, or whatever. it doesn't really matter. You could also apply a gender sticker to a car or any other inanimate object and yet people will find them attractive with or without the label of gender. That's why I said I wouldn't call it a homosexual because their attraction to that item can't really be placed into either sexuality as far as I can tell no matter what the label is before or after. You don't seem to understand that people can be attracted to an aesthetic without that aesthetic being attached to any specific sexuality.


b45fa7  No.15976570

>>15976539

You can judge nasty 3dpd tits (on nasty 3dpd thots), but surely anime tiddies are a whole different matter.


ce61d4  No.15976579

>implying you buy hentai on steam

>implying you buy games


dcc73a  No.15976587

>>15976504

According to what metric? If two men are having sex with the same woman at the same time technically neither one is being cucked. For the other question I guess it might be considered gay if two men are willing to occupy the same orifice, but if they're on opposite sides then I think you could make an argument that it's not. >>15976570

I think it all just depends on the artist skill at drawing female anatomy, or what look they're intending to go for, or what they personally find appealing. I forgot the name of the artist that likes to draw super skinny females (like you can see their rib cages) but they have natural looking large breasts. It's kind of weird looking but to each their own I guess. ( I think it might be the same artist that works on valkyria Chronicles)


d7e3f8  No.15976588

>>15976567

There is no data. Faggotry was proven to not be genetic decades ago.


ea9ea1  No.15976595

File: 5be7e9ed8c90dc2⋯.jpg (135.3 KB, 1333x1000, 1333:1000, Needs Proof.jpg)

>>15976588

>Faggotry was proven to not be genetic decades ago.

Citation please


dcc73a  No.15976596

>>15976588

>There is no data

>It was proven decades ago

That statement doesn't make any sense, if something was proven decades ago there should be data on that proof.


a933e1  No.15976603

File: 3ce66f43b58d5ab⋯.png (614.23 KB, 1122x2283, 374:761, faggotryNotGenetic.png)


9a96fb  No.15976604

File: c137184c7df17be⋯.png (443.4 KB, 1506x3976, 753:1988, the gays.png)

>>15976567

>You seem to think it's some type of brain disorder i.e. born with it.

Pretty sure you can develop mental disorders after being born. Plus everything else you wrote doesnt contradict what I said.

>Fetishes can exist independent of sexuality though,

So? What we are talking about is clearly of sexual nature.

>You haven't explained it all how it's connected you just keep making inferences.

Abnormal sexual attraction where and individual is attracted to cues that contradict the attraction towards an adult fertile healthy woman.

>People also find cars attractive and clothing, what exactly is your point?

Not sexually. If its sexually then its a fetish born by some sort of with something sexual. If they find cars sexually attractive on their own then at some point in their past they might have seen or had a lot of sex in cars and so they their brain has associated cars with sexuality. That or they are completely mentally ill and cannot even make proper sexual associations to begin with.

>You still haven't proven your case why this content should be censored and banned/destroyed and outlawed.

That was never my intention. My point is for you to drop your delusion and to be ridiculed.

>You don't seem to understand that people can be attracted to an aesthetic without that aesthetic being attached to any specific sexuality.

But we are discussing sexual attraction you mong. You can admire masculinity without sexual attraction towards male. We are talking about sexual attraction. Or is this your attempt to move the goalpost?

Clearly we are talking about sexual attraction towards loli and drawn men.

>>15976595

>>15976596

I think he meant there is no evidence to support it being genetic.


f85a02  No.15976608

File: 4d0f008d6d05faa⋯.png (632.71 KB, 1506x3976, 753:1988, Is homosexuality immoral.png)


cfb5b8  No.15976609

>>15975339

>you'll need make your own website and give the game out for free

>not giving away your address so problematic people send you tacos or rice

smh tbh fam (1)


7b41b8  No.15976612

File: b2af16722cdb978⋯.png (339.61 KB, 762x765, 254:255, wild fag is super effectiv….png)

>>15976595

fags seems to breed using child molestation, it's not 100% sure but I believe it


ce4dcf  No.15976618

File: 67c0a3110c42f01⋯.jpeg (90.48 KB, 617x1100, 617:1100, DwHIVleU0AAkWdc.jpeg)

Have the kikes even adressed these new censored games in any way or form?


ea9ea1  No.15976621

>>15976612

Dang, glad I was never fiddled.


64b9e4  No.15976623

>>15976621

it's never too late, anon.


22c3c8  No.15976653

>>15975541

No its not. Most people aren't aware of these smaller sites and everyone who isn't aware of this censorship still thinks Steam is "based" for allowing adult games and whatnot. One of the only places covering this is OAG


a2a6f1  No.15976663

>>15975339

Do retards like this really think that the only reason why people care about free speech is because of one article in one constitution?

They are just pretending to not understand that free speech is something that is valuable in itself, right?

That people aren't just concerned with some kikes adhering to the law and stuff like that.


dcc73a  No.15976690

>>15976604

>>15976604

>Pretty sure you can develop mental disorders

Most homosexuals describe always being homosexual, even from childhood. At least from all the data I've seen there's no such thing as spontaneous homosexuality.

>So? What we are talking about is clearly of sexual nature.

Yes but you seem to be equating all fetishes, with sexual nature and sexuality at the same time. IE having X fetish means homosexuality according to you at least that's how you seem to present your argument.

>Abnormal sexual attraction where and individual is attracted to cues that contradict the attraction towards an adult fertile healthy woman.

There's been a lot of theories regarding attraction and women and what makes somebody attracted to Children one of the theories has been neoteny which both women and children share. Although children/young women are much more neotenous then older women. The data suggest that being attracted to neotenous features is not abnormal.

>Not sexually. If its sexually then its a fetish born by some sort of with something sexual. If they find cars sexually attractive on their own then at some point in their past they might have seen or had a lot of sex in cars and so they their brain has associated cars with sexuality. That or they are completely mentally ill and cannot even make proper sexual associations to begin with.

You're making a lot of assumptions with very little information. The only thing we know for sure is that some people are sexually attracted to non-human things and objects. The cause is still unknown

>That was never my intention. My point is for you to drop your delusion and to be ridiculed.

I don't have any delusions, and all of your attempts at ridicule have failed. And they will continue to fail because your argument is still nothing special. The only thing different between you and the feminists of the 60s is that instead of being anti pornography you're just anti anime porn.

>But we are discussing sexual attraction you mong. You can admire masculinity without sexual attraction towards male. We are talking about sexual attraction. Or is this your attempt to move the goalpost?

