[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / ausneets / f / leftpol / quests / thestorm / trap / zoo ]

/younglove/ - Child Love Discussion

Keep it clean and legal. Thanks.

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 24rd Attention-Hungry Games
/kemono/ - A match made in heaven

Comment *
Verification *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 1 per post.

CAPTCHA is enabled for thread creation only, not for regular replies. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I only have limited tools to handle spam, and I don't want to disable Tor all together. If this doesn't help at least a bit, I'll disable CAPTCHA.

File: 24ab3157ddfc466⋯.jpg (731.22 KB, 2048x1365, 2048:1365, 1431803884200.jpg)


Welcome to /younglove/, a discussion board aimed at people who are emotionally and/or sexually attracted to people of young ages, though everyone is welcome to post.


1. All global rules apply. That means no child pornography.

2. Only post “clean” photographs. This means fully clothed (no underwear or swim suits), no nudity and no erotic poses.

3. No flooding or commercial spam.

4. Do not post real world identification (aka dox).

5. No advocating violence against children.


Things To Consider

A pedophile is defined as someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children.

Sexual attraction to pubescent children is hebephilia, while sexual attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.

Being a pedophile does not mean someone is, or ever will be, a child molester or rapist. Both molestation and rape are an action which involve a victim while pedophilia is a passive attraction.

Having a sexual attraction to children isn’t illegal, acting on such desires can be however.

While sexual attraction is the key factor in being a pedophile, many pedophiles choose to avoid contact with children completely. Others wish to be close to a child or children while abstaining from any sexual behavior.

Opinions on whether or not sexual activity with a minor is moral differ greatly and such discussion is welcome here, but while this is not a rule, please do not discuss having done anything that could be considered a crime involving a minor. Doing so can put the community at risk.

Thank you.

File: 5d011fdd21f0360⋯.png (509.03 KB, 658x433, 658:433, ClipboardImage.png)


What your two cents about little boys being dressed as little girls?

It would be cool if there was some site like the deceased Candy Dolls dedicated to show this kind of photo ◕‿◕

29 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



What mental illness is that? The ones normies cause with their oppression. As a pedo, you should be more open-minded.



Nope. Actual mental illness. You can cry about lgbtwxyz all you want, but it only makes the world a worse place to live in.



>Putting on a dress or high-heels causes mental illness

It was common practice for children of either gender to wear dresses in the early part of the 20th century. High-heels were originally made for French royal men. When you look at these simple facts, it becomes obvious that the only thing causing harm is people losing their shit over what they think is "wrong", when it was perfectly normal only a few years ago.



>Putting on a dress or high-heels causes mental illness in combination with media and teachers telling you how awesome trans people are

Yeah okay buddy, sounds like a great idea. Maybe before going for a red herring, you understand there is more to it than just "kids will always be screwed up for life if they wear a dress".



>media and teachers telling you how awesome trans people are

None of that was mentioned here; this thread is about clothing and nothing more. You're about five miles past "red herring" and into "making shit up" territory.

File: 6188cecbc677d27⋯.jpg (667.11 KB, 2048x1365, 2048:1365, merlin_131641868_bc1ff56d-….jpg)



Could this be our opportunity? Could we set up an autonomous society within one of these areas, given that Mexicans are pretty pedo-friendly as it is already?

14 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



Do some research buddy. Many of the states in Mexico have 12 as the AoC. Even after all the feminist pressure these places have not budged. So maybe next time before you do a crappy Google search, you dig a little deeper. :)



>Do some research

You asked, motherfucker.

>In Mexico, criminal legislation is shared between the federal and state governments. The federal law establishes the age of 12 as the minimum age of consent, while the age at which there are no restrictions for consensual sexual activities is 18 (sex with someone 12-18 is not illegal per se, but can still be open to prosecution under certain circumstances). Local state laws may override the federal law. In practice, the decision as to whether or not to prosecute is left to state authorities regardless of the younger person's age. At state level, the minimum ages of consent vary between 12 (and puberty in a few states) and 15, while the age at which there are no restrictions for consensual sexual activities vary from 16 to 18 (most common 18).

