/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

>>23215

No, lol.

>>23213

>>>/younglove/22877

>fat, potato-faced, boycut, below average looking girls

>one of them borderline autistic, the other actually autistic

You sickos will fuck anything below 12 now wouldn't you? Jeez, get some standards guys.

>>23238

I have standards. I just have different tastes than you. And thanks for posting that link to the other girl, I like her too.

>>23249

>>23254

It's not a matter of taste or even race. Some girls are just objectively better looking than others, and if you can stomach literal aspergers kids, your bar is near bottom of the barrel, as much as you try to justify it. Even normies follow that rule, fat, nerdy, white women with disabilities will always lose out to thin, confident-looking, Asian women with modelling careers.

>>23259

>Some girls are just objectively better looking than others

Just listen to yourself! Beauty is in the eye of the beholder! Your tastes falling in line with the majority means a hill of beans!

>>23261

>>23265

As said, it's not a matter of race, it's an objective measure of beauty. A fat kid will only get appeal from the people with the most unrefined tastes. Mental conditions and unconfident interests definitely lower appeal. The potential and build of an Asian child will trump a white one. The fact that the majority applies these concepts sets the standards for what is attractive in the world.

>>23273

>>23273

>As said, it's not a matter of race

>The potential and build of an Asian child will trump a white one

>>23282

>>23282

> anybody with more meat on their bones than a skeleton is fat

Get over YOURself!

>>23285

If I was a chubby chaser, I would like girls that look like this. Note what an actually fat face looks like.

>>23274

>she isn't fat

Are you taking the word fat literally? An overweight person is still not healthy, and a girl with that much flesh on her is definitely crossing normal weight.

>Someone going around giving interviews to people successfully definitely shouts "mental condition" and "lack of confidence."

I was referring to the kid arranging supermarket shelves for candy, but "nerd" culture like gaming definitely falls under unconfident interests. You don't see game journalists get as much sex appeal as photobook models.

>You can't say that Asians are objectively better looking that Caucasians

Human beings are attracted to neotenous features, more so for us. Asians have less body hair, smaller stature, a stunted pubertal phase sometimes leading to eternal child faces, and delayed ageing, so much that they could still have value beyond their 50s. I've seen quite some specimens that will be eternally 14.

>>23275

It's really not, cute white girls who age well are fine by me, but it's an objective fact that Asians have a far greater prevalence of neotenous features.

>>23289

>>23290

>>23291

Those aren't buds, buds are pubertal breast tissue, those are body fat deposits, like in overweight guys. She's a fattie.

>>23302

Prior tv/entertainment personnel who play games for show/attention, specifically hired because they are attractive. No +sized developers or serious enthusiasts there.

>>23313

>>23313

Fucking this!

>>23298

>but it's an objective fact that Asians have a far greater prevalence of neotenous features.

Not everyone is into that. this is coming from someone who actually likes Asians

>>23312

Both of them are chubbier than a healthy( attractive) girl should be. And the way her dad is shilling his game with her, she'll be pigeonholed into gaming soon enough.

>>23313

only half the pics so far are model shoots, the rest are candids/selfies

I understand, it's hard to believe perfection when it actually exists.

>>23314

>pedo

>doesn't like neoteny

That girl in your pic is cute because she has nice skin/eyes/hair. She's be top quality if her face was less pudgy. These are features OP and autismgirl don't have.

>>23316

Is this airbrushed? Smoothed? Highlighted? Cropped? Filtered?

You obviously can't tell

>>23315

>pedo

>doesn't like neoteny

I don't mean *I* don't like neoteny. I'm just not going to try to pass off my personal tastes as correct unlike you and your preference for little girls who's age and BMI are the same (maybe literally).

>>23344

>girls who stay fit and slim even after cramming themselves with sweets

>anything but in the healthiest conditions and BMIs

Are you one of those people from morbidly obese countries that justify neglecting their childrens' health by comparing healthy, fit, beautiful kids to holocaust victims? Does it make the threat of impending cardiac problems easier to rationalize? Or has your culture imprinted the habit of accepting fatties into your subconscious, thus causing you as a pedo to neotinize fatties?

>>23344

>>23346

Author's commentary to that comic

This girl only has hair as a saving feature, she's as low on the scale as OP

>>23348

>candid pictures plucked from blogs/social media

>retouched

Still trying to justify your shit taste in girls? Then point out exactly where it was fixed. When will you learn that oriental genes enable the perfect living dolls, slim and dainty, no make up or doctoring needed.

>>23351

Want to know which ones were shoots?

>>23238 and >>23259, just those two

Everything else was au naturel.

So isn't it funny how a(n edited) proffesional western shoot like >>23344 falls flat on its face when compared to simple high definition snaps of natural eastern dolls?

>white people and their 'everything is fat' mentality

>>23273

>racism

>>23413

And you can't photoshop what's already perfect.

>>23422

>posting a white girl drawn with superior asian features

>thinks he can call me racist after acknowledging asian superiority

>>23463

>made by japs

>japs are asian

Did you really think those japs were making cartoons voiced in japanese for lonely white pedophiles such as yourself? No, they were making them for lonely asian pedophiles. They know that most white pedos(as in this thread), have shit taste in girls, and would never be able to appreciate all the finer features of asian lolis in the first place.

