No.203
This is the thread meant to clear up any misconceptions and hopefully help with whatever reservations people are having with /waifu/ I will try to respond to everything here myself so you get MY as the board owners actual thoughts rather than gauging whats going on based on some of the users as admittedly people here obviously have biases but I choose to remain impartial.
So let's start the wild ride
No.204
What if I want my waifu to rape me? Does that mean I'll get banned?
No.205
Quick question from somebody heavy in the autism about rule 1: This doesn't just cover images, but also text I take it?
No.207
How do you plan to deal with the eventual posters on your board who shit talk /mai/, you will have posters that start to tell others they shouldn't go to the board, and that they are bad for going to other boards, and /mai/ posters "aren't serious", how do you plan on dealing with that?
No.208
>>207
I believe the existing rule 12 already nips that in the butt.
No.209
I contest that you don't care about ideas as much as you focus on the people behind them.
Also, I put forth that by dividing the community, rash judgments were made about how people would react.
Furthermore, the actions of your…co-patriots suggests that not all are free to crosspost between /mai/ and /waifu/ as they please and that the decision thereof is ultimately arbitrary, also casting doubt on your dedication to these vague ideas of which you do not specify except through the rules sticky.
In summation, this board merely seems to be more of a containment board rather than an alternative as you put forth, which can do nothing but engender between two communities that were once one.
No.211
>>208
>nips it in the butt
LEWD!!! LEWD!!! YOU'RE BREAKING RULE 1
just joking around Chadmin, pls dont ban
No.213
>>204
>want
>rape
Theres a difference between actual rape and roleplay
>>205
Yes
>>207
That is the entire reason rule 12 exists. It applies to the people here as well.
>>209
>I contest that you don't care about ideas as much as you focus on the people behind them.
I don't even know what you are getting at with that one
>Also, I put forth that by dividing the community, rash judgments were made about how people would react.
Furthermore, the actions of your…co-patriots suggests that not all are free to crosspost between /mai/ and /waifu/ as they please and that the decision thereof is ultimately arbitrary
Well any rational thinker can tell that not everyone from a certain place is like the worst of its members. The same is true here that not everyone here wants to see /mai/ burn and nobody from posting there should post here and in fact I am doing my best to discourage such behavior.
> this board merely seems to be more of a containment board rather than an alternative as you put forth, which can do nothing but engender between two communities that were once one.
This isn't a matter of containment its a matter of estrangement. The two communities can't get along quite as well as it used to and its causing unneeded stress and arguments all over the place that you and a lot of others are simply ignoring. We can't just pretend that /mai/ wasn't getting more and more heated and divided within itself
No.215
>>214
Well, I think you gotta ask yourself if this is something she would really do with you or just you projecting a fetish.
As in, you really do have to ask yourself. As nobody can really answer it besides you and your waifu.
No.216
>>213
Well I'll try to explain myself as best I can.
You talked on the other board about people throwing ideas in each others' faces as the motivation behind this secession, but I'm not sure what those ideas specifically are.
On the second point, Desu, for example, mentioned he's not really welcome here, but I didn't see him get banned from the introduction thread like others have, which begs the question are there others who are not welcome here?
As for the last point, I will concede some naivete in so far as I do not focus on board politics, but I would propose that such rivalries do not end as nicely by separating people.
No.218
>You talked on the other board about people throwing ideas in each others' faces as the motivation behind this secession, but I'm not sure what those ideas specifically are.
They are perfectly outlined in the sticky. People want to go back to the traditional meaning of the word waifu
>On the second point, Desu, for example, mentioned he's not really welcome here, but I didn't see him get banned from the introduction thread like others have, which begs the question are there others who are not welcome here?
He didn't post in the introduction thread
No.219
>>218
Alright, I'll take you on the first point, but as for the second, I'm aware he didn't post, but he somehow knew he wouldn't be allowed. Is there a list of people who would not be allowed on /waifu/ based on their behavior on /mai/?
No.220
>>219
It is mostly likely because Sui is his literal goddess, not just his spouse.
No.221
>>220
And that is to say, that Desu assumed it also. I highly doubt there is any list.
It would probably be best to ask Desu himself.
