Canned Arguments and Mass Opinion
Debating antis and pedophobes is a waste of time when most of the great sound bites have already been said better by someone else. Canned arguments are basically copypasta applied to debate.
I'm thinking specifically for youtube and reddit, where controlling the comments section is very important to change opinions.
Another important strategy is to "stack", which means replying to them in disapproval even if several other people have already. Remember, this is for those 90% reading the thread but not commenting. Showing them that those opinions are no longer popular gives them pause before expressing them themselves.
> "Sex doesn't hurt children, but society's outdated views on it do."
> "Because children's rights don't end where your feelings begin".
> "Last time I checked, wishing death upon someone because of their sexual orientation is hate speech".
> "Do you believe that masturbation is wrong too?"
> "Yes! I too think that sex is gross and icky! Do you think we could set up a few gas chambers disguised as ice cream trucks? How long do you think it would take to kill them all?
>"Huh, I didn't know you supported hitler's campaign against so-called "sexual deviants".
>"The age of consent was raised to give young girls more time to prepare for pregnancy. But today with free, easy and safe contraception that's no longer an issue."
>"So don't let your children do it. But denying other parents their right to choose so you can feel morally superior isn't just selfish, it's disgusting and makes you a bad parent.
>"I bet you only supported gay marriage when it became popular. Real progressives have been fighting for equality since when being gay was actually illegal. Fair-weather allies aren't welcome".
>"You can't call yourself a progressive without supporting a family's right to choose. It's just good politics".
>"Just because something is illegal doesn't make it immoral. See: Marijuana."
> "The war on child sexuality is only the latest in a long line of failed policies that work better on paper than the real world. See the war on drugs, terrorism and copyright infringement".
>"My kid is attracted to other kids. Does that mean he should be executed too?
> "The problem isn't with rind et al, it's with your bigoted and irrational hatred of other people. Just like climate change deniers, you ignore all evidence which goes against your dumb beliefs and continue to dig your own grave when all the science is against you".
> "The idea that kind people want to literally tear children limb from limb and feed them into woodchippers is incredibly ridiculous."
>"Let's agree to disagree." You believe x, and although that's not supported by science, logic or reason you have the right to your opinion".
>"You don't love who you love just because of sex. Why do you think it's any different with peds?
> "You don't have to be a pedophile to realize claiming all sex = rape is pants-on-head retarded."
> "The problem is this idea that sex is inherently evil. That's a judeo-christian view. Centuries of religious indoctrination have drilled this into your mind and the minds of your forefathers. In a diverse and multicultural society where not everyone believes in the same god, you have no right to force your views on others".
>"How would you feel if someone told you were only attracted to your wife because of how good she was in bed? People who say they love you just to get them in bed are the real monsters".
>"Almost everyone agrees that child abuse is bad, especially if you love them. That's why we're number one when it comes to fighting against it."
They can obviously be much longer and more detailed, but these are only a few examples. Now it's your turn to post!
ITT: Find the best arguments or modify existing ones used in support of ssm.