>>23464

>Implying that means it's based off of asian features

If you can't appreciate the beauty of any little girl if its not asian then I'm sorry but you're the one with shit taste

>>23466

And if you're not actually japanese then man, that's some next level weeabooness you got there

>>23465

>Anno Domini 2000+14+1

>using a long debunked 2ch troll

>trying to convince japs that second-rate white chicks will ever compare

The "ugly" asian girl in the leftmost top row singlehandedly beats all 4 of those average shopped manfaces.

Pic related is what japs think of the genetically mundane.

>>23466

>>23467

I'm not saying that white girls can't be cute, I'm just saying they're genetically less likely to be cute. Whatever race I am doesn't matter, because at the very least, I have standards. And having decent standards is the only thing stopping people from eventually fucking boys.

Girl in the first pic doesn't have a good amount of hairspread, making her face look disproportionately large. Her skin is average, but everything else is fine

Second pic suffers from too large a face and average skin as well. I wouldn't call either "bad", but certainly not "great"

>>23476

Yeah, because you know, the appeal of an entire population can be determined by some few attractive child models

>>23476

I take that you must be an Adonis

>>23476

>Implying that the way they depict white people affects my argument somehow

They hate white people because they wish they could look like us, which is why they spend so much time, money and effort so their eyes look bigger

>>23477

>think

I know it. I've seen and posted multiple examples already. And if you want to pretend old debunked graphics are still dank, why don't you just post some old troll memes?

>>23479

Quite perplexing isn't it? That I at the very least have a few attractive models representing a population, yet there's not a single comparable pic to represent the whites demographic.

this girl could be there if her face was less fat

>>23480

I certainly look better than the child you have posted

>>23481

>image from the same debunked batch

>refers to guys where we discuss girls

More like white people like to pretend they're modifying themselves to look like us, when in fact they're going for their own superior standards. You don't see even the most surgery-addicted Korean women giving themselves man-jaws and kike noses.

>>23482

>yet there's not a single comparable pic to represent the whites demographic.

>Because it doesn't matter who you post, I'll dislike her because she's not asian

Whatever bro

>>23482

>I certainly look better than the child you have posted

I guess you wouldn't mind proving it then

>mfw your post

>this thread

>>23483

If you hadn't noticed, the white girls in this thread have all had smaller eyes than their more naturally inclined counterparts. Whites don't own the small nose and big eyes department. They never have.

>>23484

Ah, what a beautiful slavic girl photographed in Japan you have posted. If only slavs were proper caucasians and didn't have genes from more attractive races in them. But you do have to admit, those genes turned out quite well for her. Real shame that unlike those with more saturated blood, they don't help her keep her beauty past growing tits.

>>23485

what was the point of this response friend? Were you trying to show that you were not offended? Were you implying that this mudslime laughing man is a relevant way to hide something?

>>23486

:^P

>>23488

Then why is it that the only cute white girls are those who happen to be slavic? If those white genes contributed instead of hindered their beauty, why is it that there are no pure caucasian dolls?

>>23489

There are 10s and there are 7s, friend. Sure, 7s may be pretty nice and going on some days, but 7s will never be 10s, and deluding yourself into seeing a 10 out of a 7, is deluding the truth.

>>23490

>there are no pure caucasian dolls?

Read >>23484

Some people find the people of their own race to be more attractive, some others are race traitors, but at the end of the day both are ok.

>>23491

Lets not be hasty now, I've seen a handful of white children who are high standard(but not eastern standard), and I welcome someone to post them. How unfortunate that the entire thread is only filled with the mediocre. If you guys had higher standards, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

>>23492

That's true, as long as you realise there are different ceilings for different races, and a high cut off between the great and the mundane should be made.

You know, I thought this girl here was quite attractive, but the more I stared at her picture, the more I noticed how her face was just a bit too large. Seeing her candid pics on her Facebook(https://www.facebook.com/Kristinapakarinaofficial) all but confirmed that she was not there yet.

She's also a slav, coincidentally(or not).

>>23497

>handful

>Everyone but me has shit taste

>>23500

As much as I don't want it to be that way, that's pretty evident by the state of this thread. There's really only been one cute white girl posted in this thread so far. If they weren't so busy saving up every pic, of every thing, that seems like an underaged girl, they would have a proper collection of only the best to post.

>>23504

No, for everyone, good-looking=neoteny and health

Large eyes, small button noses and subtle jawlines are neotenous features

Slimness, proportioned features, ad good skin and hair quality are healthy features

Maintaining these features through adulthood is the cherry on top

From what's been posted so far, non-asians are severely lacking in all 3 departments. If this thread were a sample of an analysis, it would provide objective proof of asians having a higher likelihood of superior features.

>>23546

There's nothing really wrong with elitism, it's the mark of a person who can apply logic to taste. It's very unfortunate to not have such a trait.