Normal sexual attraction isn't even fully understood. And yet you're telling me you know exactly what's going on with the brain chemistry of someone fapping to 2D? I sincerely doubt that.

>Clearly we are talking about sexual attraction towards loli and drawn men.

Actually this thread is about the Valve Corporation Banning / censoring games with no clear policy. Even though they said they weren't going to do that anymore. Instead of going on your long-winded rant trying to prove some meaningless Point. You could have just posted that you support valves decisions and moved on.

>I think he meant there is no evidence to support it being genetic.

That also means there's no evidence that proves it isn't genetic.


cfb5b8  No.15976695

File: b94f32871aa4043⋯.png (756.48 KB, 832x958, 416:479, 48948965651.png)

>>15975579

>Shithole countries fight for freedom of speech & expression in order to expose their corrupt governments

>not adding the freedom to have guns

nigger

>whereas first worlders are complaining about cartoon porn being freedom of speech.

As a taco, I'm glad the burgers are fighting for that, you double nigger faggot.


47abaf  No.15976717

>>15976663

Free speech is valuable because you're able to criticise people and express yourself.

You can still complain about Valve banning hentai games on Steam forums. Removing a game from a platform does not hinder freedom of speech or expression.


dcc73a  No.15976722

>>15976717

It's hindering the freedom of speech and expression of the developer of the game. Especially since it's arbitrary as to why the game is being banned.


0663f1  No.15976725

File: 5e8b114b957235e⋯.jpg (37.72 KB, 552x686, 276:343, NTR3.jpg)


2f4532  No.15976762

File: d6c620b9ac5ca9c⋯.png (4.24 KB, 500x250, 2:1, Oekaki.png)

>>15975579

here, have some cp, then


f2aafc  No.15976767

>>15976762

called the cops


611218  No.15976772

File: 6f42cdadc5bd8d7⋯.jpg (124.41 KB, 850x1176, 425:588, DtpmxMhVAAAUBDg.jpg)

>>15976039

Thanks for the Haru Yuuki.

>>15976088

Because the degenerate Left and the Church loves shota.

>I don't see why pornographic representations of other underage characters like those from Evangalion or K-on for example should be for some reason exempt

Everyone has that one series they'll look the other way when it comes to ages.

>>15976179

>What if they just remove ALL games with political views and fetishes of any kind

>fetishes of any kind

Well then we're fucked because everything is somebodies fetish.


9a96fb  No.15976785

File: 95ba3caa30865f8⋯.jpg (54.82 KB, 500x447, 500:447, 95ba3caa30865f8cd472737ce8….jpg)

>>15976690

>Most homosexuals describe always being homosexual, even from childhood. At least from all the data I've seen there's no such thing as spontaneous homosexuality.

Because homos are turned into homos before they have a chance you realize normal sexuality.

>Yes but you seem to be equating all fetishes, with sexual nature and sexuality at the same time.

No I didnt.

>IE having X fetish means homosexuality according to you at least that's how you seem to present your argument.

<your pee-pee getting hard to men or a depiction of men isnt sexual

>There's been a lot of theories regarding attraction and women and what makes somebody attracted to Children one of the theories has been neoteny which both women and children share. Although children/young women are much more neotenous then older women. The data suggest that being attracted to neotenous features is not abnormal.

That can easily be attributed to maternal attraction and association to those that are similar. Its been discovered that we are naturally more sexually attracted to those who have similar qualities. And unless you are a child or a female I dont see your point.

>You're making a lot of assumptions with very little information. The only thing we know for sure is that some people are sexually attracted to non-human things and objects.

Its entire section on psychology about sexual cues and attributes and pretty much any quality that creates association.

>I don't have any delusions, and all of your attempts at ridicule have failed.

That you just being dense. Because you have been in circlejerk for too long so you cant comprehend that you are just like faggots and furries.

>you're just anti anime porn

Never did I say I was anti-anime porn. You really love making shit up dont you? I'm specifically talking about the shit fetish known as lolicon.

>Normal sexual attraction isn't even fully understood. And yet you're telling me you know exactly what's going on with the brain chemistry of someone fapping to 2D? I sincerely doubt that.

So you just wanna deny what I'm saying? Because you havent proposed anything to actually counter it.

>Actually this thread is about the Valve Corporation Banning / censoring games with no clear policy.

We are obviously discussing another topic.

>You could have just posted that you support valves decisions and moved on.

I never alluded to such. You are just pushing ideas down my throat. I don't even give a shit about Steam that much to care about their inner workings. What I want is for to not be the monopoly on PC market. In fact I dont even buy games so I dont really give a shit about that too. I dont care much for porn games or with much sexual content and if I were to be interested in one Steam would be the last place I search.

>That also means there's no evidence that proves it isn't genetic.

At this point it doesnt even matter. Honestly it being genetic or not was probably to shut up christians and to earn privileges they got anyway by screeching hard.


073416  No.15976805

>>15976595

Psychiatrists knew about this as early as the 60s/70s. Look up the article about gay men and their mothers on a site called Fathers Against Abortion. They cite dozens upon dozens of independent psychiatric studies on gay men, and the environmental factors align way more than the genetic ones.


67db84  No.15976820

File: a4171a7628c3341⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 337.57 KB, 937x937, 1:1, 1434322630652.jpg)

File: e0fbf1b6ed68325⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 174.62 KB, 685x1004, 685:1004, ecdec92f061e1080dbd8fe6cbe….jpg)

File: 07607a2e20cd79f⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 440.04 KB, 1357x1816, 1357:1816, unshavedstillgood.jpg)

File: 37d202266690314⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 92.88 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 98-1598068852.jpg)

>>15976570

no really, "ballon breast" are only tollerable in anime because their shape change constantly from one frame to another. same with their physics.

That's why IRL even if fake, many tries to avoid the ballon shape that are oftent used by unskilled/lazy/time constrained artist because it's easier to draw ballon when hidden under cloths. at least for the sake of illustrating how big her tits are

>>15976587

> I forgot the name of the artist that likes to draw super skinny females (like you can see their rib cages) but they have natural looking large breasts.

we call all resume anime/manga to one things: it will always be a succession of poses. That's why even stuff that in IRL usually look strange: 2d can make it ok because the character will always be posing.

It's like making an movie of some hideous 3d femnazi but "photoshop each frame to make it perfect" or at least acceptable


47abaf  No.15976847

>>15976722

Yeah but banning that game literally makes nothing of value lost, in terms of "freedom of speech".

People will rile up when Valve start banning speech that matters. If they stop people from criticizing a certain thing, for example. But this is literally a video game, and had no message of importance.

