[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / baphomet / fast / firechan / leftpol / mde / vichan ]

/v4c/ - Vidya4Chan

Go to www.cytu.be/r/v4c. Just check it out /dilbert
Winner of the 62rd Attention-Hungry Games
/eris/ - Wherein Is Explained Absolutely Everything Worth Knowing About Absolutely Anything.

November 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: f23965b521e384b⋯.png (8.73 KB, 434x600, 217:300, ruh-roh.png)

08e6d6  No.4700

Around midnight (Eastern Time) on March 13, 2018, we (the administrators) have committed to a drastic restructuring of the mod list.

19 mods have been de-ranked from their positions.

Even though some of the demods may seem to have little reasoning, the mod list was in a state that required significant changes be made. Those changes came swiftly in the form of a mass culling of inactive or (otherwise) less effective moderators. At too many points throughout the day, we noticed a near complete lack of mod activity in the room. Additionally, we became weary of a number of moderators that abused their position to a negative effect, or in a way severely neglected the responsibilities entrusted to them.

A mod list cluttered with inactive or ineffectual mods leaves it difficult to expand opportunity to new blood.

We have begun a slow continuing repopulation of the list, with a number of former mods already reassuming positions in the room. A number of new recruits are also under consideration.

To the mods that remain: you have done well, keep up the good work. Continue to be a model user that shapes the future of this room and its users.

To the demodded: you can gain mod back. Show up to the room. Be active and engaged. If it's something you want, you can be blue again.

We are in the process of rebuilding the mod list.

Don't flip a bitch if you aren't remodded yet.

a88f29  No.4701

If you were demodded, dont forget to check your email for a helpful link to help get you started on the remod process.


461f67  No.4702

DO YOU REMEMBER


d7047a  No.4703

Finally :praise:


9f8446  No.4704

fake and gay


0cd54a  No.4706

File: 8f7d65e56b203a3⋯.jpg (152.73 KB, 1042x1183, 1042:1183, mosancrayonspaghetti.jpg)

>>4700

Hello, I seem to have been demodded?

Please remod me at once, thanks bro :)

Here is an anime girl for your efforts


a295d5  No.4707

I'm just glad the mods that are left are attentive and policing the room fairly. Now we only have one bluename AFK for 6 hours straight without any consequences.


a19dd1  No.4708

I'll try to follow metals example more next time. No bumps for blacknames and more videos to 1.


e5ac89  No.4709

pls mod me im fat and gay


157def  No.4710

so is this your way of attention seeking, sym? having ex-mods suck your dick for some power?

by your own criteria a user like metal should have been demodded for being a net burden on the room, but as we know v4c is run like South Africa complete with cronyism


2689f8  No.4714

>A mod list cluttered with inactive or ineffectual mods

>proceeds to mod cuntpizza

really jogs the noggin


a295d5  No.4715

Actually it really seems like absolutely nothing has changed.


d62d27  No.4716

File: 93660f1fc930e31⋯.png (56.89 KB, 198x263, 198:263, mfwSym.png)

>Those changes came swiftly in the form of a mass culling of inactive or (otherwise) less effective moderators. At too many points throughout the day, we noticed a near complete lack of mod activity in the room.

>culling inactive mods

>one of the first remods is Twaticus


157def  No.4719

>>4716

Hey now, twat bumping her own shit videos constantly is considered """""contributing""""" to the room


2cfb70  No.4746

>the mods are too inactive

>remods basedblue

Who are you trying to bullshit?


2cfb70  No.4747

>>4715

>Actually it really seems like absolutely nothing has changed.

They got rid of a couple of mods who openly have spoken out against sym such as Monokuma, HotSauce or Adderall.

Getting rid of those was what it was all about. If it wasn't about that they wouldn't have remodded useless mods like basedblue.


f26126  No.4754

really makes you think


6af1d2  No.4756

whats funnier is sym is stupid enough to try and pull this on the room, thinking no one would ask questions.


6af1d2  No.4759

Never trust a nigger.

If there's one thing we can learn from this, it's that Illusory was retarded to think sym was at all competent at mod when he basically manipulated that mutt to this position.

As the adage goes, anyone who wants power, shouldn't be given power.


f1d992  No.4760

>>4757

He actively looks for drama in the chat asking people to start shit so he can get a grasp of what it feels like to have a social life.

His life must be really fucking empty. Sad.