>>23547

Well, most of the girls posted in this thread were posted by me, so I guess your first statement applies. But it's certainly mistaken to assume that those are features common to all children, and non-asian children at that. This thread has of yet still failed to show a non-asian that strikes 3 for 3

>>23576

Superior genetics that resists tanning, since it's unlikely studio equipment could alter the weather. As for your inability to see healthy features as attractive, that is probably genetic as well. A quick chromosome check might reveal some solutions

>>23596

>There's nothing wrong with elitism

It is if based on subjective opinions

>Inb4 everything I say is an universal truth

>But it's certainly mistaken to assume that those are features common to all children, and non-asian children at that

>mfw acording to this guy these girls don't look like children

>>23492

>>23480

>>23479

>>23467

>>23466

>>23596

>Pale skin is a sign of health

>>23597

The criteria are neoteny(1), health(2) and resistance to ageing(3)

>>23492

large jawed, slightly masculine, fails 1

>>23480

weird downey face, fails 1 and 2

>>23479

fat face that droops, fails 2 and 3

>>23467

man face, below average skin, fails 1 and 2

>>23466

almost man face, below average skin, fails 2

beauty is an objective measure, and denying that is no way to justify your pleb taste. you even failed to identify the best white child in this thread, proving that it's just low standards on your part

>>23598

>Sun damaged, permanently scarred skin, with a higher susceptibility to illness, is a sign of health

>>23606

>And the lighter skins are the one's who are more susceptible to illness

citation needed

Melanin production is a specific response to light damage, it is literally a scar pigment. You have just acknowledged that your flawed taste in girls is due to lacking the ability to recognise healthy beneficial traits. I never though I'd find an evolutionary dead end here of all places.

>>23607

What other word would you use to describe the features of a child? That said, neotenous features are a component of feminity, the opposite of masculine features. For any of the poor examples in this thread to even qualify to look like adult women, they'd have to lack male features, such as man jaws. Which, judging by this thread, appear to be a genetic hindrance for many caucasian children.

>>23611

I don't think you know what corpses look like friend. Confusing superior traits for corpses might just be an innate attraction to corpses. In that case, I highly recommend you go to >>>/deadkids/

>>23615

>They not only don't look like little girls, but now they also don't look like females

I'm hiding this thread before he says they aren't human beings

>>23620

>Although you do not burn, dark-skinned people are still at risk for skin cancers, and should wear sunscreen with a SPF of 15+ and seek the shade between 10 AM and 4 PM. Acral lentiginous melanoma, a very virulent form of the disease, is more common among darker-skinned people.

And that's supposing they're born with it. Shitting up your skintone implies the damage is already done. And as with almost all bodily responses, melanin scarring is never fully effective, so an SPF 15 cream is much more effective than any amount of fucking up your skin.

Little boys are definitely masculine. And as before, I invite you to dig up an alternate word for "of features of a child", before arguing from semantics. I don't expect a person who cannot tell boys from girls to be able to, though.

Also,

>being a nig-enabler

I mean, pretending that caucasian children are just as likely to be attractive as their asian counterparts is a tolerable mistake. But you'd have to have severely defective senses to hold that appeal for dark skin

>>23621

>having reaction pics of middle-aged men

No, I said they don't look as female as should be, therefore they are not prime examples. I still eagerly await a picture of a nice, healthy, neotenous, caucasian girl to prove me wrong.

>>23646

Ghosts can take on many inhuman forms and clowns are entertainers meant to bring joy, I don't see a pattern here. Paleness has always been a trait of nobility and superiority. I think your fascination for corpses has seriously hampered your ability to perceive reality.

>>23662

>>having reaction pics of middle-aged men

And?

>>23662

They do have risk, the thing is that they have LESS risk, which means they aren't the one's who are more susceptible to skin illness

>>being a nig-enabler

>I mean, pretending that caucasian children are just as likely to be attractive as their asian counterparts is a tolerable mistake

>Implying I've ever said something like this

Nice strawman, faggot, I said darker skins are less prone to skin diseases, and they fucking are

>>23667

>paleness ever losing appeal

>rich people having to travel at all

>modern day nobility looking any different from commoners

>obesity correlating with attractiveness outside of africa ever

Maybe in one of the degenerative states of the west perhaps. Obesity's role in nobility has always been a determinant of status, but never something wished to be strived towards. Many modern cosmetics aim to whiten. Paleness still had appeal even during the tanning fad 20-30 years ago. And despite having an aversion to obesity, the caucasians you are defending in this thread seem to have it as a defining trait.

You're really pulling all the stops to justify your shitty taste, now aren't you?

>>23669

And what? I'm not here to address your confused orientations, deal with your middle-aged fixation at >>>/lgbt/

>>23670

Read the quote from your source again:

>Although you do not burn, dark-skinned people are still at risk for skin cancers, and should wear sunscreen with a SPF of 15+ and seek the shade between 10 AM and 4 PM. Acral lentiginous melanoma, a very virulent form of the disease, is more common among darker-skinned people.

>more common among darker-skinned people.

Read your own sources before you post them, they're literally trading one cancer for another. And even if shitskins were immune, that doesn't change the fact that being tanned means your skin is already fucked deep.

>strawman

That would imply that there was an argument, I was simply correcting your mistakes, nig-enabler.

>>23671

>How can they be if they have childlike features

Because they don't. Or you're one of those poor, troubled people who would insert their penis into a male child

>There isn't, why? because when it comes to children you don't use it. because in general, they all have those features. because they are freaking children

>There is no word for it because you don't use it for children

>You don't use it for children because there is no word for it

Stop, this is circular reasoning and poor English/reading ability. The bottomline is that there are degrees of which something resembles a child, such as larger eyes, smaller noses, minute features, and non-masculine traits. Every child thus far posted in this thread has all but concluded that non-asian children rarely have these features in adequate amounts.

