/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

>>25435

A lot of the anger and hatred seems to be used to derail conversations. I don't think most pedophiles (other kinds of philes) are super angry people. Most people who post that kinda stuff are just blowing off steam and being edgy.

I have heard some people on the pedo boards here say that they hate gays because a few decades back gay rights activists stop working with the pedos back then to get more mainstream support. I have never looked into that being the truth though, so I can't say for sure.

But if pedos ever want a chance at seeing equal rights they need to drop the hate.

>>25435

virped.org is probably your best bet if you want a moderated board.

You can join their support-forum by requesting it when filling in a contact form.

>>25435

Another non-pedo here. I feel that if society hates you for so long you're gonna want to hate back. See radical gay activism and malcom x.

>Homophobic

That's mostly just chan-culture and people overusing "faggot" as well as edgelords.

It's also due to, like others mentioned, gays throwing us under the bus once they realized it'd likely be easier without us for them, and then never coming back to try and help us out. Furthermore, the average gay folk is just as bad, if not worse, than the average normie to us, despite them being in similar situations occasionally, and therefore should empathize. But they don't.

Aside from that, those who like boys are typically annoying and try to annoy others with their behavior and posting, and from many peoples observations, including mine, are more often waaaaay too focused on sex and AoC rather than simply not being hated and being able to be friends with kids.

>Racism

Same thing as the above regarding chan culture.

Unless you consider racism not being attracted to and thus not dating black little girls, then no one here is really racist, minus one or two fucks.

Everyone on chans use nigger like people use faggot, stupid, idiot, Jew, etc, it's just a meaningless addition to a post to emphasize something.

>Sexism

There's literally none of that in my opinion, in terms of treating women as less or anything of that such.

The one or two fucks you see constantly whining about women, bible verses advocating rape, and saying women is property is literally, like I mentioned, one or two fucks. That's all they post about, and they don't even claim to be a pedo, or post anything actually related.

That's why I usually delete their shit if it hasn't already got too many responses. It's just OT shitposting by some fuck who's virtually brainless, as he posts like a bot would/does.

>Are most pedophiles this way?

I don't think any really are.

I don't even consider the fucks who commit most of what you likely see as pedos, as they usually don't suggest it whatsoever, or they display and say things that suggest or explicitly say that it's not about the kids, but about the power, or something of such.

Aka, they aren't pedos, as they just have a control fetish and choose to target "weak" children.

It also bothers me, and I wish I could purge them from the world entirely, however people would whine if I even purged them from the board. Most of those fucks seem like shills/shitposters/non-pedos as I said anyhow. I just wish they'd at least go to TOR and be a degenerate on there with like-minded dick-in-hand individuals and fetish fucks in general, rather than posting here where you aren't supposed to be jerking off while you post/read.

>>25440

She'd get banned for "want(ing) to humanize them and possibl(y) fight for their rights" m8.

They also discourage and often don't allow non-pedos to post whatsoever, but rather only observe.

>Ever shilling for the pedo-cucks torture chamber

>>25438

>so I can't say for sure.

It did happen, although some parts of the gay movement never accepted pedos.

>>25435

>double spacing between words

methinks op may be a certain recent anti spammer

>>25457

I'm on a tablet. Not a computer. I keep getting complaints about. When I get a computer it will get better cool? You are derailing here.

>>25457

I see.

>>25454

Interesting comparison.

>>25440

Not a deal breaker just asking.

>>25455

Lovely response. Perfect.

Let me go apparently >>25457 thinks i am a spammer. I guess spaces are

bad and mean i am a

spammer. O h n o l o l willputtimgmywordstogetherhelp?

Maybe the "spammer" is also using a phone/tablet/other device too? Idk The problem with anonymous boards is similar behaviors does not mean the same person. Just like different usage of words or different ideas does mean a different person. Maybe you are weary of non pedophiles (also a minority woman) maybe i have to gain trust. *shrugs*

I have nothing against homosexuals but I do really hate niggers.

