[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

Keep it clean and legal. Thanks.

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


If you have any complaints or just feel like chatting, we share an IRC with /loli/ at (#8chan-/loli/ @ irc.rizon.net). Come by anytime~

File: 1425531067287.jpg (49.26 KB, 730x548, 365:274, dtl_tgkids_act1_120709.blo….jpg)

 No.17910

How cute is the girl in the picture? Please respond before you click the link in the spoiler.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ

 No.17911

She's pretty cute. I don't feel like clicking the link, though.

 No.17912

>>17910
Christ alive, that's messed up.

 No.17915

Balls or not man I would so hit that

 No.17928

File: 1425578176491.png (15.34 KB, 467x453, 467:453, 1421592462484-2.png)

This could easily be a 11/10 shota, and they do THIS?!

 No.17929

We live togheter with people who think that a child is fully capable to understand what it means to change your sex, but doesnt understand sex and thus cant consent. Fuck this gay earth.

 No.17930

Cute, would cuddle.

Edit: well fuck. I've no problem with trannies, but this has gone too far.

 No.17931

>>17929
The child didn't really make that decision, the parents did. I guess you could apply that logic to sex, but good luck finding parents who would be willing to let anyone sleep with their underage child.

 No.17932

>>17929
You're using the word sex to mean two different things. The first instance is gender and biological sex - the second is sexual intercourse.

Equally hypocritical are the people posting here who would gladly fuck her but deny she is emotionally mature enough to decide what gender she is. Society gives kids too little credit, but you guys are /pol/-tier assholes.

 No.17934

>>17932
Just because I want to fuck him doesn't mean I would actually do it.

 No.17942

>>17910
Before I scroll down this thread. "She's" actually a boy right?
Why else would you want opinions before clicking the link?

 No.17944

>>17915
I would, too. 😭

 No.17947

He's a boy and his mentally ill liberal parents decided to dress him up like a girl for extra SJW browny points

 No.17948

>>17932
Oh it's the board SJW again.

You shouldnt have sex with children anon, I may want to do it but it doesnt mean its morally right. Just like you shouldnt psychologically damage your child just because it makes you feel "soooo progressive :)"

 No.17950

You should have sex with children anon and then raise them to know that having sex with an adult as a child isn't wrong and they shouldn't feel ashamed about having done it.
And teach them that when they also have sex with children when they are older they should teach them as they have been taught and break down the wall of shame and disgust that surrounds adult-child relations which leads children to resent themselves for having participated willingly in adult-child sexual interactions and becoming depressed and turning to overeating, self-harm, and suicide.

 No.17951

File: 1425603125602.jpg (3.32 KB, 120x120, 1:1, 1401927265136.jpg)

>>17910
I ain't really into boys but I'd make an exception for this one.

 No.17954

>>17950
You should kill yourself.

 No.17955

>>17947
He's not just a boy, he's a boy who is extremely feminine looking.

 No.17958

>>17950
You know there isnt any decisive proof that its socieities views of adult child sex which causes the negative effects. So anybody who would risk permanently damaging a loli just to enjoy himself for half an hour is a degenerate.

 No.17959

So the answer is to stay in limbo of not finding out decisively.

 No.17960

>>17959
lrn2reply nigger jesus christ

yeah no do the fucking research then act on the research, feels < realz

 No.17961

>>17960
>lrn2reply nigger jesus christ
I know how to reply well enough thank you.

 No.17972

you can tell it's a boy

but yeah i'd totally plow that

 No.17974

>>17950

You're right, of course. That's an unpopular opinion here, though. Lots of self-hating kidfuckers on /younglove/.

 No.17976

>>17974
acknowledging sex with children is wrong isnt the same as being self hating

 No.17978

>>17976

>acknowledging sex with children is wrong


How tiresome.

Stop "acknowledging" things that aren't true, and perhaps I can take you seriously about not being self-hating.

