/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

I'd say the number one thing to work on is formatting. As it stands, the second post in particular is a giant wall of text, which is guaranteed to turn people off. Your story Touches on some experiences that I think are pretty common, & some indentation would go a long way towards helping people take it seriously.

Thanks for doing this btw, the more people can talk frankly about their sexuality, the better off we'll all be.

>>20808

Duly noted. I have fixed it. I originally typed it while I was on my phone so it was hard to manage format. Thanks!

>>20809

Personally I'd put double line breaks between paragraphs…

… like this. It breaks the text up more and makes it much more comfortable to read.

Why Blogger? I thought that was dead because of Tumblr.

>>20818

tumblr is supplementary to blogging

Change the name and URL of the blog, if you ever want a normie to read it. Seeing "pedo" makes them see red. They'll be calling for your blood before they even bother looking at a post. Pick some other term. Child lover. Age disparate attraction. MAP. Whatever. Just not pedo.

>>20820

> Child lover

thats even worse than the word pedo.

Just use the term "MAP"

>>20820

Using politically correct terminology just makes people angrier.

>>20838

There are no politically correct terms for pedos.

Political correctness is driven by a desire not to offend or hurt a group of people who are viewed sympathetically by a sufficient number of people in media, government, academia, etc. Pedos are viewed sympathetically by hardly anyone.

So cripples are called "differently abled", because everybody feels sorry for cripples. Convicts, on the other hand, are called convicts and not "law-challenged persons" because very few people are sympathetic to criminals.

MAP and child lover are not politically correct, they are simply more accurate.

In addition, if the idea is for the blog to be read outside of a tiny pedo circlejerk, as I said, it would be wise to change the title. Most normies will not have encountered the term "MAP", so they may at least give the content a chance, even if unwittingly.

As soon as they see "pedo", however, they will:

1) Close the tab without reading any further, or

2) Immediately go into rage mode and ignore anything OP writes.

As a bonus, some will try to report it to the cops, since they think that pedophilia is a crime.

>>20854

Well what do you suggest the title be then? Something that is accurate and defines the blog but doesnt "upset" normies. And they can report me all they want.

>>20854

>Convicts, on the other hand, are called convicts and not "law-challenged persons" because very few people are sympathetic to criminals.

Convict, inmate, or suspect is already a polite term for perp. The term perpetrator is very politically incorrect.

>MAP and child lover are not politically correct, they are simply more accurate.

You are going out of your way to not offend people and even using a cumbersome term like minor attracted person. It even sounds like a politically correct term.

>>20861

"Loli-Cuddler Hotline"

:3

Oh, and "person of interest in an investigation." That's probably the most PC term for criminal.

>>20869

nobody outside of law enforcement says perp.

the politically incorrect term for criminals is scum.

>>20875

That's just a term for anyone you don't like.

>>20869

Polite != politically correct.

Also, while the term MAP might be more cumbersome, it is also more accurate.

It has nothing to do with political correctness for the reasons stated above.

>>20872

>Oh, and "person of interest in an investigation." That's probably the most PC term for criminal.

You're confused. Those terms describe two different things. A person of interest in an investigation is just that: a person of interest, who has not been charged with, much less convicted of, a crime.

A criminal has been convicted of a crime.

>>20861

Well, MAP has been suggested a number of times. Depending on what you plan to write about, it may be more accurate. Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to prepubescent children. If you plan to talk about more than sexual attraction (e.g. romantic attraction), or plan to talk about children ~10-11 years old, who have usually begun puberty in developed countries, then "minor attracted person" would be more accurate.

>>20877

>Polite != politically correct.

The whole point of political correctness is to not offend people.

>A criminal has been convicted of a crime.

A criminal is someone who commits crimes whether he gets caught or not.

>>20891

>The whole point of political correctness is to not offend people.

Nope. It's more complicated than that. Go read up on political correctness.

Either way, political correctness is still irrelevant to this discussion.

>A criminal is someone who commits crimes whether he gets caught or not.

In the abstract, yes. But the media and the government cannot call a particular person a criminal until they have been convicted of a crime.

Do not try to distract from your incorrect equating of "person of interest" with "criminal." Many persons of interest in an investigation are cleared of any suspicion quite quickly.

Now calm your 'tism before this thread goes totally off the rails.

Polite sage for offtopic.

>>20892

MAP is a stupid euphemism either way.

>>20892

okay all arguing aside I still like Loli-Cuddler Hotline lol. It's good but I'll keep it as a back-up. I am not looking for the most PC way of putting it. Just a way to phrase it so normies will at least look at it. I agree Pedo will throw up red flags for people. Can we also work towards a term that includes: Pedos, hebes, ephebos, nepios too. During editing for DSM-V, they took out the term pedohebephilia. We need something that will overarch all our preferences. MAP does work but I see there is conflict. Someone throw up some ideas and see if any stick with the majorty.

>>20809

OP, I would recommend caution treading with Blogs. I made one when I was around 15, I totally forgot I ever made it. It had a story describing how I fell in love with my cousin and how we had an intimate relationship, all of course using pseudo-names and other false or anonymous information.

I even posted under a fake name.

But when I got in trouble for some pictures on my phone in highschool when I was 17, low and behold, when looking at the evidence, they had found the blog.

They'd made a connection between emails that I used to sign up with. So please, be careful, if you ever do get in trouble with anything, this might seriously bite you in the ass like it ALMOST did for me.

>>20925

Pedos,Hebes,Ephebes,Nepios too…maybe PHEN will be equivalent to LGBTWTFBBQ one a these days.Maybe call it PHENtalk?

But then a problem with putting all 4 under one roof is that gets lunatics going on their "pedo conspiracy" hysteria bullshit.People have so much kneejerk hate about it that all the studies mean jack shit,and while I think PHEN+LGBT could go together like Deadpool and Wolverine…actually,now that I think about it,that brainfart seems like a pretty good analogy for the frienemies relationship between the two,even while they're not so fucking different.

Anyway,I would hope someone liberal enough to say we as a society should adapt and accept LGBTs(and we should for so many reasons) would be as progressive on PHEN topics.But I'm pretty sure they mostly won't.And then you have the PHENs that hate LGBTs with a bizarre passion.Lotta tolerance and understanding needs spread all around.

>>20925

Why not just something neutral, like paraphilia hotline?

>>21282

I actually like that. PHEN, NEPH, PENH, HENP, could all work.

Your dumb ass deserved it.

>>21282

>But I'm pretty sure they mostly won't

Because LGBT doesn't directly affect their family if they're straight.

PHEN however does affect their children.

>>21282

#DropTheN

>>29016

>Because LGBT doesn't directly affect their family if they're straight.

Parents who have gay kids need someone to blame, and the gay activists seem the most fitting.

This blog is retarded