>>23674

>White little girls don't look like children

>Little boys don't look like children

>>23679

You don't get it do you? only what caters to his fetish looks like children

>>23676

>everyone in the modern western world

>literally jizzing their pants for asians

But what do I and the modern western world know as compared to a dozen closet pedos on an imageboard banned in Australia?

>>23677

>posts source proving that black people get skin diseases

>shown that his source goes against his argument twice

>gets called a nig enabler in addition to that

>ignores counterarguments and starts chimp out over being called a nig enabler

>nig enabler nig enable nig enabler

It's embarrassing to have to divert facts like this. Nothing you have said thus far even supports that tanning is a sign of health. And your entire argument is nothing but support for niggers. You are literally just nig enabling at this point.

>claims childlike features aren't like feminine features

>claims childlike features are like adult features

>adult features are not feminine features

Semantics semantics. You can wrack that ESL tongue around all the words you want, but shitty looking children look more like adults, and having white genes increases your chance of being a shitty looking kid.

>>23678

>geishas still in session today

>skincare commercials always show palest of pales

The 80s were 30 years ago gramps, skin cancer isn't hip anymore

>>23679

>>23680

Incorrect, what I said was white girls and boys have less prevalence of neotenous features. They look like kids, but lower quality ones.

>>23681

pepe is meme. hitler is popular. >>23669 is a half-chan /sp/ meme. Adam Sandler wannabe man face is neither a meme nor popular, unless you have a kick for Adam Sandler wannabe man.

>>23684

>can't defend tans

>can't defend asian superiority in western culture

>merges them for a nice strawman

see first video of >>23685

>>23685

>wants to prove tan is still king

>finds the incredible amount of 2(two) videos to prove his point

>first video shows nothing but pale

How much youtube poop did you have to skim through to find the second vid?

>>23689

>>>/reddit/

>>>/tumblr/

>>>/lgbt/

pic related is acceptable because he's used here frequently. Random reaction pics of guys from shows are only used by tumblr or reddit. The exception is when it's related to a certain boards topic. Seeing as only lgbt would find AdamSandler wannabe attractive, you can make it your home.

>>23687

>entire argument based over image quality

It's not my fault gingers have an overtly reddish hue, but that's not a tanned and the product doesn't intend to turn your skin choco-shit.

>>23688

>Neither you have proven paleness=healthiness

I don't have to. Is a plain tissue cleaner than one covered in shit? Is an intact arm more healthy than one that's been burnt? All I needed to do was disprove your claim, and I did a good job with that.

>Can't help it if you hold non-japanese white people and niggers in the same standard

If you want to hold tierage over blacks, I get to hold tierage saying that asian=top. The difference between you and me is that I have pics to prove it.

And everything else is just gibberish. If you want to argue semantics, at least get a grasp over some basic English please. I can hardly tell what you're trying to point out anymore.Actually, don't argue semantics, it's a shitty tactic on the brink of an ad hominem. But please back up that grammar.

>>23690

Do normies not rate and judge women? It's ultimately pedos that will fuck anything that ruins our image. If they could get a grip around average kids and only be tempted to fuck the best, child abuse cases would plummet

>>23692

>accepting all reaction images

>having a "let all the normies in" mentality

>literally advocating cancer and the destruction of board culture

>calls someone out for making a fuss over a reaction face after making a fuss about a reaction face

reddit has an r/pedosexual for your kind

>>23694

>dismisses facts as opinions

>deflects arguments for the 5th or 6th time

>claims whites are objectively better than blacks

>but when compared with superior asians, everything is now subjective

>argues nothing but semantics

>denies that he argues from semantics

>literally argues from semantics again

Your entire mistaken viewyes, I'm calling it a mistake, it's not even valid enough to be called an "argument" is based on attacking my use of the word neotenous, all because it doesn't fit the dictionary verified definition you looked up. If you don't know what semantics means, this is a link to a well known dictionary: https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/semantics

>>23695

>all of those accurate implications that have hurt your feelings

You'll hopefully get over that middle aged men fetish someday. For the sake of all of us.

>>23697

You seem to have mistaken the context of normie in this case. I was referring to heterosexual teliophiles. They happen to be more than 80% of the population so their opinions certainly matter more than you think.

I said crime rates would plummet. CSA has a non-pedo and a pedo component. As long as the net number of attractions in the pedo component drops, the crime rate would still plummet. There is no reason to justify going to jail over trying to fuck an uggo.

>>23701

>>23707

Yeah, didn't think a pedo board could harbour this many autists. Show them a diamond and some basalt, and they'll pick the basalt everytime, even after this much drilling of the fact that diamonds are more precious and useful into their heads.

>>23744

>ok

Glad you agree. I was wondering when you'd realise that I was evidenced by my pictures, while those with lesser taste had poor examples or nothing to show at all.

>says whites are better than blacks

>denies it immediately after

>Do you even know what semantics is?

I hope you do, I did go to the trouble of digging up that link for you.

>I'm arguing that children are all childlike because they're children

And now you've shifted the semantics argument from the word "neotenous" to "children". I could be a rich man making rollercoasters out of those patterns of your circular reasoning.

>And seemingly you think all of them treat women like cattle

One heck of a white supremacists now aren't you? No wonder getting called a nig-enabler triggered you that far

Treating women like cattle is far off from having the reasoning ability to differentiate a top quality specimen, to just another stepping stone. And it just so happens that the eastern races are more top quality than stepping material.

