[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / hikki / htg / hypno / sw / teto / tijuana / trash ]

/wap/ - Women Are Property

End hypergamy with ownership.


Winner of the 19th Attention-Hungry Games
/scifi/ - We won because we paid Yawn fifty bucks.

Comment *
Verification *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

File: 7faefa9a62b8ffe⋯.jpg (87.93 KB, 634x635, 634:635, 290CD05200000578-0-image-a….jpg)


Welcome to /wap/ here anons can discuss why women should be regarded legally as property and not as people.

File: b35fad22c8eaff5⋯.jpeg (61.16 KB, 800x832, 25:26, new-infographic1.jpeg)


Ownership of women will effectively end female hypergamous nature. If women cannot select their mates there will be and end put to hypergamy once and for all. Men will no longer need to fear the state replacing the father, biased child custody battles, and divorce leaving a woman with half of a mans possessions. There can be an end to feminism, MGTOW, and all of the taint inflicted on society by feminist poisoning of women. The natural nature of women will also be held in check.

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



I believe that if women loose their human rights and become property that all of the Hypergamous nature of women will essentially be destroyed. If a woman cannot "marry up", abuse blue pilled men, or always have a fallback boy then they will loose all of the power which their pussy pass grants them in modern society. Society as a whole has seemingly been cucked by women who wish to abuse the natural male instinct of caring for and protecting women. Men are often abused financially by women. Gold digging will be wiped out. There will be no divorce court. Many MGTOW are familiar with women "hitting the wall", when an otherwise young and attractive woman reaches an age where her beauty, and body begin to decline in terms of psychical attractiveness and she can no longer reap the rewards of having men constantly trying to win her approval or her favor. The thirsty white knights who will bow and kneel to her pussy pass will cease to exist. In a /wap/ world women's privileged and rights will be revoked all in one single blow. Women will both start and end at "the wall". Women have begun to elevate their place in society due to women's rights movements. /wap/ is all about putting women back in their place.

File: 3f8047f347dcfda⋯.png (481.66 KB, 373x481, 373:481, mother hold a sleeping gir….PNG)


I think the makeup need to be banned to keep the girls pure.


1. little whores use it to make themselves look older

2. it is meant to simulate the effect of being sexually aroused

3. it dries out the skin, thereby making women hit the wall earlier and harder

agreed. also, it gets worse when you include hair dye.

don't actually ban makeup, let men use it to play vulcans on tv. here's a question: what should the role of female actresses be on tv? should they be fuckpuppets for the male characters to use and discard, or should they be completely silent?


Makeup should be permissible IMO. Why not keep the young ones looking good? Dry skin, they wont be young forever.


File: 9784c37a52458e2⋯.png (229.35 KB, 335x315, 67:63, with makeup and without ma….PNG)

I agree that it should be forbidden to use.


Makeup ruin the skins so I agree they need to be forbidden now.

File: 63c71ea03baedef⋯.jpg (82.7 KB, 1000x746, 500:373, 0_19030b_5e4f2546_orig.jpg)


One nice thing about this idea is controlling for fat and tattoos. There is a substantial proportion of the female population who would actually be attractive if not for their weight and their ink. With ownership, thin non-tattooed women would be the overwhelming norm.

18 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1936f3b1c845dea⋯.jpg (35.12 KB, 616x421, 616:421, hitting-the-wall-premier-f….jpg)


Seeing women who hit the wall is oddly satisfying.



File: 93c4e55eaa89366⋯.jpg (334.5 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, BRLh60u.jpg)


>Ugly women do not matter as they will always be ugly.

If this were to become a reality, then facial ugliness may matter less. We make a huge deal about pretty faces in our society because that is what you see. In a society where either everyone is nude or you could keep your woman nude at your leisure, that would matter much less.


File: 32c9fdbf9ce540f⋯.jpg (152.71 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, 32c9fdbf9ce540fe6c021ee2f8….jpg)

BTW, BO should allow for multiple images. It can go up to 5.



>BTW, BO should allow for multiple images. It can go up to 5.


File: 21ad5b041179c3e⋯.jpg (41.62 KB, 460x230, 2:1, ImageVaultHandler.aspx.jpg)


How did anons find /wap/?

Have you told any other anons and or friends about /wap/?

Do you have any suggestions for /wap/?

What topics do we need to cover at /wap/?

10 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: ab565655822da1e⋯.jpg (373.29 KB, 1040x1000, 26:25, single motherhood destroy ….jpg)


as someone who grew up surrounded by "strong independent women" that morals argument instantly falls on deaf ears.

when women are allowed to make moral choices for themselves, we get child abuse, abortion, parental alienation, illiteracy, starvation, and mass murder.



