No.22477
I always thought younglove was the place for friendly white knight pedophiles, not the babyfucker autists I read so much about in the newer threads.
If this trend continues I'm outta here. Just saying.
No.22479
What is a white knight pedophile? Do you stand up for little girls on the Internet when they camwhore?
No.22481
>>22479
Yeah, I was kinda wondering about that too…
I didn't want to respond because I was pretty sure he was trolling, but if he is, it's too complex for me to fully understand…
No.22482
Me too, do you know a real chan with real child and preteens porn?
No.22484
>>22482
Well, there's your problem. You're looking for porn, and this board isn't for porn of any kind.
No.22486
I know, but you can help me?
I'm also a preteen but man. I have 15years, and I love these girls, I can't find it anywhere.
No.22490
>>22479
>>22481
I wish I was trolling. Let's say the baby fucking autists are on one side of the scale and I thought most of other are on the other end.
I appreciate the beauty of little girls but I don't want to read anons retarded sex fantasies.
No.22491
>>22490
neither does anyone else
there are maybe 2 posters tops who for some reason younglove is for porn comments
No.22492
>>22491
for some reason think*
No.22495
>When I start thinking about sweet babies
No.22501
>>22495
your trip fits well :v
No.22527
not only that, but >>22508 is a good example for what does not fit in here.
>yeah but shes clothed
fuck your shit
No.22539
> friendly white knight pedophiles
No.22542
>white knight pedophile
Are you pretending, OP? A white knight is the internet version of the "nice guy". He tries to protect/save females against "creeps", often alleged that he hopes to be rewarded by them.
So a "white knight pedophile" would be someone who tries to do the same thing on lolis, pretty much what >>22479 says. I never encountered such here.
>>22490
>I appreciate the beauty of little girls but I don't want to read anons retarded sex fantasies.
So just write that and don't make up words. I agree with you, by the way. Recent examples: >>22429, >>22347, >>22499.
It is no surprise that these person(s) literally never upload a cute picture but just do their ego show by commenting.
Dude, noone gives a shit what arouses you. Keep it to yourself.
No.22552
>>22539
>>22542
I've been on younow lately and I really stood up for the "camwhores". Telling them to not give anyone their number or details while having a nice conversation. I don't need no rewards from them as I have contact to real lolis.
I am that nice guy and I couldn't care less if you believe me or not.
The posts you quoted are a good example of retards identifiying themselves as pedophiles on this board who are clearly not. Or I'm just not one of "them".
It makes me sick to read shit like that.
No.22555
>>22552
> I don't need no rewards from them as I have contact to real lolis.
>I am that nice guy and I couldn't care less if you believe me or not.
No.22590
>>22477
>Babyfucker
Hi /phile/ BO
No.22594
>>22590
Everyone hates babyfuckers except babyfuckers themselves, you dumb babyfucker. You are a disgrace to all pedodom.
No.22596
>>22594
>Everyone hates babyfuckers except babyfuckers themselves, you dumb babyfucker.
Everyone hates pedophiles except pedophiles themselves, you dumb pedophile.
:^)
>You are a disgrace to all pedodom.
Well duh, I'm not a dom pedo. I'm submissive. Even to babies.
:3
No.22614
>If this trend continues I'm outta here. Just saying.
Bye! Go back to facebook, normie.
No.22650
>>22594
My AoA is 6+ but still don't hate people attracted to toddlers. Actually I think they are the only pedophiles that nowadays can have sexual contacts without harming their partner. I believe in that because babies are mentally not capable of understanding the stigmatization of adult-child-love in today's society and therefore can't directly suffer from it.
No.22680
>>22650
1-5 are the most important years for forming who you are as a person. a baby will absolutely retain the effects of abuse or neglect.
they won't consciously remember, and they won't be effected by the social ramifications, but if you be a dick to them it'll mess them up for life.
No.22690
>>22650
You are fucking stupid
No.22693
>>22680
>but if you be a dick to them it'll mess them up for life.
Of course. But my point is that some actions have to be judged differently depending on the age of the children. Today in western societies, when I orally stimulate the vulva of a 10 year old girl it means being a dick, since the kid will most likely have a hard time to not connect what has happened with the ruling narrative of damaging child adult contacts. Still, a 2 year old has no idea about this stigma and also won't remember later in her life. So, what harm is done, I ask?
No.22698
>>22693
because youre giving the green light for other people to do the same. and they might take it further and hurt the child.
plenty of people can handle speeding, speeding is still illegal because even though its beneficial for some, overall it's still a net negative to society.
people can live without speeding, and babies can survive without getting eaten out.