>muh feminism

>right after supporting a feminist view

If they intend to abuse a child they'd have to be sexually aroused. If they have standards low enough to fuck anything(like non-pedo CSAs), they'll be ready to fuck all the time. Refining tastes leads to less sexual triggers and more control. A heterosexual rapists rapes a lot less in a gay club.

>>23745

>gets pissed over being called out for having gay reaction pics

>bitches about it

>gets called a bitch

>pretends he didn't really care in the first place

>gets asked to fuck off

>whines while admitting he did care

>gets called a fag again

>okay, okay I did care, you're an autist, le reddit 8chan sake

>two pitiful comebacks that just twisted one or two words

>still defends his idol in his reaction pic

Its okay, if you wish on the right star, he'll give you that cock you've always wanted, and you'll finally be happy

>>23752

>You're deeply retarded if you think cherrypicking is evidence

The whole thread I've invited people to post cherrypicked images of white children for a best vs best comparison. They delivered(or maybe not). It was absolutely disappointing. When you lose at best vs best, you are objectively shittier.

>Please explain how can children not have CHILDlike features then.

Give a kid man features and they'll look like a man. Give a kid inhumane amounts of fat and they look less natural. It's common sense that some things are more child-like(neotenous) than others.

>>Implying I am

>>White, non pale skin is the same as niggers covered in shit

If you're not a white supremacist than are you a nig-enabler?

>calling someone

For a guy who hates feminists, you sure echo they're views. I guess calling someone a slut is equivalent to snuff rape double scat finishers now, huh?

>fucking scumbag

I wouldn't go that far, but correct, people who mindlessly fuck girls without care towards their quality are certainly uncultured. I hope the terrible taste in this thread is just a phase for troubled souls.

>>23754

shh, only dreams now

The good thing about elitist is that they are like homosexuals

They just mean that there's more for me :^)

>>23759

>objective analysis

>anything close to personal taste

you have nothing left to defend your little abominations, you're the only one here arguing from subjective taste

>no chromosomal diseases

I didn't mention any chromosomal diseases, unless you're referring to white chromosomes, these poor white kids are just born challenged with manfaces and natural accelerated ageing.

>whitest non-pale white is the same as the darkest black

>claims he's not a racist

>goes on to say blacks can't compare to whites

>strawman

You were word for word equating spoken words and thoughts for real world crimes.

>statement unrelated previously set parameters

>moving the goalposts

>spouting every fallacy on the /pol/ memechart makes me seem intelligent

Do you even rack your brain around the meanings of those fallacies before copy pasting them?

>have nothing to do with

I've already covered this previously twice, go back and read them. There's even a self-admitted shittaster here >>23761, who literally says that there's now more share for him to fuck.

Every point thus far made by me has completely hampered your ability to further an argument, leaving you with the embarrasing option of just denying or ignoring it. You were already out of the picture 3-4 posts ago.

>>23761

I honestly pity these unfavourable girls enough already. There's really no need for your defective genes to to push their blood deeper down the shithole.

>>23762

You don't have to, some are unfortunately born with man features, but rarely if they have oriental genes

>>23764

what do you mean by reject? But the better question is, why aren't you full enough on yourself? Why would you settle for lower picks when it comes to saved images? It's not like your virginity is on the line, they're just pics. If you cannot even set a standard for the girls you admire from a distance, won't you just lose all concious judgement when you encounter any child(male or female) in real life?

>>23765

>unfavourable girls

Whatever bro, just go away and cry yourself to sleep because you wont ever be even in the same room as one of your asian "dolls"

>>23765

>Posting cherrypicked images

>Objective analysis

>goes on to say blacks can't compare to whites

>more and more strawmaning

Acknowledging white and black people are different is not racism

>say a fallacy

>get called up on it

>"le /pol/ maymay"

>Implying >>23761 or anyone else has talked about fucking, or would actually fuck a little girl

>"You're retarded, I won, shut up lalalalalala"

>>23770

>doesn't define the question

>claims I'm avoiding it

>>23761 actually is unfavourable, she's worse than some prior caucasian girls posted. In a hypothetical scenario where I could go out and snag any doll I'd want, I'd certainly pick the best of the best. But you have guys like OP who fantasize about a girl that is shares many features with a boy like >>>/younglove/23186 , and it makes you wonder, if his standards are already that low, how much lower can they get in real life? In a no risk scenario like admiring a picture, why should you go for the mundane? What does that say about the bottom limit? Why scrape below the barrel into the dirt?

>>23771

online appearances may be deceiving

>>23772

You haven't read a lick of the thread ,and I assume you do not have the linguistic ability to. I applaud you for convincing me to reply to your posts for this long, but there's nothing left for me to tear apart. You have proven your disavowal of blacks here >>23694 by calling them covered in shit. You did not realise that >>23761 was talking about fucking because your English is not good enough to perceive implications on a native level. You can only go "muh /pol/ bogeyman" in response to my last post because you ignore the coherent arguments in favour of targeting side-insults. From all evidence pointing out how paleness is superior to sunfucked skin, to all the definitive proof that no one here is able to provide a proper white specimen, to abolishing your feminist CSA abuse theories, all the way to completely destroying your semantic argument in a unique way with every post. You have not once responded to any of these, without an (actual) strawman.

>"You're retarded, I won, shut up lalalalalala"

This is literally what you've been doing 5+ times over, and the only reason there's been someone kind enough to cater to your English practice is because I'm working on my typing speed.

