[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

Keep it clean and legal. Thanks.

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Advertise on this site
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


If you have any complaints or just feel like chatting, we share an IRC with /loli/ at (#8chan-/loli/ @ irc.rizon.net). Come by anytime~

File: 1421907052247.png (331.89 KB, 512x512, 1:1, vlcsnap-2015-01-19-00h04m3….png)

 No.14058[Last 50 Posts]

Do you worry about having your own children?

 No.14059

No.

 No.14060

File: 1421909735159.jpg (885.14 KB, 3888x2592, 3:2, 1418672971753.jpg)

>>14058
>Do you worry about having your own children?
I worry about NOT having children of my own, actually.

 No.14061

>>14058

>Do you worry about having your own children?


Of course. Real wages are declining, the cost of a college education is increasing, the Earth is warming, crime and war still happen. There's a lot for a prospective parent to worry about.

 No.14062

I will never have children. I can barely maintain an erection with a woman, there's no way I could pull it off long enough to fake a marriage.

 No.14063

>>14062

Viagra.

And you don't have to be married to have children.

 No.14064

Having children is the #1 thing im excited for about adulthood. No for lewd things, but because I have a really strong paternal instinct.

 No.14066

>>14063
I would want my child to have a stable, normal life with a loving family, and still have a parent in case I die or something.

And still, there's a fifty-fifty shot of getting a boy. What the hell would I do with a boy? Take him fishing or something? What the fuck is that?

And that's assuming you get the child. Where are you living where you can just go knock up some whore and get a kid? More likely, she's fight for custody so she can collect child support and you get the girl on the first weekend of the month.

 No.14068

>>14066
>What the hell would I do with a boy?

Unconditionally love him because he's your son?

If you're fretting over having kids because you might get one you aren't sexually attracted to, you don't deserve any either way.

 No.14069

>>14068
How the fuck did you get that out of what I wrote?

 No.14071

>>14062
single mothers
bonus of being able to preview your loli daughter before committing

 No.14073

File: 1421924847702.jpg (10.42 KB, 360x240, 3:2, 1218078674793.jpg)

>>14069
>on a pedo board
>"i only want a girl"
>right, because you're sexually attracted to them and not to boys
>"N-NO!"

 No.14074

I'm not worried at all, since I'm going to adopt anyway.

 No.14080

>>14058
The thought of having children one day is pretty much the only thing that keeps me going. No, I'm not worried about having my own children.

 No.14083

File: 1421945581443.png (52.52 KB, 200x200, 1:1, 1376778023666.png)

im excited to do so

>tfw no loyal wife and mormon sized family

 No.14099

File: 1421959116583.jpg (126.91 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, 1418760327231.jpg)

>>14068
>Unconditionally love him because he's your son?
Yes, just like everyone "unconditionally loves" their children?
People don't like kids, so they usually treat them like shit.
Pedos like kids, so they usually don't, however, we're usually inclined to like one type over the other, as they're cuter to us and have better activities that they usually enjoy.

It'd be a real fuckin' shame for a girl lover to get a son if they weren't looking for one, as they would likely have a harder time bonding and having fun with them, thus making the relationship not as beneficial for either of them, and quite possibly, taking time away from girls who would benefit from the attention/time more than said boy would/is.

>>14071
Most women will still want to fuck.
And that also means you're lying hard, which will be troublesome.

>>14073
I only really want a girl because I know I'd likely not be able to bond with a boy nearly as much, or understand them, and especially not have as much fun with them.
Sure, I also think girls are waaaaaay cuter and prettier/aesthetic, but that's not why I want them over boys.
I'd be a better parent to, and enjoy parenting, a little girl than a little boy.

 No.14101

>>14099
Ignore warped-perspective Pete over here, guys.

 No.14102

>>14099
>People don't like kids, so they usually treat them like shit.
That only applies to absentee child support fathers. Most parents love their kids.

 No.14103

>>14099
>People don't like kids, so they usually treat them like shit.
Sometimes I get the feeling that you've spent way, way too much time in shitty environments. Normal people aren't nearly as bad as you often make them out to be…

Personally I don't want children, currently. It's an awkward feeling, preferring a girl, so I don't know… At the moment I just don't think I'd make a good father. Maybe some time. Other people's kids are great, but when they aren't my own, I can keep my distance when it comes to correcting them. I can try to set a good example but I'm not obligated to be an authority over them. I don't want to have to be strict with kids occasionally.

 No.14104

File: 1421966297153.jpg (857.97 KB, 4272x2848, 3:2, 1420366205565.jpg)

>>14102
>Most parents love their kids.
That's why they yell at them, often times hit them, and ignore them in general?
I don't care if they occasionally if not around them for awhile go "uhhhgguuuuuu so cute" and have fun and act like they love them if the vast vast VAST majority of the time that is not the case at all.

>>14103
>Normal people aren't nearly as bad as you often make them out to be…
What are they to you then?
Because the only decent parents I see are very much not normal, or extremely religious.
Most people are very mean and yell at their kids, be it for unrelated reasons, or because the kid does something small, some even hit their kids, especially if their kid accidentally hurts them a little, and most common of all, just simply ignore their kids and leave them alone, or put them in front of TV to get rid of them, rather than play.
If the majority of the time with your child involves them watching tv, off on their own, and you in another room, or there, but far away playing on your phone or computer, you probably don't like them, and you probably don't love them.

>At the moment I just don't think I'd make a good father.

Why?

>I can keep my distance when it comes to correcting them

>I can try to set a good example, but I'm not obligated to be an authority over them
Not as much, yes, however, you seem to think parenting a child includes authority and dictatorship over another being, and must involve tons of unwanted correcting.
You don't EVER have to be strict with kids. If you have a good relationship, they'll respect your feelings and others, and thus will usually not come into bad situations, and when they do, they won't have major issues with you helping them out.
You don't need to scald your kids or punish them for spilling their goldfish all over the couch. Let them know to be more careful, and to maybe put them somewhere else, and then ask them to help you clean them up, and give them some more.
You don't need to yell at them to stop doing that. You don't need to say "NO GOLDFISH ON THE COUCH FOR A WEEK." You don't need to send them to their room/timeout. You don't need to do really ANYTHING regarding authority of strictness.

I think this is why you, and most others think I'm cynical regarding normies. Y'all seem to think punishing kids is what you're supposed to do.
Punishment, just like war in the united states, while it is said to be a last resort, it's usually one of the first. Explain to the cutie what happened, recommend a way to fix it, and help them fix their situation and get on with it.
They'll learn from it, will respect you for being fair, and will then return such respect when you say they can't go outside right now, or they have to put a jacket on, or need to go to bed. No screaming about "NO NO NO I DON'T WANT TO GO INSIDE," none of that. No punishing them for not listening. Just they being OK with it, because they know you aren't just being a selfish fuck or spiting them.

This isn't just from personal experience, but observations of the few GOOD parents I know/see.
When a mother and son came over recently, he was good, then he acted bad around dinner time, and when his mother said we have to go home if you can't be respectful, he fixed up, but degraded down soon enough, and then she said it's time to go then, and he didn't make a little fuss whatsoever. Told everyone goodbye, I hope I can see y'all again, but I gotta go talk with my mom.
It has worked with EVERY age from what I have seen. It works/worked with my lgf since I met her, so from baby to toddler, it worked with the above's kid(s), and many others, extending it from basically 0-9/10 with multiple examples of different kids, all with many times of such good behavior.

That being said, if the main reason is you fear you couldn't punish them properly, that's good. You shouldn't ever really punish them, or even threaten it. It's not needed, welcomed, or fun for anyone.
Respect works much better.
Yes, this means no "Because I said so" like we all heard from our parents, likely many times, but rather "Because [real reason]," or "Because I [your feelings and thoughts]."

 No.14105

>>14104
>What are they to you then?
I-I don't know any bad parents like that at all. And I do know a lot of parents. I don't know anyone that are extremely religious, parents or otherwise… I'm not saying terrible parents don't exist, but they're not as common as you think. Like I said, it makes me suspect you've spent too much time in environments where shitty behavior has congregated… All the 'bad parents' I know aren't bad because they're mean, but because they don't know how to properly raise children and end up spoiling them and not enforcing / having very wobbly boundaries. So, practically the opposite problem of being mean. I've heard people who work with kids describe it as a problem of many parents today trying to be their kids' friends, rather than being parents.

And that is also exactly the issue that makes me afraid of being a parent. I know it's not a black and white "Either you're an authoritarian nazi who raises a perfect child who has nothing but respect for you, or you're a friend figure but whom your children don't respect and also they're shitty kids.". It's a complicated balance, and even just defining what it means to parent is difficult. It doesn't have to be about being strict and authoritarian, but it does mean something that isn't just 100% love and cuddles. I don't know what it is, but at this time I'm pretty sure I would be bad at it.