No.22711
>>22693
Scientists aren't entirely sure about the no memories before age four thing.
No.22713
Want to munch on a lil girls peach so bad today
Years ago when my sister had her daughters my life was in Heaven
Changing diapers and having a mid-day snack of flesh was so thrilling
Wish I could go back or have taken videos for my viewing pleasure in my later years
No.22715
>>22713
Pls stop trying to get arrested.
>>22680
>1-5 are the most important years for forming who you are as a person. a baby will absolutely retain the effects of abuse or neglect.
Which is all the more reason for them to be in a babylovers custody, as instead of being neglected and, honestly, treated like a pet, they'd be played with, given attention, spoken to in a non-abusive way, and potentially "pleasured."
They won't consciously remember it, sure, but they'll be greatly effected by it, and for the positive.
No.22716
>>22715
babyfuckers are so astronomically deluded
No.22717
Every time I hold a baby I lean them up against me at a 70 degree angle and place my full hand on their bottoms
parents dont see anything wrong with this and I have a free hand for roaming when possible. Usually, as they are only in diapers, I'll caress my finger along the edges of the. diaper and lean the beautiful darling my way. In this way I can lean her more if need be and it opens up the diaper for side viewing of vulva/mons. This technique also works on toddlers just have to try and slip the lining of the panties back before you hand her over to Mommy/Daddy or else. Your pinky or pointer finger has access to rub her outer lips and circle her anus of careful
With daughters under 2-3 dont need to worry as much since they squirm so much in their sleep or playing their bottoms always get mis-aligned anyway.
No.22719
>>22716
There's nothing deluded about loving babies, nor believing what I said in my previous post.
Most people, even a good portion of pedos apparently, don't like toddlers/babies, and they of them as boring.
We don't.
Thus we'd likely be better caretakers of them, as the relationship is mutually beneficial, and we both have fun together.
Sorry your argument is trash and I turned it around on you, friend.
No.22720
>>22719
you have literally zero idea what you are talking about, but that's ok because no one cares and this is not up for debate.
oh, and either do your fucking job for once in your fucking life and get rid of pics that break the board rules or kill yourself and let someone else do it
No.22721
>>20883
yep babyfuckers 'love' babies so much they encourage them wallowing in their own filth to get perpetual diseases and urinary tract infections so they can satisfy their disgusting fetishes
wow such care so love
No.22722
>>22720
>you have literally zero idea what you are talking about
Says the mentally ill anti-toddielover who literally has no idea what he is talking about because he refuses to look at the situation rationally, but rather with a typical "ewwww that's gross and wrong." You're just as bad as those hebes who think pedos are mentally ill because they like kids a couple years younger than "sexual maturity."
Then again, if I remember right, you basically are one of them.
>get rid of pics that break the board rules
There aren't any that really break the rules unless you're feeling extra lewd and thus project your feelings onto a picture.
I don't really consider a one piece to really be a swimsuit myself.
Regardless, you could try reporting with more than "it makes me feel uncomfortable."
We have other volunteers as well.
>>22721
>they encourage them wallowing in their own filth to get perpetual diseases and urinary tract infections so they can satisfy their disgusting fetishes
I believe that's the guy who shitposts about his fantasies, so it's kind of irrelevant, as it never happened, that is unless he's also had sex with many kids, and done so many things that he's the luckiest man alive, simply because he's not been arrested on so many ridiculous and stupid accounts.
Everyone I know who likes babies/toddlers, minus one fella who only likes them sexually, changes their cuties, or would so they say, anytime she has an "issue."
I for one never let my lgf go around with a pooper or a wet diaper simply because I don't want her to get a rash or an infection/disease.
No.22724
>2. Only post “clean” photographs. This means fully clothed (no underwear or swim suits), no nudity and no erotic poses.
>>22714
>>22694
you are so fucking disgustingly stupid. it doesn't matter what the faggot fuck a pathetically worthless subhuman's opinion what a swimsuit is when the latter pic objectively is and the first pic the girl is clearly naked or in underwear. but of course you dont give a shit because they're your precious toddlers so fuck the rules, right?
fuck you and fuck everything about you. step down from volunteering and give it to someone else now.
No.22725
>>22722
>I believe that's the guy who shitposts about his fantasies, so it's kind of irrelevant, as it never happened
>i dont like it so he doesnt count
LITERALLY
DELUSIONAL
No.22726
>>22724
Just to point something out here: The greentext rule you pointed out was made by Suika, the former board owner who is no longer here (dunno what happened, just vanished one day) and since then, tfw has taken over. I remember seeing a post from tfw in another thread saying that he wasn't going to be super strict about that particular rule, so long as everyone was following the general spirit and intention behind it. He would crack down on it if it started to get out-of-hand.