Morals are to be applied to humans

The very point of this board is that women aren't to be considered human the same way as me and you, but more like property, like an object or a pet

Would you treat your dog the same way you treat another person, let alone have it being in charge of something? yeah, me neither


File: b83b3fb7cac0bcd⋯.jpg (33.83 KB, 650x400, 13:8, angela-merkel-reuters_650x….jpg)


Agreed, empowering women causes them to get ahead of themselves and they think that they can do anything and everything. Women in government is a fucking nightmare. Abortion speaks for itself there.



Property doesn't have morals you're right!


File: bdf4bcc8e0e8701⋯.jpg (4.94 KB, 150x150, 1:1, 1438675510192.jpg)


MGTOW philosophy varies for each MGTOW. In this board the philosophy is that women are inferior to men. Psychically, mentally, and on a societal level are not equals. Concubinage and slavery are just a few wonderful ideas on what women are good for. MGTOW.

4 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



MGTOW makes plenty of sense.


It is the male reaction to feminism on some level.



I get the notion the person who made this doesn't actually know much about /pol/'s general response to sluts.



It seemed off.



they literally said that to me when they banned me from /pol/ for criticizing feminism.

it's the standard traditional conservative viewpoint, taught in church today.



It would be difficult to be more wrong.

1) >/pol/'s moderation in any way reflects its userbase

2) >traditional conservatives aren't aware of whoredom being default nowadays

3) >traditional conservatism is taught in church at all

Disagreement on this topic on /pol/ is split among who's responsible, the options being women for being whores, (((cultural directors))) for pushing them in that direction, or men not doing their part to stop either of the former. But there's no voice in the mix saying western women don't have a whore epidemic going on.

File: c9fda258fe3cc33⋯.jpg (17 KB, 600x600, 1:1, 1873449.jpg)


We need to practice the selective breeding to improve the female quality. We can use the harvested 10/10 fertilised eggs to implant it into infertile female life inmates in the propagation facilities. When the babies are weaned then they will given to the future adoptive parents.

18 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>Didn't think of it that way, a woman can just be slutty to her man

It would appear that allot of women seem to fit rather nicely into this category.

>change man

How? Run away?

Also I agree that we must take more specific precautions.

I think that indoctrinating them in their "schools" will be a good start.


File: 53ddbf42c25ca18⋯.jpg (9.83 KB, 258x145, 258:145, (m=ecuKGgaaaa)(mh=cFf6z7ZY….jpg)

>2. psychological. train females from as young as possible that their continued existence depends on the male. unfortunately, despite this being true right now, it still doesn't seem to sink in to their tiny defective minds, so this may never work without already having other methods in place to establish loyalty and dominance over women.

I believe that this is our best shot. We cannot let them go on with this empowered woman crap.

>3. physiological. sever a major tendon or 4. remove major organ or organs which otherwise enables freedom of movement. good luck not having the police find out tho, since this is currently illegal.

This is true I was thinking shock collars may be more effective and significantly less intrusive to their actual health.



unfortunately a shock collar would be too easy to remove.

their punishment must be more severe.



I'm open to hearing recommendations.



my mind immediately went to science fiction, which is currently not an option.

it would have to be under the skin, and preferably even inside or under bone. something far too painful and dangerous to remove by oneself. those chips they put in dogs could be easily dug out with a knife and maybe a few painkillers.

I think the most legit viable method for retention in the modern age would be psychological conditioning. raise them from toddlers to not just think or believe but to KNOW they are property. worst case scenario, introduce psychotropics during an education session, like a government interrogator.

File: 9359252ed31714d⋯.jpg (34.76 KB, 640x360, 16:9, keltic-alp.jpg)


The west was founded on the principle of individual freedom. If you want to enslave women as property and have concubines you are not a westerner. This is easterner theology and a more primitive society.

13 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at








File: 576a7a850094f51⋯.jpg (49.91 KB, 600x788, 150:197, ducreux1.jpg)


>The West was founded on the principle of individual freedom

1) The West was already well on its way to greatness before the Enlightenment

2) What you refer to as "individual freedom" is actually the notion of all human life being divinely profound, however you interpret that. It's more broad than 'individual freedom', because it includes 'individual responsibility' as well as a divine right to be and act. "Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness" was originally "Life, Liberty, and Property".

