/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

>>26676

>Should I move on and pursue a normal girl? Or should I wait until I find the child that will love me?

Move on and pursue a legal aged girl. Even if you found a loli that loved you, would you be happy with it being a platonic love until she reached an age where you could be intimate?

If you took it to that level with a loli, trust me, it wouldn't be paradise. You'd be paranoid that someone was going to find out and your life would be ruined and so would hers.

Girls are lame.

Be alone. If love is stressing you out and you can't see anything positive then be alone.

I've thought the exact same thing before a lot too. whenever I hear about how horrible or troublesome women can be I'm genuinely happy that I simply don't care about having a life with them. I'm non exclusive too and have dated girls my age before but it was primarily because that's just what everyone does and I didn't want to look weird, or be a virgin when all my friends were getting laid. But teens just can't compare to little girls to me, little girls are almost angelic I fall in love with one every time I leave the house while anything I do with women is either because I have nothing better to do or a chance to interact with lolis. And that's all because I feel I can't fall in love with an adult women I feel like I could only fall in love with a little girl.

>>26714

It's already pretty hard to find an adult gf, imagine a loli one…

>>26726

All you really need to find an adult gf is to be attractive and not a psychotic fuck and go in public.

Honestly, all you need is a reasonably fit body, a non-extreme personality, and a sense of what you can wear with them.

To acquire a little girl friend all you really need to do is be nice to them and be able to be around them frequently, and if you're a real pedo, odds are, you're already at least half way there.

If you aren't all the way there, you either shouldn't ever be and won't ever be, or you simply need to socialize more with your family or work at getting a job with kids.

>>26735

how much more obsessively butthurt can this autist get

>>26713

However it is wrong right? At least from what you said.

>>26679

I'm not so much afraid of the law as I am insecure about whether the kid will outgrow me, or just never truly get it. I absolutely adore talking to a lolis, and being able to talk to them intimately would be a world more than where I am now. I also wouldn't mind sex before legal age, I just don't want to have sex for the sake of sex, here has to be more meaning to it.

>>26688

Well that's been my tactic so far, and it's not feeling much better now is it?

>>26713

Is there a particular characteristic that leads to that preference? Are you still a virgin? Did you really have sex with someone over peer pressure?

>>26714

"Platonic" specifically refers to non-attractive kinship, it's not a sign of attraction, it could be taken as anything, really. It lacks the intimacy of a romantic or sexual relationship, which is why it's just not enough. Just as the company of friends can still leave you lonely at night when you're still single.

The problem is that it's not a relationship unless both are involved. And for both to be involved, there has to be a sort of attraction to you. Of which lolis do not have. Any form of respect or admiration they have of you is non-sexual, and rarely romantic, and to take them as advances similar to those of adult women would be mistaken. The cues you're talking about aren't sexual, but they've misled you into taking the initiative to "convert" these girls. That's not what I want, that's not a feeling I can trust. The girl will almost surely "wake up" and realise something is off when she is older, because it was more influence than of her own developed view.

And your mention of polygamy is a huge red flag. That's not "love" anymore, it's simply taking advantage of naivety. You can't compare attraction to sexual pleasure with genuine romance. They don't "love" you exactly, for all you know you're probably just their personal masturbation outlet, and there's no doubt they'll lose this attraction to you as they get older. If I just wanted to "get into the loli-world" and just have sexual relations, I could have done that with lolis and adult women, a long time ago.

>>26730

There's a lot more to getting a loli than that, what you're suggesting is just a blanket scheme where you rely on naivety to insert your own criteria into the girls.

>>26753

>There's a lot more to getting a loli than that, what you're suggesting is just a blanket scheme where you rely on naivety to insert your own criteria into the girls.

tfw is a retard who constantly misuses the term girlfriend. when he says it, imagine a platonic friendship.

>>26737

>butthurt

>autist

>using Aryan Lolicon's signature defense words

You can put your name back on, you samefag. The whole board already knows you're an underage b&, an attempted rapist, a hypocrite, and full of shit. You were dumb enough to put your name next to your retarded posts, and future lurkers deserve to know how much of an idiot you are.