>>22725
>hurr durr let me take a snippet of tfw's text and then apply an out of context meaning to it that makes him look bad
Tfw isn't saying, "i dont like it so he doesn't count," and you know it.
He's saying 22721 is quoting the fantasy of someone, not what actually happens in reality. In reality, people like tfw wouldn't do anything harmful like that, and he then goes on to explain that he, personally, does the exact opposite of the fantasy.
No.22746
>>22726
>Just to point something out here: The greentext rule you pointed out was made by Suika, the former board owner who is no longer here (dunno what happened, just vanished one day) and since then, tfw has taken over. I remember seeing a post from tfw in another thread saying that he wasn't going to be super strict about that particular rule, so long as everyone was following the general spirit and intention behind it. He would crack down on it if it started to get out-of-hand.
so literally fuck the rules. just literally fuck the rules.
>Tfw isn't saying, "i dont like it so he doesn't count," and you know it
every single post tfw has EVER made when the subject comes up is EXACTLY that. every single post. every single sentence he's written on the topic can be explicitly summarized as what I just quoted 100%.
tfw has explicitly stated that the people who make him look bad "aren't actually pedos/babyfuckers and doesnt count."
any other namefag on this board can back me up on that. any of them.
nowhere in that guys post is he saying its just a fantasy (infact he directly said it's reality) and fuck you and kill yourself for being such a disgusting subhuman that you resort to something as utterly pathetic as "oh thats the thing that proves me fucking wrong so ill just say he lying."
so yes that is EXACTLY what he's saying and now YOU know it.
i dont even give a jackshit about other babyfuckers as at least they dont live in a fucking delusional fantasy land but TFW is straight up less than human and you're pathetic for supporting him even slightly. faggot.
No.22747
>>22724
>>22725
Calm down friend, you seem a distraught.
>you dont give a shit because they're your precious toddlers so fuck the rules, right?
One isn't even close to being a toddler, and the other is borderline.
If you don't remember, I recently practically purged a toddler thread because they were slightly lewd and/or under-dressed.
>step down from volunteering and give it to someone else now.
As far as I know no one else really actively uses it and checks on it multiple times a day, well, aside from you and maybe one other, but I'd rather not let some insanitybot be a volunteer.
Besides, as >>22726 stated, I never said I would follow the rules strictly, and have said, or at least hinted so, in the recent past.
I don't remove the rule because it still does it's job, keeping people from posting excessive bikini/underwear/topless/lewd pics.
If you want to do that go to >>>/hebe/.
>I don't like it so he doesn't count
More like it's obviously bullshit and a fetish-ridden fantasy, so it doesn't count.
Regardless, I don't believe I pointed it out before, but he doesn't really encourage her to sit in her "own filth to get perputual diseases and urinary tract infections," as from what he said there, it doesn't indicate that he could simply go give her a bathe, and it even suggests that she hated baths for an unknown reason.
Even if you were right, you're still overlooking the reality that that's an extremely small minority, just like those who want to do mean/rude/degrading things to regular little girls, if they're pedophiles or not, the same applies here.
And if they are, then following that, he may be a nepio (assuming the girl was actually not a regular loli), but just as you may believe a sadistic "pedophile" shouldn't be around children, I may believe people who encourage what you believe that person encourages, that they shouldn't be around children, be them babies or not.
Your argument is that I am the same as them, or that babylovers in general are, thus we're bad.
Which is not true at all.
Delusional in fact.
As delusional as saying everyone on this board is a child-rapist who wants to see little girls cry.
Just as bad, maybe even worse than a normie. Get it together.
No.22748
>>22747
yes i am upset that something as despicable as you hasnt died gurgling in his own blood
>I don't remove the rule because it still does it's job, keeping people from posting excessive bikini/underwear/topless/lewd pics.
except for the part where it fucking doesnt as ive just shown. but once again you dont give even the slightest fuck because they happen to be the toddlers that you love so much. and yes they both are toddlers you shitforbrains.
>As far as I know no one else really actively uses it and checks on it multiple times a day, well, aside from you and maybe one other, but I'd rather not let some insanitybot be a volunteer.
>We have other volunteers as well.
which one is it, retard? how adorable it is that you constantly show what a massive fucking liar you are.
>you're still overlooking the reality that that's an extremely small minority
YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT
NO
FUCKING
CLUE
>Your argument is that I am the same as them, or that babylovers in general are, thus we're bad.
