No.24627
Daily reminder that if you are
>an exclusive
>attracted to boys
>attracted to children under six
you should fucking kill yourself.
No.24628
No reason to kill yourself. Juts go and masturbate and use your imagination when you need it. There's plenty of heterosexuals who don't get what they need. They still enjoy life for what it's worth, by masturabting to their favorite porn queen.
No.24629
My god, what a great, quality thread OP! How long did it take you to come up with this OC? You dont like exclusives and boyfuckers?!?!??! I have never heard this before!! I laughed my dick of rofl XD
I just dont understand how this board could go to shit with quality posters like you…
No.24631
>>24629
>defending boyfuckers
boyfuckers and their sympathizers should be shot, hung and burnt, all at once
No.24639
There is literally nothing wrong with loving babies, even exclusively.
>>24629
>Hating babylovers
Scum detected.
No.24643
>>24639
There's plenty wrong with exclusivity in general.
tfw:
>hurr just cuz im not attracted to them growing up doesnt mean i wont continue to love them
>im not attracted to boys and that is why i think they're literally subhuman animals that don't deserve to exist
No.24645
>>24643
There is only a problem with exclusivity if you have a chance of ever getting a date, which, as is common knowlege, is pretty unlikely if you a browsing an imageboard.
No.24668
>>24627
>attracted to children under six
I didn't think I was but then I visited the childcare my mom used to work at and I questioned that stance.
>>24629
>defending boyfuckers
You're probably a fag yourself. Don't you have some gay-faggot things to be doing, fag? Kill yourself, fag.
No.24671
I'm glad to see absolutely nothing has changed here.
No.24677
Glad to see that Tick is still a rampant misogynist that hates and wants to violently murder all adult women.
No.24805
>Glad to see that Tick is still a rampant misogynist that hates and wants to violently murder all adult women.
Women banned men marrying girls. Why shouldn't he hate them?
No.24807
>>24627
I hate boyfags and babyfags just as much as the next guy, but I'm almost entirely exclusive to adolescent girls. I can't help that. I assume you're talking about paedofags, but still, you should be more clear.
>>24639
>There is literally nothing wrong with loving babies, even exclusively.
Yes there is, you dope. What would you do when your baby becomes a loli? What would you do when your loli becomes an adolescent? I hope you're not an exclusive, nigger.
>>24677
>>24805
Oh, man, that is the best argument I've ever seen on here. Fuck women. I hate them. Unless they're brought up properly to not be antis, they're literally all terrible.
No.24811
It takes one delusional fuck to not see how the best mound is a fresh mound
i.e. little girls under 6yo
2-7yo are the best. just admit it
don't lie to yourself. I could post a nice fresh baby ass and all you guys would be drooling over it wanting to penetrate & hot dog a 5yo if nobody would find out
You sick motherfuckers
No.24818
>>24807
>What would you do when your adolescent becomes an adult?
No.25160
>>25155
The pedos don't care about you. Only the necros do. The necrophiles will kill you and have sex with you corpse.
No.25179
>>24807
>I hate boyfags and babyfags as much as the next guy
>but I'm almost entirely exclusive to adolescent girls.
>I can't help that
>can't help that
>implying they can help it
>hating someone because they can't help it
>not actually constructing an argument and properly defending your morals which is fine.
I'm not even a boy/babyfag but I really bothers me people who immediately resort to hate.
Youre on a pedo board, amongst pedos. At least be understanding whilst supporting your morals, and not those hypocritical criminals in prison who practice moral superiority over pedoes and feel somehow better.
No.25193
Hei OP I've got a hiking companion who's a god damn sergeant, and she fucking been to Afghanistan and carries more than half her weight on a backpack whilst having a cold, just for fun and exercise, and if I don't hold myself back when hiking with her I outrun her just on a standard pace.
Fuck you OP, you can't goddamn hold a candle to any of us.
Fuck you very, very much.
Also GH is down, is that permanent or did they switch address? Anybody know?
No.25414
I think everyone is interpreting OP wrong. He's not saying kill yourself if you're a gay pedo because it's so immoral that you deserve to die. He's saying kill yourself because your life will be torture and you'll never get to experience true satisfaction.
