/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

Yeah, sure we do.

Oh, wait…

Circle idea

Stripe idea

Cross idea

>>22378

>so that you can hide it on anything you want, on clothing, as clothing, in your school work, on your art, in your counterstrike sprays, in your profile pictures, etc, whatever you want.

I've heard several people mention this idea, but I think that's a supremely bad idea. One slip up and suddenly you'll be outed. What happens when information on these symbols is found out by the public and suddenly someone you know puts two and two together?

The closest I could go to supporting something like this is having some seemingly innocuous phrase that would be used as a code to signal your pedo status to others. For instance, if you want to find out if someone you know is a pedo, you could bring up the subject of Tor, just in general. For instance, by saying something like: "Yeah, my school is actually blocking certain websites now, it's really annoying, some people are using Tor to get around it." Then, if the other person brings up a coded phrase, you would know they are a pedo. For instance, something like "I knew someone who bought reefer on Silk Road". There's nothing outwardly suspicious about that, but the intentional use of "reefer" which is an extremely outdated nickname, which is almost never used anymore, would be a signal that this person was a pedo. The obvious downside is that you'd have to somehow get this information out to all pedos so that they knew about it.

>>22380

I always wanted to get a coin like that. I mean it's very incriminating, but man it's cool.

>>22449

>>22450

>>22451

I dislike these, due to the lack of symbolism and the fact that they don't really catch your eye.

>>22395

Yeah, this is an okay symbol. One large heart, one smaller one, but they are both connected. However I think colors are important, since they can symbolize certain attributes. I'd suggest pink on a white background, because pink is the traditional color associated with young girls, and white is the symbol of purity.

>>22456

>What happens when information on these symbols is found out by the public and suddenly someone you know puts two and two together?

That's exactly what I'm not suggesting.

No symbols.

Use a pattern, be it a placement one, color one, or object placement, to indicate if you really want to be cheeky.

The above can accidentally occur during normal peoples daily patterns, or just someone having a weird taste in (X). You could make it a dark blue and green checker pattern for example.

Literally impossible to profile accurately, but it still indicates something special may be behind those colors. But to make fear over those color combinations would be ridiculous.

>Would be a signal

But what if it's a fed or a normie who heard of it?

Ded on sight.

To spot a pedo or pedo-friendly guy in such a way is easy now any way. Just mention TOR and possibly encryption, and they'll usually return the interest in encryption and discuss the best method and software, and usually mention different sites, saying "have you heard of the (X) shutdown? That's crazy, can't believe it."

Normal people don't know of this type of stuff, but it's not a "secure" way, so no one confirms or denies anything, at least at first, and as a result as well, no popo try it.

>I dislike these, due to the lack of symbolism and the fact that they don't really catch your eye.

They're a bad idea, I agree, but that's because they're a flag.

Combine those three.

>See image

You can easily put this on anything, in any picture, anywhere, making a Christmas thing, a card, etc.

To make it even easier, put it in a circle.

You can easily tag things with it, and because of it's simplicity and the fact you aren't using it in a stand-out way, it's overseen.

Alternatively, use the image below that.

The circle.

It's simple, it matches so it could be seen as a common thing to draw, and it's at a strange angle that can indicate something. Furthermore, it's slightly too far, the red part, the line, out of the circle.

Perfect indicator.

Personally I don't think any of this matters, but if you want it, do it right.

I think our insignia should just be direct and recognisable, so that people will know what we want and represent with a single glance.

>>22890

As can be seen by the negative tone between the penis and the child, and the fact that the balls are outside the child, it can be seen that the disembodied penis is a foreign object not of the same body of the child, and is simply visiting the child's body.

The large size of the penis represents the breadth of the paedophile's love, while the large testicles represent the large amount of goodwill the paedophile intends to share. The child is portrayed as black to symbolise the dark struggles the paedophile is facing that must be overcome with love(the penis) and goodwill(the testicles).

I think it could work. See, it can be changed to show more love and goodwill, or made all artsy to appeal to the masses.

>>22899

>only one image allowed

>>22870

>>22899

That's a fucking great take on the degeneracy on here lately. Thank you for this piece of art.

>>22870

>>22899

>>22900

>that faggot shit

>>22904

>>22900

>>22899

>>22870

What the fuck is wrong with this channel.

>>22904

>hating on same-sex inter-age romance

>if I tie up its hair, its a girl now

>being a hetero-normative chauvinist

>upholding patriarchal expectations of feminine image

>objectifying children to suit your gender-conformist preferences

Here, I edited it for you, you homophobic sexist.