I never said that you contemptible fuckstain, I said you sweep every single babyfucker under the rug that happens to also be a disgusting monster (which funnily enough describes every single babyfucker that has ever happened to post on this board), because if theyre disgusting monsters they apparently dont count. how fucking convenient.
and what's disgusting is you are the same utterly unworthy of life non human routinely screeching that normalfags treat children as pets. of course you dont like normalfags so no "extremely small minority" of bad apples there huh? just fuck them all right?
kill yourself. you do not deserve life.
No.22749
>>22748
>yes they both are toddlers you shitforbrains.
The second one really isn't, she's definitely a solid 4 or 5.
The first one however, is more likely around 3-4, thus borderline. Possibly a toddie, possibly not, really depends on her genetics and the camera position/lighting.
>which one is it, retard? how adorable it is that you constantly show what a massive fucking liar you are.
There is literally nothing that is contradicting in what I said.
Again, calm down and get it together, insanity-bot.
>YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT NO FUCKING CLUE
No, actually, you have no clue what you're talking about.
Stop pulling normie-cards, again, this is exactly what they do regarding pedos.
>I said you sweep every single babyfucker under the rug that happens to also be a disgusting monster
Actually you didn't.
You're the one who did that in multiple places in this thread. Most notably, >>22721.
>utterly unworthy of life non human routinely
As much as I don't like medication, some people, like you, seem to need it.
If you can't get yourself together and calmed down, try some.
>you dont like normalfags so no "extremely small minority" of bad apples there huh?
Seriously get your text in a line, please, it's like reading a schizophrenics handwriting when they're on a bad trip.
From what I have seen, heard, observed, etc etc, it isn't an "extremely small minority" that treat their kids as lessors with little to no opinion (that matters at least), and this is especially true when regarding babies/toddlers.
Ever heard a baby crying, or a toddler crying? Their parents ignoring them, dragging them, or telling them to stop? That's exactly what I'm talking about. They don't cry for no reason, it's just that the normie does not care.
They're almost never treated as people by normies, be it during playtime, naptime, lunch/dinner/breakfast, bedtime, or just going to a store.
For fucks sake, just go ask any community anywhere, that isn't pedo, and ask them on their opinion of children, or specifically toddlers/babies.
They'll usually blatantly say that they think they're annoying/boring and too much work.
These feelings of theirs carry into their actions.
No.22750
>>22746
>so literally fuck the rules. just literally fuck the rules.
You do realize you can have rules to discourage the posting of certain material, or a certain behavior?
We'd rather be safe and keep the board around by minimizing potentially lewd pictures, as well as keeping it mostly work-safe, which is why I'll often spoil pictures that could be problematic at work outside of a thread or two, despite them being perfectly legal and just on occasion.
>tfw has explicitly stated that the people
You always say this, yet you never cite it, despite me apparently doing it "every time."
For the fourth time in recent history, by all means, show me where I did that.
>nowhere in that guys post is he saying its just a fantasy
So?
If you have a brain and can recognize his posts, and how ridiculous a lot of them are, and how illegal the acts he speaks of would be, not to mention risky, you'd know it was a fantasy.
I seriously doubt he has had contact with at least four babies, which he apparently bathed and suggested more, as well as "cleaned" some girls fingers after she did fairly disgusting things, had sex with multiple children, and fucked some gypsies or something of such, etc.
The only thing I think he, assuming it's him, has said that's true is that he has a niece, as the way he spoke regarding her spoke as if he has never done anything with her, or anyone in fact, thus further voiding the fantasies.
>i dont even give a jackshit about other babyfuckers
That's not what you display, friend.
No.22752
Pedos > normies > comprachicos > babyfuckers
tfw is a worthless human being who puts all pedos to shame. He's a delusional twat who can rationalize absolutely everything he has ever done or said to make himself the pinnacle of goodness, and convinces himself that only a select few don't like him.
Even the /phile/ admin is looking less like a faggot compared to him.
No.22753
>>22749
>There is literally nothing that is contradicting in what I said.
By even bothering to bring up there being other mods you were implying that they weren't all AWAL. A half truth is also known as a lie.
>No, actually, you have no clue what you're talking about.
Explain right now how you have even the slightest clue how the majority of babyfuckers behave.
Evidence for you: you claiming to know a couple other babyfuckers
Evidence against you: every single time a babyfucker posts anywhere
>From what I have seen, heard, observed, etc etc, it isn't an "extremely small minority" that treat their kids as lessors with little to no opinion (that matters at least), and this is especially true when regarding babies/toddlers.