4934ea  No.4763

File: 0b85dfe0c84e3fb⋯.jpg (30.79 KB, 433x419, 433:419, 1460573896651.jpg)

>>4756

whats funnier is that people like you complain all the time, yet you never do anything about it, you just keep whining like babies


157def  No.4768

>>4763

Hi sym, I know you jerk off at night to your power over the users of meme video site, but I'd just like you to know that I pity you


6af1d2  No.4771

>>4763

No one will do anything because only you care so much about this place. Everyone else has their own lives to live and don't bother with anything other than watching stupid videos in their downtime after work.

If anything you're the baby, because this place is all you have. I don't pity you at all. You did this to yourself.


4934ea  No.4772

File: c647173cc064c23⋯.png (922.35 KB, 1111x597, 1111:597, 1464018946358.png)

>>4771

>>4768

Keep fucking crying


598c25  No.4780

File: d3e0b79a41724cf⋯.png (727.56 KB, 1106x1012, 553:506, 1454927920672.png)

>>4763

What are we supposed to do about it sym? The only thing we have the power to do is complain and shitpost. If we try to do anything we get banned. One third of the users are so beat down and traumatized they have stockholm syndrome, another third are mods too scared to try to change things in fear of getting demodded and hebrewnames who

without shame worships mods in the hopes of becoming one themselves one day. The last third is the last bastion of whitenames who does everything to routinely go against the mods reign and dumb rules through OC and

disguised shitposts. Are u suggesting we take the only solidproof route and hire an assasin? Because I would not mind it at this point.


5c8ff7  No.4785

File: 0b4fad18048e4b9⋯.png (106.47 KB, 200x268, 50:67, 200px-Masatoshi_Meowth_GDZ.png)

Sym please remod me thanks, there was a bug in the matrix here when you demodded a bunch of people for no reason; I accidentally got demodded and banned.

I'd like to make it known that I am a very active user during the strayan times and a very nice person. :)

:feelsmeme:


4934ea  No.4786

File: 6e8e4fb9dbad580⋯.gif (897.09 KB, 800x430, 80:43, 1486824158826.gif)


598c25  No.4787

File: c724b140af5dbde⋯.jpg (264.94 KB, 3508x2334, 1754:1167, 1488997786003.jpg)

>>4786

so it is then


08e6d6  No.4789

>>4747

mono was gone before the purge, hotsause asked to not be remodded, and adderall is currently a mod


08e6d6  No.4791

>>4780

i think you have a lot of false assumptions here

you're in a very tiny vocal minority of entitled faggots who think you should just be allowed to do whatever you want at all times, which is basically what you're accusing the mods of doing

it's funny that you try to make that case with your generalization of the user base, but consider this:

the mods today are more fair than they've ever been

with the exception of hunter2 (who apparently believes it's his job to be a mod abuser) i can't even tell you the last time i've had to talk to a mod about random bans. mod abuse comes so few and far between now it's actually hard to believe it's the same room as even just a few years ago

the real funny part to me is that if you're trying to say that v4c is now worse or something, what you're really trying to say is that the mods don't abuse their positions enough, because that's the major change that has happened

>If we try to do anything we get banned.

can you give an example of that?

what exactly do you WANT?

if you feel ignored, then maybe you should focus on coming up with an actual solution - formulate reasoning for your arguments - instead of just randomly punching your arms around like a child


9f8446  No.4793

File: fc71baa88e307cc⋯.jpg (44.67 KB, 462x579, 154:193, awshitnigga.jpg)

5/5 thread


5d204a  No.4802

>>4791

I'll start by saying I've got no bone to pick with you, sym. You seem to actually care about v4c. Now onto my spergy longpost:

Speaking from my experience and after talking to other users: ```It's unclear what can and can't get you in trouble.```

The rule list are agreeable; You can reasonably predict you'll face consequences for breaking such rules. Then there's threatening users, doxxing, trying to damage Cytube in some way: Not on the rule list, but they don't need to be – it's ```obvious``` these are offenses.

Despite all this, kicks, mutes and bans are thrown around inconsistently and without warning. Some examples from my own experience:

- Krogan_ adds a repost and everyone is spamming Snake and american flags. I spam /feelseh amongst everyone else and face a kick and mute. In PMs Krogan_ is on my ass for having a problem with reposts. It's evidently personal as I don't face the same consequences reacting the same way to some whitename's video. My opinion on reposts shouldn't need to change, and emote reactions to a video evidently ``don't`` fall under "unrelated spam" as evidenced by how often it's permitted (ex. everyone spamming /iwanna, /realfeels, /no, etc.). A positive reaction to a video isn't inherently more 'related' than a negative one.