You can argue that some divine metaphysical rule was desecrated, but I don't think people will get behind that all that much.


116fc1  No.15976898

>>15975339

McNukes in 5


695393  No.15976921

>>15975969

i did mean "banned from steam"

polite sage


04fa14  No.15976924

Several months ago, I noticed a trend on youtube where any video that had a hot anime girl would have people making a "joke" that the FBI would be coming for you on child porn charges for watching it. This "joke" was used not with actual loli characters, but with girls who were clearly at or above the age of consent outside of Commiefornia and had big tits. At the time, I expressed a concern that this FBI meme was a way to normalize the idea that hot girl of any age = loli = child porn. I was told to fuck off because I was reading too much into a joke. Now, we have Valve banning any game with hot girls on charges of child porn, and normalfags don't care because "only pedos complain about this getting banned." This isn't coincidence, and I'm fucking sick of trying to tardwrangle you people into seeing the writing on the wall.

As my last bit of advice that I'm ever going to bother giving, watch out for everyone saying this is a freedom of speech issue. It's not, and they're just trying to derail meaningful discussion. This is a freedom of EXPRESSION issue, not freedom of speech.


67db84  No.15976931

File: 1f578cdc2266bc9⋯.webm (3.78 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, 1f578cdc2266bc93b2296366c….webm)


0663f1  No.15976935

File: 1b32c7c76ea9906⋯.png (26.43 KB, 343x326, 343:326, 1b32c7c76ea990638b89f0ca96….png)

>>15976924

I hate that normalfag meme

>1 second of an anime female

>rest of the video is just some really loud music

do people really thing thats funny?


c32ffb  No.15976941

>>15976924

If it's any consolation, you're not the only one who can notice patterns. But you may be asking too much from reddit 3.0


0663f1  No.15976955

File: 20c3cb1457af293⋯.jpg (4.66 KB, 250x161, 250:161, le FBI meme.jpg)

>>15976924

There was also that time the FBI tried to force a meme right after some big event


06ea8f  No.15977006

>>15975339

>you'll need make your own website and give the game out for free

Why do you think anyone will make games for free? The only future is some sort of payment that does not rely on PayPal to be normalized, such as cryptocurrency for the masses.


6814df  No.15977022

>>15975752

>- Yelling "fire" when there is none (I don't know the legal name for this)

False alarms.

While creating false alarms is indeed dangerous, the thing about faggots that spout this shit is for "dangerous" speech they think need to be banned.

In fact, the court case where this originated was from an anti-war activist criticizing the draft and telling people to avoid it. So it would "result in a crime and created a clear and present danger to enlistment…"

Yelling fire is more akin to pulling a fire alarm or calling in a bomb threat.


8ac660  No.15977041

>>15976847

>Just let the censors do what they want don't worry about it until it effects you

Yeah okay what next don't worry about gun rights until they want to ban the gun you own?


67db84  No.15977049

>>15977041

no country ban the ownership of gun retard.

They only ban the hability to carry them anywhere you want freely.


a9287d  No.15977087

I swear this is either some weird psyop at this point or just an incredibly autistic OP. No one gives a shit about this stuff. Why not just sell your shit on dlsite, or start your own site if you produce a lot of this content? Devs/whoever got greedy, want to sell their shitty games to the retards who use steam, and then got outjewed by Valve themselves.


7d0429  No.15977093

>>15977087

>Why not just sell your shit on dlsite

Because dlsite takes a 60% cut.


a933e1  No.15977120

>>15977093

Fuck, how do nips even turn a profit?


06ea8f  No.15977122

File: 92961a6d56244f8⋯.png (14.82 KB, 577x310, 577:310, new zealand self-defence g….png)

>>15977049

>no country ban the ownership of gun retard.


f2aafc  No.15977218

>>15977122

>indicated an intent to use a firearm for self-defence

This one never fails to make me laugh. It's so fucking ridiculous.


e8c15a  No.15977245

File: 595c166c4825028⋯.jpg (36.54 KB, 290x247, 290:247, ricotta.jpg)

Is the Age of Loli coming to an end?


0663f1  No.15977247

File: c9458500fc34e04⋯.jpg (138.75 KB, 663x1024, 663:1024, aus guns.jpg)

File: aa562ae2b47dadc⋯.jpg (127.72 KB, 1302x1446, 217:241, aus soft.jpg)

File: bc4e8c905dc084b⋯.jpg (56.53 KB, 600x521, 600:521, Australia 1.jpg)


e8c15a  No.15977259

File: 01fdfd3626d2355⋯.png (217.38 KB, 493x621, 493:621, B1U-fuLCYAEyA7H.png)

>>15977041

Meh I rather have the freedom to enjoy degenerate videogames. Guns never appealed to me. What would I even do with one realistically?


9a96fb  No.15977266

File: 3407538b625c4dd⋯.png (277.84 KB, 401x385, 401:385, 3407538b625c4dd021f1de08e4….png)

>>15977259

Kill some negroes, obviously.


06ea8f  No.15977283

>>15977259

>I only need freedom to succumb to emasculated hedonism


a933e1  No.15977285

File: aaf9b996cb06c48⋯.png (13.13 KB, 600x266, 300:133, larry_gun.png)

>>15977259

Pretty much anything you want until they call the snipers.


49e492  No.15977289

>>15977259

Take pictures of you holding it and send it to your local government officials to remind them not to push for laws that would censor your degenerate vidya, or else.


2f4532  No.15977290

>>15977259

Kill yourself with one.


fd08d0  No.15977297

>>15977218

JUST FUCKING LET TYRONE RAPE YOU TO DEATH YOU FILTHY FUCKING GOY


0663f1  No.15977298

File: cdc2eeff0d6af0e⋯.jpg (57.21 KB, 304x324, 76:81, mp5sdgsg9.jpg)

>>15977259

You could use it for self defence, fuck around with it to make it similar to a gun from a video game or use it to shoot up your school, possibilities are endless. what country are you from?


67db84  No.15977328

>>15977122

so what? you can still own a gun.

It has nothing to do with ownership. How retarded are you? must i releally make a list of all the stuff that you are allowed to have exept when you plan to use it as a way to harm other?


0663f1  No.15977343

File: 7d2119df46a1f88⋯.jpg (20.7 KB, 240x289, 240:289, g11lmgschafer.jpg)

>>15977328

>you can still own a gun

no you cant, there are so much restrictions its virtually impossible to get a gun for the average person. thats why everyone just gets their guns illegally but almost never uses them for terrorism.


49e492  No.15977345

>>15977328

>Hello, I would like to buy this spoon.

>Will you ever use it to defend yourself?