YOU
ARE
INSANE
>For fucks sake, just go ask any community anywhere, that isn't pedo, and ask them on their opinion of children, or specifically toddlers/babies.
How about you go fucking do that you insane worthless fuck?
>For the fourth time in recent history, by all means, show me where I did that.
RIGHT FUCKING NOW
>If you have a brain and can recognize his posts, and how ridiculous a lot of them are, and how illegal the acts he speaks of would be, not to mention risky, you'd know it was a fantasy.
You have literally not a single shred of evidence that he's lying. You are capable of nothing beyond crying that he's lying because his existence totally proves how fucking delusional and insane you are.
Die screaming.
No.22755
File: 1433802802703.jpg (16.64 KB, 405x344, 405:344, her smile and optimism-gon….jpg)
>>22750
>That's not what you display, friend.
Do you see me bitching at the other babyfuckers posting here? Do you see me even responding to them at all?
No. It's you I hate. It's you.
You don't deserve to be near children. You don't deserve their happiness.
No.22756
Do you want some popcorn and a loli to follow this magical conversation between babyfucker and the good guy?
No.22758
>>22752
>convinces himself that only a select few don't like him.
Oh look, his bud arrived.
Seeing as you, him, and some TORfuck, which is likely one of you, are the only ones who ever complain about things I do on this board, despite the lies and propaganda y'all spread, I would say it's a select few.
>>22753
>By even bothering to bring up there being other mods you were implying that they weren't all AWAL. A half truth is also known as a lie.
It seems anger is blinding your ability to read, as I didn't contradict myself, and you're still posting completely irrelevant things in response.
There was no half truth.
>Explain right now how you have even the slightest clue how the majority of babyfuckers behave.
Why don't you?
You appear to be the one who's accusing us of something. Is the burden of proof not on you?
You do realize how insane you're acting though, don't you? Following this quote line, you're, well, take a look for yourself >>22721.
Then, right over >>22746, you explicitly say "i dont even give a jackshit about other babyfuckers," yet you're seemingly saying that they're abusive disgusting monsters.
You're either slipping up and have multiple personalities that are crossing, or you're just flat out a monster yourself.
>YOU ARE INSANE
>How about you go fucking do that you insane worthless fuck?
As I said in the post you're quoting, I did, and that is where my findings were backed up, to further become my opinion.
>RIGHT FUCKING NOW
But I didn't say "people who make him(me) look bad aren't actually pedos/babyfuckers and (thus it) doesnt count."
Again, get it together.
>You have literally not a single shred of evidence that he's lying.
Kind of like you have about everything you claim about me.
But as a rational human being who understands the likelihood behind what he says, I can am compelled to believe he is lying, especially as in one of his posts he basically says he was drunk/over-tired or generally posting with a "disadvantage" and that it's just for fun.
Based off that, until I see/hear evidence of it being truth, odds are it is not, thus my cards will rest there. If your cards do not, reevaluate where you let them rest, as with that line of thinking you will not believe the USA/UK raped many Germans during WW2 simply because "well I have seen no proof," regardless of it being fairly well documented, albeit not advertised.
>>22755
>Do you see me bitching at the other babyfuckers posting here? Do you see me even responding to them at all?
Actually, yes, yes I do.
You responded to them in this thread before I even really got involved in the thread.
>It's you I hate. It's you.
>You don't deserve to be near children. You don't deserve their happiness.
Truly ill.
Are you bitter I make children happy or something? You should be delighted you sociopath.
And yes, I saw you complaining/bitching about those you believe to be "babyfuckers" in this thread, that aren't me. Multiple times.
No.22760
Babyfuckers will be the first lined up against the wall after the pedo revolution.
No.22761
No.22763
>>22758
>Kind of like you have about everything you claim about me.
Die in extreme fucking agony subhuman. Any namefag can completely back up the disgusting shit you spew.
>>14058
this whole thread is proof of your deserving of being tortured to death
No.22764
>>22758
>As I said in the post you're quoting, I did, and that is where my findings were backed up, to further become my opinion.
Post it. Post it right now.
No.22765
I find it funny how you always devolve into exclusively insults and asking for citations to ridiculous things to try and seem "right."
At least I always know when you run out of your delusional babble.
>>22761
Hello?
>>22763
>Die in extreme fucking agony subhuman
Get help, insanity-bot.
>this whole thread is proof of your deserving of being tortured to death
Elaborate then, psychopathic insanity-bot.
>>22764
>Post it. Post it right now.