>>25435

I generally try to be as nice as possible unless someone has presented me with a legitimate reason to the contrary. To this end I avoid slurs, I avoid appearing anti-homosexual, I try to be as understanding and accepting of individuals of all races and all genders. As a pedophile, I don't really feel I have any moral high-ground to speak down to anyone else based on broad general categories like those.

I don't even have any moral high-ground to speak down to other pedophiles based on aspects of pedophilia. So I don't.

Not all pedophiles are like what you see on the internet. Anonymity does strange things to people and removes inhibitions, much like alcohol. And so, much like in cases of alcohol consumption, the assholes and the jerks of the world, the racists and the homophobic, the most deplorable among us, are the ones who are the loudest and the most frequently heard while the nicer individuals mind their own business and keep their heads down, for the most part.

>>25472

>>25474

Apparently I struck a nerve. Why so defensive?

The only poster I ever saw double space like that, ever, is that angry anti spammer. And now you, not a day after he stops posting. hmmm.

>>25474

>>25495

>minority woman

>claims to have board experience

>doesn't show it

>takes a strict sjw stance but somehow thick skinned enough to stay after this long

It's the spammer trying to dox us in the most crude way he could think up. That's exactly how angry he is.

I think most antis are closet pedos and think killing others is the only way to repent for their sins. Exactly like all the republicans and priests who turned out to be closet gays. The forbidden fruit is always the sweetest and if they can't have it, no one should.

Even worse, some people just love to hate, and haters are running out of socially acceptable victims. There is a primal urge for group violence in society that was once satisfied by witch burnings, gladiators, and lynch mobs. Even in America, society teaches us to repress violent urges instead of channel them in healthy ways, like consensual brutal gangbangs or battle royales.

>>25498

Chill dude. Innocent until proven guilty. I understand your wariness but giving internet strangers who want to help you the benefit of the doubt has pretty low potential risk.

>>25502

Oh shit I didn't realize you meant why pedos can be so hateful OP. They're just defensive cause oftentimes people go far out of their way to hurt them. Some pedos are definitely assholes but that's true of humanity in general. Most pedos that I know in real life are either timid/weak as fuck or totally well-adjusted.

>>25503

Devil's advocate for antis here

The reason child molestation is so dangerous is that for the most part child molesters do appear to be totally well-adjusted. A guy could be totally nice and respected in the community and you wouldn't know he's raping his niece while telling her he'll kill her mom if she ever says anything.

That's another reason why it's dangerous to even admit to being a law-abiding pedophile. There's just no way anyone could totally trust you, and they don't really have any reason to outside of liberty and due process.

I mean yea you could say that about anyone, but when someone actually says they're a pedo your suspicious become a lot more well defined.

>>25498

not to mention the obvious

>First off i think you should have people write in about themselves (i am 31, lifeguard and chef, have a dog named shelly, love pizza and i am a pedophile) make pedophilia as a part of their identity not the whole.

yea, you want me to tell you my address and social security too?

>>25506

You sound way too paranoid. This person never even suggested showing your name, you can blur your face and change your voice if your too scared to show yourself.

TFW, WHY THE FUCK DID YOU DELETE MY POST? I FUCKING SPEND VALUABLE MINUTES OF MY FUCKING LIFE ON THESE FUCKING POSTS. HOW DARE YOU WASTE MY LIFE?

>>25546

>>25455

>She'd get banned for "want(ing) to humanize them and possibl(y) fight for their rights" m8.

>They also discourage and often don't allow non-pedos to post whatsoever, but rather only observe.

Shit man, I thought it was only me having negative experiences with that bunch.

I got the impression of them being mostly a group of confused people, lead by an inner circle of semi-delusional, genitally mutilated old jesus-freak men who'se dicks didn't work anymore and who'se wives were oh so understanding of their delusions.

Having no ability or interest to delegate admin privileges, responsibility for further development or any development at all, creating a website merely to serve their own self-justification and not at all the needs and wishes of young people for meaningfull debate, information, or activism.