 No.14106

I mean like, hitting your kids is straight up illegal here… Where do you even live where that's even anywhere near common behavior?

 No.14107

>>14104
>You don't EVER have to be strict with kids.
I'm currently reading a book that's basically saying those things you're saying just there. And I agree. But like I said just before, parenting does involve something that isn't all happiness and cuddling. There will be issues that don't work out, and I don't feel ready at all in tackling them. But yes, I completely agree with what you're saying.

 No.14109

>>14107
>>You don't EVER have to be strict with kids.


Part of life is learning how to be strict with yourself. You need parents to teach you how to do that. And the best way to teach, is to do.

 No.14110

>>14104
>hit them and yell at them
I see no problem here. Someone's gotta instill discipline into little shits.

Either you have no experience around children, no experience around parents, or no experience in the world outside your basement.

 No.14113

File: 1421974122875.gif (984.12 KB, 440x220, 2:1, 140607078899.gif)

>>14105
>I-I don't know any bad parents like that at all. And I do know a lot of parents. I don't know anyone that are extremely religious, parents or otherwise…
I'm not referring to eastern parents, or even non-USA parents in general.

I'd agree though, the environment here is bad.
:^)

>All the 'bad parents' I know aren't bad because they're mean

Define spoiling them, and define wobbly boundaries please.
Usually spoiling children is done when people want to just "buy" their kids while ignoring them, thus resulting in the "spoiled child" behavior of acting out, but getting anything they want, but never being truly happy and satisfied, at least for more than a moment, thus resulting in outbursts, cries for attention, which result in more gifts, a brief period of decency, followed by the fire kicking right back up in the child.
If you notice something, while the parent is spoiling the child, they are often doing so because they neglect the child, and have to balance it with spoiling them.

I spoil my little girlfriend. I give her anything she wants. I'll cave to her, aide her, and generally just give her what she wants.
However, she doesn't act spoiled with me. She will respond with a simple "owwwkay" when there's an issue. We can't go blow bubbles because it's cold and rainy? Owwwkay. I can't give you a lolipop because you have to ask your parent(s) first? Owwwkay. You can't have the goldfish in the store, because we're checking out and I'll get you some in the car? Owwwkay.
This is because while I spoil her, she still respects me and cares about me, as I do her, and thus will not make a fuss, will not act "spoiled" when she doesn't get her way.

Now regarding wobbly boundaries, that's usually, again, because, not of them caring to much, but them caring too little, and resulting in a pileup.
They'll cave when their kid asks to watch tv, because their kid will fight otherwise and be rude, because they don't respect them, and most of all, they're usually not told no followed by "we'll play instead," but rather "go play outside" or something of such. Suggesting, basically, fuck off, go do your own thing, no X because I said so.
They "wobble" not because they feel bad and give in (typically), but rather because they can't take the result of their (bad form of) fascism and it's results.

>So, practically the opposite of being mean.

It usually involves some yelling or something of such, however, it is being mean. Just not violently.

>I've heard people who work with kids

Not all people who work with kids aren't normal. Just saying.
Anyhow, there's a difference between being their friend and just treating them like shit. I treat kids like friends, and as a result, they respect me, and they give back to me.
There's a difference between shoving gadgets in your kids face and being a friend to them.

>or you're a friend figure but whom your children don't respect

Tell me, why exactly would they not respect you as a friend?
Do you not listen to friends? Look up to some? Aspire to be like some? Learn from them? Respect their wishes, desires, and wants? Listen to their advice?

>but it does mean something that isn't just 100% love and cuddles.

There's a difference between conflict where they compromise and pure joy in both people, sure, but it's not really far off. If you give them 100% love and cuddles, you won't need to be strict or authoritarian whatsoever, assuming they aren't severely mentally disabled, in which case they are going to be a problem no matter what you do.

>I don't know what it is, but at this time I'm pretty sure I would be bad at it.

Because you think you'd be too much of a "friend" to them?
If you actually pay attention to them and love them, you wouldn't have the issue most parents who act like "friends" have.

>>14106
>Where do you even live where that's even anywhere near common behavior?
America, it has become less common, however, many, even most parents, still do it occasionally. Maybe not as the first measure, usually that will be yelling and timeout, but it shouldn't be a measure at all, just as yelling shouldn't be, or even timeout.
Talk to them, don't punish them. (S)he runs in the street because (s)he doesn't understand the danger or why you don't want them to, or because (s)he want's attention, attention you refuse to give them, and thus they do it again.
Sending them inside and yelling for them to not do it again will not do ANYTHING positive.

>>14110
>Le satire dorito man fase
:^)

 No.14114


>>14107
>parenting does involve something that isn't all happiness and cuddling.
Such as?
I've never had a bad sad response from a child when I said no to something or something of such.
I wouldn't say her "owwwkay" as a negative response. She's still alright, she's still mildly happy, and she is still cuddly. It's not a "fuck I can't go outside" it's a "well, I guess we aren't going out, can you flip me upside-down?"

>There will be issues that don't work out, and I don't feel ready at all in tackling them.

All you need to tackle any issue is love and understanding. Honestly.
Take care of them and respect them, and love them, and you won't run into anything you can't, you won't, just naturally handle.

>>14109
My authoritarian parents never could teach me that.
I taught myself that, and thus became fit in a few years after being 200lbs at 12yo.
There's a difference between striding for something, and being strict about it, and obtaining it, rather than forcing yourself to do something you don't want to do, just because it's apparently a good thing to do, according to others.

Again, you don't EVER have to be strict with kids.
You don't need to be strict with yourself, or shouldn't need to. Not in the common usage of the word that is.

Besides, you can teach a child to do their homework without threats, but rather with encouragement. It will instill the same strictness with their self and others you seem to believe authoritarian parenting will.

 No.14117

>>14114
>my parents failed thus all parents failed

there's a word for this

 No.14121

>>14117
>My parents failed
I didn't say that at all, mr projector.

I'd think you'd stop this in every thread eventually.
But you don't.

 No.14124

>>14114
I cant wait for you to become a parent to see how wrong you are. You NEED strictness. You dont need a lot, but its still necessary.

You preach "PEACE PEACE PEACE!", but that wont get anywhere. Hell, this is all from first person experience. My parents seem to be the opposite of yours, very calm and encouraging, but it has only gotten me failing grades and failed goals. Interestingly I was in a very strict and physically strict household when I was little (1-12 years old), but bullying happened in middle school and my parents softened up a lot to help me cope. That was a mistake.
If your children are smart, dont give too much leeway, you must remain vigilant and strict as a parent. Otherwise, you will come to learn that a smart child of any temperament will easily manipulate you, as I did with my parents and my students try to do with me.

Overall you are wrong about raising children, but not entirely wrong. A balance between strictness and pacifism must be met. This is how I interact with children as a teacher and it works very effectively. I will tell you that the only way I KNOW that a child has learned something morally is if I see tears. Dont fear your childs emotions by being a pansy parent, it will only make them manipulative.

 No.14126

>>14121
You directly stated your parents failed.

You sitting here trying to lie to me or anyone else is pointless.
I'm starting to feel like you must be a compulsive liar as well as a delirious narcissist.

A powerful combination.

 No.14128

>>14126
>I'm starting to feel like you must be a compulsive liar as well as a delirious narcissist.

Yeah im starting to feel the same about him. He probably shouldnt post his fucking trip anymore, now I just see this guy as some sort of lying, narcissistic, deluded sack of shit with autism. Not even joking about the autism.
He needs some serious mental help before he parents.

 No.14130

>>14128
It's not really his fault.

With you or I, our opinions are structured on reality, for him, his reality is formed around his opinions.

 No.14131

File: 1421990017603.jpg (88.64 KB, 1024x685, 1024:685, 142015220248.jpg)

>>14126
>You directly stated your parents failed.
Please cite, friend.

Again, worthless added words revolving around hate and nothing more.
Stop projecting.
Semi-colon Carrot Right-Parentheses

>>14124
>I cant wait for you to become a parent to see how wrong you are.
I deal with many kids quite frequently, and two almost bi-daily, and I haven't been proven wrong yet.

>My parents seem to be the opposite of yours

My father was abusive and strict, my mother was sweet and gentle. I turned and basically "overthrew" them when I was around 7 or 8 and took dominance in the situation because of the way the house was managed, because I didn't like their shit anymore, and I recognized they had NO power over me.
That being said, no, my parents didn't push me to do homework, or push me to get good grades. But I got them anyhow. I got straight A's, even when I skipped school, I still managed to snag them.

>but it has only gotten me failing grades and failed goals

You seem to have the issue most people have. They blame EVERYONE but their self for their problems.
It's your fault you were shit in school, you were just a stupid motherfucker with bad priorities, and likely parents who missed key things, and thus while they may have been calm, they were absent or something of such.