>Huh? Well, I mean, if I have to then I guess I wo-

>THAT'S NO GOOD M8, YOU CAN'T HAVE IT

Is that how it works in Australia?


d7e3f8  No.15977350

>>15977259

>OY VEY GOYIM GUNS HAVE NO PURPOSE OY VEY NEVER USE THEM HA HA WHAT WOULD YOU EVEN DO ANYWAY LOL

Reminder that these paid shills are allowed to post here.


a933e1  No.15977358

File: 67907758396651b⋯.webm (7.73 MB, 480x360, 4:3, asian_lady_gun_owner_vers….webm)

>>15977328

It means in practice you aren't allowed by the state to have a gun unless you're connected. I don't know NZ but that's often how it works. Also in many other countries you can't have one unless you're police, military, bodyguard, criminal, etc.


8ac660  No.15977359

>>15977328

Please do provide a list of rights the government is infringing on.


e32529  No.15977361

>>15975686

I know the feel of deep shame. It reaches so deep that sometimes I think we'd all be better off if anime no longer existed. The shame is just too strong.


e32529  No.15977364

File: 9204efc6e31d436⋯.jpg (7.33 KB, 255x255, 1:1, 4ec52bd2c878743388924b8c95….jpg)

>>15977259

>my degeneracy is more important than my right to bear arms


f85a02  No.15977372

File: 2211602ab01e2f9⋯.webm (4.38 MB, 534x300, 89:50, Janusz Korwin-Mikke on gu….webm)

>>15977259

>What would I even do with one realistically?


9a96fb  No.15977373

File: 8455546ebf0e3b5⋯.png (408.73 KB, 500x442, 250:221, 8455546ebf0e3b581baf94a9e8….png)

>>15977350

Free access to guns allows street scum to be much more deadly then usual. Mass shootouts are extremely rare in countries without such lenient gun laws. For somebody to perform a mass shooting he must smuggle fire-arms that americans could casually buy. Countries filled with shitskin but strict gun laws dont have such mortality rates.


e32529  No.15977375

>>15977373

Mass shootings are good. Most people are shit.


e32529  No.15977378

>>15977375

Adding to this the problem with mass shootings is that the wrong people get shot.


49e492  No.15977379

>>15977373

>ountries filled with shitskin but strict gun laws dont have such mortality rates.

Spic here, you are pulling that off your ass. Any latinamerican country has a lot more crime than the US, and here the laws are strict as fuck (maybe with the exception of Argentina and soon Brazil).


a933e1  No.15977382

File: e7d0a3a173dd1f6⋯.png (104.85 KB, 1558x1006, 779:503, guns-and-deaths.png)

>>15977373

>Countries filled with shitskin but strict gun laws dont have such mortality rates.

Except they do. I'm sure your opinion to want to ban guns was based on that wrong information and now you'll rationally stop being against banning them instead of coming up with some excuse to hold onto your beliefs like the media told you to.


f85a02  No.15977384

>>15977375

Mass shooting are ineffective as fuck. Didn't some fuck have the highest kill count by going on a rampage in New York with nothing but a truck and explosives?


67db84  No.15977393

File: 942d324c51f5442⋯.jpg (3.31 MB, 3264x2448, 4:3, 20131109_165231.jpg)

>>15977343

>no you cant, there are so much restrictions its virtually impossible to get a gun for the average person.

I don't know how australia or NZ works (they do have strange censorship)

But i know that this logic is why america is fucked.

Guns are not toys. They should not be owned by anyone just because they want it.

It's NOT impossible. You just have to proove that you are serious about this hobby, that you know what guns are, how to use them, (safety etc ..) and that you are serious.

Some gun can be aquired super easely like hunting riffle. But i do not see what's wrong in having to wait for a year of expertise to own an AR-15 for example. a year where you had to make 3 controlled shot during 6 month, and get an approval letter from shooting range owner.

yes the ammunition is not of the caliber of the gun shown

>>15977359

the 1st that come to my head is you are allowed to have knife, sword etc … but not carry them in plain sight or use them to kill.


49e492  No.15977394

>>15977388

Checking hitler dubs for mass shooting the federal reserve's HQ


9a96fb  No.15977398

File: 2a2d60db00049cc⋯.png (74.27 KB, 300x165, 20:11, 2a2d60db00049ccfb1a38cf106….png)

>>15977379

You dont even have control over that shit. Im pretty sure guns flow like water thanks to all the gangs and cartels.

>>15977382

That looks pretty well spread-out. Only around the center with a general increase in ownership do the homocides jump up. In the low gun ownership there is still a very low homocide rates. By this it looks like

>low gun ownership - safest

>high ownership - second safest

>no guns - second most dangerous

>middle amount of gun ownership most dangerous


fce801  No.15977400

>>15977373

Guns are so yesterday. Trucks are where it's at when it comes to highscores


a933e1  No.15977403

>>15977388

Why was this post deleted? How is that wrong but telling someone to shoot coons not?


9a96fb  No.15977405

>>15977398

Too add:

If anything it just makes shitskins and specifically spics more dangerous.


f85a02  No.15977418

File: 5842817044f3f2b⋯.jpg (85.41 KB, 480x604, 120:151, Still safer to live in Jap….JPG)

>>15977398

>>low gun ownership - safest

You DO realize that chart only shows crimes committed with guns. It doesn't show anything crimes committed via other means.


49e492  No.15977420

>>15977398

>You dont even have control over that shit. Im pretty sure guns flow like water thanks to all the gangs and cartels.

That's the fucking point you idiot. Gun laws don't mean shit and they don't help decrease homicide if your country is filled with subhumans. It's only used as an excuse to disarm the populace and later fuck you over with even shittier laws because you can't do anything about it but pray that your capital gets magically nuked.

>That looks pretty well spread-out

Imagine looking at that graph and thinking this. That image shows the correlation to be nonexistant, and in any mildly scientific paper that same level of correlation would get your theory passed as bullshit.