Oh well. Guess I'll ask one of these days if there's a list of clear- and dark-net discussion boards where normies and maps can have a cordial discussion without all the antis and invaders shitposting all over the place.

>>25546

Literally who? I've only deleted spam and the spamshit fuck who keeps exclusively hate-posting while mad, and literally one other post in a week, and before then it was only the Bible-quote/rape bot.

You were banned over two months ago for (less than, like only half or a fourth of) a day and for making a post, like this, as well as previously, complaining about quality, while having nothing to do with the thread.

Aka, I'm shitposting about others funposting.

I don't think I ever used the [D+] feature before the madposting shitposter came along and started flooding literally "fuck you pedo rapist stupid nigger cunts fuck you shit you stupid baboons I hope you get arrested fucking rapists" and shit like that.

So I didn't delete anything more than a post or two that were OT.

Now looking at the board log I only deleted one post around that time, likely not even yours, as it was right before a ban for "spamshit," when I still banned for that.

>>21693 was the post, and it wasn't even deleted, nor the other shitposts in your ID, which there were a few.

M8 pls

>>25549

I don't think such a place really exists beyond this and the occasional intelligent discussion on an lgbt board where everyones Ooooo'ing at a decent pedo who's explaining their self.

It's really difficult to have such a place.

I've personally never been there, but I've heard stories and seen their users elsewhere, and seen their site, and the way it is really just does not seem ideal.

Some people on here whine about GC, but while they may not be ideal, and they are virtually without debate, and thus a "hugbox" or "echo chamber," they at least see pedos as humans who can love and not just do harm or be "controlled." They at least think pedos can, do, and should be able to make children happy, at least emotionally.

They're at least not VP.

>>25530

Then it won't have nearly as much meaning.

It'd be better to go casually chat on omegle, then when it goes to relationships, mention how great yours is with your lgf.

Every time I accidentally do that the people find it adoring and don't mind it in the slightest, and want to speak to me again as well as respect my privacy, and clearly aren't a fed for how long they stayed and talked OT of fed-stuff.

That's much more humanizing than you simply making an article or having someone, of you, with no face or voice, and without a real name or something to believe you off of.

They still won't know you, you still didn't help them, give them advise, show them you had the same parental problems or lack of desire in schooling, etc.

>>25495

>>25498

The hashes nor the posting matches up in my opinion, although there's no real hasing decoding or posting personality matcher that I have.

Plus she's not screaming "DIE PEDOS SICK FUCKS KJFHWIFHOUFGYEFGEKFLF ANGEEERR WOLF WOLF WOLF WOOOOOOOOOF."

>>25480

>while the nicer individuals mind their own business and keep their heads down, for the most part.

You also have to think, the nicer ones are more likely to have lgfs and stuff, and thus have less time to post.

No lgf = me posting all day every day everywhere

With lgf = me posting occasionally and glancing at places I mod frequently

Despite not being with her every single day all day, it still effects me. Give me a little more lgf, and I might not even post but once a week.

>>25495

Um i was joking?

>>25503

Ah i see. Thanks for explaining. For some reason people are upset at me for asking? This thread has gotten off track.

>>25498

I'm a woman, not a man. You aren't the only one to call me he but I find it odd. I guess pedophiles have to be quite guarded even in an anonymous forum. Hell I'm using fake IP address and someone else's tablet and I'm not a pedophile.

Maybe I'm foolish. I thought spamming involved post advertisements or links? Have I posted too many threads? Was the survey like spam? I don't get the culture here.

>>25575

Only a woman could be as deliriously butthurt as the anti spammer was

>double spaces

>posts multiple times a day every day

>you show up posting with the same double spacing not even a day after that poster stops

>that anti shitposter hasnt posted again since mysteriously

>slurs, Homophobic remarks, racism, sexism,

All chans are like this. That is not related to pedophilia

>>25553

Maybe this question was too much? Another post I asked if something was CP (it was deleted?). I did get banned for that. I wasn't try to troll but make sure you guys don't get in trouble. When i was younger i made "cp" so i didn't think it was "evil". I know anyone can post here so I was just checking.