This means that, even if the law states the age of consent as 12, it means there are RESTRICTIONS on what you can do. It doesn't just mean you have free reign to go grab a random 13-year-old girl and fuck her. You'd be charged with abuse, or obtaining the consent through manipulation, or corruption of a minor, or whatever the fuck else. While in theory this will only happen if the minor in question or a guardian files a complaint, in practice they will all do that because pedophiles are demonized the world over.

You're the kind of dumb motherfucker who thinks he can walk into a courtroom with the letter of the constitution and get away with literal murder due to some obscure legal loophole. It's hopelessly fucking naive. All laws are subject to interpretation, and almost always end up being bent in favor of the prosecution. If you fuck someone under 16 in Mexico, and get caught, you're going to jail. End of story.



>It doesn't just mean you have free reign to go grab a random 13-year-old girl and fuck her.

Moving the goalposts there eh? Where in my original post did I say rape was legal? Try again. It is really sad how stupid you made yourself look :)




Moving the goalposts there eh?

When did he say rape, you impotent dumbfuck?



Alright, tell you what big guy. Why don't you head right on down to Mexico, find the first 13- or 14-year-old girl that strikes your fancy, and try to court her and then have sex with her. Make sure to tell her parents and the police what you're doing, so you can be sure they all approve and have no problems with this. After all, it's perfectly legal!

I eagerly await the results of your experiment. :^)

File: e0a2720d9991015⋯.jpg (309.85 KB, 1024x557, 1024:557, JrRoastBeef_1024x557[1].jpg)


Why is it that a "normal" man's idea of a perfect vagina one that looks as similar to a prepubescent one as possible? I've tried asking normal people but they just act defensive or tell me to kill myself.

66 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



>At least I referenced simple explanation of how "more pleasure" = "more babies" = "humans continue as a species".

That is the dumbest argument I have ever read. Less pleasure != no pleasure. Humans can have less intense orgasms post puberty and still fuck like rabbits. Otherwise no one who's circumcised would fuck.

I'm not going to sit here and bullshit you that children have more intense orgasms, since personal anecdotal evidence tells me that that's not true, but don't try to pretend that your argument doesn't suck.

Also don't talk about moving goalposts when you switched half way through between higher intensity orgasms and higher levels of sexual activity.



But you don't have any, either. :^)



As a normal man, I can say that most of us prefer a vagina like that of a female who is a year or 2 into puberty. That's the perfection that all heterosexual males are naturally drawn to.




>some animals mate for pleasure

>well, actually.. um, it's like some birds and monkeys and stuff

>b-but those other fifty-million species d-don't count, yeah!

>all animals have sex for pleasure!!

You're really bad at this.

File: 7c29cb7dc70a40a⋯.jpg (226.93 KB, 500x391, 500:391, large.jpg)


The things some pedos always get in trouble doing, never learn from others mistakes and possibly going to jail for it. Stuff that you usually see on the news everyday.

Examples like keeping CP on your phone or risking talking to a child on very moderated sites like Facebook.


Acting IRL.


File: 2983e7507020dc2⋯.png (571.69 KB, 575x802, 575:802, Screen-Shot-2017-11-26-at-….png)

lgbtqia ?





Obviously a false-flag.



>pedos using Discord or using PM on Facebook to post child porn

>pedos keeping CP on Google Drive

>pedos still don't know how to OPSEC

I know some pedos aren't tech savvy but damn its aggravating.



Why? The more low-hanging fruit gets picked off by the feds, the safer you are. They aren't stupid; they know damn well that they can't stop pedophiles, or prevent the creation of CP, or anything else. Every once in a while they bust someone for possession and distribution, or they break up a "child porn ring", or they throw the book at some stupid kid who texted a picture of his dick, to prove to the public that what they're doing has merit. It's meaningless behavior to justify their continuing to get a paycheck. They're barely trying.


Would you be okay with a child having sex with many different people? Would you require children to be tested for diseases? Would you be okay with child pornstars, strippers, or hookers? Should adults be allowed to trick children into sex like they do other adults?

45 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



>I guess they were only seeking out and downloading cp in their own mind too, huh.

I guess looking at 1s and 0s on a screen magically hurts someone 1000 miles away, huh.

>I agree, it should be illegal for police to run cp sites.