My brother always whines about how our mother made him fail a few grades, when in reality it's because he is/was skipping too much, while getting shit grades, missing tests, and being bad socially.
My mother tried her best with the school, and put ME second in the schooling, while he says I was first, always pleading them to let him pass or understand, while not taking me out of the shit school I was in or letting me skip grades.
I blame her for nothing, but he blames her for it all. She helped him all she could, more than really anyone else would have, but he still failed.
Don't be my brother.

>Interestingly I was in a very strict and physically strict household when I was little (1-12 years old)

So it really is 100% undeniably your fault? You were shit with your grades and goals when you were a teen? And you blame your parents parenting style for that?

It wasn't a mistake softening up, but rather bullying you into a place where you had no basis for your own survival and values outside of fear of your parents.
Which I wouldn't consider much of a loving relationship at all if one party feels fear to the other.

They should have removed you from the school, or told you how to REALLY deal with the situation rather than "softening" up as you call it.

>If your children are smart

If your children are smart you shouldn't NEED to worry about too much "leeway" and shouldn't need to be strict at all. They should, and would stride for the things that are obviously beneficial.
They might need some guidance, or advice, but they shouldn't ever need to fear their parents/caretakers.

>Otherwise, you will come to learn that a smart child of any temperament will easily manipulate you

A smart child will turn on their parents and defy them outright in the face of oppression like I did, and like many others I know did. Telling bold face lies to them, threatening to fight back violently, with weapons, if they were hit, and outright defying any restrictions the parent puts on them till the parent realizes it's not working, or they're removed from their problematic situation.
A smart child does not need to manipulate a loving parent, and thus, you will likely never have such an issue.

>A balance between strictness and pacifism

I haven't advocated for pacifism at all.
You don't need to not confront your children about things at all. You should confront them. Just don't do it meanly and unfairly. Give them respect, listen to them, explain to them the real reasons, and you won't run into really any conflicts from what I have seen.
They'll learn from the situation, share the burden of their mistake(s), and respect you, so that when you don't want to do something or disagree with them, they'll cave to YOU without any issue.

>I will tell you that the only way I KNOW that a child has learned something morally is if I see tears

You should fear having children then, as the newer generations seem to be leaning more to the way I was as a child, and this being said, when you see those tears, yes, they have learned something, that is true, but it is not something positive.
It revolves, likely, around a hate for you, a fear of you, and a rage building in them to injure you if you EVER touch them again.
Enjoy being disowned like I disowned my father, and likely having a wife that disagrees with your likely sadistic form of managing kids, and inevitably, likely, leaving you for it, assuming she isn't just as disgusting as you.

>Don't fear your childs emotions

You don't fear them, you respect them, and consider them you psycho.

>>14130
>Our opinions are based off reality while his aren't, regardless of him being around kids often and seeing it work in kids, and personally being raised in the way most advocate, including myself, and disagreeing with it.
And I'm deluded.

>>14128
>He probably shouldnt post his fucking trip anymore
;^)

 No.14132

>>14113
>>14114
You would raise the worst piece of shit child. They would be walking all over you and you'd let them because you're so wrapped up in your attraction that you refuse to acknowledge that children aren't perfect little angels all the time.

I have a kid and they're sweet but they also lie and steal. It's a parent's job to teach them that shit is not okay. You don't need to yell or abuse them, you just need to be firm. Earlier my kid dumped a bag of chips out all over the table and I made them pick it all up and put it back in the bag. They couldn't leave until it was all up and they didn't like it but that's tough. Don't dump shit everywhere.

Discipline and abuse aren't the same thing at all.

 No.14133

File: 1421992437944.jpg (161.98 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, 1420311294348-1.jpg)

>>14132
>They would be walking all over you
Again, you give respect, they give respect, is this not how humans generally work?
Give and take.
It hasn't went wrong with me yet. I enjoy my time with kids, and when my lgf (for example) wants to blow bubbles, I'd usually love to too. But when I don't, that's fine too. When she can't have X, that's fine by her.
When it's nap time or bed time, and she's not ready, I'll ask her why, and instead of forcing her to sleep and holding her down and having her cry to sleep, I simply play with her for a good 10-15minutes or give her a quick bath, and she's all good to go, all smiles, and cuddles right up and goes to sleep in minutes.
This relationship, of giving and taking, has worked with every child, regardless of relationship or relation to them I have, be us just meeting each other 10minutes ago, or knowing each other on and off for months, or constantly for more than a year.

>Children aren't perfect little angels all the time

Yes, but they USUALLY are, contrary to what most people seem to believe.
And when they aren't, there's usually a simple fix, and it's honestly, usually the caretakers fault, for example, not respecting them and letting them play with you for another 10minutes, or giving them a snack after you promised them one when you get back to the car.
When they do misbehave, they genuinely learn from it though, and know they shouldn't do it, as it wasn't as good as they expected, and they know it hurt you, and y'alls relationship.
Instead of fearing telling you and hiding wrongdoings, they'll be more likely to be upfront and honest about them, and come to you for help or advice. They know they won't be scalded for spilling the milk, so they won't try to clean it up badly, thereby leaving a big wetspot to stink up your bed and leave you sheetless come bedtime. They'll tell you, and you can clean it up WITH them, thereby showing them how to properly, letting them know to be more careful, and maybe advising them on an alternative to prevent it from happening again. And with such treatment, they'll be understanding to you when you don't feel like going to the park, or outside, or letting them go over to X's house.

>It's a parent's job to teach them that shit is not okay.

I never said they didn't do those things.
Nor did I say I would ignore them, thereby avoiding that responsibility of teaching them that it's not okay.
Instead of being "firm" or abusive like some people are, most are, you can just fix the situation with them, and talk to them about it, calmly, not down to them, and just be nice.
If they steal something and they let you know, or you find out, talk to them, why'd you steal it, I know you know it's wrong, can we not do that again, if you need something just ask and we can talk about it, etc.

Or, in your case, if they dump a bag of potato chips, sure, tell them to be more careful, or to put it somewhere else next time, and yes, DON'T just pick it up yourself. But, like I honestly feel you were, don't be a lazy bastard and watch them pick it up and force them to do so while you just watch.
Help them pick it up real quick.
It didn't take any time out of yours, probably saved you some waiting, it made them feel like you're helping too and not treating them like shit, etc.
Get on the floor and help them out, hold the dustpan while they scoop it in, pick up some crumbs with them, etc.
It's not okay to throw chips on the floor, or leave a mess you created, but you, as the parent, or caretaker, should back your children up in their mistakes. It's okay if they mess up. They don't need to be treated as lesser "little shits" as others have called them in this thread. But they do need to learn from it, I suppose, and they should take responsibility, and be happy you helped them out. Which always has been the case for me.

There's a difference between being a lazy fuck or someone who just cares about punishing their kids so they don't have to deal with it as much and someone who is trying to teach their kids right from wrong, how to be nice, share, friendly, and all types of things.
Kids make mistakes, and if you can't let them do that and help them out when they do, you really shouldn't have kids, or be around them at all in my opinion.

This applies to ANY situation I can think of with kids.
If it's a mess, help them clean up, especially if they're young, and you have time, or are just going to watch them do it anyhow.
If it's them ordering the wrong food or asking for the wrong one, share a little of yours and trade foods if need be. Sure, you don't have to re-order, but don't be rude and tell them to eat it all because they ordered it.
If it's them running in the street, go over to them, grab them, whatever, and then sit down with them and tell them to be more careful and how it's dangerous.
If it's them wanting to do something, give in sometimes, other times, if you don't feel like it, or it's probably not for the best, say no, and if they do, unlikely albeit, they do get fussy, talk to them about it. Tell them you will go later, tomorrow, whatever, and FOLLOW what you told them. Don't lie.
If they want some of your dinner or to try something you have, such as wine, but aren't eating theirs well, tell them to eat a little more X first, and then you'll let them have some.
If they're struggling with their homework, do it WITH them, yes DO IT with them. HELP them. Don't just leave them to do it on their own. Once you remind them how, and they get it, they can do the rest, and offer them help if they get stuck anywhere. Condition going to the park, "Well, I wasn't planning on it, but if you want we can if we finish your homework early enough," and going to the park together, and if they need help, help them a little, and if they don't finish early enough, but do finish, tell them, "y'know what, you are (almost?) finished (and it's getting late), we might not be able to go today, but we can tomorrow, want to do X (watch a movie?) tonight on the couch?"

>Discipline and abuse aren't the same thing at all

But usually they're one in the same in reality, as what people do regarding discipline, is often, usually, abusive.
Regardless, again, discipline, strictness, etc, is not needed almost ever in any case, and there's much better techniques to teach and instill values than the techniques most people seem to practice, and even the ones you seem to promote.