You can go ahead and pretend you were trolling all along now. I'm merciful enough to let you have some damage control

>>23778

Did you actually look at her face or just the thumbnail? Her facial features are scrunched together with odd placement, there's close to an inch of space between the edges of her face and the nearest face component.

>>23779

>>23781

>double posting

>reading comprehension

If you don't reject a girl outside your parameters, you do not have any standards. You are equivalent to a dog that can be trained to rape a rabbit, or any other unnatural thing.

>>23780

>admits to having shit taste in girls

>admits to samefagging

>admits to willingly fucking absolutely everything given the chance

>doesn't understand the meanings of board terms

>denies evidence once again

>literally says he'll abuse a kid if I don't take it here>>23761

Until you can post a pic of a proper white specimen, they might as well not exist. I'm not seeing any top shoots let alone candids.

That's not possible, because projecting argument flaws on to you is like pouring a cup of salt water into the ocean

>>23782

A functioning human being with ambitions? The "more mud for me" mentality will hardly do you good in the long run.

>>23783

That's a pretty neat way to look at things. All these failures target genetically flawed girls because they don't have the self-esteem to target real dolls. They pretend they have functional tastes because they can only go for girls genetically more despicable than themselves, but in reality they just refuse to admit that they are flawed themselves.

>>23789

club penguin

>>23821

Is it autism or lack of reading ability here? I've given you multiple yes answers already.

>>23825

Liking shit is shit taste. Liking poor quality shit is poor taste. Being objectively wrong about beauty standards is the definitive of having shit taste.

Doing two posts to seem like majority(as yo have) is samefagging.

Liking girls of low quality, which basically means most girls, is absolutely "having the will to fuck everything".

Lack of pictures of good quality white girls is evidence enough that white girls are often low quality. Having pictures of superior asian lolis sets my point in stone.

>projections

good damage control. It's okay, this board is filled with rapists like you, no need to freak out.

>putting shit in my mouth is better than looking for real food

Well, scat is a legitimate fetish I guess, so if you're born with the mental defects for having shit taste, I can't exactly blame you for it.

>>23827

>watches eastern animation

>quotes eastern phrases

>pretends he doesn't think east>west

Someone here got really pissed that I dared to compare his white "angels" to niggers. I'm an open book as to what should be attractive, while everyone else is forced to justify their lack of taste with they're personal set of rules.

>>23833

How long were you waiting to type us this post? Were you waiting so eagerly for a yes answer so you could have a psuedo-intelligent dramatic response? Is any of this jealous projection helping you out? Or was it just an attempt at an insult? Would it break your heart to find out that I'm a well-liked person, moderately successful, and live around and know some top(not shit) girls?

You don't get brownie points on anonymous imageboards for trying to get a hat-tip response.

>>23835

This is hilarious. I've never seen someone so utterly devastated that he has to resort to an entire projective post for maximum damage control. I'll try to make out what I can of your horrid grammar.

>He's scared, to rape a children that is, deep down He's ashamed of being a pedo

Here he admits that a real pedo should rape kids. He calls me scared, because I have the decency not to rape any child like thing near me.

>He copes with that is having this retarded elitism as to make sure He never hurts a children

Here he tries to say that pedos must have elitism to not rape children. Proving that he thinks the default state of a pedophile is to rape.

>He already know that you will be never be able to be nowhere near one of His "dolls"

Here he tries to feel better about his pathetic self by imagining me as a person who is not already enjoying the fruits of his labour.

He uses the word "projection" and "rapist" repeatedly as a defensive mechanism, in the hopes that his awful sentence structure will hide the fact that he's simply upset.

>We aren't rapist, we aren't mindless, we are just as any other male/female in this world, your sexuality doesn't mean you'll ever do anything wrong to anyone

The last sentence is a direct 180 to his previous statements, an attempt to cover up the fact that he thinks abuse is a norm. Notice how he uses "we" to give the aura of having others supporting him, when the reality is that he is alone.

>>23840

>literally begs for an answer for hours on end

>gets his answer 3 times

>rejects them because he can't give a "cool" fedora response without a yes or no answer

>finally gets the "yes" he's been craving for all his this time

>makes a cheesy projection post

>starts it by literally saying "call me whatever you like, I won't respond anymore"

>get's called a fedoralord

>responds almost immediately

There is no logic in the realm of shit-taste.

>>23909

Eastern photoshoot specimen(pic related)

Western photoshoot specimen >>23344

Comparing the worst asians to the best whites means nothing when the best asians beat the best whites everytime

>>23916

>low quality pick

>average

So you've never seen an Asian child in real life before huh?

>>23923

maybe by having more than one pic to back your shit up, or panning out that pic to reveal the superior specimens

>yfw that same pic has a short haired qt with her faced obstructed

>yfw that same set focusing on temple activities has a better(though not top) girl in another pic

>>23924

I do have, but I don't know how well do they fit inside your standards

is an elementary class average enough for you?

