Once a country has banned lolicon can it be reversed ever? Has it ever been legalized after being criminalized? I mean there's no logical or rational reason for it to be illegal at all yet it actually is in some states, Canada, UK and Australia.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 1 per post.

File: 1433647300471.jpg (486 KB, 1081x1600, 1081:1600, comic lo lolicon brother a….jpg)

Aryan Lolicon 06/07/15 (Sun) 03:21:40 No.22697

Once a country has banned lolicon can it be reversed ever? Has it ever been legalized after being criminalized? I mean there's no logical or rational reason for it to be illegal at all yet it actually is in some states, Canada, UK and Australia.

Anonymous 06/07/15 (Sun) 07:14:18 No.22703

SCOTUS struck down a ban twice, so yes.

But I think you're referring to the actual legislature making the change, which is something that I've never heard of happening.

Anonymous 06/07/15 (Sun) 07:24:18 No.22704

Thank god I don't live in a third-world shithole.

Anonymous 06/07/15 (Sun) 08:19:17 No.22705

File: 1433665157843.jpg (134.08 KB, 850x850, 1:1, 1403048337076.jpg)

maybe if loli was banned youd find the motivation to get out and become a winner like me

Anonymous 06/10/15 (Wed) 23:51:18 No.22816

File: 1433980278540.png (86.35 KB, 271x389, 271:389, 1432038008038.png)

Will Japan ever reverse it's CP ban? Will the terror of an entire year of prison ever leave after the olympics?

Anonymous 06/10/15 (Wed) 23:58:48 No.22817

>>22816

CP has been illegal in Japan since 1999.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Japan

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 01:15:17 No.22819

File: 1433985329115.png (68.69 KB, 400x400, 1:1, 3(-)3.png)

>>22817

the wiki info is outdated and also wrong in various places

http://www.ageofconsent.com/japan.htm

Oh boy, 3 years for paying to fuck a loli, one year for videotaping it and keeping the video, and 3 more years for sharing the video with your friends before selling it, how backwards can Japan possibly be?

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 01:23:24 No.22820

>>22819

Remember that Wikipedia is not about truth but verifiability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Truth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability,_not_truth

The actual policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 01:31:57 No.22821

>>22819

>For the purpose of this Law, a "child" means a person under the age of 18 years.

>The Article 3 of the Japanese Civil Code states that the age of majority is twenty (20) years old.

I'm confused.

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 12:34:32 No.22828

>>22820

>unpopular fringe articles

>updated and checked regularly

>updated and checked at all

>defending jimbo's ponzi scheme

The second note here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Japan#cite_note-2) saying 5 years for distribution links to an FBI human rights report (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2011/eap/186276.htm)

That very report says 3 years. It is the fucking second sentence on the wiki page. Never trust the wiki, the primary motivation for writing wiki pages is to gain reputation to stroke some kind of closeted e-peen.

>>22821

And the default age of consent is 13. The laws there are such that whether you're convicted of crime or not is entirely dependant on the court's mood on that day.

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 13:57:22 No.22836

>>22828

How am I defending it? I even said that it's NOT about truth.

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 13:58:55 No.22837

>>22828

>The second note here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Japan#cite_note-2) saying 5 years for distribution links to an FBI human rights report (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2011/eap/186276.htm)

>That very report says 3 years. It is the fucking second sentence on the wiki page. Never trust the wiki, the primary motivation for writing wiki pages is to gain reputation to stroke some kind of closeted e-peen.

Are you implying that people don't make mistakes and that typos aren't a thing?

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 14:29:34 No.22838

>>22837

Thats the fucking point, wiki slave #5943 here desperately scrambled up a source without reading it properly, and then went on to write a misinformed article. The wiki slaves after him added on or made completely superficial edits without realising anything. Checking the page history shows that it's been erroneous at least since June last year. It shows a lot about what drives the site and if you aren't daft you should be raising eyebrows.

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 14:31:31 No.22839

>>22838

You do know that the article can be edited, right?

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 14:55:56 No.22840

>>22839

And what good will fixing their shit be if some other article on the site gets the same treatment for the same reasons? The site is flawed in conception but unfortunately very highly trusted. If you want to work for Jimbo for free, be my guest.

Anonymous 06/11/15 (Thu) 18:28:18 No.22846

>>22840

so less people are misinformed by a very highly trusted resource?