 No.14134

>>14133
Obviously the caretakers in your life were pieces of shit, but that doesn't mean that everyone is. You're projecting.

>help pick up the chips

>express that wrongdoings offer no real consequences and they can get away with anything if they look sad enough

Right, that's preparing them for the real world. Being a parent is training a child on how to be an adult. It might be in bright colors and song but it's all lessons for how to function on your own. If you fuck up as an adult you're not going to find many of the people you've wronged are willing to help you pick up the pieces.

 No.14135

>>14131
You need some learning before you think about "proper" parenting. Learning both logically (1/3 of the >>14131 post was misdirected at a wrong assumption) and realistically (almost all kids are not angels).

 No.14136

>>14135
Me again, the guy that you (wrongly) associate with your brother. You keep on basing ALL your info on your measly interaction with kids and parents. I interact with ~150 children + their parents daily. I have a lot more wisdom with little kid psychology.
Dont think of this as some debate, learn from it. Other dude knows his shit too it seems.

 No.14137

>>14136
This sort of intense naivety and straight up denial cannot simply be attributed to a lack of exposure to children and parents. He obviously has developed a very serious mental block that he is unwilling to work past.

 No.14138

The kindest thing you can do for children is to teach them that THEY must fix THEIR mistakes, because no one else is going to in adulthood.

Honestly, preparing them for some sort of fantasy world that does not exist is cruelty to children.

 No.14139

>>14134
>Obviously the caretakers in your life were pieces of shit
Again, I didn't say that.
One was, my father, yes, however, the others weren't. My mother made some mistakes, as did my cousin, they weren't perfect, but they did a very nice job overall.
I don't blame any of them for ANY of the issues in my life today.
They were my choices, or are things I have conquered and moved beyond, or feel aren't significant, such as stretch marks that are barely there, in certain areas, from my childhood.

>You've wronged that are willing to help you pick up the pieces

Usually that's because of the circumstances, and how, as an adult, it'd be weird to be helped, and thus you either do it all, or do none of it.
Regardless, children aren't adults. As you said, you're preparing them for the adult world. This preparation must begin with a helping hand, to show them how, and get them used to it.
When they get used to it, they'll naturally do it. And instead of out of fear of trouble, they'll do it just because it's messy.

Just as you say it may be in song or with fancy colors, it can be taught through helping them out, and showing them the proper way, and that it's not so bad, and it really makes others happy.
Do you tell your son to go make you dinner when he's 8? No, you ask him to help you out with dinner, and you show him how, and have him do some of it that he knows how to, and is used to doing, and knows makes you happy.

Regardless of those points, as I said, you give, you take, they give, they get. You help pick up, they respect you more, they have less "fits," they aren't dishonest and hide things from you, they still learn from it, and THEY HELP YOU without resentment. They'll be perfectly okay, or even enjoy cleaning a little with you, as they like being with you, and they naturally give back, like ALL good friends do to one another, and ALL good family does to one another.

>>14135
>1/3rd of the (post) was misdirected
Not really.
Only a brief part uses you as an example of the problem with a lot of people. They blame others for their failures. Be it "ohhh noooo I was molested I'm brooooken" to "oooohhhh my parents didn't beat me and threaten me so I got bad grades."
Take responsibility for your failures.
Especially when you're a teenager.
You aren't a child anymore.
You don't/shouldn't need any guidance at all anymore.

>Almost all kids are not angels

They are with me.
They only aren't when they're being neglected, or if they're the 1 in hundreds that are, well, just unstable for some reason deeper than you can fix, as for example, a teacher.
As I said, they can have some issues, but they're easily fixed with a small friendly talk, and often times it's the caretakers fault by breaking a promise and not saying sorry, or being unreasonable with the child.
My lgf never hits people, grabs toys, she shares everything, she's gentle with all kids, doesn't steal things, doesn't yell or scream, etc, with me. Apparently, toddlers aren't like this, according to most people. She is an angel, sure, she has an issue occasionally, but it's very rare, and in general, she's an angel.

>>14136
Quality > Quantity

You may be a nice Gym teacher and play with some kids, tons of kids, near-daily, but you don't however go through life with them, and have a real relationship with each and every one of them.
A teacher is not a parent or a caregiver when they take care of that many kids and parents every day, or hell, really even every week.

>>14137
>>14138
I'm just curious, how come you literally never have ever agreed with me on anything, ever?
Regarding your post, read >>14133, as you seem to be the one in denial, and seem to be tag-teaming with the other fella(s) about some sort of delusional world y'all made up that throws out about half of what I say because if I said it, you'd have nothing to argue about.

 No.14145

>>14139
>Take responsibility for your failures.
Yup.
>Especially when you're a teenager.
Those years are far away
>You aren't a child anymore.
Totally.
>You don't/shouldn't need any guidance at all anymore.
Yup.

And your view on kids is still skewed
>They are [angels] with me.
Then you got lucky, congratulations
>Quality > Quantity
You assume too much. Ive successfully helped a child cope with the death of their father. Have you done that? Thats just one of many experiences I've had. You do not know my life, stop assuming a false reality.

>I'm just curious, how come you literally never have ever agreed with me on anything, ever?

Sure I agree, but not what you say entirely. You only have half of the spectrum down. You cannot rely on a system of pure trust and honor because kids are more immature than you think they are. Sure, you can always teach them trust and honor, but actually understanding those concepts take age and wisdom. You are heavily implying that ALL children are this wise and mature, and at such immature ages. This is simply not true. You have been lucky with the few kids youre around, so dont generalize all children to be that great.

 No.14147

tfwqtp2tlgf;3, I actually agree with all of your explanations of those specific situations, and being friendly and helpful even when kids fuck up.

>>14134
>Right, that's preparing them for the real world.
I've heard that argument in so many contexts and I find it really annoying. "The world is shit, therefore we'll be shit as parents, too, to avoid confusion". Children will learn the horrors of the world on their own; they will learn that some times they have to pick up all the chips by themselves. Why should the parents actively make that reality a constant reality, when it doesn't have to be? One day, they'll drop the chips and daddy will be busy with something else - that's a natural reason not to help clean up. You don't need to do shitty things to people with this "Welcome to the real world, jackass" attitude.

But anyway. I'm curious, tfwqtp2tlgf;3: Your explanations seem to orbit the idea of one parent teaching one child. How would you apply your ideas to a situation with several children, either because of siblings or as a teacher / kindergarten teacher? How would you handle it when several kids get into conflicts and sometimes down right physical fights? Such dynamics with several children can be very complex, and I don't think your theories apply all the time to that. There are just straight up disrespectful children out there that will manipulate you and act like shit, how would you say those things could be handled?

 No.14149

>>14147
>"The world is shit, therefore we'll be shit as parents, too, to avoid confusion".

That is a complete strawman and you know it.

>Children will learn the horrors of the world on their own; they will learn that some times they have to pick up all the chips by themselves.

Or you could actually do your job as a parent and teach them.

You can DIRECTLY SEE THIS AROUND YOU RIGHT NOW that many people simply never learn to "pick up the chips." It's not something that children just learn themselves. You can directly and empirically prove this statement by taking a look at the people in your immediate surroundings.

>>14139
>I'm just curious, how come you literally never have ever agreed with me on anything, ever?

Because your insane, disgusting beliefs would literally lead to the destruction of children's lives.

You are an active danger to any child in your care. Cyanide with a candy coating.
I spit on you.

 No.14150

>>14147
>Children will learn the horrors of the world on their own
It's harder to adjust if you have been spoiled, though.

 No.14151

>>14149
>That is a complete strawman and you know it.
Good thing I went back to the original example and didn't use it to prove my point, then. That's just what it sounds like sometimes.

>You can DIRECTLY SEE THIS AROUND YOU RIGHT NOW that many people simply never learn to "pick up the chips."

That's not what anyone said not to teach kids. What I and tfwqtp2tlgf;3 said is not to be an asshole nazi about it and make the children clean up by themselves if you are easily able to help. Helping them enforces your relationship with them and their trust in you. It doesn't make them not learn to clean up for themselves unless you actually do all of it for them.

>You can directly and empirically prove this statement by taking a look at the people in your immediate surroundings.

I don't think you realize what you're saying. Most parents go by some strictness, i.e. making them pick up all the chips is the norm. And yet, here you're saying that many people never learn it.

>It's harder to adjust if you have been spoiled, though.

Yeah, showing them reality like that will make them tougher, I guess. But it costs pieces of your relation and pieces of trust.

It's just prioritizing between your relation to the child and toughening up the child. Neither option excludes the possibility of teaching them to "pick up the chips".

 No.14152

>>14151
>And yet, here you're saying that many people never learn it.