No.222
>>219
Desu never asked me nor is there a list. He read the rules and saw that he didn't fit within them. Its really nothing more than that
No.223
I see there's a no lewd rule and my waifu is lewd, am I de facto banned?
No.225
>10. If you couldn't hold a relationship with her if she existed, she's not your waifu, you don't belong here.
Is this rule mostly about your willingness to commit? What about in the entirely hypothetical situation that someone was a hopeless sperg?
No.226
>>225
I would say (and in the least offensive manner possible) to take a step back and evaluate your relationship with your waifu:
When you imagine yourself with her, is she just a person that come out of no where and offers comfort and advice when you are down?
Aside from that does she not factor into any other area of your life?
Barring societal norms, expectations, class differences, etc. could you see yourself with her?
Is there any aspect of your interactions that would bare you from holding what most people call a healthy relationship (beating, abuse, ignoring one another unless their presence is convenient, see them on a purely sexual level, etc.)?
Part of it is to see if a person sees their waifu as someone more than a sexual object or crutch for when they're on hard times, and part of it is to weed out people who thing this is all a hug-box sort of thing.
No.228
No.231
Rule 10 will make a lot of people uncomfortable and may lead them to leave their waifu entirely if they take it as true, basically if you are ugly and inferior you can't have a waifu, according to those standards.
No.232
>>226
then why remove people only with daughterus or goddesses, they seem pretty serious, and can see themselves in those relationships if their special someone were real, and are arguably even more attached to and more affected by them
not sure why they had to be left out from a new board
No.233
>>231
Basically rule 10 gives 3DPD qualities to 2D.
But on the good side, it may make the most alpha board on 8chan.
No.234
>>232
I think the rule specifically refers to romantic relationships.
No.235
>>231
>>233
Pretty sure the rule means no hug-blanketing or people who use their waifu as a replacement for 3dpd.
No.236
>>235
It doesn't seem to me, the owner should explain himself, this is beyond strict, is outright discrimination.
No.237
>>231
>>233
>>235
>>236
Oh shit, you're right. This really makes me reconsider whether or not I want to post on this board. The appeal to having a waifu to me is that her and her world is the way I want her to be (and how other believers of the same fiction think as well) rather than basically being 3DPD. Even if you are not ugly or inferior, even if you're a fucking Olympic athlete, many people here would not be loved by their waifu if given 3DPD qualities because they are so much stronger than them. I think it's a dumb rule that needs to be altered or removed entirely, there's no point in it when "only serious waifufags post here" is a rule already.
No.238
>>236
>>237
I really don't think it has to do with looks.
No.239
>>232
>Daughteru
No real comment or issue with them, aside from the fact that discussion could be more difficult for them. But that's their choice if they want to come here and discuss things, in my eyes they're fine so long as they're serious versus just having an attachment to a character. This is a board for waifus, thus most discussion will be centered around romantic interactions and relations. If people with Daughteru's feel fine with bending questions/dicussions to suit their own needs then fine, go right on ahead.
>Goddesses
This on the other hand is not a waifu and has no need for discussion here. I don't have any issue with people who follow this belief, but they are not the same as people with waifus. They might be serious, but it isn't the same relationship between two spouses. At that point you're stepping in religious territory and as such, would not constitute the same mentality here. There are our lovers, girlfriends/boyfriends, spouses, husbands/wives, partners, etc. not a God, idol, or deity.
No.240
>>237
We have to wait until we get an explanation
No.241
>>238
The way I see it, I'd look the same as every other character in her world, with differences to indicate my hair, skin colour, etc while still staying close to the style of that world. So no, it's not looks. But I don't want my waifu to be real. I want to be with her in her world, as a character who is like all the other characters. I don't expect to have any superpowers or anything like that which are not allowed to me by others, so it's not a total self insert power fantasy or anything like that. But let's face it, women in the real world won't love you if you can't provide for them. I see 2D love as more pure than 3D love because it doesn't suddenly stop as soon as one person is incapable of providing for the other. It's not conditional love, it's unconditional.