Nice try. But that is not the only thing that needs to be changed about cp laws.



>Watching explotation of undeveloped children is supporting exploitation

You're going to have to provide some reasoning for this one. There are no download or view counters on the darkweb sites where these things are posted, and the vast, vast majority of CP is reposts of reposts of reposts. It's impossible for most producers to have any idea how popular their content is. Posting encouragement on forums is obviously encouragement, but just seeing decades-old pictures is not.



Y'all keep bitching out offline, though.


I just fapped to the 9/11 footage. Please give me a concrete number of how many more times I have to do this for the USA to fall, so we can test your hypotheosis.



You might want to talk to someone. You can learn to control your sadistic urges. Hopefully you'll get help before you really hurt someone.



>The burden then falls on you to provide an explanation that excuses it

The burden of proof is SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE FUCKING PROSECUTION! They should have to prove that a child was actually harmed by that guy possessing or acquiring CP, like they must with EVERY OTHER FUCKING CRIME IN THE COUNTRY!!

Want to tell me again that CP doesn't have special exclusions of law? It's a clear violation of the 5th amendment rights against "cruel and unusual punishment", but not even the most liberal Supreme Court judge is going to risk their career defending pedophiles.

File: 2a57a47677f7576⋯.jpg (30.86 KB, 492x313, 492:313, b9d17d7c33565be91644713dbe….jpg)


A serious question needs to be asked and that question being what the hell has happened to this board?? when i first discovered this board it only had a small amount of people on it who were just shootin shit and having decent discussion about being maps and how much we as maps love children but recently this board has become a lot more active and has been

flooded with shills some normalfags and degenerate non- emotive maps so the quality of the boards content has been going downhill in my personal opinion but where did all these people come from and what has exactly happened to this board /younglove/?.

54 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>recently this board has become a lot more active

Really? Holy shit that is depressing. I stumbled across here and it's fucking dead. Hell even /b/ is moving slow, so maybe 8chan as a whole is a ghost town. I just decided to look for some new places recently and I doubt I'll be back here too often.


I've been on Virped. I'm not here to cuck up this place. I don't even give a fuck if there are pro-contact fags around here to disagree with. But this thread was more depressing than a "I hate muh pedo self and I wanna die" thread on Virped. Now I'm going to get out of this place and find something to jack off to.



How much is there to really say on the topic? There's only so many times you can talk about stigma, the several dozen existing studies, the legal system, child development, personal experiences, how cute girls are, the anatomy of the vagina and public attitudes and how to change them before the conversations end up repeating themselves.

Virpeds can talk about their feefees and struggles on a daily basis and never run out of things to cry about.



Also the real reason this place is the way it is is because of how poorly moderated it is. Go to any discussion board or forum anywhere else and spam it with irrelevant comments, flood it with several thousand word essays consisting entirely of logical fallacies, insult and swear at everyone and stir up drama and it's pretty much a guarantee your posts will be deleted and you'll get banned.



>Also the real reason this place is the way it is is because of how poorly moderated it is.

This BO is a faggot i mean come on there is a thread up right now about killing antis.



Few boards here have anything other than extremely loose moderation. Where it's not, you get deletions and censoring by mods clearly pushing an agenda (usually /pol/ related). You don't want that shit here, or anywhere else.

File: 0938c96553c6937⋯.jpg (102.38 KB, 1280x858, 640:429, uprising.jpg)


Is a pedo uprising possible?? would any of you kill normalfags to get it through their thick fucking heads that sex isnt bad for kids??.

128 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



Insults don't need to be 100% accurate.



Only fags make insults that aren't 100% accurate. Nice try though.


File: a8ddf4a1a258fc8⋯.mp4 (292.42 KB, 360x360, 1:1, videoplayback (1).mp4)


>Nah this is a joke. Gays have been normalized and now they're trying to normalize pedophilia. Why am I not suprised that freaks have a victim complex?




And yet you are not smarter than a fifth grader, Ellen.



Fearmongering isn't evidence. People will never fear pedophiles because they've been permanently conditioned to think of them as fat ugly men who are made of tissue paper and kidnap and rape children because they're too weak and pathetic to do anything else.