BECAUSE MOST PARENTS ~DO NOT~~~ GO BY THIS STRICTNESS

most parents skirt either edge of the spectrum, weak willed parents that are incapable of doing the job set out for them, or they are inconsistently strict, and inconsistency teaches children nothing but how to acquire weed.

 No.14153

File: 1422037366603.jpg (174.45 KB, 745x1024, 745:1024, 1420311546626-0.jpg)

>>14145
>Then you got lucky, congratulations
Yes, lucky many many many times with many many different kids, from many many backgrounds and amount of time with them, especially when some of them are "monsters" to others, but angels to me.
Lucky.

>You assume too much. Ive successfully helped a child cope with the death of their father. Have you done that?

>I-I've done more than you, something bigger than you did, see I have quality too!!!!
You used an example of tons of kids as if you knew them. You don't. Now you're using a strange rare example as something you did.
Again, parenting/caring for children is MUCH MUCH more than what a teacher does, especially when you apparently interact with 40~ -> 150 kids a day.

>You do not know my life, stop assuming a false reality.

You mean stop, apparently, acting the way you have been every time you interact with me?
I'm taking what you say at face value, and it's still shit.
For your information, I did actually help a little boy, about 7, with his fathers death, in the sense he was sad about it, we talked, and he brightened up afterwards, on Monday actually.

>kids are more immature than you think they are

Maturity is not needed for a simple give and take relationship.
Every toddler I have been around, including my lgf, NEVER has had an issue with me that wasn't completely explainable. Are they immature? Yes. Are they stupid? No, and because of this, they see/feel emotions and notice nice people, and will act according to them. Nicely.

>Sure, you can always teach them trust and honor, BUT…

See, I don't agree with that.
They know, they seemingly ALWAYS know it. However, they don't show it often because parents are usually fucking awful to them, and thus they aren't trustworthy, because if they were honest, they'd be punished, usually unfairly, and almost always abusively.

You don't need to understand them, just as kids don't need to understand every aspect of sex to enjoy it. However, just as with sex, they can understand it if they're educated on it.
However, just like before, if they're in a shitty situation, why would they follow it? Who cares about your honor if telling you took something will only degrade it, and likely get you punished, be it by timeout, no X, a spanking, and likely a good yell.

>>14147
>Your explanations seem to orbit the idea of one parent teaching one child.
The more parents/caretakers, the easier it is if they agree to this relationship, the more kids, the more the relationship must spread.

If one child wants to do X, but another wants to do Y, and you cannot, say, play in the park and read a book inside on the couch at the same time, you can say we'll do one now and one later.

If one child wants X toy, and another is using it, lets just say they were mean and snatched it, and the one who originally had it gets upset. Go over to them, ask them what's wrong, or tell them one second, and go talk to the other one. Ask the snatcher for the toy back, and that (s)he can have it in a minute if she wants.
Once a minute comes around, go to the original one, who received their toy back, with likely an apology, and ask them to let the snatcher have the toy now.
I have NEVER had one say no, even though they're still actively playing with said toy. They're PERFECTLY okay with it, and will move to another toy or activity, be it with you, alone, or with another kid.

If kids get in fights, just ask them what's wrong, and try to sort it out, be it by getting them another sharpie to draw with, changing them to a different group if they want, or whatever else it may be.
It's not going to change anything, unless the kid is the 1 in 1000s I spoke of earlier, by punishing them and sending them to the corner to "think about it for a few minutes." Even those kids, now that I say it, won't benefit. They'll just not be problem for a little while.

>How would you

Well it depends on the way, and how they are about things.
It could be just a simple talking to them and asking why they're do X, or telling them to do X differently, or to ask first.
Normally you should never have to even consider punishment or talking down to them, but certain kids are just, honestly, mentally ill, and you can't really do much if it's bad enough aside from try to avoid them causing too many problems.
Some kids will get in a fight, then continue fighting or hitting things when you come. You'd need him to go somewhere alone, or to a timeout type place, just so you can help out his poor victim.
It's not going to help him/her(kek) out, but it will give you the chance to help their victim with their issue. Sometimes you can diffuse them, for example, with tickles, or slapping their punches, but if you're busy enough in a classroom, that's not going to be very viable.

Always be persistent and try to get them to open up and stop before giving up when it gets busy/tough though.
But, like I said, some kids are just ill from their home-life, or family, and upbringing, so much so that they can't have any respect for anyone, and can't control their self whatsoever. I've only ever come across one who is even somewhat like that, even once.

 No.14154

File: 1422039396796.jpg (172.34 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, 1420311294348-0.jpg)

>>14149
>That is a complete strawman and you know it.
I don't get why you continuously point these out, yet every time you do, they are always backed up by an actual argument.
Are you just trying to deflect it, or do you just compulsively throw out anything you disagree with while naming one of the many most common fallacies?

>Or you could actually do your job as a parent and teach them.

Forcing them to do something =/= Teaching
Do you teach your child to cook by forcing them to make you Chicken parm with a side of spaghetti and sauteed spinach and kale, with some bread? Do you then tell them to go to their room if they don't make it perfectly and timely?
No, you bring them into the kitchen, and you do it with them till they learn how to do it, and it's all natural to them, till they're comfortable and used to it. Then one day, when you're sick, or came home late after having a flat, or simply aren't home and they need food, they make a restaurant quality $20 a plate of Italian food, and it's fucking delicious.
You taught them well, and when the time came, they used their knowledge well.

>You can DIRECTLY SEE THIS AROUND YOU RIGHT NOW that many people simply never learn to "pick up the chips."

That's because instead of doing it MY way, they do it yours, and end up hating cooking, so they just order in, or it not being natural, so they just take shit out of a jar and throw it on noodles.
They weren't taught how to pick up the chips, or why you should, but rather that "I AM YOUR FATHER, YOU BETTER PICK UP YOUR MESS OR YOU CANNOT WATCH TV FOR A WEEK (and I won't play with you like normal :^)!"

>>14149
>You are an active danger to any child in your care.
That's why no child in my care has ever gotten hurt, and always acts like angels.

Didn't you say before that all pedos are a danger to children in their care, as they're more likely to molest? Or that men are?
No wonder I'm so dangerous to you.

>>14150
Being spoiled is having your parent do everything.
If you pick up all their chips and get them another bag, that's spoiled.
If you make them sandwiches and snacks every time, once they get older, when they know how, that's spoiling them and feeding their laziness.
However, if you show them how, or help them make a sandwich, or help them pick up, you're showing them it's not so bad, and making them more confident in their ability to do the task on their own.

My mother still makes my brother, who has been a legal adult for a while, sandwiches, gets him drinks, and all types of things when he's simply watching youtube videos and streams.
She's spoiling him, although I don't think it matters anymore being who he is.

However, with me, years ago, when I didn't know how to cook many things, I looked them up, I told her I was going to try to make it tomorrow night, and knowing her making delicious sauce, I asked for her opinion and advice, changed a couple things that I didn't think I'd like, such as meat in it, and it was delicious.
Sure, I could have done it myself, but it wouldn't have been as enjoyable, and it would have been shit for awhile, and it would have made me think worse of her when she rejected my simple request.
She didn't spoil me, she helped me.
Like I'll help the kids in my life.

>>14152
>MOST PARENTS DO NOT GO BY THIS STRICTNESS
They do though, and if they don't, they go to the complete opposite, of usually yelling and abusing their kids, then cleaning it up all by their self because their children aren't willing to do it after being treated like shit.
We aren't suggesting spoiling them, just not abusing them. Almost no one parents like this, as they don't parent for the child, but parent for their self.

I agree a lot of parents are wobbly, and will say you have to do X or no X, and then cave anyways later, or don't do it the next time, however, they're not usually doing it out of love, or for a good reason.
They're doing it because it's easier on them.
It's easier to let their kids walk all over them, as when they try to punish, they get severe opposition, which they will always be forced to cave to if their kids are strong enough.

The reality is most parents are abusive, half of those are wobbly, half are strict and solid, and as a result, the strict and solid dominates the wobbly parent, resulting in a slight bit more strict parented kids.
Most kids are parented strictly, others are on and off parented that way.
The wobbly individuals parent that way because they were taught to parent strictly, but either feel bad doing it, and see it not working, or/and they think it's easier to just do it their self so that whatever it is doesn't get ruined more, by them doing it wrong, or it's easier to do it their self because they don't want their "annoying brat" around them any more than they have to, so they send them to timeout, being strict, then clean it up their self, and thus being seen as wobbly to you.
In reality they're just selfish authoritarian parents that hate their kids.

 No.14189

File: 1422065445580.jpg (196.89 KB, 500x750, 2:3, 1396224453375.jpg)

>>14153
I can conclude from your experience and mine that you live in a much different world than I, therefore any more talk is futile. You still also are assuming (very) wrongly about my life and my experiences, but im just going to let that slide since thats your own problem, and its causing an annoying tangent.