No.242
>>241
>>237
I don't think that's what he was getting at with rule 10, the way I interpreted it was the following:
If you and your waifu were to meet right now at this very instant, would you be able to hold a relationship with her? You are both both 2D or 3D, you both have your same exact personalities, disregard any physical looks or idea of being attractive or not as well. Possible reasons why you couldn't be together could be, but are not limited to:
>You are already in a relationship (2D harem or with 3D)
>You know literally nothing about her aside from her name and looks (Geared towards people who think of waifuism as a meme, "look at my new waifu guys!")
>You ignore their presence unless them being around is convenient (Hug-boxers/comfort blanket)
>You/They are physically or mentally abusive, and not in a loving or teasing way
>You focus purely upon their physical looks/attractiveness (Actual love/infatuation vs pure lust)
There are probably more examples, but there are some the biggest ones I could think of. This is more of a question (from what I can tell) that is meant to weed out "serious" people from casuals or those who have a relationship with a character that isn't exactly waifuism.
No.243
>>242
>>You are already in a relationship (2D harem or with 3D)
Those people make me angry. I view romantic love as pure when it's devoted towards one person, no exceptions.
>>You know literally nothing about her aside from her name and looks (Geared towards people who think of waifuism as a meme, "look at my new waifu guys!")
That makes me upset too, but I don't think Rule 10 was implying that.
>>You ignore their presence unless them being around is convenient (Hug-boxers/comfort blanket)
She does come to mind when I am upset, but often SHE is the reason I'm upset because when I allow negative thoughts to encroach upon me, I think of her not loving me at all because of who I am.
>>You/They are physically or mentally abusive, and not in a loving or teasing way
This should not happen in 2D, but I'm sure the admin and other people here would argue that you should be doing that to not seem like a "hugblanketer" because such abuse happens in real life relationships all the time.
>>You focus purely upon their physical looks/attractiveness (Actual love/infatuation vs pure lust)
I don't like this either, I have strong lust for my waifu but I also have powerful romantic feelings for her. I believe the lust for her appearance stems from my romantic feelings for her, though I know how it feels to love someone without wanting to have sexual thoughts about them because I had feelings for a 2D girl like that many years ago before I met my beloved.
No.244
>>243
>She does come to mind when I am upset, but often SHE is the reason I'm upset because when I allow negative thoughts to encroach upon me, I think of her not loving me at all because of who I am.
This is understandable in the sense that a) you don't just think of her when you're upset but also at other times in your daily life. and b) that is more attributed to your own emotions versus you actually pinning the blame onto her. It's fine to sometimes feel inferior enough to not be "worthy" of your waifu, everyone has their highs and lows. At the same time however, that does not mean that she wouldn't love just because you think that she wouldn't at times.
>This should not happen in 2D, but I'm sure the admin and other people here would argue that you should be doing that to not seem like a "hugblanketer" because such abuse happens in real life relationships all the time
It was more meant in a sense of being malicious to be malicious. Maiming, hitting, slapping, hurting, as well as mentally/emotionally hurting someone via lying, blaming, slandering, etc. I believe that is different than getting into a fight as most couples do (although I do understand this can bleed over at times). The difference is that one is done in the heat of the moment and truly wasn't meant to be done, while the other is done on purpose with the intent to harm your partner.
>I don't like this either, I have strong lust for my waifu but I also have powerful romantic feelings for her. I believe the lust for her appearance stems from my romantic feelings for her, though I know how it feels to love someone without wanting to have sexual thoughts about them because I had feelings for a 2D girl like that many years ago before I met my beloved.
Lust/desire out of romance is fine, this point was more about acknowledging all parts of your waifu. There's a difference between loving her for her personality and having no sexual desire for anyone/anything, and primarily loving her just for her body. With the second definition, you could have a character that looked just like her but had a different personality, and you'd "love" that character regardless. The point is to make sure that you love her not only for her looks, but also for who she is.
No.245
>>225
I very much believe it to be about willingness to commit and like >>226 said
>Part of it is to see if a person sees their waifu as someone more than a sexual object or crutch for when they're on hard times, and part of it is to weed out people who thing this is all a hug-box sort of thing.