Don't kill yourself guys. Society is changing at a rapid clip. Who knows? If you live another 50 years things might change for the better! And remember: true heroes are forged in hell. The monk-tier self-control you develop from living a tortured life and the sociopath-tier lying-ability you develop from never telling anyone your secret will both come in handy throughout your entire life.
No.25429
>>25414
No, I think he means fags should kill themselves because they're filthy fucking fags and fags ought to die.
No.25551
No.27034
>>25429
i dont get how dumb fucks like you look in the mirror? your pedo yet you judge those that like similar tastes outside the "norm" wtf is wrong with u ?
No.27035
>>27034
Homosexuals are self-righteous about it.
No.27088
>>27035
>80% of the posters here arent insufferably self-righteous
No.27092
>>27088
Still better than 100%
No.27093
>>27092
>hurrdurr every homo is exactly the same
all pedos are inhumane child raping/murdering monsters
No.27094
>>27093
Homos have no reason not to be self-righteous considering the environment they are in.
No.27095
>>27094
gee i guess they just make up their reasons then because most homos just want to live their lives just like most pedos
No.27096
>>27095
They want to be sexually repressed?
No.27097
>>27096
what's your definition of sexual repression? if it has something to with not shouting at everyone around you, you may be a sadist.
wanting to live a satisfying life =! self-righteous
No.27098
>>27097
>what's your definition of sexual repression?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_repression
>if it has something to with not shouting at everyone around you
That's decorum, not sexual repression.
>wanting to live a satisfying life =! self-righteous
Homosexuals seem to believe they have the absolute right to have sex with anyone they want and not be called out on being a fornicating pervert. What else could that be than self-righteousness?
No.27100
>>27098
>Homosexuals seem to believe they have the absolute right to have sex with anyone they want and not be called out on being a fornicating pervert.
>What else could that be than self-righteousness?
That would be called a strawman.
Like I said 2 posts ago, most homos do not care if you cry like a faggot about them.
>Pedos seem to believe they have the absolute right to abduct and rape babies.
No.27102
>>27100
>Like I said 2 posts ago, most homos do not care if you cry like a faggot about them.
Exactly. I would show them some respect if they showed anything resembling shame.
>Pedos seem to believe they have the absolute right to abduct and rape babies.
Any pedophile like that would end up in a jail cell in short order.
No.27107
>>27102
>Exactly. I would show them some respect if they showed anything resembling shame.
The vast majority do, you don't realize they're gay because they aren't screaming in your face. People naturally want something to cry about, and fags just happen to have something really convincing to cry about, so of course they REEEE a bit more often relatively to normies.
>Any pedophile like that would end up in a jail cell in short order.
Irrelevant, some still try, and using your logic that proves that every single last pedo on earth wants to rape murder and then rape the corpses of children.
At least you didn't go down the tfw path of claiming that anyone who hurts to kids isn't actually a pedo.
No.27108
>>27107
Even ones that casually mention boyfriends don't seem to show any shame about it.
No.27109
>>27108
most straight people occasionally talk about their partners too, what's your point? from their perspective you're the one that doesn't "seem" to show any shame about hating gays and then hiding that obvious blanket hatred behind trite excuses such as "i'll stop being butthurt when they fit my vague subjective criteria!", which is something a lot more shameful than liking dicks in your ass.
No.27113
gotta love pedos hating on other pedos.
also fuk women
No.27118
This board needs to merge with /mental/ disorders and illnesses.
How anyone thinks they're going to be able to sit down and rationalize the subject, even in the form of an anonymous message board, and expect progress to be made in favor of pedos?
There is no common ground between pedos and the rest of society. No one will ever in their right mind allow this to happen knowingly to a child. In any degree, from rape to pathetically being infatuated with a child from afar, neither is acceptable, neither would be allowed to exist of brought out into the open.
So why this whole board?
/thread
/younglove
No.27121
>>27109
Straight people are called straight because they follow the straight and narrow. Unlike homosexuals, who are total perverts, but want to be treated exactly the same as people who reproduce and help humanity by doing so.