Yes, because I save every detail of my personal studies that are not going to be cared about by anyone but possibly a random chan user who will likely cry out that it's not valid simply because it doesn't support his opinio- I mean because it isn't done in a "real" scientific study?
No.22767
>>22765
>Yes, because I save every detail of my personal studies that are not going to be cared about by anyone but possibly a random chan user who will likely cry out that it's not valid simply because it doesn't support his opinio- I mean because it isn't done in a "real" scientific study?
No, because you're a disgusting liar who's 'personal studies' amounts to his mom and the people he sees at the grocery store and that should have never survived his abortion.
Evil that doesn't know it is evil is the worst injustice.
No.22771
>>22756
>between babyfucker and the good guy
I hate to say it, but to me, I'm confused by who is who.
1. tfw doesn't fuck babies. He has no sexual contact with his lgf
2. The Anon arguing with tfw is quite clearly psycho. I don't know if that disqualifies him as a good guy, but certainly calls it into question.
3. tfw is fine and rational to me. He's a better contender for "the good guy" than the anon, in my eyes.
4. This is where the actual quandary pops up, because the anon probably isn't a "babyfucker"; there's nothing to support that.
But sure, I'll have some of that popcorn, she can take the bowl and sit right next to me.
No.22775
>>22771
> tfw is fine and rational
ahaha oh fucking god
tfw is an insane freak that brings this entire board down and the rest of the board is pretty much entirely in solidarity with this.
you live in a different world from reality if anything about that despicable non human animal is rational to you. or maybe you're just a gullible retard with the attention span of a goldfish that has totally fallen for his absolute lies.
No.22776
oh now i remember zed, i see you're just invested in defending tfw's insanity no matter what
>>16670
No.22777
>>22771
>tfw is fine and rational to me
Either you are tfw patheticaly trying to shill for himself under an other name (that would explain why he doesnt use a tripcode, beside beeing stupid of course) or you are simply insane as well .
No.22780
>>22775
>tfw is an insane freak that brings this entire board down
I don't see how? His arguments in this thread are better than yours and I haven't ever heard him say something that would "bring this board down".
>you live in a different world from reality if anything about that despicable non human animal is rational to you
Now who's acting irrational? Just because you don't agree with what he believes or some of the things he does doesn't make him a "despicable non human". He's not breaking any laws and he's not hurting anyone, so your mindset just makes you out to be an intolerant bigot.
>>22777
>Either you are tfw pathetically trying to shill for himself
I can assure you I'm not. I've been here for quite a while, I just lurk alot.
>or you are simply insane as well
No, I'm just sticking up for someone who's being unjustly discriminated against because he believes differently than you. Have I done anything insane other than rooting for the underdog here?
No.22785
>>22780
>I don't see how?
Because you refuse to. You're a pathetic imbecile that that is embarrassingly desperate to ignore reality and even the shit tfw has said himself. I have no reason to explain anything to mental invalids, and I'm already satisfied with the worthless disgusting subhuman faggot's current approval rating here.
I pity your worthlessness as a human, but I and I figure no one else is going to waste our time on someone who refuses to acknowledge the truth. What a waste.
No.22786
>>22785
>I'm already satisfied with the worthless disgusting subhuman faggot's current approval rating here.
But my approval rating is fantastic, seeing as the only two who complain besides you two buddies have suddenly appeared, with zero posts under their belt, >>22777 and >>22756, both who fanatically seem to be one your side.
I bet just like every time you argue and these 0posters come out and say something, they'll disappear forever once again.
>>22780
Just stop responding, they've devolved into (exclusively) delusional babble and insults once again.
No.22788
>>22786
>zero posts
>suddenly appeared
>mfw
No.22793
>>22786
I know you like keeping tabs on everyone and all (why else would you have been so against IP hashing?), but please keep in mind that some people don't have static IP addresses. I know that's a tall order, asking your very small and limited mind to know basic tech information like that, but please make an effort, you degenerate black mark against all pedos.
No.22794
A CP producing NAMbLA donator babysitter and convicted sex offender was teaching a class on tfwqtp2tlgf;^3, known nepiophile.
"Before this class begins, you must get on your knees and worship tfwqtp2tlgf;^3 and accept that he was the most noble pedophile the world has ever known, even greater than Lewis Carroll!"
At this moment, a brave, friendly, well-adjusted girllove champion who was attracted to girls in the 4-11 age range and understood that a lack of tears does not mean consent and fully supported waiting for verbal consent stood up and held up some CP.
"Is this child consenting, babyfucker?"
The arrogant babysitter smirked quite degenerately and smugly replied "Oh course she is, she's not even bleeding, you stupid normalfag!"