>>228
honestly for now, yes. But not forever
>>231
>>233
>>235
>>236
>>237
>>238
>>238
>>241
It isn't making it more like a 3dpd relationship where she has conditions. Its basically if you don't feel you could keep the relationship going, ie being as faithful as your waifu would want, not doing the stuff she can be shown in the show to specifically hate. Its a matter of commitment and knowing what you'd be getting into by having a relationship with her. It has nothing to do with appearance
No.274
Also I hate to be that guy but: nigga what general thread?
Is there gonna be one? If so, I'm not sure if we really need one. Would it be strictly off topic only?
No.322
I am curious, what is this board stance on modern cartoon characters over all?
No.323
>>322
If somebody thinks they might be a seasonal they might wanna wait before posting here.
Posters are going to have have a spouse from any range of time though, in fact that's already true of the board.
No.325
>>323
I meant modern as in the on model geometric simplistic style they use that was popularized by early cartoon network years. I don't know how is it called, kind of like the evolution of the Hanna-Barbera style.
No.328
>>325
Are you asking about western cartoons?
As long as the person is serious about their loved one and isn't breaking one of the rules nobody is gonna care.
No.334
>>239
But the sticky itself, says spouses.
This is a board for spouses
5. Keep the discussion about waifus and/or husbandos (save for the general thead)
Why would you talk about things that aren't your wife on the wife board, unless your waifu canonically has a daughter.
It's absolutely within the realms of something that is debatable, and will bring lots of /meta/, "what is a daughteru" "how do you tell if someone is serious" "what about someone with a daughteru and no waifu"
Wasn't this board designed to simply be somewhere people can go to talk about their wives, and avoid the discussions that go into "what is waifuism" and have a single unified ideology, unlike /mai/ which allows any ideology which results in debates, while people here aren't really interested in debate they want to just be around similar people, those similar people being people with 2d wives, and 2d wives only.
You are inviting in the debate with daughterus.
Also by this logic even a goddessfag or someone with no waifu would be able to post, just only about their daughteru if that gets allowed, yes?
If daughterus are allowed, it risks the debate coming in. If daughterus aren't allowed, it should be across the board even, no daughterus at all unless its canon. If we allow only people with waifus to post daughterus, then it just validate this board as an exclusive "elitist" club, only people with "real" waifus get to post about daughteru feelings in that case, when this boards own sister board is for different types of beliefs to be allowed, ie daughterus
If people don't want to post daughterus on /mai/ and only here, and want to keep anyone without a wife from discussing daughterus here, they are posting on this board for the wrong reasons elitism
No.335
>>334
infact, the same goes for anything outside of discussions of waifus, a general thread for example, becomes spoiler text for what it will be read as "general for people with wives only no dirty casuals allowed"
Plus a general thread is likely to bring drama that has nothing to do with waifus either
A general chat or an irc or discord would make sense, as its a general chat where the /meta/ wont creep in, however a general THREAD would just be silly, as the other board does a good job at keeping its drama outside its general non related discussion thread, but a terrible job of keeping it out of every other thread and chat, the whole reason for this board, a place where everyone is generally unified in beliefs and practices, so the debates wont really happen, and everyone can just post about waifus happily without any need for "what is and isn't okay" discussions.
None of this is criticism of the other board, just acknowledgement of its unique role, and this boards unique role by the way
No.336
>>335
interpreted as* not read as, sorry
No.338
>>334
I had actually assumed this board was only for waifu/husbandos myself.
No.342
Yknow I don't wanna beat a dead horse but..
well..
No.343
>>342
>he deleted his own posts
oh well
No.344
>>342
thanks for screencapping that, its prob the tor poster who was trying to stir shit
remember, people like that belong on neither board
don't let him cause us to fight eachother, ill share this with /mai/ so they are aware
No.346
>>344
oh looks like i got beat
>>>/mai/47798
No.347
>>342
>>344
>>346
actually what are the rules for this, "don't bring drama from other boards" is a rule, but, this is drama that is directly about our board, and attempting to cause further drama on our board, I don't think just pretending its not there will fix anything, could we make some rules on exact procedures to deal with drama when it does arise?