073416  No.15977434

File: d43519b563a4a59⋯.jpg (101.23 KB, 731x620, 731:620, bc85aaf52f1dfec4d12884f321….jpg)

>>15977373

>Free access to guns allows street scum to be much more deadly then usual.

this is correct, but you're missing the forest for the trees. the people who shoot each other in America are gangbangers. our media tries as hard as possible to ignore this, and in international media it's either ignored or only mentioned in statistics which imply that the average white American has to dodge automatic gunfire on the way to work.

here's the thing: gangs are like tribes. i could even take it a step further and call them proto-nations. they disregard all authority and try as hard as possible to do everything outside of any legal or traceable system. the only difference is they act like slow parasites instead of trying to take over the host.

so these gangs or tribes, they disrespect all host authority, which means they completely disregard the justice system, which means that they disrespect police entirely to the point where even a ganger's most hated enemy wouldn't call police on them unless they were, by gang standards, a pathetic little bitch. the result is an insular sub-society where people shoot each other over gang affiliation routinely but this violence rarely leaks out to society at large; after all, shooting bystanders brings the cops down on your ass. if we removed the ability for a law-abiding citizen to own guns, all you are doing is making them easy prey for the occasional cocky or insane gangbanger. in the meantime you've done nothing to reduce gang violence because these dumb fucks feel like they have something to prove and will continue to kill each other with other means, or any of the 1.5 guns per person that already exist, even assuming that all gun manufacturing and importing stopped tomorrow. t's not unlike Muslims and honor killings.


9a96fb  No.15977441

File: ad21f906026ce53⋯.jpg (146.27 KB, 600x400, 3:2, ad21f906026ce534cc3fec0584….jpg)

>>15977420

>>15977418

>>15977434

Joke 's on you. I was merely pretending to be retarded!


f85a02  No.15977450

File: e7da4fba8469d6f⋯.jpg (455.99 KB, 1242x2208, 9:16, Feeding ducks bread.jpg)

File: e9d12f3942d5dcf⋯.png (722.64 KB, 947x859, 947:859, 40_percent_of_cop_killers_….png)

File: 1779399f5a84726⋯.jpg (43.5 KB, 592x489, 592:489, 949b7c12aae2b07e42c555e56e….jpg)

File: f49e0073af4fe62⋯.png (111.51 KB, 1594x854, 797:427, 2016_FBI_Crime_Statistics_….png)

File: ec9543f2da0a438⋯.png (25.51 KB, 536x392, 67:49, 1448231802650.png)

>>15977434

>this is correct, but you're missing the forest for the trees. the people who shoot each other in America are gangbangers. our media tries as hard as possible to ignore this, and in international media it's either ignored or only mentioned in statistics which imply that the average white American has to dodge automatic gunfire on the way to work.


695393  No.15977460

>>15977245

not if we make our own little loli games


f85a02  No.15977461

File: e1bfa2a8bcd5992⋯.png (130.31 KB, 600x829, 600:829, 1465841809954-2.png)

File: 45023485dff96bd⋯.jpg (132.18 KB, 960x706, 480:353, 1465841809955-3.jpg)

File: 771068bf0837672⋯.png (279.75 KB, 960x960, 1:1, 1465841809955-4.png)

File: 8f34017cd1fc0c7⋯.jpg (83.64 KB, 750x510, 25:17, DdiB1mZX4AMeaiK.jpg)

File: 66f3e2b338052c9⋯.jpg (88.42 KB, 640x690, 64:69, Gun_ownership.jpg)


f85a02  No.15977468

File: ca13627d76614ae⋯.png (113.42 KB, 600x833, 600:833, mass_shootings.png)

File: 8897c42a8b4d0d2⋯.jpg (80.21 KB, 960x743, 960:743, NYC_crime_stats.jpg)

File: 9b8805be2a6642a⋯.png (258.84 KB, 1090x767, 1090:767, Rates_per_100k_-_Murder.png)

File: 5160b93ff6e0cc6⋯.png (311.32 KB, 597x668, 597:668, These Kalashnikovs are jus….png)

File: 4378f275ce94a7b⋯.png (220.87 KB, 731x559, 17:13, These Kalashnikovs are jus….png)


f85a02  No.15977470

File: 1b47fb89427e5e5⋯.png (300.1 KB, 520x767, 40:59, These Kalashnikovs are jus….png)

File: 2de4ac3640eec98⋯.png (411.49 KB, 788x779, 788:779, These Kalashnikovs are jus….png)

File: e67cb5f60604c01⋯.jpg (70.24 KB, 713x570, 713:570, videogameviolencechart.jpg)

File: 03fe75ecd866007⋯.png (247.46 KB, 1630x1200, 163:120, violent-crime-vs-video-gam….png)

File: e09470baaa5c90b⋯.png (1.66 MB, 700x2200, 7:22, World's largest army.png)


67db84  No.15977474

File: 4a565ae60621fa8⋯.jpg (106.62 KB, 689x672, 689:672, tc021.jpg)

this thread kind of went off rails


9a96fb  No.15977479

File: 3e5447c43e90fcb⋯.jpg (30 KB, 538x491, 538:491, 3e5447c43e90fcb60c59586dc2….jpg)

>>15977474

Of course it would. Its a thread about Steam.


9a96fb  No.15977488

File: 77fefa4c0d4b40c⋯.jpg (55.16 KB, 621x646, 621:646, 77fefa4c0d4b40c6319ba3481e….jpg)

>>15977482

God I want to give her dick induced house-wife syndrome so badly.


f85a02  No.15977489

>>15977482

How else can you get retards like 9a96fb to shut the fuck up when the bastard is a blatant shill, and no one is reporting him?

The guy hasn't made ONE good post in this thread.


f85a02  No.15977493

File: 203b1a881ee7819⋯.png (2.17 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, loli freedom fighters.png)

>>15977482

Also

>Commiecat

Fuck off /leftypol/!!!


3360a0  No.15977504

>>15977379

No, Argentina is super strict, you can't own a gun unless you buy it illegally.

t. Argentinian.


0b3209  No.15977507

>>15977482

I will behead you bourgeoisie nigger


f43355  No.15977510

>>15977482

>having a self insert of a tranny fat ass as a mascot


f35d3c  No.15977512

>>15977122

>>15977218

>>15977343

>retards on /v/ acting like they know your countries firearms and self defense laws

NZ basically has stand your ground and its easy to get a gun. Even though they say that owning a gun for self defense isn't a good enough reason to have a gun people still get off on using them for self defense, its just that you have to explain how you managed to get to your safe and load your gun in time to shoot the person. Because of this its better from a legal standpoint to brutally beat or stab a home intruder to death than it is to shoot them.

t. kiwi who owns guns


9a96fb  No.15977517

File: ddee4b85c2ea825⋯.jpg (35.62 KB, 512x544, 16:17, ddee4b85c2ea82530bebe95c42….jpg)

>>15977489

How am I shilling, anon? What am I even shilling? This isn't your safe-space, I can come in and say whatever I want. What defines a good post? That which agrees with you? Because you sure sound upset. Did I upset the internet community vanguard who protect from unwanted opinions and aggressively try to defend and enforce a circlejerk?


f85a02  No.15977522

File: eeb797984e258c5⋯.png (109.99 KB, 668x1206, 334:603, Why are (YOU) here.png)

>>15977517

>How am I shilling, anon?