A bunch of murders "supposedly committed by pedophiles" will likely be ignored as nonsense. Nobody will believe it. What it would take is someone supremely powerful to be an open pedophile, after showing off that power. But that sort of thing isn't possible in this world. If Hitler had been an open pedophile, and actually won WWII, and his heirs continued to rule the entire world even now, then pedos would have respect. But because that isn't the case, you're just a creep in a white-panel van perving on little girls because you're too pathetic to date adults, and that will NEVER change.


So I don't understand pedophile's or pedophilia in general. I'm almost 15 and hebephile makes sense because they show signs of puberty but can someone explain why kids (11 and under normally) are attractive? Feel free to email me or just respond to this thread.

Ps. I don't hate pedophile's just curious.

1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at


Do you know about the cunny?


…because they're god-damned adorable?

Aesthetically, the signs of puberty really aren't that amazing. I really don't care about this "unspoiled" crap the trolls spew on the board, but bluntly, if I want tits, I can find them on a guy.

…and I'm not into guys, personally. Welcome to the board.


Are you asking about physical characteristics that are attractive, or why we're attracted to them? They're attractive to us because that's the way we're wired, the same way gay men are attracted to men, straight men are attracted to women, and attack helicopters are attracted to attack helicopters. I guess if you're asking for an evolutionary reason then we can use the gay defence and start talking about bonobos, but I don't really know what you want to know.

Also, be very careful using a gmail on any sort of pedo related types of sites, whether you are interested in children or not….


Edit was to remove email.



Pretty much this. I can compose entire books of poetry and essays on why boys aged 10-12 are the most beautiful creatures in the universe, to rival anything any man every wrote about adult women. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder; all else is meaningless and usually subjective justifications.

File: 55bae8c0c3a47a6⋯.png (43.04 KB, 300x300, 1:1, unnamed.png)


Should we create a map Discord or does one already exist??.

44 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Thanks for posting this


Please post a new invite. The current one is already a week old.



Old one got nuked, try asking for it in either of the other alternate chats posted above, this is to filter potential trolls and apparently salty anti-contacts whom are actually the ones responsible of our severs being taken down.





To all fellow pedos don't go in here its a normalfag server.

File: cba87b1ca5a8036⋯.jpg (32.14 KB, 600x899, 600:899, 6061434e8820d48933fb8a34fb….jpg)




What do you think about this. What would be your reaction to this kind of behavior. Pic unrelated I suppose except age

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



I would have no issues with a son or daughter masturbating. I disagree with the article woman's rejoice over the impending "social embarrassment" that will quash such activity in the future. I find it almost irritating.


Kinsey has a lot of extremely detailed descriptions of children masturbating. It’s pretty hot.



Hello illiterate anon, the author isn't saying the kid is going to stop masturbating, she's just saying she's glad the kid will learn to do it in private.


It's so common Dana Carvey addressed it years ago in a comedy special (Squatting Monkeys Tell No Lies I think). During the post-show Q&A a woman said she worked in a preschool and many laughs were had about how often she and other parents have to constantly tell children to stop touching themselves.

I started "self abuse" as this article calls it around age 3. Then in preschool when I was one of only 2 boys in a class of very curious girls the naughty exploration continued.

As a parent (and I doubt I'll ever be one) I'd at least insist that certain things only happen in private. I'd also insist that it not happen constantly and that hands and any other parts involved always be washed before and afterwards. I'd also be far less worried about my son having gfs or my daughter having bfs (since at least I'd know where they were and what they were doing) than to know they were getting into other things like alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, etc.



I call bullshit. There is no way he has descriptions of such a thing. I mean where is the proof. It doesn't exist because who would let him watch that?


I was thinking of going on vacation to Singapore because, as long as you don't download it as a file, viewing CP on your computer is legal there.

31 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



or don't waste your money and just use TAILS, if you don't download any files then after shutdown there is practically no trace anything ever happened.



or don't waste your money and just use TAILS, if you don't download any files then after shutdown, when it automatically clears RAM, there is practically no trace anything ever happened- network logs that you used TOR, but if you have valid reasons for that it can easily be explained away. perhaps easier than a trip to thailand. anybody who has gone to certain places for vacation is basically suspect as a pedo, or drug dealer, or whatever. you may be suspect for using TOR? so what, at least you didn't waste your money going to another country



if you don't download you have to find new content every time, draining.




