>>27273
>Because these images can be indistinguishable from that found in games/and movies, and sharing of them does not bring you to the level of a murderer.
I never said it did. I said it's still bad.
Even violent video games are something a good person wouldn't play, but no one is that good, so no one really minds if you do, precisely because it's nowhere near on the same level as what we are talking about.
>I'm not seeing you make a case for celebrity leaks. I expected you to tack on the morally ambiguous example, just as many others "muh CP" moralshits have.
So you wanted to chide me for something, and when I didn't do that something you try to chide me for it anyways? Do you see how fucking pathetic and facetious that makes you look? I don't need to talk about j-law or whoever because I can talk directly about the subject, as you'll see below.
>to which she would never actually know who or exactly how many
Why is that relevant to her suffering? If you embarrass yourself on live tv, do you need to know the names of every single person who laughed at you ion their living room to feel hugely embarrassed? if i took a picture of you masturbating to your CP and sent it the police, would you need to know the names of every cop who saw it to feel tremendously nervous that police can see your face?
>these people now take the full brunt of the moral burden of sharing those images in the first place
The emotional burden? Yes absolutely, because they star in it, you cowardly tool.
>A paranoia that would not go away or change no matter how many people stop fapping.
It would lessen dramatically if they had the assurance of how difficult it was to get away with jacking off to it. That also is zero justification for you to fap to it and goes back to what I said precisely.
>So you think piracy is wrong as well?
Yes. People asked you to pay for their product, and you took it anyways without paying. "well the piracy doesn't account for ALL lost sales" is the most utterly pathetic and retarded attempt at a point you could have made.
But we aren't talking about piracy, we're talking about sharing of private media that the subject did not agree to share. People have a certain expectation of privacy that is honored by law. Even if it's just a picture of me opening a xmas present in the living room, I reserve the legal right to my own likeness and the ability to tell anyone who shares that image to cease.
>Fucking hilarious coming from a guy who thinks NN modeling is acceptable. Do you honestly think the level of coercion is any different?
Yes, because we have actual children's testimonies. So yes, I literally know for a fact what the industry is like, because we have actual first hand reports.
Some modeling puts undue pressure on the models, and those models speak out about it. That's how we know.
We also have first hand reports on being a victim of CP, funnily enough, and that's how I can back up what I've said about how the victims feel. Unlike you, who has nothing but pathetic attempts at self-justification which ironically enough only serves to show how you care more about jacking off than about children themselves, which proves most of what antis say about you 100%.
The rest of your post is mindless embarrassingly pathetic and empty accusations and I am satisfied knowing how much pain and misery you must be enforcing on yourself to spew such impotently idiotic projecting filth on an anonymous imageboard every single day, just so you can look at yourself in the mirror in the morning and not want to kill yourself. You'll say and believe anything to not have to come to terms with just what subhuman filth you really are, and that says everything on its own.
I can neither add to nor lessen the pain and anxiety you obviously feel every single moment.
>>27277
Like this post right here.