Look I'm still learning and trying to be patient (so please be patient with me) , because I understand the paranoia. I know it is easier to believe I am some pedophile hating man than a minority woman who supports you and even had fun as a child. When I stop using my friend's stupid tablet and get my computer fixed i will write i'm detail why i support your cause. ♡♡♡♡

>>25577

O realy? Had no idea. Never been to other parts. I'm not used to the Internet being this way.

>>25576

None of this can prove that this person is the anti spammer.

>>25579

Yeah, it's pretty normal to see all sorts of slurs here. Chan culture has always been known to be offensive. It's not just something contained to the pedophiles here.

>>25576

The anti shitposter moved to /phile/ where they have no moderation. Took over a day to remove his shit.

Not even the BO uses his board!

>>25579

>I did get banned for that.

M-musta been another board…which I figured before when you said you gave out advice or whatever about certain things and I remember reading them somewhere else, but couldn't find them.

I remember deleting that post though, or one like it, as I deleted the OP that was I believe one of the spamming links.

>>25605

The post I cannot find included a like to /phile/. Where I am the Board Owner and post all the time. I just don't namefag, dummy. And we do have moderation. That anti that you mentioned, I just carpet bombed his posts the other day.

>>25435

>Does it come from anger and frustration?

It comes from being on a chan, you dumb gash. Pissing into an ocean of piss &c.

>>25683

Everybody has to piss on someone.The world aren't ready to discuss pedophilia. I wish this forum was for pedosex friendly people only. That we could all discuss the 99 positions possible on the couch in LauraB07.

But people are grey and boring and wants to talk "moral", like it is durable and not written in water.

I don't know. I only hate individuals, people who don't suit my taste or hurt me. But if they're black, white, women, muslim, pedo, normal… I don't care. It's only terms and generalities.

>>25795

Surprise 70%+ of humanity are blithering self absorbed retards and pedos are not an exception.

>>25795

It's a discussion board, what did you expect? If you remove pedophilia it is not so different from other discussion forums. It's a chaos in all directions which leads nowhere. Pedos and anti-pedos.

Your contribution is just another attempt to shit down the whole conversation and everyone who participates in it.

>>25795

>There also seem to be more sexually frustrated faggots who keep hating on LGBT because they are jelly top kek

What is /pol/? 8chan's /pol/ wasn't always a nazi echochamber, but once it became that it spread pretty fast to the other boards.

>>25795

>pedophiles are selfish, narcissist, ignorant

A lot of people are. That's not just limited to pedophiles. And not all pedophiles have those flaws either. In fact, not even all the pedophiles on this board have all those qualities.

>delusional and whining assholes who are never tired to cry about being "oppressed" and "misunderstood", not ONCE considering that they actually are mentally ill

That is a generalization; a generalization that I take offense to because I don't fit that description. But I will grant you: it is something that I've seen a lot of recently. It probably has something to do with:

>this community had a change in its user-base ~3-4months ago … Suddenly all the autistic loners came and now its all about whining, CP and sex, in every single thread.

>>25795

I think this is a fairly typcial Chan post. I've been to other boards and themes and if you comment something it has a tendency to be followed by insults that borders on tourette's syndrome.

Just look at pictures that people post on Chan. It's almost always ugly and bizarre. Maybe things would have been more civilized if none could not be anonymous, but for pedophiles it's probably not a good idea. It would have silenced this board. Just as well maybe, some would say.

>>25795

>If I have learned anything about homosexuals while lurking forums/this board it was; homosexuals are selfish, narcissist, ignorant, delusional and whining assholes who are never tiered to cry about beeing "opressed" and "misunderstood", not ONCE considering that they actually are mentally ill, living in a world that is all about themselves. Homosexuals dont care about love, they never do, they just want to use others to satisfy their own, sick urges. They think with their dick and never fail to prove that homosexuals in general have a below average intelligence.