>>26765

>the two most common insults on imageboards prove youre a specific poster

it is utterly sublime how deliriously butthurt this pathetic autistic faggot has become. its fucking beautiful.

ahahahahahaha

>>26791

>However, it is a sign that they enjoy being around you and like you, and that they may love you.

Platonic love, not sexual, confusing this for a "go-ahead" isn't wise, and contributes to an "relationship bubble" that will soon burst.

>Even if you're alone most nights, or every night, which is not ideal, the rest of the time you're having a grand'ol time.

Depending on your relationship and how you know her, she very well may sleep with you sometimes, or you sleep with her. Sure, it likely won't be every day, as she isn't literally your daughter, and thus you won't be around for her to cuddle.

I'm getting mixed vibes from this. You're appropriating a whole varied mix of relations, like some sort of mangled Oedipus complex. Enjoying the company of children is one thing, but confusing sexual and non-sexual attraction and just blending it into some kind of medley isn't a true relationship anymore.

>They may not have a sexual attraction, a "genuine" one at least, however, they can still love you and be attracted to who you are as a person/alien/pedo.

I'm not sure about that. These things get shed as children grow. If they were more than just general kindness caused by lesser developed brain functions, these affinities would last well into adulthood.

>What are you talking about?

Honestly, were you high when you made this post?

You literally mentioned taking advantage of your cousin AND her friends.

>Not really, you just need access to a loli, the ability to be around her often, and a decency and respect for her. If you treat her good, and you're fun, just like with EVERY other decent living thing, she will like you, and if y'all grow close she may begin to truly love you and care about you, even in a super-special way.

If you still don't get it at this point, let me spell it out for you. Those kids do not really love you. You have tricked yourself into thinking general kindness is a sign that they do, and used it as a go ahead to have sex with them. As they did not initiate contact, everything they know about sex, whether truthful or not, came from your influence. They are emulating your rules for sex, not theirs. When they realise this when they're older, they will ditch you or even antagonise you. You could even end up in jail.

The fact that you went as far as to take this risk with MULTIPLE lolis screws you over even more, because polygamy is a terribly unstable platform to romantic relationships. You're walking a dangerous path trusting these early feelings, and even if LEAs don't deter you, the prospect of these lolis dumping you and breaking your heart when they realise they were never really into you, should.

>>26776

>samefags twice

>abluh bluh buh butthurt a-autism

>uses his signature insults twice in a row

>literally screaming like a baby to save face

It's adorable to see you squirming so hard to get out of your little corner. Your reputation has become complete and utter trash. No one will ever take you seriously again, you'll have to scream harder than ever before anyone will even acknowledge you. You've lost your precious name, your credibility, and any possible chance of having further arguments. Everyone knows that you're human garbage in real life, as well as on the internet. And the only person you can blame, is your own idiotic self. Congratulations, Aryan Lolicon.

>>26791

Defending antis again? Don't you have some babies to rape? Don't you realise that these antis want your babies for themselves to rape? Being a bad admin is one thing, but being tfw is a whole new world of reason to kill yourself.

TFW ABUSES CHILDREN, YET DEFENDS ANTIS

>>26753

I'm not a virgin, I'm non exclusive so I am sexually attracted to teen girls.

It wasn't entirely to look normal I did enjoy it but teens just can't compare to little girls.

>>26765

Why are you so obsessed with me? You realise butthurt and autist are extremely common insults on imageboards right?

>>26818

>>26819

What a cute little act. So desperate to backpedal on your bullshit that you'd samefag to this extent? Absolutely pitiful.

You can try as hard as you like, but its over. You tried to intoxicate and rape two girls. You pretend to be an anti but intend to rape children. You're not even old enough to drive yet. It's all out there. Everyone knows you're an underaged hypocrite, but atleast you're not a virgin right? After all, being a child rapist has it's privileges.

>>26821

Yeah he is. He actually makes antis look bad. He shows they have a lot of internal issues, delusional and actually probably evil bastards. They would tell on another MAP person yet they do the same thing.

>>26818

Then why did you do it if you knew it wouldn't satisfy you enough?

>>26827

You can deny that you're carefree view towards taking advantage of children is harmful, you can use a passive aggressive tone implying that I'm mentally unsound because you don't agree with me, but you cant deny the fact that you have completely deluded yourself into believing that innocent cues are invitations to sex.