I think we shouldn't just let it play out, we should have a policy on what to do in case of drama
No.351
>>325
Western cartoons are a bit iffy and I'm gonna want to think about that one for a while before coming to a clear decision
>>334
I was a bit iffy on the whole daughteru thing myself but I agree with a lot of this post
This IS a significant other board
>>347
Well realistically we can't stop people from other boards outside of /mai/ and /waifu/ from saying whatever they want about us. When they are within our sphere of influence its actually pretty easy to deal with. So if someone wants to post nasty shit on say /v/ /mai/ and /waifu/ can just blow them out there like I was told happened this time
No.352
|
| ('A`) ∠ This pretender probably doesn't know anything
／￣ﾉ( ﾍﾍ￣
So Board Owner, tell me. How much do you know about 2D love?
Are you a Otaku of any kind?
Spill it.
No.353
>>352
>needing to be an otaku to know what waifuism is
Not the board owner, but you're saying some dumb shit right now, and this is coming from an actual ANIME PRO that uses /a/ as his primary board outside of /waifu/. I'll bet you don't even know what chuun-dere is, you fokin cazual fggt. Do you even naizuri? :^)
No.354
>>352
Oh look, it's the smartass from the other board. I see you changed the terminology from weeaboo to otaku. Open up your ear holes, and put on your thinking cap and listen up, you trolling little shit
Read up? It's text anyway! To answer your first mind-numbingly retarded question I've seen in this post, yes, I do know about 2d love. With a very sweet and caring girl, I think, with an above average jealous tendency and a not-so-good (terrible, really). She's 2d, finicky around other people, doesn't like Kanye, is not the same dimension as I am, and sometimes she gives me some really detailed visual imagery of us doing very lewd and very loving things together, causing me to have bones at the worst of times, because she's a tease like that.
Also she's shit against sharing types, cannot stop hugging me, and if you search for your waifu on any of the art sites I got to (I think 3D is PD, so probably not on any of the ones you frequent, anon-chan) you get terrible shit drawn by people who want muh special snowflake murrohcees. Not to mention I don't get any VN's or a tv show that is for kids.
Still, I love her, and she's been my only gf and companion for years, probably before you were born. Go ahead and show me your waifu though, anon-kun. I'll wait while you post your large Eyed Anime Girl #3899320756, and them I'm going to laugh at you and finish this delightfully good can of iced tea. If you've any non-stupid questions, I'd love to read some of them. Might help you get to know me a little better. Which is good.
No.356
>>353
>>354
This is some high quality shit. Emphasis on the shit part considering you're getting defensive over a question you don't understand.
None of you have the ##Board Owner code though, so pardon me for not losing my expectations yet.
No.357
>>356
What is there to know about 2d love?
I love my waifu in the most sincere of ways. My mind and heart is occupied by her night and day, every day, all year. I do a lot of things to make her happy and seeing her happy is one of the biggest treasures of the universe. Nothing and no one could compare.
As for am I an otaku. Admittedly not really. I used to watch a lot of anime, some vn's here and there, weeb rpgs. I'm still way into weeb games but I can't really bring myself to watch anything for a long time let alone anime. Anime movies are more up my alley though and the Godzilla movies are fantastic. The real Godzilla movies, Mothra best kaiju. Also sentai's are really cool and I can definitely afford to get more into that. Juuko B-Fighter is my favorite.
No.359
File: 1446108932384.jpg (Spoiler Image, 47.08 KB, 288x798, 48:133, 00000000000000000000.jpg)
>>357
>What is there to know about 2d love?
More than you know.
No.362
>>354
Who is your waifu darling?
>>351
Yeah, I find hard to believe someone can love any of the cartoons we have nowadays and I just plain think people here would not like to even see them posted.
✈🏢🏢
No.363
Why even bother with forced anon when you can tell who most people are?
No.364
>>357
Huh.
I expected that the BO would be a Anime Otaku or something of the matter.
But love for you waifu works, I guess.
No.368
>>237
>>236
>>235
>>234
>>233
>>231
>>357
>>351
God damn it Chadmin, you came back here to answer some questions but you didn't answer the most important ones of all in this thread. When you made rule 10, are you basically saying "if your waifu was a 3DPD and you wouldn't be able to make her love you then you don't belong on this board"? This may come as a shock to you, but none of us are youkai or gods or vampires or demons or anything like that, we're just human beings, so that rule would really kill your board if everyone took it seriously.