Overall, I agree with most of the things you say about raising a child, for being a good role model is key in raising a child. However, I will stand strong in how discipline through stringency is also necessary in raising a child. Keep in mind that I live in a much different environment than you do (judging by our personal experiences)

 No.14209

>>14058
What is that image from? She's holding Sakura's wand.

 No.14251

>>14133
>>14154
She's beautiful. Is there more of her?

 No.14252

File: 1422110883886.jpg (42.2 KB, 450x253, 450:253, sad-026.jpg)

Yes, one of my biggest fantasies is having sex with my loli daughter and making her orgasm, so I'd really rather not have a child at all…

 No.14265

>>14102
Absentee dads most of them still talk to and hang with their kids

 No.14266

>>14252
You don't have to have sex with your daughter to make her orgasm

 No.14267

>>14138
Its funny as I'm 24 and managed to get girls to clean my place and also I helped people move their shit around.

Arguably you are helping to create that world. Or more accurately perpetuate it.

 No.14268

>>14147
Not tfw but it's sometimes a good idea to let them fight especially if it's like two people with a grudge against each other let em bruise each other up

 No.14269

File: 1422114953945.gif (130.56 KB, 300x167, 300:167, 1420991860056.gif)

>>14153
You remind me in a way of Stefan Molyneux.

 No.14270

>>14209
>>14058
Ditto. It reminds me of that Disney show you see people talk about a pot. The animation style.

 No.14397

>>14058
Yes. Sometimes I would like to have kids. But I don't know how good I could make their lives.

I'm at that age where the likelihood of my children being born with mental illness, or autism, or schizophrenia, etc is much higher. I have certain personality traits I wouldn't want to pass on to anyone.

And the world is shit.

And you're basically sentencing someone to a life full of pain and suffering and class anxiety and peer pressure and misery and boredom and inevitable death. I don't think I could do that to a child.

Sex creates death. If you only masturbate nobody gets hurt.

 No.14399

>>14102

No, studies have shown that most parents hate parenting, and having children really increases the chances a couple will get divorced.

Yes, they will say they love their kids, but they can't really stand being around them most of the time.

 No.14409

>>14399
People only hate having babies.

 No.14443

>>14399
They say that because it's incredibly stressful and draining work, that you can't walk away from.

You say you love lolis, but if you had to raise one for 10 years you would say the exact same damn thing the parents say.

They hate PARENTING, not children.

 No.14542

No, I desperately want children, but I still view all post-pubescent women and evil harpies

 No.14546

File: 1422347443008.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.76 MB, 2800x4000, 7:10, modern women.jpg)

>>14542
this

Sometimes I think about getting a wife and then having kids with her but then I realize how much I'd hate living with a women (and giving her my money), and then there's the chance she finds out im a paedophile and goes "ZOMG U MONSTER" and if we have kids she'll take them and probably make them think I abused them..etc to use as ammunition during the divorce.

 No.14607

More like I worry I'll never be able to.

I've met several women who were pedo or pedo-friendly. With each one, I developed a relationship where we both expressed a desire to marry, breed, and raise our family in accordance with our sexual values.

They always get cold feet. Just like any other women, they don't want that dream more than they want a fat wallet.

 No.14616

I really want them, but it seems like a hassle dealing with adult women.

Sigh, I guess the best thing to do is go after single moms Humbert-style, especially ones where the daughter is very young and birth father is completely out of her life for good. Then once we're married I'd stage the mother's suicide so I can have the girl all too myself. But even then she'd have to go to public school and she'd probably get corrupted by society and become gross as she became a teen

 No.14617

>>14607
Where do you meet these women?

 No.14722

>>14617

Interbutts. Sheltered girls who are into it because they want freedom so much they can't think straight.

I don't meet them at any particular site, I'm just weird enough that I tend to find them. Partly because I'm also a zoophile. I often get girls who are impressed by the way I write when I debate that issue.

 No.16852

File: 1424293470159.png (215.85 KB, 280x339, 280:339, Angry fish.png)

>>14104
God, you are just a stupid cunt.
>sexually attracted to your own kids
>only treat them good when they are girls
>spend a lot of time with them, not letting them do anything their on their own
>end up molesting them
>IAM A GOOD PARNT NUT LIK THIS FUKING NORMIS!!!!!!!!!

You simply have to be autistic, even a sociopath is better at this than you.

 No.16862

>>16852
You're implying an awful lot of baseless implications there, chum.

 No.16865

>>16862
tfw has gone on record directly stating that people are only good caregivers of children when they are sexually attracted to them. This is something he's explicitly stated.

He's also gone on record saying that little boys are simply not as good of people as little girls, most likely for nothing more than, again, not being sexually attracted to them.

 No.16871

>>16865
Alright, I've heard him say some crazy shit, but never that crazy.

 No.17433

Every day.

 No.17435

File: 1424889206771.jpg (89.37 KB, 1600x1067, 1600:1067, 1420406593450-3.jpg)

>>14409
>People only hate having babies.
Since when?

>>14443
>They say that because it's incredibly stressful and draining work, that you can't walk away from.
How is it stressful exactly?
Because you can't text your co-workers or be lazy, and thus you are stressed trying to do both?
Try just focusing on your kids, it's not stressful, in fact, it's relaxing.

Draining?
Well sure, if you don't love your kids, and don't care about their future, and thus see it as a chore, sure it'll be draining.
But if not, sure, you might be tired, but so are they. You had an active day, have a nice sleep.

>They hate parenting, not children

Yes, that's why most people/normies think children are annoying, loud, disgusting, sloppy, boring, and just generally bad.
It's because they hate parenting, not the child!

>>16852
That's probably the most delusional and shill-tier post I have read on this entire board.
Congratulations.

>>16865
>tfw has gone on record directly stating that people are only good caregivers of children when they are sexually attracted to them.
>This is something he's explicitly stated.
Heh, no.
I've said that people who are sexually attracted to kids seem to be more inclined to love kids, and enjoy being around them, and thus will make better caretakers than the majority, as the majority dislikes children.

>He's also gone on record saying that little boys are simply not as good of people as little girls, most likely for nothing more than, again, not being sexually attracted to them.

It seems like all of your posts mix up "love" with "sexually attracted to."
I have said that I think little boys are worse than little girls because (X, their personality differences), plus they're boys, but that could be because I love girl personalities, not boys, and thus I dislike boys.
Little boys ARE awful terrible monsters, in general, to me. Little girls aren't. They act different. Boys are violent, rough, like shitty activities, girls usually don't.
How dense can you be.
Christ, you behave just like that shitposting BLer who started making all those shit threads making assumptions.

 No.17436

>>14074
That's no easy feat to accomplish, either.

>>14104
And just like that I find myself in a tl;dr thread.

>It works/worked with my lgf since I met her, so from baby to toddler

Are you telling me you have a toddler lgf? I must not be reading this correctly.

…Fuck it, I can't read more yet, it's time to watch Super Sentai.

 No.17437

>>14058
What's the sauce on this image, also? This girl is really adorable.

 No.17441

>>17436
>>17437
>Are you telling me you have a toddler lgf?
>I must not be reading this correctly.
Y-yes, you are reading it correctly.
Toddler-loli best loli.

>What's the sauce

It's from a show called "star vs the fandoms of evil."

 No.17444

File: 1424898630089.gif (2.94 MB, 740x416, 185:104, Toy Take away.gif)

>>17435
lol
>Yes, that's why most people/normies think children are annoying, loud, disgusting, sloppy, boring, and just generally bad.
You stated yourself that "Boys are violent, rough, like shitty activities,…", and when I last checked, boys were children.

>It's because they hate parenting, not the child!

>Well sure, if you don't love your kids, and don't care about their future, and thus see it as a chore, sure it'll be draining.
But if not, sure, you might be tired, but so are they. You had an active day, have a nice sleep.
Puh, you are not a parent, I was already worried. Go ask your parents or any parent out there and ask them if raising a child is draining. The answer will always be yes. Having a child doesnt mean you have a personal cooksleeve, it means you have a responsiblity; in fact, the biggest responsibility there is. You have to feed them, take them to school, help them, bring them to bed, watch out for them 24/7, answer their questions… . Additionaly you have other parents trying to be better than you and, well, us. Of course thats draining, that has nothing to do with "not loving your children"
Also, can you please answer me how "not caring about their future" makes it more stressfull? There cant be nothing worse than your child not beeing good at school, getting a social outcast or even develope mental problems. Worrying about your childs life has to be one of the most draining things about parenthood.

>I've said that people who are sexually attracted to kids seem to be more inclined to love kids, and enjoy being around them, and thus will make better caretakers than the majority, as the majority dislikes children.