<Begins by going "Muh child porn": >>15975874

<Changes tune to go on rallying against guns at: >>15977373

<Then: >>15977441

>I was merely pretending to be retarded!


9a96fb  No.15977527

File: 9bfb2d343723230⋯.jpg (92.84 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 9bfb2d3437232300b54161c869….jpg)

>>15977522

The original discussion still stands. I did try to rile up anons with the gun comments though.

>Why are you here

Because its free access, clearly. Love how you faggots get so hot and bothered when people challenge your opinions and actually have something in response to all your template arguments.


f105ee  No.15977530

File: 49ec38ca628c105⋯.png (487.73 KB, 2894x4093, 2894:4093, __jahy_jahy_sama_wa_kujike….png)

>>15977527

You can't argue with a nu-/pol/ fag, anon.


8ac645  No.15977535

>nothing but weebshit getting BTFO

I just bought 1000 dollars worth of stuff on steam to support this, thank you based gaben for cleansing the weeb menace from western platforms

Next step up, anime profile pictures are a bannable offence.


6f8817  No.15977540

>>15977535

I hope you get aids fagot


073416  No.15977543

>>15977441

the "retard" act is a little worn out here on the internet


f2aafc  No.15977592

File: ff6513739650138⋯.png (830.03 KB, 689x721, 689:721, 1376278738570.png)

>>15977527

>being this smug about pretending to be retarded throughout an entire thread

>"you're just mad I'm challenging your opinions by acting like a retard lol"

>(38)

There's your mental illness right there.


9a96fb  No.15977645

File: 0edd6ea34d6cd20⋯.gif (73.15 KB, 675x227, 675:227, 0edd6ea34d6cd20e60d3af0f11….gif)

>>15977592

>look at this convenient get out of jail you provided me, better use it a much as i can even though it means nothing


8ac660  No.15977694

>>15977527

>I can't believe you guys get mad when I want the stuff you like banned because of it makes me feel icky.


9a96fb  No.15977720

File: 1e95ee69d4e66bb⋯.jpg (66.72 KB, 600x450, 4:3, anons fantasy.jpg)

>>15977694

>would dance around a circle if things he finds icky get banned

>cries when his thing others find icky get banned

>pretend like what i argued about was censorship


369f10  No.15977729

File: 516e57330cba155⋯.jpg (33.3 KB, 600x581, 600:581, fba.jpg)

>>15975874

>Its still a murder of a character even if that character doesnt exist and no one actually got murdered.

Holy shit you fucking nigger, you are the one doing the mental gymnastics here. No it's fucking not, no one actually dies when a character dies. You try to equate loli wih pedophilia and visibly want them to be treated similar, or even the same as shown by this post >>15976141 , yet you don't realize that by the same fucking logic and your own simple fucking comparison, murder of a fictional character should be treated similarily if you believe that a character's murder is still "murder". But you're not going to go with that conclusion, because everyone would think you are an insane fucking faggot, so you are going to act like a disingenious fuck and use an comparison that shits on your entire argument as if it was in support of it.

Speaking of you being a disingenious fuck, I'm tired of you stupid nigger trying to larp as /pol/ trying to seem as if you belong here to make your arguments seem more valid. You're using "faggotry" as a buzzword to paint an emotional picture without actually adressing whether the problem is harmful or not. It's easy to blame something harmless without evidence if you try and force the image of something unpleasant onto it. "WELL, I DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY ARGUMENTS OR STUDIES THAT SHOW THAT LOLI IS HARMFUL, BUT LOOK, I CAN SAY IT'S HOMOSEXUAL SO IT MUST BE BAD"

You argue like a kike, and you probably are one. Fucking gass yourself.


e80e51  No.15977731

File: fe2aa1a810efd01⋯.jpg (94.49 KB, 800x600, 4:3, fe2aa1a810efd01d47587b7c1c….jpg)


f85a02  No.15977732

File: 7308fb521d8e041⋯.mp4 (879.03 KB, 480x480, 1:1, #1 on the charts.mp4)

>>15977645

>>15977720

>(40)

Face it, dibshit, you fucked up.


369f10  No.15977741

File: 9f75864e9f8d60e⋯.jpg (9.35 KB, 540x205, 108:41, What you are doing right n….jpg)

>>15977720

>would dance around a circle if things he finds icky get banned


369f10  No.15977807

File: 3566f3ce0f76bee⋯.png (191.89 KB, 473x488, 473:488, 1446035988583.png)

>>15977535

>Haha ban le weebshit, fuck weebs amIrite guys? Anime is now illegal, ban anime profiles xD

When the fuck will this shitty kikebook meme die?


8ac660  No.15977810

>>15977720

>would dance around a circle if things he finds icky get banned

False I don't give shit how much trash steam sell. Even the fraudulent shit like asset flips I could not give a fuck. I'm a functioning adult I can just not buy shit. Also steam has refunds and user reviews if you end up with something you hate it's your fault. Communists are hilarious they cannot comprehend anybody being okay with stuff they don't like existing.


8ac660  No.15977825

>>15977807

Steam is filled with the idiots look in any anti-denuvo thread. One of the first replies will be "I'm glad this game has denuvo to protect it from thieves. I just bought 10 copies".


8ac645  No.15977836

>>15977807

hating weebs and furries has been a time honored tradition since the beginning of the internet, you would know this if you weren't an underage faggot


369f10  No.15977882

File: d691ac525b0f5e1⋯.jpg (27.65 KB, 540x540, 1:1, 21371184_1806347922727350_….jpg)

>>15977836

And maybe you would know how to be funny if you weren't a cock-gobbling fucking faggot.


e80e51  No.15977889

File: cc4b14148bc61f8⋯.png (327.93 KB, 530x633, 530:633, 3fe1f6186fe5c2b1128601bac0….png)

>>15977882

>replying to goons


369f10  No.15977896

File: d5626f045052510⋯.gif (3.63 MB, 280x302, 140:151, 90a93e202b41bed4338e2ac3bc….gif)

>>15977889

>Not bullying goons for fun.


e80e51  No.15977912

File: 083368cf8d99d46⋯.png (518.91 KB, 762x647, 762:647, 083368cf8d99d46465c491cc6b….png)

>>15977896

>doing exactly what they want you to do is bullying


369f10  No.15977949

File: fb0e97407ecbb14⋯.png (556.18 KB, 720x672, 15:14, fb0e97407ecbb14b449bd2bd78….png)

>>15977912

>Insulting them without getting into an argument with them is doing exactly what they want.