>Of course they may stop being so cuddly, as it's considered inappropriate around that age and childish, and generally, people that age don't want to cuddle.

This sentence clearly shows you have a very misconstrued perception of how relationships work. If I were to guess the kind of pedo you are, you'd be the type with a childlike mentality that relates more to children.

>That has nothing to do with her just being a kind child, she still had a preference to be with me, and I still made her happier than anyone else.

Let's clear up some red flags shall we. Who started the relationship? Who initiated sexual contact? Why does she have a preference to you? And what do you mean by "happy"?

You're going to find that the feelings involved in this situation are likely to come from your own perception.

>It's because she grew up and she may have been easier for the public to influence and pressure her into behaviors, or she simply has grown out of them due to preferring other things.

She's growing out of it because her brain is developing an increasing in functionality. She can recognise more ruses and has better reasoning ability. The fact that you're not in jail yet means she can't possibly have been influenced by anyone any more than she has previously. You were riding on a feeling that she's losing as she grows up. That feeling wasn't love.

>She still loved me.

What's with the past tense? Is that a slip up that you're going to blame on a typo? How does it feel to have her push you away? Not very pleasant now is it?

>Please cite as explicitly & detailed as possible.

>>26714

> I acquired a lgf out of my cousins daughter, and was brought into the world of lolis through her, meeting all types of lolis. I know she loves me, and I know many of her "friends" seem to as well.

Still going to deny it?

It's apparent that you've got a lot of underlying issues that muddle your decisions. You've got a lot of sorting out to do.

>>26849

He's calling you mentally unsound because you keep talking about sexual contact when he's said there wasn't any over and over again, and making very strange projections as a result.

So actually you have a lot of sorting out to do. Literal sorting, of posts.

>>26857

Except he's been constantly mentioning his loli escapades and has posted before that he's had sex with children. In addition to misusing the word "projection", it's extremely out of place for anyone on this board to ever defend tfw. Did I strike a nerve?

>>26858

>Except he's been constantly mentioning his loli escapades and has posted before that he's had sex with children.

???

I've seen tfw shitpost since back when he posted on /pol/ and I've never once heard him talking about having sex with any children, and speaking of taking passive aggressive tones mr delirious hypocrite, all your weird passive aggressive tone here is doing is embarrassing yourself.

I also used projection perfectly accurately by the way, you are just unintelligent. You're projecting your own undesired tendencies on a situation you factually have zero knowledge of.

>>26676

>>26679

not OP ut what about a decent compromise? early jaybee girl, dude is in his early 20s so its easier for him to hang with someone 12-15 or so, depending on how he looks/dresses

>>26862

This is a myth. Unless he is a part of something where he can inconspicuous hang out his age doesn't help. It also looks worse if he is by him self. Not to mention of he is a hermit crab type.

>>26862

This is a myth. Unless he is a part of something where he can inconspicuous hang out his age doesn't help. It also looks worse if he is by him self. Not to mention of he is a hermit crab type.

>>26863

>>26864

I go to animu cons and stuff, so I am "shielded" by that when at cons or whatnot. It depends on the social environment and the person's personality/dress/etc. i.e. someone in cosplay at a ponycon could prolly get away with murder.

>>26860

You can drop the act, tfw. I have never seen anyone show you any sympathy, much less from someone who's "seen you shitpost as far back as /pol/". It's far more likely that someone who's known you for that long would be shitting on you even more than I am. If you weren't tfw, you wouldn't have been stupid enough to misuse "projection" again, AS WELL as "hypocrite","passive aggressive", and "delirious".

The fact that you have to resort to samefagging to insult someone, to pretend there's someone to whiteknight for you, just goes to show how much of an insecure nutcase you are. Get some fucking help before your mommy issues cause you a neural relapse.

>>26862

By then they would have lost all their childish traits and personalities. Teens don't differ much at all from adults, save for experience. A desire for teens is usually just a physical desire, and then you'd just be playing with something just as fickle as an adult, but with the consequences of the law.

Calling people out on pretending to be someone else is meaningless, regardless of whether you are right about it. They can keep denying and you can't prove it. It's silly and reeks of extreme paranoia, again regardless of whether you are right or not. I think it has happened twice already in this thread, I'd hate to see it become a trend. And again, it is fucking meaningless.