3) The world is more complicated than a dichotomy of "freedom" and "slavery". There are infinitely fractious gradients of chaos versus structure. A modern SJW's head would explode if they were exposed to Roman style slavery, for example. Women can and should be deprived of the vote, but that doesn't make them slaves either.



>"Life, Liberty, and Property".



> Women can and should be deprived of the vote

Women in politics has been a mistake.

It does not make them slaves but then comes /wap/.

File: 83671b7f4cb19ca⋯.jpg (54.54 KB, 315x700, 9:20, 50s-housewife-experiment.jpg)


We need to create a school that can give the future wives the domestic skills so they can be efficient and well organised to lessen the burdens on the husbands.

5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.




>Does anyone want new property?






File: c75813d92d7460e⋯.jpg (37.62 KB, 570x319, 570:319, o-cheers-leonardo-dicaprio….jpg)


Cheers anon! Thanks! Spread the word!



I like you.



Spread the word to the world.


Please dominate and enslave me. I want to be property

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



Then go protest for stripping the women's rights.


File: c72e71187a06d5a⋯.jpg (96.05 KB, 1200x630, 40:21, cheers-beer-yoga-1200x630.jpg)


Here here!



I want to enslave you as my housewife but I cannot because it is illegal.



That is why we are here.



Enslaving you even if you want to be a slave is illegal.

File: 0667751de73523b⋯.png (564.13 KB, 736x1187, 736:1187, 1974fed02f01a14256542c8e83….png)


Post your MGTOW related stats, numbers, charts, info-graphs and other assorted goods here.

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


Who here identifies as MGTOW?


I've been "mgtow" before I even knew what mgtow meant. I refused to even entertain the concept of marriage. my family seems to actually get this, considering the history we all understand. I sure as shit am not going to offer my life to gynocentrism and women's tender feefees.

ultimately, if there is one thing I have observed about mgtow, there are only two kinds of people. there are mgtow, and there are anti mgtow who cannot grasp the concept and misrepresent mgtow at every opportunity.



Not me.



>ultimately, if there is one thing I have observed about mgtow, there are only two kinds of people. there are mgtow, and there are anti mgtow who cannot grasp the concept and misrepresent mgtow at every opportunity.

This could not be more accurate.

It is good to see another man on here who is not going to blue pill himself into financial suicide. MGTOW will grow when men wake up. I wish you well anon.




1 Non

File: 95aaefec5b14af0⋯.png (39.12 KB, 240x240, 1:1, Institute_WRB.png)


We need a governmental branch to track down runaway women. Regardless of returning them to their rightful owners we need an arm of the government which can find the runaway and abandoned women to take them in as state property.

1 post and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



>We need the funds to take care of the women as the government property


Not sure about the rest but sounds fine.


best case, no tax money would be required. private corporations would be compelled to be sure their stock of breeding females was secured at all times. contractors would be hired to recover escapees.

do women really need their hamstring or achilles tendon?




>do women really need their hamstring or achilles tendon?

Problematic bitches do not.



What will the government do with the state property?



State being government.

File: 31d122a402f959d⋯.jpg (202.14 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, ward-3.jpg)


Where do you stand on beating women? Should women be beaten? Why or why not? Is it even the states right to regulate such treatment of property, why or why not?

26 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>What form of punishment would you advocate that can substitute beating?

Belting, paddling, hand and foot whipping.


The state of your property reflects your lifestyle. If your women look/act like shit you're probably a dirty hobo.



so all men that have ever existed are dirty hobos?

nope. go lick snatch somewhere else.



Roman slavery > dirty ape slavery

When your buddy shows up at your house the first thing he sees is your slaves, if your slaves look like shit it means you don't care about your shit. Therefore, you're a dirty hobo.

A well behaved slave is property of a good master. A rebellious slave is property of an inadequate master.



No, only those who worship pedophile warlords and would rather lay with a goat than with a woman.

File: cd504282cfcb685⋯.jpg (24.5 KB, 534x401, 534:401, 636218006602620344-pregnan….jpg)


How will we deal with pregnant women? Will abortions become a large scale problem? How will this affect abortion and how may it enable new laws to deal with the major societal changes? Will pregnant women be able to be bought and sold while they are pregnant? How do we deal with birth rates? Please post all birth and pregnancy related subjects here.

3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 06ad78733828756⋯.jpg (20.72 KB, 294x262, 147:131, slave.jpg)


>Strict welfare laws for male babies. Having an unborn boy inside her would be as close as a woman could come to having human rights.

Absolutely. Women are replaceable, men are valuable.