Well I can believe that the cucks like being treated like shit so maybe there is something to what you are saying.


3de4eb  No.15978128

>>15977896

Goons get pleasure by going on the internet and declaring themselves inferior to women and being their internet servants, they enjoy being bullied. They probably get off to it.


611218  No.15978321

>>15977474

I came in here trying to find out if Steam ever gave its reason and got tricked into forgetting I'm on /v/ ,not /n/.


155811  No.15978821

Didn't valve just allow a game on that they banned before for no reason and said it was a mistake? Was the guy reprimanded so he decided to ban every game he could until he gets fired?


8ac645  No.15978850

>>15977882

>you're not funny your posts don't entertain me :(

good

every post reveals your femine mentality, roleplaying as a girl on the internet too long as permanently fucked your brain


369f10  No.15978908

File: 7c8f095b1465197⋯.jpg (38.38 KB, 323x559, 323:559, 7c8.jpg)

>>15978850

Roleplaying as a raging faggot on the internet has pernamently fucked your brain into being an actual faggot.


21bb42  No.15978940

>>15978821

>Didn't valve just allow a game on that they banned before for no reason and said it was a mistake?

Yes. They've been flip-flopping on this ever since they originally made that post allowing adult content. I imagine the games they approved recently will get quietly re-banned in the future when people forget about them.

I also don't think it's one guy doing it. I think it's valve's flat company hierarchy "working as intended".


b59540  No.15979138

>>15977359

Right to life by allowing abortions

Violating roman definition of justice by not having death penalty,

>>15977247

>airsoft youtube watching

All flagged as terrorists to be swooped once they grow up.

>>15977122

>If you know a bad goy, that makes you an even worse goy.

Based article 58 of Soviet Penal Code, timeless classic.


54981b  No.15979237

>>15978821

Still flip flopping without addressing the issue. Which reminds me, I don't think Sony ever addressed their censorship, even though they said they would and delayed it because it was Chrismas time. Already a third of the way through January and still no information yet.


c5ba6c  No.15979291

File: dd6d787eb3608c4⋯.png (446.08 KB, 549x428, 549:428, heiy.png)


2f2380  No.15979471

>>15979237

They won't, they were clearly just stalling and hoping people would forget and move on. But this isn't the sort of idiocy you can really hide and as someone who only had much interest in their systems for trashy anime fanservice, kind of killed my interest in their platform.


cbdc18  No.15979516

File: f5a875e10fc0017⋯.png (310.9 KB, 960x720, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 908081ebabf39bb⋯.png (311.49 KB, 960x720, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 169c7c2d8de2f2d⋯.png (307.36 KB, 960x720, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

File: ea6504cd9fdc4f5⋯.png (311.18 KB, 960x720, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d9e5029e641a6e0⋯.png (306.11 KB, 960x720, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)


2c3f45  No.15979620

File: bba3944a5072a9a⋯.jpg (25.9 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1453769638448.jpg)

>muh loli is pedo

That's funny, every pedo I've been unfortunate enough to encounter preferred cancerous western art with more realistic proportions and most fucking loathed loli. If you've ever seen those pedophiles who raid active 8chan threads at random, they lose their shit if you bring up anime and they start ranting about how liking attractive 2D women of any age makes you a closet pedophile just like everyone else on the planet, all while expressing disgust for anime and congratulating themselves for enjoying CP and fugly, uncanny valley western shit instead.


dd3e9d  No.15980439

>Not wanting to date and marry a young teenager to have that sweet, sweet loli body and then have her grow up to be an ara ara to get the best of both worlds at different times.

Come on, anons. Think bigger. Video games are supposed to expand your mind.


e228ee  No.15980548

File: 993f2da8717d2ce⋯.jpg (285 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 1495901964641.jpg)

>>15975296

We can have games where you torture and murder people but lewd/sex stuff is going to far?

I really hate the west sometimes.


8e6257  No.15980554

>>15977474

just like valve's censorship

not_carlos.jpeg


c52521  No.15980556

>>15977488

What was the pic?


1bc422  No.15980574

>>15980556

the commie cat


030362  No.15980587

>>15975454

Nice strawman.


f776e6  No.15980637

File: 2ad84a726c7c7ca⋯.jpg (123.8 KB, 808x431, 808:431, flam.jpg)

>porn used to not be allowed on steam

>porn devs abuse greenlight and false advertising to publish porn on steam

>valve eventually gives up

>porn gets added to steam

>people upload pedo shit and gore

>andnobodywassurprisedthatday.webm

>pedoshit starts getting removed

>retards screech censorship

All porn should be removed from steam, not just pedoshit. For one it's going to protect valve from legal trouble, two it's going to stop porn popping up when I search for games and three it shits up the service and makes it worse by osmosis.

The only people that asked for this shit were horrible porn "game devs". Everyone else thought it would be a shit idea and that it would flood the store with more absolute garbage and cause drama, lo and behold garbage and drama.

>not loli

90% of hentai stars and features underaged girls. Don't get me wrong, legislating fiction is retarded beyond belief but it is legislated and Valve needs neither the lawsuits nor the bad PR.


695393  No.15980645

>>15980637

>nor the bad PR.

it totally does.


000000  No.15980646

>>15980637

Tags: [Steam] [Big Dick] [Gay] [All the way through] [Anal] [Blowjob]


ffaf7a  No.15980647

>>15975531

>can't discriminate

Being honest this is a legitimately valid law in case of public services(even when they're private businesses like hospitals and ambulances). For private businesses? I can see an argument there.

>Wants to have no building codes and regulations

This is how you get favelas and fires that engulf half a city and kill like 3,000 people. Building codes are there to protect other people from you.

>rules about who you hire

Well if you advertise yourself as a hospital and you hire entirely unqualified staff you're going to main and murder people.

That said there's practically no limits on who you can hire to be a waiter or office temp.

It's also there to protect employees from abuse, which makes sense. That said, you can skip that in it's entirety by employing private contractors which is what most companies do these days.

>private companies can do whatever they want

No they have to abide by the same employment and safety regulations as you, anon. The difference is they have more capital to work with so it's easier on them even if they do violate regulations since they can just pay the fines without going under.


ffaf7a  No.15980648

>>15980646

You do the edit man, my low effort post is all you're getting today.


ea9126  No.15980664

>>15980637

Damn, you insufferable moron, you have no idea what you're talking about. None, absolutely none, of the games that have been banned by Steam were illegal or posed any potential legal difficulties for Steam. This is banning because the content is intolerable to leftist, feminist cunts, probably like yourself.