I can also say I've never seen tfw say he has done anything inappropriate with children, so there you go, 'whiteknighting for tfw', sincerely, Tick. (But of course, anyone could take my name too, so what the fuck ever.)

>>26907

>Teens don't differ much at all from adults, save for experience.

>you'd just be playing with something just as fickle as an adult,

That's an incredibly shallow view of people in general. People are who they are; sure they change when they go from childhood to teen and eventually to adult, but they don't get assimilated into some hive mind that is adulthood. People who speak like you do there conjure up imaginations of pedophiles who conform to the stereotype that we only like children because we either dislike or fear adults.

>>26676

>Should I move on and pursue a normal girl? Or should I wait until I find the child that will love me?

The former. One quick stupid reason; little girls like adults, and they expect adults to have girlfriends or to have had a girlfriend. It's a point of attractiveness to have some experience, so just go get some experience. And you get to find an alternative that won't land you or others in trouble. That's my own plan, anyway.

>>26908

Try a word for word writing style, a defensive post written from a personal angle, and the fact that no one, and I mean no one, has ever sided with tfw. Acknowledging that it could just be about anyone like what you're doing is reasonable, but for someone to come out all bleeding heart offended for another anon, much less someone as hated as tfw, is nothing short of samefaggotry.

>That's an incredibly shallow view of people in general. People are who they are; sure they change when they go from childhood to teen and eventually to adult, but they don't get assimilated into some hive mind that is adulthood.

Incorrect, children's brains develop as they, culminating at the start of puberty where their brains are fully developed. That's not to say they become more conscious or self-aware, the greatest development that they undergo is their communication and societal ability. This means that they recognise more patterns when speaking to someone or in a social situation. Patterns that can help them fit in or gain appeal from certain individuals. They learn of ways to manipulate or acquire a sleight of hand, such as making a white lie to diffuse a situation, learning when it's more beneficial to take a risk(like cheating or lying in a relationship), or learning how to measure people by their material worth.

These are very reasonable reasons to doubt adults, and teens as well(they have the same manipulative ability, just less experience), because they are actual characteristics that need to be overcome by some method or another.

>One quick stupid reason; little girls like adults, and they expect adults to have girlfriends or to have had a girlfriend. It's a point of attractiveness to have some experience, so just go get some experience.

Case in point. Here, you(the adult), have reasoned that children like "experienced" men. You have then decided that you best way into getting them is to first start some sacrificial relationships with women, just so you can get to the end goal of a relationship with a child. Would a child have thought of this convoluted plan to acquire a specific relationship? No, according to yourself, they would have just expressed greater affection to an adult who's already been taken.

>That's my own plan, anyway.

And how is that working out? Getting a sacrificial relationship with an adult woman is not a very hard thing to do, so how many have you tossed for that "experience" you need?

>is nothing short of samefaggotry.

Most likely true. But still meaningless. I think the best course of action would be to ignore something like that. But then, I suppose, it becomes hard to figure out which things here shouldn't be ignored…

>Patterns that can help them fit in or gain appeal from certain individuals. They learn of ways to manipulate or acquire a sleight of hand, such as making a white lie to diffuse a situation, learning when it's more beneficial to take a risk(like cheating or lying in a relationship), or learning how to measure people by their material worth.

These are not defining traits of adults. At best, they're an extremely negative interpretation of skills that sometimes manifest as the actions you speak of (judging by material worth, manipulating, cheating, lying).

>Would a child have thought of this convoluted plan to acquire a specific relationship?

Well, you got me there. Adults can come up with more stupidly convoluted shit than children can.

>>26910

I don't know what a sacrificial relationship is. What I refer to as my plan is simply to pursue a relationship with an adult woman. Becoming more attractive to little girls isn't the reason for that. Like I said, that was "one quick stupid reason". My reason for mentioning it comes from when I had kids around me often, they would sometimes ask me if I had a girlfriend, or if I had ever had one, and they actually seemed disappointed that I hadn't. I suppose what it really boils down to is that I would have felt better about myself if I had that experience, it would have given myself some more confidence which is good no matter what for.

>>26908

Calling out people as liars is also pretty pointless when you have no proof.