- People in chat (jokingly) saying things like "no mods, post pants /pants". I (also jokingly) say "NO MODS, POST GOOD VIDEOS /alarm THEY HATE THOSE" once and instantly face a ban without warning. It was obvious I was poking fun, especially considering mods were online and had recently typed in chat – But someone was upset. When I'm upset and my ``feelings are hurt``, I don't ban people, because I can't (not that I ever would).

- I point out a video says "SKIP" in big letters in the bottom-right. Said it 7 times quickly and was kicked – ``I was breaking the rules`` via skipbeg spam, so it was fair. I come back saying, jokingly, "you know what to do /feelsyes" once, and face an ip ban. Was it because I didn't like someone's video? That isn't an offense. Was it the spam? I just got kicked for that already. Maybe I'm ip banned for a totally different reason – I can't know who did it, how long it lasts, and don't ``specifically`` know how to avoid such trouble in the future. One could argue I'd be safe if I simply never hinted at disliking a video or ever advocated skipping, but being punished for not liking a thing hurts a community more than it helps.

I'm vocal about my distaste for reposts and boring videos. I'm not the only one that's vocal, and when I see such videos get skipped after like 22 votes, it's evidently not a trait that makes me unique. Sure, some think I 'hate every video and v4c' despite all the times I say I'm "adding this to YouTube faves" or literally say "good vid", and they're allowed to vocalize that opinion. We all think there's some group of people that 'make v4c great' and 'ruin v4c'. The full extent of my power is using my words, when I disagree with someone.

In terms of actual solutions: "no random/unjust bans" should apply to more than just bluenames. If it already does, perhaps seniority and rank should be less of a safety net from punishment, if it is. Again, unless it already does, "no random/unjust bans" should also apply whether it's permanent, a day, an hour, or any length of time.

sym, you openly admit hunter abuses his modship, and he still holds such power. Maybe he's been here 5 years, maybe he's a good friend, but you know there's a problem, even if things are supposedly better than they used to be. I'm often reminded of 'how little I know of mod responsibilities/happenings', ``I don't claim to know`` what shit goes on behind the scenes or people's history, I (and others) just want to enjoy v4c and be open and honest about the content in it without being subject to what appears to be a mod's personal opinion, current mood, and status.


5d204a  No.4803

>>4802

attempt to ignore the unsuccessfull formatting.


08e6d6  No.4804

>>4802

>A positive reaction to a video isn't inherently more 'related' than a negative one.

i agree with you on this. however, if it turns into a thing where you're doing it on every single video, it comes off more like you're just doing it to be a dick and action is probably going to be taken against you. upon investigation of that specific situation, it appears that's exactly what happened. i don't think anyone is actually attempting to censor you or make the case that you can't express distaste in what's currently playing (that's exactly the opposite of what i wanted when i got rid of the "no skipbegging" rule, because it seemed unfair to me that if a shitty video was playing then you just have to sit on your hands and deal with it for its duration), and i'm all in favor of telling people who post shitty videos how much their shit sucks, but at what point does it cease being a displeased expression and start being a disruptive one? this is where mod discretion enters the picture. different mods mod differently and while some might not see what you're doing as being particularly disruptive, others will take quick action to stop you. that may be where this perception of inconsistency comes from

>I (also jokingly) say "NO MODS, POST GOOD VIDEOS /alarm THEY HATE THOSE" once and instantly face a ban without warning.

context is important, and in this case you were apparently unbanned in seconds after this happened. joke bans are joke bans and not meant to actually keep you out of the room

first you say

>bans are thrown around inconsistently and without warning

and then you say this

>I point out a video says "SKIP" in big letters in the bottom-right. Said it 7 times quickly and was kicked – ``I was breaking the rules`` via skipbeg spam, so it was fair. I come back saying, jokingly, "you know what to do /feelsyes" once, and face an ip ban. Was it because I didn't like someone's video?

you did exactly what you did to get kicked in the first place as soon as you came back to the room. the kick is your warning, if you come back and do it again and are punished, how can you claim ignorance of what happened? this isn't an example of mod abuse, this is working exactly as intended

and in case it's not obvious to you, the more you do this, the more likely mods are going to be less lenient when dealing with you. if you're seen as someone constantly causing a problem in the room, and even further, coming back on alt names and grey names to continue causing a problem after you've had action taken against you, you really shouldn't be surprised when the next action comes quicker and with greater force than the last


3e068e  No.4805

>>4804

good job ignoring the second half of his entire post lol


08e6d6  No.4806

>>4805

what am i ignoring? the hunter thing?