>>23926

its not like i would have a problem with most of these girls

>>23926

>>23927

>google "japanese school children"

>pick the worst pics on the page

You can wrangle up as many images of ugly lower rate kids you want, you still won't be able to deny they're objective superiority over caucasian children as per >>23914

>>23929

I actually picked the higher res i could find but whatever

and hey, i'm not objecting that any race is better than the others, i'm just posting cute girls

>>23931

>cute

you're looking in the right tree, but picking the wrong fruit

>>23933

there are atleast 4, but that's more than can be said for the average sample of other races

>>23933

the girl in the middle is better than almost all of the girls at >>23932

but don't worry, you can get your time and search for pictures of japanese modelling schools so you can post

meantime i'll be looking at cute japanese girls

>>23936

>yfw I picked those images from the same google search as you did

>yfw there's a qt in this pic that you missed while cherrypicking that hard for uggos

here, have some more "cute" girls to waste your sperm on

>>23937

>being this desperate

what happened bro? aren't this girls superior enough for you?

>>23938

they sure are for me

what about these ones bro? they have nice bodies too

>>23938

>>23939

>>23940

>can't find a single pic of some good looking white kids

>tries to prove a point by posting pics of average girls

>ends up posting a qt in every pic

>furthers my point without realising it

>literally admiring boys

>thinks he can call me desperate

See >>23929 and >>23914

if only i didn't suck at teaching

>>23941

what are you talking about? i'm just posting the superior cuties

and who the hell said anything about boys?

and yeah, they might be average but i don't have a problem with that, but maybe they're not superior enough for you

like the girls with the glasses here, they sure are qts but they obviously have defective genes that makes them wear glasses so maybe they are too inferior

oh how i'd wish i could be in that tub with those ultimate dolls

i just realized these girl's skin isn't as fair and white as the one from your models so their skin might be too fucked up for you as well

>>23942

>>23943

>>23944

>>23945

>>23946

>wants to insert his penis in even the lowest of girls

>contributing to the image of pedos as a threat to all children

If you have any decency you should only be attracted to one or two of the girls in some of these pictures and none at all for the rest

>>23947

what are you talking about? im not a thread for anyone, i just think these girls are cute, don't you too? these is the superior race after all. or maybe you have unrealistic standards…

naa, you seem like a chill dude

I mean, there isn't a single girl in dozen of photos that looks nearly similar to the ones you post but that's probably just coincidence, they must still be the norm for asian girls

>>23946

wait, i found one, but her jaw is too thick, so it's not good enough either

>>23947

that's like saying i don't have standards because i won't date only supermodels

it's the girl in the left asian? she looks too western and inferior to be so

>>23942

although i could be a good coach

>tfw you'll never spend the day building sand castles with asian dolls

I think that's enough, it's getting late (because i live in superior japanese timezone) and i'm getting sleepy, i hope i can dream with some of these qts

>>23954

Whenever you say dolls, the only thing I can think of is the musical.

>>23948

>>23949

>>23950

>implying there weren't already a few

>implying class photos that are rarely uploaded online show the full scope of increased prevalence of top features

>>23951

>implying it takes being supermodel to be top when it comes to eastern genes

maybe for a white kid

>>23952

whatever she is, her asian parts saved her a lot of damage

>>23954

>>23955

there is no hope for those who will never develop taste, only the pain of eventual suffering

>>24003

>rarely uploaded

>there's dozens and dozens of photos

sure bro, whatever it takes for you to keep your unrealistic standards going :^)

>>24003

Aren't most of your girls models too? fag

>>24003

why would i suffer? it's not as if my standards couldn't be fulfilled by regular people, its not as if i were an elitist who would reject anyone who tries to reach him for not being perfect enough

unlike you, i'd live a happy life if i had a girl that looked like most of the ones in this thread

>>24015

>dozens of classes for hundreds of schools

>across half a dozen countries

>multiple generations in the range of being a child

>only posts uploaded japanese class pics of which most are not even high res

>still manages to get a few dolls across

there must be some kind of psychological reason for you to insist that you stick to low value

>>24016

>candid pics

>from blogs of parents trying to shill their kids as models

>doesn't show the scope of wholesome parents who don't shill their dolls

You can roll out any asian kid and she'll be a better model than >>23344

>>24017

>inevitable regret

>inevitable adultery

>inevitable heartbreak

>happiness

If a ragtag mongrel of a child were any easier or more fulfilling to get, why haven't you snagged one yet,you hypocrite?

>>24024

you know, i'm being fair with you by not posting southeast asians and most of those are high res

>>candid pics

>>from blogs of parents trying to shill their kids as models

>>doesn't show the scope of wholesome parents who don't shill their dolls

>changing the subject because he knows he's been caught

i repeat, your girls are all models and you base your standards on those models so yeah, at least with you, they need to be

>>inevitable regret

as i said, i like them, they fill my standards, how would i regret? you sure would, given that you need perfection to be happy, but i don't

>>24032

>southeast asians

>comparable in any way to pure east asians

>even suggesting that the countries I was referring to were anywhere near south east asia

except maybe singapore, but that's just a chinese colony anyways

Modelling is a career, it in no way devalues the inherent genetic beauty of an individual(unless the individual has shitty genes already). Many child modellers love to use shitter kids as well to advertise products, because they lack the ability to realise what's cute. These shitter kids are well within your low standards, but are still models, what does that say about your career bias?

>how would i regret?

Why don't you just answer me as to why you haven't snagged a shitter kid when you think it's that much easier to satisfy yourself, you japan squatter. or do you refuse to believe you are in a state where you neither have happiness nor taste?

