/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

>>31262

>proximity and 'in' with qt azn loli

>Not a cause for jealousy

I remain unconvinced.

>>31269

She's not a particularly cute loli though. I mean, I don't want to be mean, and I'm sure she has a great personality, but … those eyes man.

>>31273

>Implying there is anything wrong with them

>>31284

Maybe maybe not. We can't tell because they are so asian they look like vaginas.

>>31290

Pls no bully loli.

>>31275

Nice reply. It's true, there is no legit solution to OP's request. But so many drugs can enhance the masturbatory experience. I hear lots of tales of epic meth porn binges, and smoking some pot and looking at loli can be rather delightful. Sorry though OP, there is no drug that will just automatically make your choice of sex hallucinations happen. The hallucinogen drugs will usually take you where your unconscious mind decides to wander, your conscious choice won't have much input.

>>31275

Not related to OPs request for hallucinations, but how are the pedofeels on mescaline? I've always wanted to try it, but a single dose is about $75 on the deep web.

>>31288

Yeah, I've only ever tried molly and acid, but the experience is almost completely unstructured. You may get lucky and get loli, or you may not. It is still useful for self-exploration. Just get testing kits if you try anything OP.

And really, everything is better on weed. The pictures become more "real" to me at least. See how you like that before you go on meth binges.

Do we need a pedo cock thread?

>>31151

If it's possible to have such a thing, then yes, yes we do.

>>31081

>It would be fun to share the fantasy of playing with a little girl while getting my cock sucked

This is top tier shit, can confirm.

My friend, if you have thoughts about cock, (unless it's a little boy) then you're gay, pure and simple. I'm 100% straight and never ever had sick thoughts about cock (except little boys of course). It's impossible for a straight man to think like that….ok, if you want, call it bye-sexual, but to me, they're all faggots! Hope this helps my friend

>>31285

pederasts are such disgusting faggot trash, this board is for loli-loving pedos

>>31105

They usually stand outside big stores, especially wal-marts, but most grocery stores too, on weekends. Maybe you could try there.

But anyway, I haven't seen that happening in my city. Every time I've bought them, the girls were the ones who handled all the transactions and the parent was just there to make sure that no tried to steal cookies or whatever. They did have them on store shelves for a while a few years ago though.

>>31105

>Though I don't know why other companies cannot get the thin mint concept down.

Who wants to be seen trying to compete with the girl scouts? Maybe if the stop having girls sell them.

TAGALONGS, MOTHERFUCKER

>>31264

SAMOSA!

>>26185

so old black or asian pedos etc. are better? you anti-White faggit!

>>26173

stop dude, this thread doesn't even have the traffic for "le b8s"

what if an underage wants an older bf, it's just as illegal as far as i know.

fuck my life

>>31238

I don't think they do, so far I see they like is a vitruvian man with some nice clothes and a good smell

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYc_Z9Wi4Gs

Yeah I don't know of any but i would like to know of more as well.

There isn't really any. Everywhere is either dead, dying, or closed to the public.

The only thing I can think of that you might not know of is cunnychan, but it's /tv/'s spin-off and I don't know what those nerds are talking about most of the time, so I don't go there. There are some interesting pedo chat threads on 4/r9k/, but they get deleted after a couple hours.

It wasn't the board wipe, I think. It was the autistic necrobumping spammer from /phile/ (which, ironically, is even faster than here) ruined it for a month, then the board was frozen for a month, then the infinity next guy leaked IPs, and now the front page is full of CP 90% of the time, so everything looks dead and no one bothers posting.

The places that have given me the most support on this subject haven't been pedo/hebe-related sites. In my experience, sites that are specifically about pedophilia tend to be major ass.

>>31222

my own lazyness tbh. but idk i have until july

>>31231

It's not to late to change your NEET ways! Lolita like diligent guys who can provide a stable life for them.