5d204a  No.4807

>>4804

>if it turns into a thing where you're doing it on every single video, it comes off more like you're just doing it to be a dick and action is probably going to be taken against you.

That's fair, agreed on the whole paragraph. Just personally confused by the assessment (from multiple people) that I hate almost every video, or that I've been excessive. Maybe I just remember wrong, but I swear I normally say good things about videos, just seems like human nature to notice the bad a lot more.

As far as being 'disruptive' I'll say this: Few days ago, too tired to do anything, so I spent 12 hours or so on v4c. Lotsa watchin', talkin', using v4c like I usually do, with no mod intervention. Don't recall anyone being bothered by my presence, or anyone else's for that matter, everyone was just chilling – Then Krogan_ shows up and like… Suddenly I must be stopped. Was it even about 'disruption' in this case considering it was his video and he PMs me about my distate for reposts afterward? It has me (or anyone else in a similar situation) in a tough spot when it seems like being on good or bad terms personally with a mod influences your fate. I don't really know how to control this or the solution, but this is what I'm seeing.

>unbanned in seconds after this happened.

I swear I came back an hour or so later and was still banned, but if you can actually see ban/unban times I'll take your word. No issue with a couple second joke ban if that's what happened.

>stuff about skip in bottom-right

I do understand the warning-kick dynamic here, but when I came back to the room to say "you know what to do /feelsyes" I said it precisely once to purposefully avoid re-offending, because I assumed the issue was that I skipbeg SPAMMED. For my own sake I'll avoid saying things even related to whatever had be warned in the first place, but it's still odd that whatever bluename did considered what I did as repeating the previous offense.

>last paragraph

I get where you're coming from, but if a mod keeps -seeing- someone as being a problem when they aren't, maybe it isn't an issue with the someone. Me, from what I recall: Kicked for not liking a repost, muted for not liking a repost after returning, log off to be a guest to evade my lack of wrong-doing, realize 'oh guests can't skip' so I hop onto an alt I made a while ago (because to my knowledge using alts isn't an offense), I later spam /feelsunwell amongst people's other spam, get kicked for 'unrelated spam' (which it wasn't), and when I return to say that isn't unrelated spam Krogan tells me it was personal. The full extent of problem caused appears to have been not to v4c, but to Krogan's feelings.

Also I don't think you ignored anything. Soz for the wordiness, just making sure I'm saying things clearly.


08e6d6  No.4808

>>4807

>It has me (or anyone else in a similar situation) in a tough spot when it seems like being on good or bad terms personally with a mod influences your fate. I don't really know how to control this or the solution, but this is what I'm seeing.

well how about talking about it with the mod in question? if you're straightforward with your intent then there's less grey area when it comes to them escalating the situation. and i'm not saying "go clear everything you do with a mod before you do it" however if a mod accuses you of doing something wrong and you reasonably explain what you were doing, it's a lot easier for them to make a judgment call that will probably end up being in your favor

>I get where you're coming from, but if a mod keeps -seeing- someone as being a problem when they aren't, maybe it isn't an issue with the someone.

i've talked this exact thing over with not only krogan but others too, and what i'm getting is that more than just the person you're accusing of abuse thinks action against you was justified. if you're unsatisfied then pm me and we can talk about it

don't take any of this as being dismissive of your concerns, but if you really think you're being abused then the strongest move you have is to screenshot it and take it to an admin as soon as you can. if there's merit to the accusations then they will be acted on. i'm not trying to foster some environment where people are fuckin afraid to say shit that others disagree with


5d204a  No.4810

>>4808

>how about talking about it with the mod in question?

I'll do that in the future, actually a good idea. Is there some way I can know for sure who did it if it isn't clear? If there isn't, I'd understand…

>more than just the person you're accusing of abuse thinks action against you was justified

More than just that person gets upset when I don't like their video… but, yes, you need objective proof to back claims up so I'll take screens from now on.


598c25  No.4823

File: 3e48e44777fef3f⋯.gif (962.8 KB, 450x232, 225:116, symspet.gif)

>>4791

hey dummy, this was a reply to >>4763 which was probably you or one of your minions in disguise >pic related

>i think you have a lot of false assumptions here

how fucking ironic!