3fbb3c  No.15980683

File: 0181588a6c5111a⋯.gif (1.96 MB, 580x433, 580:433, 42958734643.gif)

>>15980637

Imagine being this much of a disingenuous faggot


355bbe  No.15980691

>>15975317

> AROS is being shilled as something useable.

When the fuck did this happen? Did I miss something with Linux being overthrown as the go-to? AmigaOS is comfy as all fuck to use so I'm not complaining at all.


3fbb3c  No.15980696

>>15980691

Linux has been infected by the SJW


90531e  No.15980700

File: 891f40b1b096e94⋯.jpg (23.74 KB, 450x318, 75:53, zZZZZzzzzz.jpg)

>this company that hasn't made a good game since DoD (2006) is now censoring some shitty incel games no one would even buy

wow awful.. lets start a petition or something


4a1d86  No.15980720

File: 6c9a716aa4277c5⋯.png (549.52 KB, 623x399, 89:57, mega-church.png)

>>15980700

Is this what America is? Censorship is alright, its good for people to decide my life praise Jesus?


90531e  No.15980727

File: e1aefb5a09e0c33⋯.jpg (170.23 KB, 1024x681, 1024:681, farage.jpg)

>>15980720

censoring porn is good.

porn is for faggots and demons.


88bdda  No.15980728

File: 000e6327775e9b6⋯.png (609.28 KB, 789x789, 1:1, 3785.png)

>going to Steam for porn games

imagine my shock when it's censored to hell


ffaf7a  No.15980749

>>15980683

How am I being disingenuous, anon? What part of what I said is wrong?


0c1557  No.15980764

As if this thread wasn't going to be full of loli pedo kikes trying to convince us they aren't wannabe kid diddlers. It's quite bizarre how they always try and convince us that they aren't like we're some clueless idiots who just discovered the internet yesterday. You're fooling no one. You're especially not fooling us and it's insulting that you would even try.


2f2380  No.15980779

>>15980764

Go and fuck yourself with a rusty chainsaw for even daring to try pretending /v/ in general hates loli. And also for pretending that that's the sole issue at hand. Valve are being capricious with ero content in general when they said they weren't going to.


1bc422  No.15980788

File: b252d6badb9c349⋯.png (311.92 KB, 600x430, 60:43, b252d6badb9c34940d0e82aa69….png)

>>15980749

Dont bother. These are retarded lolbertarians that think porn is the holy grail of freedom.

>>15980779

You are a minority with a fetish and/or an obsessed with muh internet culture and are loud as fuck. You are worse than furfags, trapfags, futafags, fagfags and greenniggerfags.


7490f7  No.15980790

>>15980779

This is probably the most pathetic thing I've read today. "Stop pretending /v/ in general hates loli"? You absolute 5 IQ ape, it doesn't matter what your club thinks of you. In the end you're lolishit.

Waterboard yourself until you're brain damaged enough to not be able to speak.


599ca7  No.15980793

File: 9d1e3e7d10826c5⋯.jpg (79.08 KB, 639x768, 213:256, future.jpg)

>>15980779

>wants others to share his cuck degeneracy

Those with tainted souls always want to drag others down. Disgusting.


269eb3  No.15980852

>>15980790

I thought it was common knowledge that lolis were welcome in 8chan. Where did you crawl from?


fe4aa0  No.15980867

File: 2d3442d7547d8c9⋯.png (45.17 KB, 436x432, 109:108, around_bait_hesitate.png)


1bc422  No.15980871

File: aeb0869b72471c5⋯.jpg (71.4 KB, 1000x668, 250:167, aeb0869b72471c5e27f0ff5b0f….jpg)

>>15980867

>everything i dont like is bait


9dda11  No.15981071

>>15980720

Yes. Have you not read "The Federalist", which are the definitive arguments for why the colonies should adopt the US Constitution? Or any other founding literature like Thomas Paine's "Common Sense"? "Muh freedoms" is an invention from the 1960's. "Freedom" in the USA's first days means freedom from the tyranny of the British Crown so that the colonists can create their own brand of tyranny more palatable to their specific tastes. You believe in a lie when you say the USA was ever built on the idea of absolute freedom.

>>15976460

Interesting information, anon. For me, an attraction to anime drawings of adolescents came before an attraction to real adolescents. But I'm not encouraged to commit age of consent offenses because they're a crime, and the risks outweigh the benefits. But if lower ages were legalized, or decriminalized to a low fine which basically amounts to a new tax, I can see myself going as low as around thirteen. I have two fully nude dakis of an anime character who is canonically thirteen, with a body type to match. And I have a petite-size "mega masturbator" which is as big as a girl around the same age. Fictional depictions of adolescent bodies most definitely contribute to my feelings. There is just no way to rationalize it away.

As for the people who really are not encouraged to commit crimes because of their drawings, do their drawings still affect their views on adolescent sexuality in other ways outside of committing crimes? For example, becoming sympathetic/desensitized/whatever to the concepts, and how those feelings may affect their views on this or that social and/or government age of consent policy. Science needs more research into these questions.


2c3f45  No.15981301

File: 15d6939c6d5207f⋯.png (593.96 KB, 300x300, 1:1, 1447094984513-2.png)

>>15980788

>>15980871

>if I keep telling everyone lolifags are worse than furniggers/trapfags/homosexuals it will magically become true

>and or an obsessed

Take your sad bait to >>>/cuckchan/ where it belongs.


449ada  No.15981346

File: b000de1a13baac6⋯.jpg (62.27 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 54478572346546585468.jpg)

>>15981301

His next line will be about you proving him right by posting a smug anime face (somehow)


b5ce14  No.15983451

File: cbd5877084ece37⋯.png (81.1 KB, 640x495, 128:99, edf_the_hell_he's_saying?.png)

If you want porn games then get it off of DLsite or similar online stores. I never understand why some people really wanted them on Steam to begin with.


b243e7  No.15986276

Any alternatives to Steam that aren't afraid of hentai? Even porn sites like Imagefap are banning certain kinds of hentai. I'm not a fan of those kinds of hentai, but I'm also not a fan of censorship.


695393  No.15987119

>>15986276

Don't like? Make your own internet store front or porn site! :^)


f9ea12  No.15994321

>>15975341

monopolies ARE the result of a free market

>>15975531

this so much

>>15975532

censorship does only really exist in islamic countries and north korea, in the West its the beauty of unregulated markets


78d67e  No.15996436

>>15976695

based padre




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / cafechan / clang / doomer / mde / rtd / vg ]