Because it's a lot easier to identify you in the first place, typically when browsing on topic stuff you shouldn't have scripts enabled which you need for streaming. It's better to not be caught at all than to be on a list as someone who has for sure been watching child porn whether it's legal or not. You can actually stay pretty safe watching CP as long as you use good OPSEC. If you're convinced that you want to watch CP (think long and hard about it because it's hard to stop when you start), then just learn how to be secure and anonymous. No need to travel somewhere else.

File: 16c8b7161c48beb⋯.png (1.18 MB, 614x1384, 307:692, 1391745826927.png)


>tfw there's no point coming here when lera threads aren't allowed



Is wayyyy better this board is dead and has turned into cancer too many Virpeds and normalfags (Antis) on here now.

File: 1457139510577.jpg (155.03 KB, 960x960, 1:1, 1455900665514.jpg)


What if the lolis bully you for being a pedo?

33 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


hey guys


I am a grown man with self confidence irl. I cannot realistically be bulled by a loli (unless I let her for "reasons").

If one tried I would tell her to knock it off and then ignore her.



It is s joke you idiot.


Please do not bully loli.


File: d222f998ae8d9ca⋯.jpg (93.74 KB, 720x907, 720:907, 1494431215321.jpg)

What if they respect you for it?

File: 1454318055916.png (173.41 KB, 800x607, 800:607, tmp_12214-1452840718750-15….png)


>get help fgt

What help? The only "treatment" is either getting castrated or getting forced to acknowledge you are the scum of the earth. And all are super expensive and most are only available after prison. This isn't like the time you broke up with your boyfriend and got told your a strong, independent woman who don't need no man by a sycophant you paid $100/hour to cry to, faggot.

>I hope you don't touch them!

What I do or don't do is between me and the lolis, cunt. I don't give a fuck what you fucking think. I do not need you approval to do a damn thing. Eat shit, you arrogant prick. Your wishes are the least important thing, and any pedo who alters their actions based on your hopes was lacking any guiding moral principles or framework anyway, and is a dangerous lout who without conviction who is going to change his kind anyway.

>I bet you were touched as a kid and just don't remember it

How 'bout you go tell a molested kid that they could grow up to be a pedo.

>Faggotry is betwwen cansanting adaldz din campur 2 padofels u homophosbsu sywb snsuw nzj amam bshw qqqq anus

Fuck everything about this line. I've not once seen it used in a way that makes sense. It's usual a reply to psychological classifications, and how psychology is fallible. Non sequitur. Sometimes it's used against the ostracism and shame pedos feel, because as every anti knows, we chose this life and it definitely didn't hurt growing up as a teenage boy, thinking you were a vile worm destined to be a monster. Nah, no way could we possibly related to other marginalized groups.


Fuck, I sound like a SJW, don't I? BRB, commiting sudoku then.

34 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



I don't understand what you are saying, and a lot of what I do is plain wrong, but I will only address

>SJW's, are less than 0.01% of the population. Who the fuck cares what they think.

Which is true, but

>They don't do anything but bitch about shit, like old hens.

is not. They are a small minority, but they are very vocal, and should not be ignored. They weasel their way into power and are experts of throwing fits until they get their way.



>All it does is sexualize them in an unrealistic way.

Humans aren't attracted to "realistic". That's why things like makeup has been used for thousands of years in various forms to attract males. I get hard from looking at 10~13 year old range imagery of little girls in lolicon manga because they show idealised displays of females that I am naturally attracted to. Even though 99.99% of the things I use to get off two are 2D loli, that doesn't mean I'm magically not a hebe/paedo/whatever. The human brain has no fucking idea how to objectively perceive the world.

Also: porn.



I don't know where you have that information, but I do believe you are wrong



Yeah, it's probably some fantasy. Ugly women were never sold into slavery specifically. If anything, they escaped slavery because they would be worth less. And I'm pretty sure the bible doesn't mention age at all.



>that pic

"Human rights" is a moral grandstanding spook designed to protect undesirables like you.

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / ausneets / f / leftpol / quests / thestorm / trap / zoo ]