 No.17980

>>17978
you're the one calling people kidfuckers like its an insult anon.

 No.17982

>>17910
Adorable 10/10 would cuddle

After:
Adorable 10/10 would cuddle

 No.17983

>>17948
No /pol/, just because you're happy with your biological sex doesn't mean that everyone else is. Trans people aren't some Jewish conspiracy, and kids generally become aware of their gender before they're 5 years old.
As far as questionable parenting decisions go, the parents beating their kids on a regular basis for misbehaving or telling them that they'll burn in hell for all eternity if they don't pray hard enough causing infinitely more harm.

 No.17992

>>17983
As someone who was also a rather girly boy, I disagree completely. In addition to just looking really cute, I made friends with mainly girls and played dolls with them, yet I still view myself as a guy. Things might have been different if I had some sort of weird ass political group trying to convince me as was really female just because I was never very manly.

 No.17996

>>17910
Suspicious/10 Not only the text had me suspicious, but she seemed kinda muscular. I think I'm good at telling males from females.

 No.17997

>>17910
Kind of cute.

Perhaps it's just a bad photo, but she looks wrinkly to me.

 No.17998

Just watched the video after posting: >>17997. That kid's a dude, but god damn his parents suck - I feel bad for him. I'll never understand why people like this can become parents, but pedos can't even adopt orphans.

>"My child was broken, and there was something really wrong - I just wanted it fixed."


>I know, I'll give him 14 different kinds of medications in 17 different doses throughout the day before he's even 5-years-old in order to treat shit he probably doesn't even have, but then embrace his gender identity disorder which was probably a result of all the fucked up meds in the first place, and turn him into a girl. Then I'll put him on HRT when he starts puberty to fuck him up even more!

 No.18006

>My three year old son throws tantrums and likes to play with dolls! Whelp, better get the scalpel and make him a girl!

This was literally what happened. And I thought the Ritalin over-prescription fad was bad.

 No.18012

>>18006
uhh i dont think hes post op anon

 No.18016

>>18012
They gave her hormone blockers in the video and talked about estrogen in two years to give her breast. No matter what, the die are cast and this cannot be undone.

Also, she talked about wavering, but her mother and some psych her mother no-doubt shopped around for talked her out of it.

They dressed it up with thoughtful music, but this is horrifying.

 No.18018

>>17983
sjw leave

 No.18023

>>17992
>Things might have been different if I had some sort of weird ass political group trying to convince me as was really female just because I was never very manly.
This is literally pure conjecture. You assume that because the parents let the kid dress as a girl they must have been pushy and manipulated her into it.

I'd have expected fewer bigoted /pol/tards on a board like this.

 No.18025

>>18023
Liberals are hilariously hypocritical.

>I'd have expected fewer bigoted /pol/tards on a board like this.


>bigot

>a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
you are THE DEFINITION of a bigot mr sjw

 No.18026

>>18025
How is he being intolerant? He's not attacking any of your beliefs specifically, he's just defending the parents.

Maybe instead of making hypocrisy strawman deflections you could actually engage in the discussion.

 No.18027

>>18023
Before:
>Oh god that little shit is drawing on the walls again and wearing his sister's panties on his head and acting like a three year old. Bed time, no dinner, and lets see if we can get the little fuckers some pills to shut him up.
The doctor:
>You're son is playing with dolls, that means that he's a transgirl in his heart. There's nothing wrong with that at all, and I'll even prescribe some stuff to fuck up his hormones and make sure he ends up all fucked up like Michael Jackson even if he ever changes his mind.
After:
>Oh Josey my precious little girl we've always loved you and we're so happy that you're really a girl and we've got these pills that will alter your delicate brain chemistry so we'll love you even more!

Yeah, not pressured at all. If anyone is hypocritical it's normals. That's basically the same thing that happens when a child gets pressured into sex, but encouraging them to chop their dick off is okay, sexing them is not.

