No.13450
Opinions on trottla dolls?
Have you considered getting one?
Are you already an owner?
Whats the legality of these things anyway?
No.13451
>>13450So fucking creepy. I feel like it'd be like selling your soul. I literally cannot imagine being able to achieve orgasm while staring into those dead, soulless eyes. Even the thought makes me sad. Real children or nothing, which right now means nothing.
Plus, I imagine they'd be pretty expensive.
No.13454
>>13451I think some of them are really realistic, im pretty wealthy I could sink 3-5k into one of these. But to each to his own
No.13455
>>13454For that kind of money I'd rather just go to rehab.
No.13459
>>13454Why re-create candydoll shots with these dolls when you can just look at the actual candydoll images?
No.13460
>>13456I found one that I really really liked. Dude knew I was a pedo and everything, was really cool, had his own proprietary system that actually worked, and just generally was a really smart and nice guy. Unfortunately, that place was as expensive as it was effective, and I was but an intern.
No.13461
>>13459Because that guy now has his own personal lera
No.13462
>>13461I don't, fuck him.
No.13463
>>13460thats nice, but I dont really want to be "treated"
No.13465
>>13463Oh not for pedophilia of course. There's no curing that. It was a drug treatment facility. I guess there's really no connection with what you said, other than that if I had that kind of money, I could find better uses for it than an extra creepy sex doll.
I'm sorry, just disregard all of this.
No.13467
>>13460>Dude knew I was a pedo How? Is that a rehab for pedos or something?
No.13469
I don't have money, so no.
inb4 I rob bank and buy 100 loli dolls
No.13470
No.13474
can i post nudes of trottla dolls
No.13535
>>13474I mean, why would you? Are we not under enough attack already? Who would it benefit, really? Even leaving out that I personally think they're creepy, it just seems like a terrible idea. I mean, you probably can, I just don't think it'd be a great idea.
No.13545
No.13682
No.13687
No.13688
is it legal in the land of the free to own one of these things?
do they come in olive skin tone?
No.13698
Faces look a bit oriental for my tastes, and a bit creepy, but they're clearly made nicely enough. But I don't think they are for sex, it says on the website "not for practical purposes". Still, you could use it like a daki and cuddle with it, probably achieving better similitude than the small pillow I am using now. If I had the money and didn't live in a fascist pedo-hating country where such a product is illegal I might buy one.
Pic related looks nice. And imagine what we'll have just 10 years from now, combined with the robotics technology that's coming out. Though, I do not believe we will ever be able to wholly counterfeit the beauty and charm of a little girl with every subtle organic detail. Not in my lifetime anyway, and I'm not sure I would want to live to see that either…
No.13708
Almost certainly illegal in Australia as simulated child porn is illegal. I remember reading about some guy getting arrested for importing one of these things into Canada. I guess I'll just have to stick to raping real children.
No.13709
>>13698The only way a "little girl bot" would work is if it's so good you couldn't tell it's a robot, but then what would be the difference?
It wouldn't work for me if I knew it was a robot though, since I'd know it was "fake".
No.14098
This dolls will become a big thing in the future, not because new technology, but bacause a change on the zeitgeist, which allow us to see them for what they are: a materialization of the concept of female beauty, and a real work of art; instead of some creepy, degenerated, shameful shit.
>>13709NO. they shouldn't be "almost as cute as a real girl". They MUST be way cuter than any human being could possibly be. Is within humanity reach to create superlative beauty: sky is the limit.
No.14253
Can you seriously buy these in the US?
If you can I would seriously save up for one.
No.14259
>>14253You can, check their website
No.20173
No.20182
>>14253yup they're legal in the US but considered CP in Canada and Ausfailia.
No.20673
these are complete pieces of junk, stay away. lurk on some of the doll forums and you'll see he sells trash that falls apart look to makepure or Dollsweet.. even some of the US manufacturers make loli dolls but they dont post them as available on their sites for obvis reasons
No.20704
>>20673
can you link to a thread talking about trottla dolls?
I remember a guy on masterchan saying the doll broke into pieces when he tried fucking it.
No.20710
I find the idea really creepy.
And i see no benefits over a regular tight onahole.
No.20712
>>20710
I tried one of those… Was hard to squeeze into it…
No.20715
>>20704
There have been several threads on sites like thedollforum and ourdoll that mention how poor the construction is, but they get deleted pretty soon on dollforum due to site rules, they are NOT anatomically correct, so anyone saying they had sex with one is either 1 full of crap, or they tried drilling the thing which would honestly cause the tpe to tear to shreds. there's also a french language doll forum that has a couple of owners on there discussing how bad the casting is, its full of airbubbles and breaks easily.. thy also have a few pics of how bad the doll really looks in real life.. google trottla review and a few of the threads will come up.. plus the wait is something like 2.5 years on one. so you send him 7k and then may or may not ever hear from him again.. shin is an asshole, jusd send him an inquiry see if he even responds..
No.21614
There is another site that sells loli-dolls? Sorry for bad english.
No.21642
No.21644
>>21614
I can't tell you, but try /jp/ on 4chan. There at least used to be quite a bit of discussion about dolls there.
No.21652
>>20767
Not anatomically correct internally, most likely. Doesn't look like there's actually a hole there.
No.21719
>>21718
Whoa, don't do that. http://8ch.net/dost.html
>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.
Let's not give them a reason to shut down the board, again.
No.21721
>>21719
Fuck off, you idiot, nobody fucking cares.
No.21730
>>21721
Fuck you, you little autist. Don't get pissy at me just because you're angry that other people won't fight your battles for you.
No.21759
>>21719
>[…] indistinguishable from real children […]
I've never seen a real girl with seams. 2/10