No.370
>>368
He did answer that
>>245
>It isn't making it more like a 3dpd relationship where she has conditions. Its basically if you don't feel you could keep the relationship going, ie being as faithful as your waifu would want, not doing the stuff she can be shown in the show to specifically hate. Its a matter of commitment and knowing what you'd be getting into by having a relationship with her. It has nothing to do with appearance
No.371
>>370
That's Yunobro though, not the board owner.
No.372
>>371
Yunobro is the board owner.
No.373
>>351
I really want to give this board a chance, but I can't believe that you would discriminate against waifus because of their art style? I can't love somebody just because of their art style?
No.374
>>351
I really want to give this board a chance, but I can't believe that you would discriminate against waifus because of their art style? I can't love somebody just because of their art style? And don't give me the excuse of "western media is usually not as in depth" because that's not true and you know it.
No.376
>>373
>>374
I don't know who you are, but if you are who I think you are, I'll just say: make your own board for you and your friends.
Also, those cartoons you talk about are very rare exceptions.
No.377
>>373
Again, this isn't about people saying you can't love somebody. They're just saying you can't post them here. And like the other guy said, go make your own damn community.
No.378
>14. If you eat pizza with a knife and fork what are you doing man
Being civilized.
No.381
>>376
>>377
I'd love to know who you think I am, because you're probably wrong. But it doesn't matter who I am anyways. What ever happened to "the post is more important that the poster"?
The point is this. If you're arguing that you won't allow western waifus because they're usually from kids shows, now you have to say that waifus from shoenn or bishoujo shows aren't allowed, or you're being a hypocrite.
Or you can say that you'll only allow waifus from "serious" sources. Then you have to not allow waifus from any comedy show, and that includes stuff like Yuru Yuri, Lucky Star, stuff like that. Any ecchi show isn't serious either I'd say so Kill la Kill, Highschool of the Dead, and Rosario Vampire aren't allowed either.
OR admit that it's just the artstyle that you think is icky and say that anything with that art style isn't allowed. So that means no Tezuka, and pretty much no anime from the 90's, since most anime artists from that era were inspired by western art.
No.382
>if you don't like the way the mods run things around here, go make your own board.
But we already have that. It's called /mai/ and nobody ever HAD to make their own board because the mods were running things just fine without needing a giant Q&A thread to explain their motives and how they operate to their posters.
No.383
>>381
>now you have to say that waifus from shoenn or bishoujo shows aren't allowed, or you're being a hypocrite
>Or you can say that you'll only allow waifus from "serious" sources. Then you have to…
>OR admit that it's just the artstyle that you think is icky and say that anything with that art style isn't allowed. So that means…
No.384
Can a waifu community, one based primarily on love, really succeed when its very creation and ongoing existence is just drenched in drama and anger?
Sometimes I take a step back and try to piece together how so much drama and hate arise out of groups that get together to express their love. Always with some snowball effect on some comparatively small conflict, and I wish I could figure out how to stop these things before we get…well, this.
No.385
File: 1446170837064.jpg (Spoiler Image, 78.12 KB, 554x513, 554:513, woman with huge ass makes ….jpg)
No.386
>>381
Okay, you're probably not the cyclops guy. Your English is coherent.
It's not about the characters being from kids shows. It's about cartoons and comics people not mixing with anime and manga people. You either choose to strictly forbid all western cartoons, or allow all.
>>384
I think the only way it can be stopped is by having a clear purpose and strictly enforced rules from the beginning. There are many ways people handle this concept. But in a community, a common method or view needs to be agreed upon. Otherwise there will always be conflict.
No.387
>>386
Okay then. So Wonder Red anon can't post here. Phantasy Star Online is inspired by western media, so the guy with Lisa is out right? And most 90's anime are inspired by Western art, so that means that anyone with a waifu from Tenshi or Ranma or anyone with a waifu from a Miyazaki film, like Nausicaa or Kiki's Delivery Service right?
Also, who made you board owner?
No.388
>>387
Woah, woah, WOAH. Now you're jumping to conclusions. Those characters are all Japanese, so they should be allowed. Western influence should be fine. I don't think it matters. But that's just what I believe.