>>26910

You're fucking insane, shithead. If my posting style was anywhere close to tfw's my post would have been several paragraphs long, you know, like every single post tfw has ever made, and fucking bleeding heart personal angle? What the fuck are you talking about? I must have stuck a nerve with you, because you're an utter fucking joke.

>>26917

>>26860

>>26857

>"delirious"

>using "projection" for things he doesn't like

>"utter"

>"joke"

>repeating insults hurled at him when he gets butthurt

what? no "butthurt" and "autism"?

>>26910

You've got the wrong namefag. Those are Aryan Lolicon's signature shitposts, a 17 year old kid who tried to intoxicate and rape two girls, yet still maintains a hard anti child sex stance like the shitposting hypocrite he is.

Guess his edge with tfw just got revealed. It's looking like tfw's got some special relation with him, what with letting him shit up the board without consequence.

>>26911

>Most likely true. But still meaningless. I think the best course of action would be to ignore something like that.

Well the first post started out seemingly genuine, so I was just making it clear that tfw has talked about sexual experiences with children before, even in this very thread.

>These are not defining traits of adults.

Well either you live around some really nice people, or these "nice" people have been pulling you by the nose. Manipulation and sleight is a kind of universal trait for humans. You don't even need to be in many relationships to see that, just a group of friends is evident enough. There'll be that guy that makes the entire group friendly when he's around, but once he's left, everyone talks behind his back about him. There'll be the fatties in this circle talking shit about how fat other fatties are in other circles. Same with any negative trait. And when someone enters a relationship, the dynamic of the entire circle get's rearranged to compensate for this "foreign" stem. And this is just on the level of peers, what a world you'll be in for with relationships.

>Adults can come up with more stupidly convoluted shit than children can.

It's not so much that they can, but that they will. It's a matter of trust, not capability.

>My reason for mentioning it comes from when I had kids around me often, they would sometimes ask me if I had a girlfriend, or if I had ever had one, and they actually seemed disappointed that I hadn't.

This was something I was trying to explain to tfw, that cues from a child are not based on sexual attraction. They obviously weren't disappointed because they thought you were less attractive, more likely they were looking for advice or wanted info on the topic and you turned out to be a bad source. I've had loads of kids ask me whether I'm in a relationship, often because they think that adults should be paired, and find it odd that I'm not. And while it's good that you didn't take this seriously, a lot of pedos actually make this mistake, and take these innocent cues as advances.

> I suppose what it really boils down to is that I would have felt better about myself if I had that experience

Let me ask you this, what do you think is the purpose of a relationship? Is it not to find a permanent partner? If you use a relationship as a means to an end(gaining confidence), could you really call it a proper relationship? Then is it genuine experience?

>>26917

Well it's not my fault you type on the same retarded level as tfw then. So how many good boy points do you get every time you lick tfw's asshole? I'm wondering what would drive a person to get emotionally hurt enough to sperg out over his precious admin's psychotic tendencies being called out. Unless of course, he's the same person.

>>26919

And I thought this shit only happened in /phile/

>>26921

>This was something I was trying to explain to tfw, that cues from a child are not based on sexual attraction.

I wrote out a long and winding reply to this, complete with quotations from earlier in this thread. But seriously, I can do it more concisely than that. Tfw already agrees with this and I don't understand how you haven't recognized this. He has not said anything about sexual attraction or sexual relations; you most likely initially misunderstood what he said about 'sleeping with' a child and subsequently refused to see it the way it was actually meant. He literally spoke of sleeping, in the company of a child. And he spoke of affection, and love. Never sexual attraction. I might be wrong, but then you're going to have to cite the places where he did.

>Let me ask you this, what do you think is the purpose of a relationship?

Well, I suppose my sole motivation is sex, after all. I'm a desperate motherfucker and honestly I've ostensibly no interest in an actual relationship. Hm. Hadn't actually thought about it like that. It does have a lot to do with confidence, this irrational desire to lose my virginity, like it's an obstacle that's holding me from being a proper person. But most of all, I'm just a desperate motherfucker.

>>26919

It's an objective literal fact that he was projecting his own self hating perspective and unwanted desires on a situation he has no information about. That is the exact definition of projecting and I have given a direct explanation for why it fits that definition.