If the main reason for you to be around children is your sexual attraction to them, then yes, you will end up molesting them. Thats not an "assumption".
The best caretakers are, as you stated, the people who enjoy beeing around children, enjoy their innocence, their laughter, their naivity oposing the praganism of adults and most importantly; they will love you back endlessly if you take care of them. People who admire this are the best to be around children, BUT only when they dont have the disre to have sex with them. That shit ruins children.
And I agree with you, we live in a society that hates children, but that doesnt mean everybody is like that. There are a lot of great female and male teachers/educators/caretakers who are fully dedicated to their job and the children, although males have it though since our society is biased. But the way how you make yourself the perfect child educator (this is about yourself, not about "us" or "pedos in general") and everybody else the evil child hater is delusional.

>I have said that I think little boys are worse than little girls because (X, their personality differences), plus they're boys, but that could be because I love girl personalities, not boys, and thus I dislike boys.

>Little boys ARE awful terrible monsters, in general, to me. Little girls aren't.
>They act different. Boys are violent, rough, like shitty activities, girls usually don't.
>He's also gone on record saying that little boys are simply not as good of people as little girls, most likely for nothing more than, again, not being sexually attracted to them.


tl;dr >That's probably the most delusional and shill-tier post I have read on this entire board. Congratulations.

 No.17446

>>17444
>You stated yourself that "Boys are violent, rough, like shitty activities,…", and when I last checked, boys were children.
There's a difference between disliking a certain portion of a group's personality and hating the group entirely, not to mention the reasons behind it.
I don't dislike/hate little boys because they're boring, disgusting, or any of that stuff. I just don't like them because they aren't fun, they like violent brute activities, and I don't, at least not like that.
The difference is that I dislike the typical boy personality, normies hate the base of children. They hate that they need attention, and/or hate that they have to take care of them.
I don't mind that, even with boys, but boys still are violent bastards most of the time. That's not a trait in their being, but just for some reason how the vast majority are.

>Go ask your parents or any parent out there and ask them if raising a child is draining.

As I have said before, even in this thread, of course they'll say that, they're most likely normies.
They didn't enjoy, and/or don't enjoy it, and have other priorities, and thus it is a drain for them. But that is not the constant must value.
If kids are a "drain" on you, don't have them. You probably aren't good for them.

Again, stop projecting.
If you think those activities, taking care of them, is draining, you should never have a child, and give up any that you have, as you're very likely to be mistreating them or neglecting them.
Those activities should be fulfilling, not draining.

>If the main reason for you to be around children is

Literally delusional/irrelevant.

>if you have a desire to have sex with them you aren't the best around kids, and are likely to "ruin" them.

Literally delusional.

>that doesn't mean everyone is like that

Yes, but the vast vast majority are like that, and most that seem to not be like that act/think like pedos.
Every person who has treated kids good has been a pedo. They might not admit it, they might say "I-I don't want to have sex with kids" but they have always fantasized about them, and romantically loved them like we do, so I consider them as such.
Not to say all people who don't hate kids are pedos, but most appear to be. If they enjoy kids, that is.

>Everyone is a child hate

Again, literally delusional.

 No.17447

>>17446

I like how obvious it is that you have learned to argue by imitating people who rightly call your idiotically generalizing statements "delusional." It's like you think that's some kind of debate-crushing trump card. You're one of those that wants to fuck kids because you mostly never stopped being one, aren't you? Don't feel too bad, my sex life when I was eight years old was also much better than it is now. I know how it be.

 No.17449

Every single parent on Earth will tell you that raising a child is tough, draining, and often thankless work.

A namefag who is not a parent says otherwise.

Who should I believe?

 No.17450

I'm pretty sure a lot of parents will say that bringing up children is both immensely fulfilling and stressful & draining as fuck. Just saying.


>Yes, that's why most people/normies think children are annoying […]

>I just don't like them because they aren't fun, they like violent brute activities
>Every person who has treated kids good has been a pedo.
I'm so, so tired of generalizations…

 No.17451

Gee, guys, I sure love how you keep adding more and more tl;dr, and how you can never find a steady balance of activity rather than just these random spikes of tl;dr.

 No.17452

I love how much a non issue like this bothers you.

 No.17454

>>17451
>le important snide comment

 No.18896

>>17441
Yeah, well, I guess that's fine. Weird, but fine. Also, the name you posted was for a fanart blog for the actual show, which is called Star vs. The Forces of Evil and kicks a lot of ass. I am glad I Googled that.

Go watch Star vs. The Forces of Evil, you guys. Seriously.

 No.18922

Oh, this thread how I missed you.

 No.21912

>>14058

I have my own child, She is smart, beautiful, and very willing to love me; But I am scared. My ex; her mom, was a teen mom at 16, and we grew up together in a very rural secluded place, approved and even encouraged in our relationship by her father and step mother. (one night even told to "go fuck". it was a very retarded homel; poverty, alcoholism, but I felt comfortable there. though; I even knew how messed up it was. I was 23 when we conceived my daughter)

well, anyways back to my rant.

Worse came to worse, and I was only with my baby momma "for our child" and the relationship crumbled, but she also discovered my taboo interest. Now I am a weekend parent, if im lucky, I sense a lot of daddy issues. I have a lot of issues, being around her. I keep it "normal"?, I guess, but I am constantly worried that some day I will get vanned.

I guess I am very lucky, hell I know I am, but I know its all hanging by a thread. I am always hiding a rage that she was actually "molested" (other peoples words) by a teen son of a babysitter and had an exploration with another friend of hers(again I don't know a lot since I am hardly a father). And I could see/sense the stigma in her mother (oh no! my child is broken!). I see it as a normal behavior, but i am bias and broken too.

I think I will come here more often, I actually started another thread http://8ch.net/younglove/res/21905.html#q21905


 No.21915

>>14058

No because I would never ruin my relationship with my daughter by abusing her. Its pretty depressing reading a lot of these replys- it definitely is abuse of parents power. At some point you will no longer have a sexual relationship but she will remember it, leading to A) jailtime B) public and personal humiliation C) loss of marriage/ family and D) her cutting ties with you.

Anyone have success with a therapist? I'm worried because the humiliation and possibility of the therapist breaking anonymity / them putting things in the medical record that can be accessed by others/ hacked


 No.21916

>>21912

me

>>21915

extremely valid point. I think I am very lucky to have experienced a child early on in my life to not get sucked into the prevailing mentality of "I want a girl *wink* XD lulz"

I am extremely tempted by the fantasy, but I have very hardwired line between fantasy and reality. Im still so scared though.


 No.21922

>>21915

> success with a therapist

https://www.dont-offend.org/


 No.21959

>>14099

It depends on you and your efforts regardless of anything else. If you take parenting serious and actually care about children you'll change and do what you need to and be really happy. That said, it's difficult and fully time consuming regardless. Also, there's more differences between girls and boys than the body and cuteness. Generally boys, while traditionally into frogs, pissing with friends, etc. they are much cleaner. Srsly, you have no clue how filthy and disgusting girls and women are. Feral really. Besides not caring about shitting or vomitting any/everywhere for someone else to clean up (and other such things) you have to deal with every stupid Frozen, periods, crushes on boys, etc. etc. Usually boys are much more easier to deal with.

While you can take the girl to gymnastics, dance, and have sleepovers you'll be the odd Man out and what if you like their friend more, imagine the hurt your daughter will go through - for life - because you paid more attention to her friend. A boy you can teach to enjoy, ahem, the little things in life. You know, raise a future member of the club but with the benefit of having been carefully taught about things to avoid, and maybe add in how to persuade in debate. Maybe a future generation will be politically active and effective to actually turn things around.

You can also take the boy to dance, gymnastics, even pageants, all as a straight boy. If that's what he's (been taught to be) into then he'll be loved and accepted and maybe you'll be the loving, open minded, safe dad. You can loli watch together. Imagine him getting to know how to appreciate lolis when he's their age. Taught to enjoy discretely so he and the loli can enjoy without anyone busting him and ruining life, because he had a father who cared enough to share the knowledge. Then he can share his tales with you. You get to chaperone dates. Maybe you can even double date, have him tell his gf to bring her friend along so she's not feeling left out and say his dad ix really great too so they (son & gf) can still have time to each other without worrying her friend will be alone and unhappy. Wins around, son gets points for caring, dad gets points for giving his time to/for his son, girls are more comfortable, happy, relaxed, open, responsive, and growing closer to son & dad who both get a "date" with a loli.

Of course, you could do much these things with a daughter too (teaching the appreciation, loli watching, her bringing you friends - but she may end up a tomboy, which isn't bad, or a lez, either of which will make her school life harder and other girls Not around). Whatever, however, it's up to your willingness. Things never go how you think though so deciding to be relaxed and just love and do the best and safest you can is the thing to do irregardless.

tldr: …your lose, go back & read

>>14058

I happen to know from some younger days that Everything works as it should so no worries about "having children".