>you're in a very tiny vocal minority of entitled faggots who think you should just be allowed to do whatever you want at all times, which is basically what you're accusing the mods of doing

again numbnuts, i was replying to >>4763 asking what he(aka you, see pic below) expects us to do about this >>4756

It had absolutely nothing to do about wanting to be allowed to do whatever we want! It was about whitenames not being able to address any issue, minor or big, in any way and have anything be actually done about it. Wether it be through filing a simple complaint, shitposting or making OC about it, NOTHING EVER FUCKING HAPPENS!

>i think you have a lot of false assumptions here

U are so incompetent and deluded by your "grand" power of admin that u thought u didn't even need to read the post i replied to >>4763

and reply to me based on your own assumptions and then say i had alot of false assumptions! This is textbook evidence towards your incapability to be admin!

>you're in a very tiny vocal minority

so barely anyone complains huh?

>it's funny that you try to make that case with your generalization of the user base

Again you fucking dummy! I was not making a case, I was asking a question, motivated why i was asking the question using that generalization of the user base.

The post opened with the question >"What are we supposed to do about it sym?" it was pretty clear what i was asking for, that is if u had actually read the post i was replying to >>4763

(by pic related again)

>the mods today are more fair than they've ever been

Yes and I can't understand why this guy fled North Korea! I mean North Korea are more fair today than they've ever been!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN2ke0v85sI

>i can't even tell you the last time i've had to talk to a mod about random bans

Again, this was never about random bans, it was about how even if all the whitenames wanted and asked for a certain thing to be done or fixed, whatever it may be, it would surely be dismissed and dropped completely if

you, just you (SYM) didn't like the idea or care for it!

>the real funny part to me is that if you're trying to say that v4c is now worse or something

I am trying to say that the fundamental issue with v4c is that whitenames can't address issues or problems and have anything be done about them. As soon as one tries to make a complaint, you admins immediately jump on to the other side and begins refuting whatever one says, The irony is this is exactly what is happening here right now! /realfeels

>what you're really trying to say is that the mods don't abuse their positions enough, because that's the major change that has happened

do you have actual brain damage?

>>If we try to do anything we get banned.

can you give an example of that?

what exactly do you WANT?

Again, if u had actually read the post i replied to >>4763 , u would realise that that was just to answer his dumb post

>can you give an example of that?

If we address an issue, nothing happens

If we actively break dumb meme rules by posting something like BRAP, we atleast get one second of attention but then we get banned

>if you feel ignored, then maybe you should focus on coming up with an actual solution - formulate reasoning for your arguments - instead of just randomly punching your arms around like a child

and yet there are several complains with the simplest and solid reasoning even in only this thread to begin with

>>4707

>I'm just glad the mods that are left are attentive and policing the room fairly. Now we only have one bluename AFK for 6 hours straight without any consequences.

Don't mod people who are not attentative, i have experienced the same mods not even respond to you on several occassions and at different times whenever you ask for for example a bump, you are just ignored and have to ask someone else, even though the mods are active in chat. Rastapopolous comes to mind but i haven't been to the chat in a while so i might have the mod wrong

>>4708

>I'll try to follow metals example more next time. No bumps for blacknames and more videos to 1.

Demod metal for some time and if ´he ever begins doing this again, demod him eternally, this has been a rampant complaint for 2 years now as i can remember, perhaps even longer!

>>4710

>so is this your way of attention seeking, sym? having ex-mods suck your dick for some power?

>by your own criteria a user like metal should have been demodded for being a net burden on the room, but as we know v4c is run like South Africa complete with cronyism

Don't be an attention seeking cunt sym, and don't give mod by the process of cronyism, twaticus comes to mind and also metal which is mentioned here as well again


598c25  No.4824

>>4823

>>>4715

>>Actually it really seems like absolutely nothing has changed.

>Again, nothing ever happens or changes with how this place is run, actually listen to the complaints for once

>>>4716

>>>one of the first remods is Twaticus

>Another complaint about how nothing changes and the abundance of cronyism of selecting mods

>>>4719

>>Hey now, twat bumping her own shit videos constantly is considered """""contributing""""" to the room

>How are u not getting the message at this point?

>>>4746

>>>the mods are too inactive

>>remods basedblue

>>>4747

>>They got rid of a couple of mods who openly have spoken out against sym such as Monokuma, HotSauce or Adderall.

>>Getting rid of those was what it was all about. If it wasn't about that they wouldn't have remodded useless mods like basedblue.