>>31072

>>31068

>>31065

I feel so sorry for you OP. I got caught taking photos of some kids I was teaching overseas, and my folks still let me come back and stay, gave me support and didn't let my younger brothers and sisters know. I would've killed myself if it wasn't for them.

I wish the best for you, just try to find a hobby or place people go, try to get into study and slowly work forward. Take each day at a time.

All the best dude.

>>31244

>I got caught taking photos of some kids I was teaching overseas, and my folks still let me come back and stay, gave me support and didn't let my younger brothers and sisters know. I would've killed myself if it wasn't for them.

wut?

So you were making CP and got deported or something and your parents were cool with it?

>>31249

Didn't get the impression of "deported for making CP" so much as "fired for creeping out the staff".

>>31243

>Implying I would be emotionally harmed by that

Physically, sure. Probably more than the vast majority of children in the CP that I was talking about, who aren't being harmed at all. Your anti-edginess is appreciated.

>>31250

Your edginess however isn't. Vast majority of children in CP would tremendously prefer to not be victims of cp after the fact, and I'm really not interested in whatever attempt at a rebuttal you might have. Really not sure why you're even trying to contradict me in the first place actually.

>>31255

Before we start questioning everything, are you an anti/virped? If you think that sexual relations with a child is harmful then youre on the wrong board.

Child pornography just means an image of a child doing something lewd. What inherent harm comes from that alone that we can say that being involved in child porn automatically makes them a victim ?

We aren't talking about sex slaves being raped by their fathers or society barging in to a child's life after finding out she/he was in porn or anything that specific. A 12 year old could take a nude of themselves and thats now child porn, are you telling me that now the 12 year old instantaneously harmed from the taking of that picture alone? If so how?

We're never going to get anywhere if we keep perpetuating the myth that all cp is of children getting abused.

Such a shameful outcome. That said, he knew the consequences when he broke the law, even if it was a shitty law.

I wish there were more information about him. Everything just focuses on him and MD Anderson trying to protect their image.

>>31259

>If you think that sexual relations with a child is harmful then youre on the wrong board.

No, he's on the right board. It's a board for pedos to talk and debate. Let's not get caught up in dogma. As long as he's not shitposting or a frothing anti, I don't see why he should leave.

>>31255

>Implying edginess

>"Psh, no one's being harmed, kid …"

>I don't want to have a conversation

>Why would you try to contradict me in the first place

Antis truly are malignant narcissists.

>>31260

>Implying there is any kind of anti other than a frothing anti

>>31206

>The audience as more so caught up in her stupid opinions, honestly. She had the gall to say that "They wouldn't be in prison if they didn't commit the crime," in response to someone pointing out that innocent people are sometimes sentenced.

Caught up as in believed or as in righteously called her out on her shit? If so there may be hope for the future yet.

Unless those "studies" are right, that most <16yo's are freaky libertarian, only to turn full metal SJW on campus. Then we're all fucked.

>>31256

>Whether they know it consciously or not these people are playing a political game, and a dirty one at that. As much as we all hate the cunts for it, perhaps we need to start doing the same.

Yeah, I've argued that before on here. The problem is that that is a very hard thing to train for. You either have charisma or you don't. You can practice at it and get a little better of course, but if you don't have the talent to charm a crowd, then you don't have it. Further, logic and debate are much easier, because the rules are written and the same for everyone. Emotional arguments are not like that. I, as a straight white male, can not make the same statement as a gay black female and have have the listener hear the same thing. It is an artform rather than a science.

Really though, science itself isn't as clear cut as people think. Intuition and feeling play a huge role, even if only when scientists choose which leads to pursue. Pure logical debate is an ivory tower discipline. If you read Plato, even he, who no one would try and say is an anti-intellectual, regularly makes strawmen out of his enemies. That is the nature of rhetoric. The challenge is trying to make it not obvious.

Additionally, the playing field is not level for us. People think we are liars already and are looking for deceit, while the antis can say whatever the fuck they want and they rarely get called on it. We are held to much stricter rules, and logic can't help us with that.

