No.22994
>boylovers
I just don't get it.
No.22995
Pedos are interested in children, their innocence, size, and smooth body. Boys have also got all of these.
No.22996
This little man makes me hard. And about you? :)
No.22999
>>22995
>>22996
>this degeneracy
I wish I never asked. This is nauseating.
No.23000
Some people get off to cars and balloons, so that's no so difficult to grasp.
That said, they have shit taste, boys are just annoying little shits
>>22995
>Size
I wouldn't fuck midgets so no
>Smooth body
After years of playing in dirt and scratching themselves all over? not really
And their body shape is disgusting, either they are like miniature mens or their ribcage is disproportionately large
No.23002
>>22995
girls also have all of those too, so why are there degenerates who only fuck boys?
explain that, boyfucker
No.23008
>>23002
The law is more strict when it comes to girls.
No.23009
>>22999
>wants to fuck little girls
>calls anyone else a degenerate
I'm not even a BLfag, but holy shit, talk about hypocrisy
No.23010
>the soulless, thousand-yard stare of the boylover
There is not an undiseased mind, much less decent man, amongst the boyloving race.
No.23012
>>23009
>People can't have different moral standards
>There's only two options in the moral spectrum
Oh wow, what a faggot
No.23013
AND ZEN WE WILL GAS ZE BOYLOVERS
No.23015
You force your faggotry onto little boys, you disgusting degenerate. Little girls are at least capable of wanting romance with men; boy's definitely don't. Boyfuckers are overwhelmingly stupid, insane wretches.
No.23017
>>23009
Spotted the feminazi.
No.23022
Some people are born gay, some people are born pedophiles, some people are born gay pedophiles. It's not that hard to understand. I'm not a boylover, but it's sad to see you retards throwing other pedophiles under the bus to make yourself look better. Stop treating your pedophilia like a fucking badge of honor and come to terms with the fact that you're just a person with a mental disorder. Unless you're a hebe or ephebo, your interests are just as unnatural as their interests.
>>23015
>You force your faggotry onto little boys
Sure, they force their faggotry onto little boys as much as I force my sexual desires onto my loli cousins who I just play video games with and the lolis on my computer screen that I fap to. You sound like a fucking anti-pedophile normalfag. If you and I live a life without diddling kids, why can't they?
>>23017
So he's a feminazi for calling you out on hypocrisy? Like, call him an SJW if you want to make at least a little bit of sense. Even then, you don't have to be an SJW dimwit to accept gays. I fucking despise a lot of gay people, but I'm also able to realize that for a lot of them it's just an attraction and not an excuse to get pampered by SJWs and whatnot.
No.23027
>>23022
The thing is that if you end up in a relationship with a young girl, you will eventually end up in a normal relationship as she gets older. Then you can have children together and it would be no different than you dated a teenager or adult. So you can't say that pederasty and other forms of pedophilia are both equally wrong morally when one will fix itself and the other will not.
No.23028
>>23027
You do raise a good point, but if you end up in a relationship with a young boy that both of you are equally interested in, doesn't matter if it's faggotry or not, I don't see what's wrong with it. These days, the two would be considered in a normal relationship once the boy gets older anyway. Also, you have to consider the amount of pedophiles who don't even seek relationships.
>you can't say that pederasty and other forms of pedophilia are both equally wrong morally
I wouldn't say equally wrong, just equally weird.
No.23035
Boylovers are the reason our people are never gonna have anything.
They're all flesh-hungry, delusional goons.
No.23036
>>23028
The thing is that yeah, some kids can be gay but that's not so common so we perceive that kind of relationship as forcing them into going full homo because if it wasn't because of the boylover the kid would've grown into a straight male, unlike with girls because they would still be straight
No.23039
>>23036
Glad you can actually make sense instead of just flat-out calling all boylovers degenerates. At this point, it's just a matter of opinion.
No.23040
Boys don't even have cunnies!
What's the point!
No.23044
>Boylovers: Not even once
No.23045
>>23044
Do you not see all the people posting little girls doing this? It's just as bad
No.23047
>>23045
It's even worse, because its a man
No.23048
>>23047
More like it was supposed to grow into one instead of… that
No.23049
Let's see what we're looking at here. I'd roughly put a 40% chance a child would show attraction to an adult. In a given population, about 5% of people are homosexual. Do some kindergarten arithmetic, 0.40*0.05, and you get a whopping 0.02% chance that some boy's going to willingly agree to suck your dick. Boyfuckers are degenerate scum that see children on a purely sexual basis. There is zero biological reason for their existence, and they're demographics are so minute that the attraction is more likely to be a mental anomaly than a legitimate paraphillia.
No.23050
>>23049
I knew educational standards where getting higher, but I didn't think kindergarteners were doing percentage problems. Thought that was middle school.
No.23058
>>22994
There's not much to get, some people are just stupid faggots with bad taste who should kill themselves.
>>22996
Nah, I'm not a fag.
No.23084
>>23049
But we're talking about boylovers, not boyfuckers. I think we can agree that it's wrong for them to try to get a little boy to suck their dick, but I don't see what the problem is if they're just attracted to them.
No.23100
>>23084
Because they would say "If having sex with a little girl isn't wrong then me fucking a little boy shouldn't be wrong either"
No.23113
>>23100
That would be a problem if having sex with little girls wasn't also completely forbidden.
No.23142
>So he's a feminazi for calling you out on hypocrisy?
No hypocrisy. All old religions allow man+girl.
No.23147
No.23159
>>23113
Yeah but that's what a lot of guys here are fighting to change
No.23176
Fuck everything posted in this thread so far. THIS is a shota I can get in to.
No.23177
>>23159
They can fight all they want, it ain't gonna.
No.23179
>>23176
An overweight kid with a mullet? You have some sort of hillbilly fetish?
No.23183
>>23180
It's a haircut that's long in the back, but trimmed in the front and sides. It looks like he hasn't had a haircut in a while and the sides/front are starting to grow in.
He could front a glam rock band with that hair.
No.23186
>>23183
I highly doubt this counts as a mullet.
No.23191
>>23186
How else would you describe long hair on a boy?
No.23192
>>23191
> boy + long hair = mullet
No.23193
No.23194
>>23193
You're an idiot. THIS is a mullet
No.23196
>>23194
Take this, and add a few years without getting a haircut, and you get that.
No.23198
>>23176
Just I said, shit taste
No.23222
>>23044
>Gays: not even once
No.23250
>>23196
Yeah, you get something that no longer looks like a mullet.
No.23256
>>23250
An overgrown mullet is still a mullet.
No.23267
>>23256
This argument is stupid. Just post some cute boys.
No.23268
>>23267
Why would you want me to do that? I thought you were into overweight ugly boys.
No.23272
>>23268
Oh for fuck's sake…
No.23307
>>23191
long hair? a mullet is a specific hair style…