"Wrong. It's been five months since she was born. If she were consenting, as you say… then she should just tell you that."
The babysitter was so visibly shaken that he dropped his crayon and complete archive of all the Babyshii videos. He stormed out of the room crying those babyfucker crocodile tears. The same tears babyfuckers cry when parents call the cops on them when they get caught ejaculating in the baby food. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Candy Finklestein, whished he had enjoyed the company of little girls who were capable of loving him back instead of victimizing the ones who couldn't reject him. He wished so much that he had enough sleeping pills to kill himself with over the embarrassment, but he himself had used it all on small children!
The students applauded and all applied to become elementary school teachers that very day, and accepted Lewis Carroll as their role model. An eagle named "Young Love" flew into the room and perched atop the spiral heart banner and shed a tear on the chalk.
The babyfucker forgot to register with the sheriff's office and was arrested the next day. His babyfucking ways disgusted the wise pedophile warden and was tossed into the general population for all of eternity.
Semper Benigna.
(Gas the boyfaggots too).
No.22802
>>22793
More asian loli please.
No.22809
No.22811
>>22802
Join the army then.
No.22813
>>22811
That would be extremely painful
No.22822
No.22826
No.22847
>>22594
If you wouldn't make love to this girl, you're gay.
No.22848
>>22847
FFFFFUUUUUUcuuuuuuuuuuuuuukkkkkkkkk
What I wouldn't do to spend an hour with her. Cum all over her inner thighs & make sure her legs are massaged with my cream
Suck those beautiful toes and kiss her gorgeous DSL
No.22849
>>22848
Sure, not all babyfuckers are this stupid, but the majority of them are babyfuckers (see: almost every site that allows loli but bans toddlercon). Why keep them around at all when it just attracts these subhumans?
No.22865
>>22849
What site allows loli, but disallows toddler?
Rule34? No (http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/466423)
exhentai? Certainly not (http://exhentai.org/g/818739/1f824c5731/)
danbooru? If you can see loli, you can see toddler. (http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/82621)
No.22867
>>22865
Gelbooru, 7chan, and Rule 34 did the last time I had looked.
http://rule34.paheal.net/wiki/Notes
>Toddlercon/Babykon: I really shouldn't have to explain this. Content like this is strictly forbidden to post on Paheal and posters will be warned followed by a site ban if the posting doesn't stop. UPDATE: We have decided to only remove toddlerkon that violates DA's definition of porn (link) so that we can allow some images that potentially hold a level of "artistic merit". Also, non-human, extremely stylized, and "chibi" drawings are exempt.
Which basically seems to include almost all the toddlercon I've ever seen.
No.22874
>>22848
God damn, you're so fucking autistic.
No.22882
>>22874
At least I am TRUE to myself
Unlike all you fake pedo cry babies always talking about how cute a girl is but being a little bitch and not having the balls to do anything.
Girls are to be loved and treasured - this is true
But they also are here to pleasure a man. You PC liberals never understand the concept that females are born TO PLEASE a man
One gender gets FUCKED
the other DOES THE FUCKING
You little boy
No.22894
>>22882
You should follow the law even if you don't agree with it.
No.22910
>>22849
You seem pretty booty bothered these days, /phile/ owner. Is it because even the wizardchan lifeboat has twice the active users you do?
No.22912
>>22882
I remember a post almost exactly like this with the "you don't have balls to do anything"
No.22988
Reminds me of the days back on /pol/ with Art Admirer arguing with the normies who went absolutely off their nut.
I dont come here so its surprising how mad you guys get.
I dont really have a problem with it if it the baby enjoys it.
No.22991
>>22988
>if it the baby enjoys it
Why are pedophiles just so utterly fucking braindead?
No.23004
>>22988
Art Admirer was a faggot whos argument relied on "BUT U CANT KNOW1!!!" whenever someone brings up consent.
>>22991
why are you so utterly retarded you cant tell the difference between an individual paedophile and all paedophiles?
No.23005
>>22991
>Babies don't have feelings/Can't like things
Why do psychopaths project on babies like this?
No.23006
>>23005
Now that's what I call an strawman
No.23007
>>23004
Between him, the fags like !Q and Based at /b/ and tfw its hard not to, hell, sometimes I hope we never get accepted just so they can't act on their retardness
No.23026
File: 1434351567523.jpg (22.89 KB, 225x346, 225:346, 51Wao911GTL._SY344_BO1,204….jpg)
>>23007
I wouldn't worry, then. I have a feeling that the future is going to be moving towards a Make Us Happy like future, where everyone is conditioned to be sexually attracted to old people. Soon, people won't even consider dating anyone under 30.