>tfw: i've had relationships with children

>shitposter that desperately wants to fuck children: fucking kids is wrong you monster!

tfw: i've never had sex with any children, a relationship does not require sex

He projected sex onto the situation because that's what HE desires. Literally projection.

so i was tfw and now im aryan lolicon. what other namefags are left to accuse me of being? is every namefag in on an insane conspiracy to get you, some anonymous faggot?

>>26921

>y-y-yea well you're r-r-r-retarded!!!

Wipe the fucking snot off your face you sniveling whelp.

>>26922

Actually, never mind, I see it.

>In a way, it is sexual, depending on your definition.

>So, again, I don't see how kids can't be good loving partners, be it in a "platonic" way or in a "romantic" way, or even a sexual one given the chance.

I agree with what he says in that post, though, so I don't really know where I'm going with this anymore. He clearly defines what he means with romantic, and acknowledges that what 'sexual' means may wary from individual to individual. Your reply to that, in >>26753, completely misses what tfw is trying to say. I'm not sure what else to say, so I'm gonna stop.

>>26925

You're wasting your time talking to someone who is clearly a paranoid schizophrenic.

>>26922

>>26925

You speak as if you know tfw, and assume that your account is true, but what more standing do your claims have over mine? You can deny it all you want, but tfw has without a doubt, mentioned his sexual relations in this thread(and in others). You're under the assumption that he has to literally say, "I stuck all 3 inches of my dick in some sweet baby pussy", before it actually counts, when the fact that he actively encourages sex and alludes to his many relationships, should be evidence enough that he's done it. Furthermore, from how he takes everything a loli does as an "attraction", I can then go on to reasonably say that he's gone in deep over cues that weren't proper consent, ie taking advantage of children.

The post you quoted wasn't even a jab at his loli rape, it was to point out that his laid back outlook on child relationships will eventually hurt him, because he's misinterpreting innocence as attraction.

Tfw wrote a terribly convoluted post filled with misinformation about relationships, incestuous cues, and parent-child fetishes, and when confronted about his unstable profile, he did not acknowledge it and just repeated what he said before. It was a terrible, overly psycho-emotional way to explain something, and just goes to show what kind of mental plane he exists on.

I don't know where you get your desire to assume the best of tfw, but if tfw really wasn't in a twist, why didn't he answer these >>26849 questions:

>>That has nothing to do with her just being a kind child, she still had a preference to be with me, and I still made her happier than anyone else.

>Let's clear up some red flags shall we. Who started the relationship? Who initiated sexual contact? Why does she have a preference to you? And what do you mean by "happy"?

Surely tfw would have just cleared that up if he hadn't raped his niece, instead of resorting to samefagging as a whiteknight to throw the discussion off like a little bitch.

>Well, I suppose my sole motivation is sex, after all. I'm a desperate motherfucker and honestly I've ostensibly no interest in an actual relationship.

And to think you had so much trust in your fellow adults. Replace "sex" with material worth or social points, and you've got a likely profile for someone else.

>>26924

>>26926

>>y-y-yea well you're r-r-r-retarded!!!

That's exactly what you've been doing, you've run out of insults and can only helplessly toss back those that have already emotionally hurt you. Running out of insults already, you fuckwit? Did I really trash you that hard? Yes, you are retarded, retarded enough to try a cussing match thinking you could cry out of it.

>>26923

Oh god, you can't possibly make yourself look more like an idiot, now can you? In addition to misusing the word projection again, you;ve now gone on to use "objective" and "literal" wrong as well. Did you fucking finish school or are you some Euro trash ESL?

Self-hating perspective? No information? Do you not know how to read? If there's anyone "projecting" anything here, it's a little whiteknight projecting his desire to lick tfw's asshole. If you want to start some kind of cum-swallowing circlejerk, fuck off to >>>/phile/.

>>26934

>without a doubt, mentioned his sexual relations

>he didn't actually say it, i deduced it

>from how he takes everything a loli does as an "attraction"

>because he's misinterpreting innocence as attraction.

>>26791

>They may not have a sexual attraction, a "genuine" one at least, however, they can still love you and be attracted to who you are as a person/alien/pedo.