 No.21961

>>14102

>>People don't like kids, so they usually treat them like shit.

>That only applies to absentee child support fathers. Most parents love their kids.

¿femnustic much, Leftwinger?


 No.21964

>>21961

The mother always gets awarded alimony, don't try to deny it. There isn't such a thing as a child support mother.


 No.21969

>>14104

You're so delusional I couldn't finish reading your post. (I did try my best and skimmed the last third.) Why delusional? Presumptions that something is always the case is usually wrong. I'll give you that your description of proper raising could happen, i think, but I strongly believe that it depends on the temperment the child is born with. Next, a bad parent doesn't necessarily not love their child but is just ignorant, more self consumed, or both. Most people probably think the tv and such is how to raise and it might be how they were raised. Right behavior? No, but unfortunately realistic. And an absentee dad, as someone mentioned, might be so for a number of reasons such as the still-woman-leaning-court-system in usa, prevention from the mom & her family, the dad trying to better himself in school/work by a short time away for coming back and providing a hugely higher quality of life from then out.

Oh, um. Rant and brainfart.

Depends on your definition of punishment, discipline, etc. I define that the proper way is about correction and guidance and not retaliation and should be consistant, appropriate, clear. People and life aren't perfect though and the best intentions sometimes get left out. Again, that's for those who are trying. Many people think they know THE way and want nothing to do with anything else. That's how you sound plus with an unrealistic view. I agree parents and not gov should raise a child, i would rather parents learned more and made a better effort, i say that even the seemingly best form of correction still requires adjustment and involves mistakes. But as i began i think your proper scenerio is not realistic because it will not work with most children because most children are born with a temperment not of compliance but of testing the limits. Indeed, testing limits is how humans generally are able to grow in understanding and is also a tenant of free will and individualism. Compliant children will, i think, learn to get away with things by simply play acting and deceiving their parents. Or they will live scared, unfulfilled lives.


 No.21972

>the best way to teach, is to do.

I disagree unless I misunderstand you. The best way to teach is by open example - doing it to yourself, and then continued verbal reinforcement by talking about it openly. Third is to do, as i assume you mean, to the child, that is correct and guide when the need arises but by the 2 previous you're guiding before a mistake is made.

The bad thing is twofold. 1 Society doesn't bother to think this way and do it anymore. 2 Because of 1 life has been structured so that it's near impossible to do this for those who want to.

Also, the specifics are toned for age and development but children are capable and are sponges.


 No.21973

>>21972

>The best way to teach is by open example - doing it to yourself

That's basically an exact paraphrasing of "teaching by doing".

Also it's pretty obvious that correcting and guiding is an inherent part of parenting.

I think the brunt of what he was saying is that it's better for a child's development to learn how to be strict with themselves rather than rely on their parents being strict towards, however to instill that you do have to apply strictness.


 No.21974

>>21964

Exactly.

I understood them saying the only abusers were the child supportibg absentee dads which is what I took offense at and name called because of.


 No.21975

>>21973

I thought he was saying by parents doing to children.

While correcting and guiding may be inherent to parenting most people don't practice it, though I'm probably over generalizing most people. I'm afraid I've become cynical about humans.

Ok, yes. I think that and my view are the same. I guess I was nitpicking on a phrasing I didn't understand.

Thank you for your response.

This is actually my first time ever here. Alas other things call right now.


 No.21977

>>21974

Yet even abusive mothers have to be around their children and develop feelings for them, unlike someone who never even meets with the child.


 No.21986

>>21977

It's pretty easy to love a child when you only have to deal with their shit every other weekend.


 No.22002

>>21986

That's if they visit. If they don't, then they likely just view the child as another expense.


 No.22006

>>21915

How exactly is it an "abuse of…power," people always say this, but they can never think of anything other than "they will do what you say" or "you could force them to do it because of your authority."

You don't have to be one of those parents.

>>18896

I noticed right after I posted that that'd be a ridiculous name.


 No.22007

>>22006

If you are a parent, that automatically puts you in a position of power and authority.


 No.22010

>>22007

>Power

Typically, yes, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it.

Regardless, that applies with almost everything regarding adults/kids, or in fact, any relationship, ever.

>Authority

Again, you don't have to abuse it.

Really authority isn't a requirement in parenthood.

inb4yesitisifyoudon'tbeatyourkidsyou'reabadparent


 No.22012

>>22010

How can you be certain that they are doing it because you are a nice guy or they are doing it because you are their parent and they feel they must?


 No.22013

>>22012

You can tell by them liking it or not liking it, wanting to do it more or not, while not pressuring them.

If you pressure them to, or just tell them to do it, that's an issue.

But if they come to you asking to do (x), then obviously they're doing it because they like it and, likely, because they know you do.

>How do you know they aren't just doing it because they know you like it then

Because they will ask more often and likely in a way of "can we" rather than "do you want to." Because they'll show obvious physical signs of liking it and being happy.

>In other words

The same way you know what other people like when around them, and if they enjoyed something.

>B-but authority, please master please master

Think of a child being given chores by their cunt parents.

Now is the child happily doing it, asking if they can do it, and generally being super-happy about it? No? Then that's not the case.


 No.22017

>>22007

>>22012

Don't bother trying to argue with him. He thinks that babies are born with perfect facilities and act and think exactly how he does. And once he decides something, he will never change his mind.


 No.22058

>>22017

>babies are born with perfect facilities

What does that even mean?

Crazy pls go


 No.22059

>>22058

>doesn't understand a word

>doesn't bother to look up definition

Stupid pls go


 No.22061

>>22059

Context wise that's a terrible word choice, but regardless, I was more of assuming it based off you being the same crazy that always spazes when they see me post.


 No.22063

>>22061

No it isn't you dumb tool it's a common phrase. What's also hilarious is thinking everyone who criticizes you is one person while in the same breath saying anyone else is crazy.

Newsflash most of the regulars of this board hates you, you legitimately crazy babyfriend.


 No.22064

>>22063

It's faculties, not facilities.


 No.22065

>>22064

Oh, you're right.

I read his post and my brain wrote in the right word in it's place. It's a pretty obvious Rickyism, but I get how it could confuse someone as pathetically stupid as tfw.


 No.22068

Here are the main things I worry about when it comes to having children:

>Dealing with an adult woman long enough to have a child together. That's just asking for trouble. I'm sure she'd end up ruining my life in some way or other

>How can I know that the child will be a girl? There's a 50% chance that the child will be a boy and then I'll be sick with it for 18 years

>If I do have a daughter, how can I keep her protected from being corrupted by the outside world? As soon as she goes to school, or gets a phone, or gets access to the Internet, or starts interacting with other kids her age - she will slowly but surely start to become slutty, rude, cruel, uncaring, and just monstrous, like all adult women

Any solutions on how to address these problems?


 No.22078

>>22063

>>22065

>What's also hilarious is thinking everyone who criticizes you is one person

I don't say that, I say they're a small few.

Which they appear to be.

Only a couple people here ever complain about me, and in your case, it seems to be fueled by believing the other shitposters lies.

>Newsflash most of the regulars of this board hates you, you legitimately crazy babyfriend.

:^)


 No.22079

>>22068

>>If I do have a daughter, how can I keep her protected from being corrupted by the outside world? As soon as she goes to school, or gets a phone, or gets access to the Internet, or starts interacting with other kids her age - she will slowly but surely start to become slutty, rude, cruel, uncaring, and just monstrous, like all adult women

I think it is good that you won't have a child. You scare even me, and i am no child.


 No.22083

>>22068

She's a person, she is not a vassal you can live through. If you want to own someone, buy a slave. Don't be so fucking clingy and let her live her life, you selfish asshole.

Advice: don't have kids. There will come a day when you realize that her life no longer revolves you, and you will probably do something stupid.

>>22078

One of the worst parts about you is that you dismiss all criticism and parade your idiocy ever harder, and convince yourself that it's just a small group that dislikes you.


 No.22085

>>22078

>I don't say that

>you being the same crazy that always spazes when they see me post.


 No.22543

>>14154

>I don't get why you continuously point these out, yet every time you do, they are always backed up by an actual argument.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy


 No.22585

Not really, I can't bring myself to hurt kid like the way my urges tell me when alone and for some reason when actually around kids they go away. Don't really get the hate for boys but that's probably I'm equal opportunity like that…

Doesn't hurt I'm not outright disgusted by adult 3DPD but just have strong preference for kids.


 No.22598

>>14133

>>14154

tfwqtp2tlgf;3 who is she? She's adorable.


 No.28703

I really want children, but I don't know if I'll ever find someone to have them with


 No.28719

>>28718

Why are you so butthurt?


 No.28731

Not at all. I'm not some out-of-control monster, after all.

That said, I probably won't have them anyway. ;_;




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]