>>24043

>decent physical traits

>exclusive to supermodel tier girls

As before, maybe for whites perhaps

If you honestly believe that this tierage of high aesthetics is that rare for the average asian, your self-esteem must have landed yourself some japanese property near an aspie rehabilitation center. Desiring something of this upper class should be obligatory for a healthy, confident individual. Aiming for those lower reflects the ways of someone with only the self-esteem to know that he wants to fuck a girl, but any girl like thing(like a fucking boy) will do.

>because it's fucking illegal

And there we go. You think a girl of uggo class would just fall on your lap with any more luck than a top class porcelain doll? Of course not. You'd have an argument if the stakes were a scot-free chance at tossing your virginity, but the pretty-to-risk ratio just doesn't add up with lower class girls. There is nothing redeemable about fantasizing over 4th class girls when going after a 1st class specimen takes just as much effort.

>>24106

The fact that males of higher standards end up or pursue females of higher standards doesn't seem familiar to you? Maybe you should park yourself to that same rehab center and find girls that better fit your self-esteem model(low).

>>24108

>decent=perfection

that's not what a man with confidence would say

>not even 20

Who's the one with unrealistic standards here again? Or perhaps you're still trying to pretend non-asians have any remnant of an upper hand left

>you know what being realistic is?

being realistic is realising that young girls don't have the same standards as women, an even an average joe has a shot at the top. unless he would shoot himself down before even trying

>abuse

That was a risk allegory, you stuttering coward. Toss your virginity, meaningful relationship, it's police either way. And even if it's just a platonic(cuck) relationship you want, a top of tops girl would still be more worth to look at than some rag muncher.

>you aren't entitled to ask for perfection

Yes you are, it's called having standards. Beggars think they're entitled to things, pursuers aim for what they want. You want to take second hand 4th rate goods without complaint, you can suffer in your own altruism, but don't try to justify losing out as anything but a mistake on your part.

>>24164

>the thing it's that i don't need perfection

And that's what makes you a person with trashy standards. No odds and ends about that.

It's one thing to still accept half-decent mid rangers, it's another to want to put your dick into wasted genes. And with your ambivalence to anything femalish under 12, you might as well not pretend you even have a set of standards to begin with

>>24165

And what else would a little girls worth be? They haven't developed the personal diversity or societal vanity that morphs them into the wildcard that is an adult. Other than hobbies and flavours of gum, the difference between one kid to the next is negligible if not adaptable. But you're free to delude yourself into thinking that a genetic aberration would have any more personality than a proper high quality doll.

>>24204

>>24207

>>24209

>autism meme

Numerous cycles of internet discussion have evidenced that the defeated side will often turn to shitposting as a last resort

>>24207

>implying recognising superior traits is anything but a natural if not universal inclination

What you described is also quite similar to how the sad bunch here claim they have facts to back up their universal sexual attraction, yet their statements only have the illusion of coherence

>>24210

If you believe they have greater such value, then answer the question. What else would a little girls worth be?

>>24211

And half those genes won't even be expressed til puberty, what more value do you expect out of a child until then? Unless you were referring to difference in quality, which is apt, considering how badly some of the non-asians in this thread can flop

>>24255

>defending a complete lack of any preset standards or taste

>implying the people in this thread even have a trash cut-off mark

There wouldn't be a problem if these guys weren't garbagephiles now would there?

>demanding citations for common knowledge

>doesn't know that children cannot fully develop until puberty starts

Did you flunk middle school science?

>>24257

Great, you just about described 80% of all girls, 95% if you count deviations by a point. So if practically all girls already have these traits, what else are you going to use to judge their qualities other than their looks? Isn't it logical that top face+top heart>>>>trash+top heart, every time?

>>24262

I see, you're a self-admitted idiot. You are mentally incapable of understanding a simple middle school concept and the only retort you have left is to spasm the word "autism" into your keyboard without thinking. I now have unequivocal proof that interest in genetic defects is caused by possessing similar if not worse genes.

>>24263

Yes, some of them prefer blue to pink and some might eat carrots. Not like that will make enough difference for anyone to make an objective personality measure. The only significant trait left to judge a girl with is her genetic capability, which is reflected in traits and aesthetics. The trashier the traits, the trashier the genes.

This thread is a great example of why you shouldn't get carried away with a fetish.

>>24279

>uses insults to argue

>gets pissy when insulted

>literally stupid enough to demand proof that kids need puberty to grow into adults

You still haven't given an alternative measure of worth. All you've been doing is reconfirming your willingness to stick your penis into any and all garbage.

>>24265

>2004

>yfw she's atleast old enough to drive now

>yfw her western culture almost guarantees that she's had hundreds of cocks in her already

Still a neat slavic girl before her horrible pubertal deterioration phase

>>24341

>having reading comprehension rivalling his lack of common sense

>outright distorting information to appear correct

>strawman

>blurting out fallacies for which he does not know the meaning of

>using an actual strawman after accusing someone of it

You've just merged all the points into a convenient slurry that has no relation to anything I originally said. No doubt because you're in a corner with no way to retort. You can pretend you weren't humiliating yourself begging for sources that puberty leads to development into an adult, but your posts are all up there for everyone to see.

And as you're linking up posts that were already dismissed, it's obvious that you really have nothing to justify your desire to enjoy shit. Difference in traits mean nothing to overall value when they are completely negligible, unlike the differing standards of beauty in which superior girls notably shine over unterspecimens.