Raising children is doable as long as you do not sell the daughters but then they would live with you forever.

Spaying ugly women should be a state mandated excursion. High quality women should and or must always be bred. All women look like fuck dolls and slaves to me.

Yes! We wont just own them, we will own their entire populations means of sustainability and existence. Women control jack shit. We control everything, including women!



> Women are replaceable

Well, it's harder to repopulate with a majority of men and minority of women, just saying


File: 16818a64ad5b44e⋯.jpg (35.53 KB, 500x333, 500:333, Rape-and-other-sexual-assa….jpg)


Absolutely but if we get to the point of cloning and making test tube women then it really wont matter how we treat them and they will be truly powerless.

No longer will women hold the power of creation over men, we will harvest subjugated women to be the birth mothers of our seed test tube or otherwise.



during wartime perhaps, in an extremely depopulated country.

in any first world/developed nation, this is not an issue.



Agreed, it wouldn't surprise me if some form of population control ratio could be worked out if absolutely necessary.


What laws need to be passed to support the ownership and training of women? Should the state take an active role in correcting their behavior, or is it up to their owners?

Should clothes be required in public, or banned?

What is done about runaway or abandoned women?

What jobs can women do?

How are they kept and treated by their owners, and are there any laws against mistreatment?

What are the laws on buying and selling?

How do scenes from daily life change when women are property?


>What laws need to be passed to support the ownership and training of women? Should the state take an active role in correcting their behavior, or is it up to their owners?

Abolish the laws that gave the women the rights to do whatever they want.

>Should clothes be required in public, or banned?

Yes they should be required to wear modestly or face the execution.

>What is done about runaway or abandoned women?

The abandoned women will become the government's properties but runaway women will be bring back to the owners. If they aren't able to locate the owners for 14 days then it will become government property.

>What jobs can women do?

Full time mothers, home businesses, menial jobs and house servants.

>How are they kept and treated by their owners, and are there any laws against mistreatment?

Owners will be allowed to punish the women whatever they can as long as the damage is not permanent nor can cause the scars. Owners will lose the right to own a woman if the damage is found to be permanent. Racemixing is forbidden.

>What are the laws on buying and selling?

Owners have the right to set the prices and buyers will have the right to get the money back if they are not satisfied with the quality of the women.

>How do scenes from daily life change when women are property?

Probably they will obey every orders from the owners.


>What laws need to be passed to support the ownership and training of women? Should the state take an active role in correcting their behavior, or is it up to their owners?

Education for women's studies should be mandatory on some level to breed women who can read and write at a bare minimum. Cooking, cleaning, housewife chores and general sexual education should also be a minimum of education. Theoretically no women will have to be subjected to any of this because they are property. This is not an absolute but I believe that it should be regarded as a list of minimum requirements to produce and breed quality women.

>Should clothes be required in public, or banned?

Clothing is up to the discretion of the owner. I would recommend that clothing be enforced on a minimal level to maintain the proper health and well-being of women to keep them healthy.

>What is done about runaway or abandoned women?

Runaway women should be returned to their legal owners. The returning of said runaway women to their owners is not the responsibility of the state. Interestingly enough if necessary there could be a "Woman Retention Bureau".

>What jobs can women do?

Ideally light labor, housekeeping, clerk work, anything that will not ruin them physically or be too dangerous to entrust them with.

>How are they kept and treated by their owners, and are there any laws against mistreatment?

Women should be housed at a minimum. Keeping women outside exposed to the elements naked will damage them and produce unhealthy women. Women must be fed at a minimum for their necessary nutrition. Laws against the mistreatment of women should exist to maintain a healthy stock of women. The extent of those laws are debatable to say the least. Consequences for breaking those laws should depend on the severity of the crime committed but should not be limited to a temporary or even a permanent banPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



>Should clothes be required in public, or banned?

Honestly, this question is a bigger issue than what women should wear. The truth is that there would no such thing as laws against nudity or "public decency" or any of that other bullshit in societies that don't care about female opinions on public policy. Men by themselves really don't care about this. That doesn't mean we would all walk around naked, but if someone wants to strip down at the beach or on their back porch or to go out to get the mail on a hot day, nobody would care.

Women trade on their physical attractiveness. Keeping it less accessible gives them more leverage with men who want access. Today, women are less concerned with commitment, so we see much more than we did in some earlier eras like the 19th century.



I see no reason as to why clothing must be regulated at all for women. Other than well being and keeping them in good condition from the elements.

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / hikki / htg / hypno / sw / teto / tijuana / trash ]