>2 years ago I was pro-homosexuals or at least supporting the idea of legalizing sodomy, but now, after seeing what my fellow homosexuals really are, I changed my mind. Thanks for opening my eyes.

>Its pretty interesting, because this community had a change in its userbase ~3-4months ago. December, January and February were actually pretty entertaining, but then suddenly all the autistic loners came and now its all about whining, stds and sex, in every single thread. There also seem to be more sexually frustrated faggots who keep hating on heterosexuals because they are jelly top kek

>Why am I still here? I dont fucking know.

>>25798

Look, nobody cares about your opinion and your little "discussions", which only consist of demanding proof while making shit up yourself anyway. All that was said here has already been said a thousand times before, and guess what; noone cares. You can throw your shit opinion around as much as you want, we have already heard it a thousand times before. Nobody is going to legalize your little fetish, or at least listen to you. Nobody gives a shit about you, your feelings and your "facts".

See, discussions oti are the most pointless thing in the world, you wont change anybodys opinion here. A chan, and this includes this board, is here for feels, dank memes, OC and fun.

I enjoyed the thread with the father that worked for CC or the one where Anon wanted to open his own orphanage (kek) much more than the 100th muh opressions and muh sex thread.

What a boring fucking topic, made by boring people for a shit board.

>>25435

>I want to humanize them and possible… slurs, homophobic remarks, racism…

That is non-specific to pedos… That is just locker-talking… Like when girls call each other bitches and whores, but not actually (but actually meaning) the person in question is those things..

You stupid nigger, jew, faggit, bitch whore… We love you anyways…

It's a "thing" of "the internet", that chans embrace as their own "thing"… Even though it has been done since the beginning of the net, before channers were even born. They would claim they invented the internet, just to argue with you… (Actually some have already, lol!)

To understand pedophiles, first you have to understand yourself…

When you were a kid, what did you masturbate to? Thoughts of an older man (an adult) molesting you… you molesting him… (Molesting = touching sexually)…

Thus, you imagined being molested by a pedo.

or, you imagined molesting another kid your age… or younger… showing them the good feelings you feel now yourself, as you masturbate… In which case, you were a pedo, at that moment in time. (Something you later, apparently grew out of, for whatever reason. Except the part about being molested by another adult, which you may also have grown out of too.)

Are most pedos this way?

Well, most pedos are suppressed, so frustration would be a more psychological word to describe any animosity, along with others indirectly bashing them, as happens with blacks or jews or gays or children… (Why do they lash-out and have such strong opinions? Because otherwise no-one listens.)

Not sure if most are that "brazen", as many are still a form of "stuck introvert". Those who feel like they "lost something from childhood", (suppression of what they wanted to do… sexually or emotionally…), and are still living more in their heads and out of the society that essentially banished them, calling them sluts or perverts and told them how they were just bad people/kids… now older… but don't feel any older… are less inclined to even speak to those who outcast them into living in their heads only, or online in virtual worlds. (I know MANY MANY MANY of those. They LOVE to talk, almost too much, and tend to be a little clingy to anyone who talks back to them.. almost smothering at times.)

You con't have to humanize us, we are more human than "societal clans", that have given-up humanity in the name of humanity, when they actually just destroy it by voluntarily stopping to act human and natural.

>>25505

That is a stigma that keeps the laws enforced, more than the actual actions…

Witch-hunts… from Anti-Peds… (Violent Anti-Peds, as many are not violent but still have strong beliefs.)

The more you fuck with peoples heads (talking about the anti-ped propaganda and crying wolf.) The more violent those morons become. (Not saying Anti-pedos are morons, just the violent ones… as the violent pedos are also morons… Begin a pedo is just something-else they like, as being moronic and hateful and controlling and violent and superiority complex or just having a deathwish.)

The funny thing is… these stupid white-knights who go vigilante, actually think the rest of the world is standing behind them… Then they wonder why they end-up standing alone… Because, the majority isn't behind them, they are just playing along with the "behind closed doors", or "keep it in your head", societal rules…

this board is flooded with surveys, and

why are you giving this "woman" special attention? it's stupid