Sorry if I come across as the voice of authority. I'm just a guy who has seen how conflict in these communities explode multiple times. I want to share my advice on how this might be stopped.
No.389
>>388
So if it's not about the art style, what's it about? The color of the skin of the creators? "No whiteys on /waifu/" is that it? "It's not about the waifu but the creator of the waifu" that's what it sounds like you're saying, is that right?
No.391
>>389
Holy shit. You might not be him, but you sure are just as bone-headed as he was. I'm done.
No.392
I think as long as the person is behaved and not breaking any of the rules it'll be fine, no matter if the one they love is western or eastern.
No.393
>>389
It's just "STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE". Nothing more, nothing less.
No.394
>>389
You're just looking to stir shit aren't you?
The sad thing is that it's actually working.
No.395
>>387
>>389
>>393
(‘・ω・) What hit you in the head?
No.396
>>394
I'm not trying to stir shit. I just want some honesty and consistency. The problem isn't that western and eastern fans don't get along, because guess what? There's a waifu board where both are allowed and there's been no shit stirred about it.
No.398
>>397
That's a horrible image. It says waifv, not waifu.
No.400
>>397
You already posted that on /mai/ and it still isn't funny or helpful.
No.401
>>364
Its just because my attention span isn't the best for watching stuff. I have tons of anime half finished.
>>368
This was answered
see
>>370
>>396
Spel your persecution complex is showing again
>>378
I seriously hope nobody takes that rule seriously
>>382
Thats great dear
>>383
Don't worry about him
>>384
Waifu's are a polarizing subject for many. To try to unite every single one of them is simply impossible. Its a great dream but sadly unreachable because humans are fickle
No.402
>>401
Dude I'm not Spel. Again, let me quote you yourself. "The post is more important than the poster." So it doesn't even matter if I am him or not. I just want to hear a good and consistent reason for why western waifus shouldn't be allowed.
No.403
I know a few of our visitors hate the board already, but why come to argue about something that isn't even a rule? If you're so sure that the board is going to die quickly, why not just leave it be and let nature take its course?
No.405
>>385
Exactly why did you post this?
No.406
>>402
I believe I actually said I'm not really sure one way or another on it. I mean we could try it so long as its not some pony. Go ahead and post her. We will let you be the example of why we allow them or why we don't.
No.408
>>406
Well it certainly looks like someone has already been banned for it >>141
No.410
>>408
>>408
He has a short ban for Rule 12 actually.
I actually forgot entirely that raven was western
No.416
Owner, what you should do is to check on the board more often or get some mods that could.
>>398
…
No.419
>>386
>>401
>Who the fuck is spel?
>Cyclops guy
HAHA! wth I remember that annoying Little shit, all the pics he posts are disgusting, we should ban that fucking cartoon along with the ponies just to piss him off.
>>410
Raven is fine though, she does looks ok and he is a well behaved poster, I hope his ban is lifted son.
No.420
>>419
Yeah I'm pretty sure you're Spel.
No.421
>>416
Hello there. I am actually a mod here. I have previous experience being a mod for one of the top 25 boards on this site, so you can rest assured I know how to handle the mod client and such. With the board's currentl traffic level, we don't really need any more than two people moderating the board. We have also started to finally go back to having different sleeping schedules and thus are able to monitor the board in a manner more closely resembling a 24/7 watch.
What I can tell you based on my previous moderation style is that a poster is more likely to get banned or have their post/image removed if you actually report it, unless it is either a blatent disregard for basic rules or it breaks a global rule. However, unlike the other board I moderate, I do read every post on the board so far, so at this point it is more of a matter of getting reassurance that I'm not the only person bothered by a post than it is bringing to my attention that it exists. If smeone DOES break a global rule (CP, link spamming, etc.) then be sure to global report it in order for it to have a better chance to get removed ASAP. You'd think this is common sense and that it only happens in certain boards but you'd be surprised.
tl;dr I am keeping watch on the board just like Yuno-bro and we'll enlist another mod if/when the board gets enough traffic to warrent it.
No.422
>>420
>that 420 get
420 tells the truth