>Tfw wrote a terribly convoluted post filled with misinformation about relationships, incestuous cues, and parent-child fetishes

Cite, please, god damnit, cite.

>why didn't he answer these questions:

Because those are awful questions. The answers are obvious. He started the relationship; nobody initiated sexual contact; she has a preference for him because he's nice to her, and by happy he means excessive amounts of daily squirting orgasms.

>>26926

No matter who it is directed at, I don't think it's a good idea to jump to conclusions about people's characters. It still serves nothing other than possibly being used as an insult. That said, you're probably absolutely right about this being a waste of time. I guess the branch of our discussion that has to do with pursuing adult relationships is the only bit that's even on-topic, too.

>And to think you had so much trust in your fellow adults. Replace "sex" with material worth or social points, and you've got a likely profile for someone else.

I don't think I'm a bad person, or a superficial or otherwise unpleasant person, for wanting sex. People are more complex than a raging desire for sex, material worth and social points. I can't know squat about your social life or the experiences you've had, but you make it sound like all adults are awful, which simply can't be true considering how different people are.

>>26676

Of course you are pedo. Loli is like a beautiful flower. You will enjoy the scent.

>>26936

>>he didn't actually say it, i deduced it

Do you need water to jump out and tell you it's wet? You even acknowledged that he mentioned taking sexual cues here >>26925. That's literal proof, and if you've seen enough of his past conversations you'd recognise his sexual innuendos disguised with "child-talk". I could ask you for evidence proving tfw's been innocent, but could you take that burden of proof? Or will you continue demanding unreasonable amounts of evidence?

>>They may not have a sexual attraction, a "genuine" one at least, however, they can still love you and be attracted to who you are as a person/alien/pedo.

>may not

>sexual

I replied to that sentence explaining that any attraction whatsoever is likely to be mistaken, including romantic attractions, I did not limit my definition to sexual attractions. Also not that he says "may not", meaning that he believes that there is a likelihood that they do give off sexual attraction, showing that he truly is deluded.

>Cite, please, god damnit, cite.

>>Depending on your relationship and how you know her, she very well may sleep with you sometimes, or you sleep with her. Sure, it likely won't be every day, as she isn't literally your daughter, and thus you won't be around for her to cuddle.

incestous tones, coercive activity

>>Of course they may stop being so cuddly, as it's considered inappropriate around that age and childish, and generally, people that age don't want to cuddle.

talking as if he was an expert on bodily contact norms, speaking of kids as mere cuddle tools

>>It's because she grew up and she may have been easier for the public to influence and pressure her into behaviors, or she simply has grown out of them due to preferring other things. She still loved me.

blaming society for his misgivings, letting slip that his relationship is rockier than it seems

And there's more, tfw is a real piece of work, but he wants to pretend he's one of the "better" pedos.

Unlike this chucklefuck here with the projection fetish >>26923 >>26924 >>26926 , I'm not honour bound defending some abusive nutcase without reason, tfw just posts some really stupid stuff.

>Because those are awful questions. The answers are obvious.

If they were so obvious, then why did tfw pussy out to his whiteknights? Why are you answering these questions for him? The insecure little guy could have done a good deal, not looking like he's reeling from regularly raping his niece.

>I don't think I'm a bad person, or a superficial or otherwise unpleasant person, for wanting sex.

Not until you find a manipulative angle to acquire sex that is. Which you were all for, a couple posts back. Tell me, what's stopping you right now from indulging in adult women?

>which simply can't be true considering how different people are.

What's the basis here for assuming that people are inherently different? Beyond the culture and the ethnicities, you'll find this facade based pattern wherever you go.

>>26939

But if you don't acquire the scent properly, the flower wilts away, and sometimes poisons you as well.

>>26923

And you have all the information? Are you admitting that you're close to tfw, that you have a reason to shill for him? What the fuck are you talking about? Tfw's talked about his rape attempts multiple times, the only one projecting here is you.

You know, let's pretend you're not Aryan Lolicon, that you're not a butthurt underaged rapist. Is that any justification for typing like a literal braindead retard? Is that any justification for getting assmad enough to cry about "muh projections" when a lowlife like tfw get's called out for his bullshit?

