/widf/ - White Internet Defense Force

bump

No one else? I'll post what I've written thus far.

The WIDF Mission Statement
The White Internet Defense Force (WIDF) exists to defend the White race in general and White individuals accused of bigotry in particular. We have allowed media – both social and corporate – to run the White race into the ground over Ferguson, Trayvon Martin, and every other significant racialized event within the past few years. White people are continuously being painted as racists and supremacists for the most benign of actions and inactions. The WIDF shall move to counter the anti-White rhetoric and produce a shift in dialog over individual cases from "Why did White people do this? Why do White people hate <group>?" to "Why did this individual do this? Is the media really reporting the truth? Do I know all the facts? Has a crime even been committed? Isn't his right to defend himself and to speak his mind?"

We cannot allow ourselves to be subverted by provocateurs – those who will infiltrate our movement with the purpose of devolving it into namecalling, petty insults, trolling, and infighting – or those who will derail it into covering a broader range than it can or should be committed to. We must defend the White race; not attack other races, not defend men against feminists, not attack gays, not support Christians. Defending the White race is the sole purpose of the WIDF.

The Battle Plan
1. Identify anti-White propaganda outlets we can target. These will be places with comments enabled. YouTube is increasingly worthless in this regard, while Twitter and the blogosphere are ripe for the picking. Comment sections on news sites are hit-and-miss, and Tumblr is too overwhelmed by anti-Whites for our work to be effective; anything we say there will fall upon deaf ears.

2. Wait until the anti-White agency publishes something particularly damning. Do not nitpick. Do not exaggerate. Do not whine about articles, Tweets, comments, etc. older than the current calendar week; instead, save them for usage later when we're pointing out that the source has a history of inciting hatred against or being derisive towards the White race.

3. Zerg rush them. Generating outrage early is important, as it swings the conversation immediately to our side.

Code of Conduct
1. Hide your power level. NEVER identify yourself as a white nationalist and NEVER use racial slurs. Our words will plant the seed of doubt in the minds of our readers; they will begin to doubt the narratives they've been fed, the history they've been taught, the "facts" the media reports, and so on, if only we present our arguments effectively. Redpilling is a gradual process. Trying to immerse them too quickly will only drive them further away.

2. Always remain polite – never display negative emotions such as anger. The enemy will seize upon hate to brand you as a bigot forever, and every argument you've ever made will instantly lose its merit. Likewise, rudeness will be labelled as misogyny, racism, xenophobia, or any other brand of bigotry. When you are branded as a bigot, there is no going back.

3. Use their own tactics against them. Don't become an enraged, screeching banshee, but do use their more subtle techniques as they do. Read Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky if you have the time; it will give you great insight into the enemy's mindset. For now: Avoid directly engaging any credible enemy point unless absolutely forced to, and instead dismiss it as "antiquated," "bigoted," or "unfeasible." Mildly misinterpret their comments to aid in this. Here is an example of what not to do:
>TrueLiberal82: i luv affirmative action we need more of it hurr durr
>WIDF: @TrueLiberal82 I can't believe you hate black people so much.
Don't make off the wall comments like this. The keyword here is mildly. Instead try:
>TrueLiberal82: i luv affirmative action we need more of it hurr durr
>WIDF: What, you don't think that black students can succeed on their own? That's horrifically insulting.
Or:
>WIDF: If you're wondering where all the Frederick Douglasses of our generation are, they were encouraged to not succeed by people like @TrueLiberal82 telling them they need special treatment to even keep up with everyone else.
Or:
>WIDF: How about instead of lowering the bar for the uneducated, we raise our standards for education? Increased funding for poor school districts will do more for minorities than Affirmative Action ever could.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Board owner has joined me over here, I really appreciate your passion and would love it over on the official board.

>>>/adolf/

>>3
ITER is not a good example of good inventions made by Whites. It's a multiculti one world government project for crying out loud!

>1

who's*

>>2
Fuck

>>10
Whats the plan?
What is this board about?
Do you own any other boards?
Have you been on /pol/ long?
Can you also post with your board owner tag on plz?