By the way, are there any girl-to-boy kids, or is it only trendy and progressive for parents to subject male children to this?

Maybe Putin's gay propaganda law isn't such a bad idea after all.

 No.18028

>>18026
I wasnt the guy he replied to I was just cutting in to tell him that he's more of a bigot than any /pol/ack here.

Also you dont know what strawman means.

 No.18030


 No.18032

>>18028
Actually I do, and what's funny is you don't know what hypocrisy means.

You're accusing him of having any sort of argument intolerant against poltards. He didn't, he just mentioned that he didn't expect so many of them to be here.

You don't know what hypocrisy means because he isn't one.
It isn't hypocritical to not like bigoted x but like bigoted y.
It would be hypocritical if he said he didn't like bigotry itself.

Once again, failure, can you actually describe what specifically he's being intolerant about?

Here's some intolerance just for you: fuck off, retard.

 No.18033

>>18032
He's intolerant because he's calling people who have different views than him as being from /pol/ and nobody wants to be associated with /pol/.

 No.18034

>>18027
>If anyone is hypocritical it's normals

These parents aren't normal. The reason this is even news is because of how divisive it is.

 No.18035

File: 1425701539938.gif (2.85 MB, 390x293, 390:293, too much trash.gif)

>>18032
it's hypocrtical to be a bigot and decry bigottry and we all know that guy is the kind of retard that spams "/pol/ pls go" because different opinions trigger him.

>Here's some intolerance just for you: fuck off, retard.

damn you're butthurt.
chill the fuck out it's the internet, geez.

 No.18036

>>18034
Normal compared to basement dwelling neckbeards. In other words, people who post on sites like this.

 No.18037

>>18036
>im a failure so everyone else must be
Kek.

 No.18039

>>18037
That's not a failure, that's the best kind of life.

 No.18044

>>17974
I wouldn't say they are self-hating pedos. They may just be abstinent pedos who hate non-abstinent pedos. Yep, while normies see us as all the same when you actually pull it up with a magnifying glass you'll notice that there's an even finer detailed hierarchy. And non-abstinent pedos fall rather low on the totem pole of acceptance. And those divisions are the easiest way to push for acceptance of a higher group by pushing all of the negativity onto the lower group to make the higher group seem more acceptable.

Anyway,
They just believe that if any harm occurs it is because the pedo did something sexual with the child and it is not the fault of society. And thus the acknowledgement that sex with children is wrong.
However, that just feels like a surface layer conclusion which people are happy to accept without any desire to look deeper and understandably, if they are abstinent and have no desire to do anything sexual with children why would they be interested in looking further?

I'd say the harm comes more from both the paedos deceit and secret-keeping and society's shaming mentality when it comes to sex than the act of an adult doing something sexual with a child. But what do I know? I'm not a psychologist. I don't have any psychology papers focused on finding out these answers. Feel free to disregard.

 No.18048

>>18035
>It isn't hypocritical to not like bigoted x but like bigoted y.
>It would be hypocritical if he said he didn't like bigotry itself.

It's like you can't even read. Into the trash you go.

 No.18077

>>17932
>Equally hypocritical are the people posting here who would gladly fuck her but deny she is emotionally mature enough to decide what gender she is.
I would be tempted to agree, but there could be a strong argument made that there's more to understand about gender than the act of sex.

>>17983
>As far as questionable parenting decisions go, the parents beating their kids on a regular basis for misbehaving or telling them that they'll burn in hell for all eternity if they don't pray hard enough causing infinitely more harm.
>you can't oppose anything that isn't the worst possible thing

>>18016
>Also, she talked about wavering, but her mother and some psych her mother no-doubt shopped around for talked her out of it.
>They dressed it up with thoughtful music, but this is horrifying.
Yup

 No.18090

>>17910
>>17996
Also, I'm transphobic so, 0/10.

 No.18095

I somehow knew it would be a trap or she would be some other form of degeneracy.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]