[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

Keep it clean and legal. Thanks.

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next Beta period has started, click here for info or go directly to beta.8ch.net
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


If you have any complaints or just feel like chatting, we share an IRC with /loli/ at (#8chan-/loli/ @ irc.rizon.net). Come by anytime~

File: 1447723060595.jpg (15.94 KB, 480x480, 1:1, 1926671_1680412298912032_1….jpg)

 No.29070

I'm writing a peper for a university project. Basically it's 'the darknet is an awesome thing and states should not fuck with it'. The three major shit on the darnet is drugs, cyberterrorism (or IRL terrorism/weapons) and CP. I have enough sources for the first two, but I'd like to have some good sources on why CP should be legal.

I don't care, you can use Tor sources (as long as its not *actual CP). Tor sites (and stuff here and wherever else) would be a good 'primary source'.

And no, I won' be V& for writing a paper saying 'CP should be legal'.

 No.29098

A simple question from Doug Stanhope and a few related ones from me: Why is CP the only crime it's illegal to view caught on video when every other crime caught on video (or in pictures) becomes a hit TV show, movie, or video game?

Should second- or third-hand witnesses be treated the same as (or in many cases far worse) those committing physical acts?

Prohibition has failed time and time again in various forms, so why is selective prohibition still so common?

You probably already have plenty of evidence on how making something illegal doesn't directly decrease crime rates. My biggest suggestions would be to remain entirely unbiased and let actual stats make your case rather than opinions or sources that can't be verified.

And if you haven't already, check out Moral Panic by Philip Jenkins and Harmful to Minors by Judith Levine. They're slightly out of date (meaning pre-Tor) but still great reads.


 No.29134

1.

Because it provides an outlet for pedophiles and causes lower rates of sexual contact with minors

http://phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html

2.

Because children now have cameras and are sexting like the horny monkeys that they are and we cannot criminalize children / minors

https://archive.is/G1YAO

Nor, can we realistically upon minors as a protected class, because reasons.

http://mjlr.org/2014/10/27/sexting-prosecutions-minors-as-a-protected-class-from-child-pornography-charges/

3.

Because CP is becoming so prevalent, and there are so many consumers - in addition to the producers, the minors themselves, that CP cannot be prosecuted and therefore becomes arbitrary, also plantable and a source of extortion.

www.presstv.com/detail/2014/10/21/383015/uk-pedophiles-too-many-to-prosecute/

Later point BTW would be fun to do to moral-fags - had I any such material that might be illegal in my jurisdiction.


 No.29135

>>29134

4.

Also because minors are hawt and prohibiting CP is effectively tantamount to moralistic thoughtpolicing which is retarded and abused to suppress people and justify a surveillance state

5.

Because we ARE thinking of the children and they deserve sexual liberation and porn of same age people too


 No.29136

>>29129

>Cp should not be made legal. Anyone who even says that should be shot in the face and left for dead. Kill yourself op.

Anyone who calls for the death of others for being more informed, reflected, and intellectual than themselves, and therefore having different opinions than their pathetic lowest common denominator of the masses horse-brand opinions, should be denied access to watching television or mass media and sentenced to reading at least one book a week on human psychology, sexology, the development of laws on sexuality and morals, and be required to pass a test each and every week if they wanted their chastety belt removed and be given access to playing with their tiny dicks.

Oh and they should be forced to watch eleven year girls masterbate and be woken up to the sound of their moaning and whimpering in orgasms each and every week until they were rehabilitated.


 No.29155

People aat your university are going to know you rape babys. So you could be the victim of a hate crime.


 No.29157

>>29152

>What about the hurt core cp? You know that is on the rise right?

Haven't your insight into hurt core cp, I do however know that when you outlaw cp, the only places having cp will have all kinds of cp.

Which is another shot in the foot of your wooden legs of work-eaten logic.

Now, on the other hand, were cp legal one could easily put up sites where there were more effective filters, created by the lea's, to weed out just that material that you do not like.

Dramatically reducing it's propagation and such.

Also, I have heard that pedos have standards too, such as what girlsHUB is alleged to have as rules: "None under four, no hurtcore, no visibly / audibly distressed child".

But, I haven't been following this as well as you no doubt have up in your deluded mind.

Also, you do realize that when you ask people to kill yourself over the internet, you come across as not only overly hatefull and unreasonable, but you also have obvious social adaptibility issues - as well as some mental ones.

What, do you think you can make people kill themselves by saying that YOU - especially being an ignorant idiot - think that they should?

Or are you motivating them to go out and rape and kill a child because when you are othering people like that, they see you as sub-human yourself and if a child grew up to become such a failed adult as you perhaps it would serve no better purpose than a receptable for semen before it were put down, out of its misery.