No.23029
>>22991
>>23004
>>23007
hmm
im not into babies myself but ive reached a point where i dont really ostracize people for their sexual preferences
tfw doesnt strike me as someone who wants to hurt babies or anyone really
No.26780
No.26782
>>22776
Hey Zed, you said you take your responsibility for and don't delete your posts, so what happened to this quoted post in this one?
No.26872
>>22794
oh my, great turn on that copypasta
No.26874
File: 1439336958077.jpg (58.67 KB, 720x714, 120:119, 11700885_10206251068708495….jpg)
god damnit it, stop fighting each other!
No.26882
>>26874
This is the problem with the internet as a meeting space. Arguments break out easily and are hard to de-escalate because of the lack of normal body language and tone cues. People who should be allies end up at each other's throats.
Also, I'd be very, very surprised if there weren't at least a few antis here using social engineering tactics to fracture this community.
The main thing this board needs is a moderator who is willing to delete/ban stupid arguments.
No.26885
>>26882
You got that right. Whether we like babies, toddlers, little girls/boys, tween girls/boys, or teen girls/boys, we're all MAP's and should stand together rather than arguing.
No.26886
>>26885
I'm not going to support someone who wants to do things I don't agree with.
No.26888
>>26886
Who others are attracted to or not attracted to isn't your business. What's your business is that we are all MAP's in one way or another. Just because your morals are different doesn't mean they're better.
"You like girls that are 4-7? You sick fuck! I like girls from 8-11, I'm better cuz the girls I like are older."
Yeah, um, okay……..
No.26889
>>26888
What others want to do is definitely my business.
And yes, my morals are superior to an extent I don't want to waste the time describing to blithering retarded subhumans.
No.26890
>>26889
I lol'ed
Subhuman berates subhumans. Get a life moralfag.
I just fucked your 6yo sister now what bitch?
No.26893
>>26882
It's something specific to 8chan., due to the radicalization from gamergate and people bitching about SJW. when 2chan still existed, and even some of the old /b/ theads (i.e. before 2008) were pretty decent
No.26900
>>26893
It's also probably due to a more concerted effort by normies to disrupt and fracture communities such as this one.
Think about it from their perspective. They just have to come on here, make a few posts under the guise of hebephiles condemning "babyfuckers" in the harshest terms possible, make a few angry, irrational retaliatory posts under the guise of pedophiles, and suddenly there's an all-out flame war where there should have been cooperation. They'd be stupid not to do it.
The only ways to limit the effectiveness of such tactics are strict moderation (deleting arguments before they can escalate) and teaching legitimate users to ignore stupid inflammatory arguments.
No.26909
No.26913
>>26909
Go home JTRIG. Don't you have some pro-TPP propaganda to write?
No.26928
>>26890
>I just made an embarrassingly pathetic shitpost, now what?!??!
You've certainly made me cringe, if that was what you were hoping for.
No.26929
>>26900
Normies do not need to waste their time shitposting in an ocean of shit. Do you think this "community" actually accomplishes anything normies give a shit about?
No.26944
>>26929
Unfortunately it's impossible to tell whether the community being shit is its own fault or the fault of an outside force.
The hypothesis that it is an outside force encourages unity, so that is the conclusion I'm going with.
No.26945
>>26929
Also my advice of stricter moderation and thicker skin is still valid regardless of who's causing the community to be shit.
No.26987
>>26929
I remember……there were normie shitposers on wizardchan when I hung out there…
No.26992
>>26944
It's way too hopeful to assume all the insane shitposts and cringey porn comments here are just the work of bored antis. There's just too much of it, too often. Normie shilling comes and goes in spats, not like what you see on this board.
Either way, I do not want to unite with the sort of people who make those posts.
>>26987
Wizardchan existed solely as a cesspool of delirious shitposting, the fact that posters here "hung out there" does not fill me with any confidence that there aren't legitimate weirdos on this board that have no business being around children.
No.26993
>>26992
well, this is a *chan, that's everyone here to be honest (yes, I am reaching back to the mythical days of when everyone on /b/ was crazy motherfuckers and whatnot)
No.27621
>>22848
how does one even become attracted to prepubescent children? Weird.
No.27638
>>27621
Well it's simple, really. Prebunbescent girls are attractive.
No.27669
>>27638
>Prebunbescent
dafuq what?
No.30264
>>22794
>>22794
>22794
my god lol
No.30265
Pretty funny thread. I hope the board gets this big again.
No.30275
>>22847
I'm certainly not gay, and we would have much fun.
No.30296