No.21489
>>21415
What happened to the old thread?
No.21531
No.21533
>>21531
ITT we watch videos where the source is printed in the video itself, and then reply to it with "sauce" like we're megaHAL9000.
No.21534
>>21533
Can't find that particular scene in the "movie"
No.21536
>>21534
>>21531
in that case you are a nigger-tier moron and should leave computers alone.
No.21552
>>21533
>bad videos from the same origin
>asking for sauce when there is watermark
Obvious shill is shill.
The cunt just want to sell more of his below-average "movies" made using a open-source engine like it was "hard work".
Every other SFM are better than this paid crap full of clipping errors and cheesy voiceover.
No.26319
No.31129
No.31174
>>21419
I'd cum and die happy.
No.31216
>>31174
>Not disarming her and fucking her violently.
No.32234
>>21531
It was a side release for a raffle. There's Lara in Trouble which is the movie, then Lara's Revenge that was the raffle.
No.32243
Sound on these things is always the fucking worst. It sounds so obviously fake and dubbed in. Nobody knows how sound mixing really works.
No.32309
>>26741
where did noname55 get the model for the dog?
No.32321
Fuck, I tried getting into making my own, but I couldn't stand sitting through the entire official tutorial just for the few parts I'd need to know to make loops.
No.32370
>>>32321
>I pretty much stopped dead when I found out there was no pose symmetry. For fuck sakes even xnalara has that and xnalara is the very definition of shitty free software.
>Also, a model release is only as good as the person who ported / rigged it. So if your favorite character got ported by amateuredeviantartmotherfuckerportingfromashitxnalaraportthosefacebonesmakeherheadfalloff #4532 you are shit out of luck.
No.32394
No.32453
No.32917
No.46703
What's a good website for sfm porn anyways? I'm talking either feature length or quick 30 second stuff, not loops made for webming.
No.47468
>>21552
Vaako? Is that you, you salty ass motherfucker?