>>31261

>Additionally, the playing field is not level for us. People think we are liars already and are looking for deceit, while the antis can say whatever the fuck they want and they rarely get called on it. We are held to much stricter rules, and logic can't help us with that.

Yeah, like I said, cultural status quo. I think what you have to remember is that pretty much everyone with any stake in this is ultimately motivated by emotions. Our emotions, kids emotions, parents emotions, and it's not as though you can just make your logical arguments to impassionate bureaucrats, legislators, journalists and other intelligentsia, then let equality laws do the rest of the work for you. Especially if you're of a pro-contact/choice/legalization/whatever persuasion, sooner or later you're going to have to convince individual helicopter soccer moms and manly-man dads to shut up and let you and their precious son/daughter touch each other in places. SJWs strike a natural chord with these people, it'll take some chords of our own to overcome it.

But IMO that doesn't have to involve direct gospel-preaching public speeches like OP's or charismatic talking heads on TV, which it sounds like you're assuming. There are lots of peripheral, libertarian issues you can agitate for that don't require you to even mention pedophilia, much less come out as one, but still move people in our political direction and without prejudicing the contact debate the way it feels a lot of people banging the drum on "non-offending MAPs" do.

Teen infantilization/youth lib, free speech, social interventionism, alternative approaches to police and criminal justice (did anyone tell that girl about Scandinavian prisons?), press ethics, anything to do with witchunts and hysteria in general are all good. You can discredit opponents without having to argue for yourself too, just look at how effective attack ads are in US politics.

And it's not like you have to be Donald Trump to be convincing enough. Hell this is the Internet, nobody even has to know you're a straight white guy if that matters.

>>31257

>Caught up as in believed or as in righteously called her out on her shit

Righteously called her out on her shit. I have no idea why, but my year is surprisingly sane in comparison to the rest of the country. They can't stand feminism either.

>If so there may be hope for the future yet

I think this is the exception, rather than the rule. Millennials are still probably going to ruin everything.

>>31267

Yeah, I doubt we're going to get far if we blatantly advocate for contact rights. At the end of the day, the everyday person isn't open minded enough to listen to a pro-contact argument. The moment they realise what you're saying, they'll close up and you'll get nowhere.

What I did probably isn't the way to go about it, but I'm not slick enough to dance around the issue like that, and I thought I could probably get away with it considering the people in my year.

>>31280

>and I thought I could probably get away with it considering the people in my year.

Compared to what some predicted at the start of this thread, I'd say you did :)

>>26861

>>26842

>>26838

>>26836

>>26811

>>26809

>>26794

>>27101

>>27185

>>27203

>>27271

>>27315

>>27333

>>27360

>>28068

>>28121

>>28160

>>28226

>>28272

>>30952

fucking newfag

>>31187

Truly lolis are a gift of god, I wanna cum inside them, I wanna lick their minipussy, take them away from their families and have them as my sex mascots.

Good thread, I'm about 60/40 I have lots of fantasies of being dominate and would love to be the dom for beautiful loli, but i also am kinda turned on about the loli being dominant and telling be what to do and what she wants. My crush is actually kinda bossy when she plays with me always telling me what game we are gonna play next and where I have to sit and all that. It's kinda thrilling lol

>>19884

ahahahha

Nice thread, I am acually living my dream mostly I am a photographer and most of my clients are little amature models! I have photographed some beauties! I am going to be shooting alot more this spring and summer so it's gonna be great. I also have kind of a notch for design. Mostly panties lol I'm obsessed with little girls panties I actually picked up some things last week to make a pair of cute little panties for my loli love. Gonna give it a try this weekend. If I can get it down. I'm gonna start making limited quantities to sell. ;)

Ha actually I was going to post a pic when I made them for all too see. I'm gonna try to make them this weekend ;)

Oh and I love that idea. I have a niece she's 16 now but I have been stealing her dirty panties for years. Nothing better than a pair of dirty little panties :)

>>30950

I like your idea.

Care to post some of your designs friend?