TFW GIVES SPECIAL TREATMENT TO CERTAIN POSTERS, CALLS ON THEM TO WHITEKNIGHT FOR HIM

>>26941

>What's the basis here for assuming that people are inherently different?

My own meandering experience. I'm sorry if you really believe that you can boil all adult behavior down to superfluous and unpleasant patterns of manipulation and crappy motives…

>Not until you find a manipulative angle to acquire sex that is. Which you were all for, a couple posts back.

Was I? What's stopping me is that I'm shy and don't have a very large social circle of adults, but this will change quite soon and I hope to make some friends and whatever else happens naturally. I'm not prepared to, or I believe capable of, manipulating people to acquire sex - depending of course on your definition of manipulation.

What I'm prepared to do is just act like I normally do, talk to as many people I can and try to talk more to the people I like. Hopefully, something will come of that.

>he believes that there is a likelihood that they do give off sexual attraction, showing that he truly is deluded.

Wait, so are you saying it is entirely impossible for a child to feel and express sexual feelings toward an adult?

>>26946

> I'm sorry if you really believe that you can boil all adult behavior down to superfluous and unpleasant patterns of manipulation and crappy motives…

Take it from me, when push comes to shove, the cynic wins the day. If you ever get duped, I warned you.

>Wait, so are you saying it is entirely impossible for a child to feel and express sexual feelings toward an adult?

From my experience, that is true, though the children I have communicated with were all on the lower end of the scale, from around 5-8. Nothing a child says is truly sexual, even if they were to ask to see your genitals, it's out of pure curiosity, and the child won't make a sexual connection unless you explain it to them. Romantic affections are possible, but genuine ones are very rare, most are fad-like and disappear over some days, like interest in a new toy. Most times a pedo thinks a girl "loves" him, he's really mistaking friendship for romance.

>Was I?

Sort off, you had a half-hearted agenda. But that's in line with what I said, adults(and teens) have the capability to deceive, but not necessarily the experience to pull it off, just as you can think it up, but might not be ready to try it out.

>What I'm prepared to do is just act like I normally do, talk to as many people I can and try to talk more to the people I like. Hopefully, something will come of that.

It's really just using the assets you were born with. If you don't have the looks or the height, you'll lose out. Lifting helps if you're not short, but you'll have to get maximum gains before it can completely override a really bad face. The rest is just keeping a girl interested while pushing her towards intimate situations. Aim for girls equal or lower tier than you, and good luck.

>>26946

There's no point trying to talk to deranged psychotic lunatics, Tick.

>>26948

Subhuman ESL please go. Who knows how many dictionaries you had to flip through to scrape up those 3 pitiful words.

>>26953

>Did I strike a nerve?

>>26960

>4 straight posts copypasting insults

>thinks this makes him seem clever

Every time you do this, you're just giving me a free jab at you. How does it feel to helplessly put yourself out to be trashed over and over? You've come to enjoy the humiliation, now haven't you?

>>26963

>sages while making deliriously butthurt shitposts

>anyone but you has been humiliated

The guy who typed "how many dictionaries you used" wants tell tell other people about what's clever…. not to mention the single most laughably pathetic delusional lunatic on younglove thinks he's giving jabs.

Gracious, what a treat we have been given on this day. God I love this.

>>26970

>being a mentally unsound rapist with parent issues

>anything close to calling out common imageboard behaviour

Funny how my picture got spoilered when you showed up, tfw

>incomprehensible

So all those jabs at your English incompetence really hit the mark, eh?

>paranoid psychopath

You've used these words atleast thrice each, whats next? "butthurt"? "autist"? You're just desperately trying to get the last response, so you can pretend you "won" something right?

>having a full on mental breakdown

Let's not forget

>>Gracious, what a treat we have been given on this day. God I love this.

To think that an adult person was tormented to such a mental state that he actually used, "Thanks for dominating me and giving me the anal destruction that I love", as an insult.

I deserve a pat on the back, I've outdid myself today.

>>26960

>>26963

>>26965

>>26967

>>26970

>>26971

>Aryan Lolicon being shit at insults

>Aryan Lolicon getting btfo

What else is new?

>>26953

>subhuman

reminder that subhuman is one of Aryan Lolicon's buzz words, and using it lowers yourself to his hypocritical child rapist level