>Don't demod people just because they speak out against you sym you snowflake

>>>4756

>>whats funnier is sym is stupid enough to try and pull this on the room, thinking no one would ask questions.

>>>4759

>>Never trust a nigger.

>>If there's one thing we can learn from this, it's that Illusory was retarded to think sym was at all competent at mod when he basically manipulated that mutt to this position.

>>As the adage goes, anyone who wants power, shouldn't be given power.

>>>4768

>>Hi sym, I know you jerk off at night to your power over the users of meme video site, but I'd just like you to know that I pity you

>People obviously think you are incompetent and is not qualified to be in the position that u are in, which is very clear from how you replied to my post. Solution? Give up the position to someone who is competent!


598c25  No.4825

File: 902a43347a324b7⋯.jpg (60.96 KB, 1000x800, 5:4, 1492656606079.jpg)

>>4824

fucked up by accidentally memearrowing too much, still not as incompetent as sym though


4934ea  No.4826

File: bbb0af78476b231⋯.png (995.87 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, 1511468825913.png)


08e6d6  No.4835

>>4823

>>4824

since you think i'm not capable of reading into the implications in your previous replies (even though i basically already replied to these last 2 posts with >>4791) how about i try to summarize what you're saying and then you can tell me if i'm getting your complaint(s) correctly

main complaints:

1. there are issues that need addressing on v4c

2. we don't address the issues that people complain about

3. furthermore, we punish people who complain

side complaints:

1. mods ignore users

2. metal bumps too much

3. basedblue is not active

4. we demodded monokuma or hotsause because they "spoke out"

5. sym is a bad guy

is that right?


6bf142  No.4836

Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to mod cuntpizza? One of the biggest spammers not only in chat but the playlist too since he self bumps all the time?


598c25  No.4917

>>4835

this is sociopathic tbh


b8ab25  No.4927

Just a warning all homophobic posters WILL be banned. As a homosexual I cannot allow injustices in this LGBT friendly chatroom.

You're been warned.


08e6d6  No.4939

>>4917

good response


2eb596  No.4976

>"drastic restructuring of the mod list"

>everything is literally the same

Quick reminder this entire thing was nothing but a powertrip.


08e6d6  No.4978

>>4976

>19 mods have been de-ranked

we also have like 10~ newly modded/remodded oldmods


90fe5c  No.4980

>>4978

90% of these demods were people who haven't been in v4c for years. I don't see why you would need to make a huge thing out of it by demodding literally everyone instead of just demodding those obviously inactive mods. Obvious powertrip mentality right there.

If you actually were looking to do some "drastic reconstructuring" you wouldn't have remodded useless mods like basedblue, henry_, etc.

Regarding the new mods: New mods are not "drastic reconstructuring" of the mod list.


c3395e  No.4981

>>4980

>"useless" mods ironically are the only mods who make the room enjoyable and bump people

really makes you think. Out of curiosity, what defines "useful" in this case? You just sound like a salty ex-mod who takes the room too seriously.


043b6b  No.4985

Has there ever been an instance where 'under moderation' was an issue?


08e6d6  No.4987

>>4980

removing like 30% of the modlist at once is drastic

>90% of these demods were people who haven't been in v4c for years. I don't see why you would need to make a huge thing out of it by demodding literally everyone instead of just demodding those obviously inactive mods.

you're actually wrong. most of the people that were demodded have been to the room relatively recently

i didn't make a big deal about it, you are by continuing to try and make an issue out of it a month later

the explanations given are more for the people who got removed than people like you who just want to point fingers and bitch about it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edCqF_NtpOQ


08e6d6  No.4988

>>4985

yeah it used to be really bad on instasynch when there were hardly any euro mods and early morning US hours there wasn't even a mod in the room let alone anyone being there AFK

discord has solved a lot of those issues as well because any time something major is going on the mods and admins can be alerted to it nearly instantly


598c25  No.4991

>>4988

no one in this entire thread agrees with anything u say sym, just heed our advice for once


08e6d6  No.4993

>>4991

you disagree that late night/early morning when no mods were around was a shit show?

were you even around back then?


043b6b  No.5010

>>4993

I agree that the pre discord days were a shitshow outside of prime time, but we don't have this issue as much anymore.

Even after the mod purge, we have had 20+ mods online certain nights.

We purged the mods, but then added redundant mods to the same time slots.

The least amount of moderation required is the best amount of moderation.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / baphomet / fast / firechan / leftpol / mde / vichan ]