No.27123
No.27125
>>27123
This is exactly the self-righteousness I'm talking about.
No.27126
No actually that's smugness, but I could understand why a butthurt downsie would have a hard time with his vocab.
No.27127
>>27126
It's smug self-righteousness.
No.27128
>>27127
as opposed to your autistic self righteousness?
>complains that fags are supposedly self righteous
>demonstrates absolute self righteousness himself
if you want to cry like a faggot about faggots then stick to the perversion garbage because at least then everyone else can't also blast you for hypocrisy while they laugh at how delusional you are.
No.27130
>>27128
>as opposed to your autistic self righteousness?
I will fully admit that being attracted to children isn't ethical.
No.27131
>>27130
>while they laugh at how delusional you are
No.27135
>>27130
>ethical
Ethics pertains only to conduct, ie physical actions, not metaphysical concepts like attraction.
No.27139
>>27135
Attraction involves physical actions. Like staring or masturbation.
No.27141
>>27139
Private masturbation affects the physical world around you just about as much as thinking does. Not at all.
Besides, you didn't say staring or masturbation, you said attraction, a purely non physically existent phenomenon.
We can do this as long as you want, buddy.
No.27142
>>27141
Then instead of unethical, immoral. Then you won't have this silly physical argument.
No.27143
>>27141
>attraction, a purely non physically existent phenomenon
Attraction is nothing more than chemicals reacting in the brain - purely physical.
No.27144
>>27142
>silly physical argument
as opposed to your much more important muh feels argument? you really want to abandon the only position that gives your shit-talking any relevance whatsoever? fine by me, just let me introduce you to an entire western civilization that's ready and raring to shit-talk you right down the drain.
>>27143
sophistry always hurts the user more than anyone it's directed at
No.27146
>>27144
You can't ignore feelings entirely. You see a cute little girl, you feel good, you look at more little girls. That's immoral. Instead of doing that, upstanding people would try to look at women their own age and ignore children. I'm not willing to be a moral person, though. I would rather look at little girls. However, I'm not going to pretend that being attracted to children is an acceptable or righteous thing to do.
No.27150
>>27146
Sure, they just have to ignore your feelings. That's much easier.
If you think professing to be a self hater is gaining you any ground here then I'll leave the floor open to see what other amusing things you have to say.
No.27160
>>27150
>Sure, they just have to ignore your feelings. That's much easier.
If you are trying to portray homosexuals as sympathetic, you are failing badly.
No.27166
>>27160
They don't have to prove anything. You are the one that has failed to portray himself as a human worthy of continued life.
No.29709
It amuses me. Even pedos have the "my form of paedophilia is superior" mindset.
Not that I don't think exclusives aren't plebs. I'm just saying.
No.29712
>>27093
Ephebos and Teleios are the ones that abort there unborn!
No.29713
>>29709
There's simple minds within every group of people. Hopefully, what we're seeing a lot of the time is simple minds being loud, and a vast amount of reasonable people staying quiet…
>>27146
You have a screwed sense of morality. Try measuring morality in what you do for others. If something you do involves none other than yourself, such as looking at attractive people; then any moral value you assign to it is irrelevant. Do not throw away the chance of letting yourself be a good person on the grounds of having unreasonable expectations for goodness. Be "acceptable" and "righteous" when others are involved; in your own mind and privacy, do what ever you want and it will always be moral.
No.29722
>>29709
is there any mindset more banal and worthless than "morality is subjective therefore i have somehow transcended morality even though literally every viewpoint i have fits into a framework of morality that i personally hold"?
because unless you think raping babies is a-ok, i can know for a fact that even you agree that non baby rapists are superior to baby rapists, which makes your trite prattle of all pedos being equal ring kind of fucking hollow.
No.29725
No.29727
>>29725
exclusively sexually interested in prepubescents, not interested in adults whatsoever. so basically an actual pedophile.
No.29734
OP needs to bust this nut but he can't do that until someone dies. That's where YOU come anon, OP will finally be able to cum; all you have to is kill you're self fagit!