So in conclusion, fuck you, but have a nice day.

And do try to follow your thoughts through to their logical conclusion, there's more than your navel-gazing, hatefull pathos argumentation in this world.

(finally, if I ever meet a person such as you in real life, I'll befriend you and plant CP on your computer and turn you in to the police, just to make you grow up and think a little)


 No.29158

>>29152

>You know that is on the rise right?

...and how exactly would you know that?


 No.29167

>>29155

OP here, I'm already an edgemaster so fuck it.

>>29134

>>29135

Thanks. I'll try to phrase that in a better formating, but I had arguments along that line.

Also, sorry for the misleading thing, but this paper is about the darknet in total. But I can't lie and ignore all the CP discussions, etc on the darknet so this is a subsection of darknet discussions.

(small) sample of the paper: http://pasted.co/984050e8


 No.29168


 No.29173

>>29167

>>29168

Sounds interesting.

Glad to be of some assistance.

If you'd like me to partticipate further, let me know and I can set up a throw-away mail.

Also you may wish to get a minimum 8 GiB USB-stick and install TAILS on it, if you wish to use darknets in an investigative capacity.

https://tails.boum.org/download/index.en.html


 No.29182

>>29173

Unfortunately, interviewing users personally is not allowed under this project. I still will be cool with using you for a source (this i for more personal questions, i.e. if I do grad school and use something related to the darknet as a topic).

Also, I would rather not write about incriminating shit in a paper ("oh I downloaded all this CP its not bad XD") Just as I'm not going to write "Oh I bought 2 kg of chronic off a site, and it's perfectly ok!"). But using second-hand sources (i.e. that 'my life in child porn ' guy, or a vice article on the darknet, or a tor website about those topics which is legal to browse would be ok).

Trying to not get V& and all that. But the prof (an SJW) apparently took an interview from a ED admin and whatnot, and was ok with that.


 No.29191

>>29168

Whenever I hear about prevention (of crimes like rape and molestation) and treatment (of known deviants) most people always seem entirely against the idea of letting anyone look at images in the privacy of their own home, even if it was the most effective solution.

From my own experience and countless stories I've heard, porn can and will make you bored and lazy, and most women and girls might not look as desirable IRL, but porn generally doesn't lead to forceful sexual acts or violence, least of all against children. If it did there'd be bodies everywhere. The fact that there aren't is a good thing that needs to be pointed out.


 No.29192

>>29179

Do people look at fans of Human Centipede or the Saw movies the same way? I think most parents would prefer that those who have abnormal sexual attractions stay home and vent their evil energies looking at a computer screen instead of going out even looking at one of their kids.


 No.29199

So let's see here, Mr. Law Enforcement Officer.

Your PSYOP went from: "let's trawl for who is of the opinion that CP should be legal in the hopes of catching some fishies that we can reel in for further PSYOP-training".

To: "I'm like totally a rad kid like you channer guys", and "hey don't be afraid I don't need any identifying information I was just wondering if you could set me up for further contact so that I can PSYOP this shit for my training and also maybe catch me some fishies", and finally "hey you know any good sites"?

Nice try. I'm not so familiar with PSYOPS myself, but I guess it was an inevitability once the posts about TAILS and Qubes OS start being registered.

You guys do so much have a hard on for freedom and liberty of information inherent in unbreakable encryption, don't you?

Even calling on your jew friends to take down protonmail.ch - temporarily…

Well, enjoy your field experience in PSYOPs, good talking to you, it adds to my experiences in dealing with you scum of the earth piggies.


 No.29202

>>29199

>let's trawl for who is of the opinion that CP should be legal in the hopes of catching some fishies

uhh buddy you're already posting on a pedophilia board, they already have enough to know you're probably a pedophile who probably looks at cp

>it adds to my experiences in dealing with you scum of the earth piggies.

maybe you'll get the experience of finding out why it's a bad idea to taunt people with the power to completely fuck you over like the most braindead arrogant autist on earth.


 No.29207

this anon sounds like a pedo pretending to be an idiotic raving lunatic to make antis look bad


 No.29211

>>29207

SHUT UP YOUR COMMENT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. HOW CAN WE GET RIGHTS OF WR CONDONE CP? I'VE SEEN HURTCORE IT IS CRUEL. I WANT EQUAL RIGHTS AND NOT TO BE SEEN AS A CHILD RAPIST LIKE THOSE OF YOU WHI APPROVE OF CP.


 No.29228

>>29211

>I WANT EQUAL RIGHTS AND NOT TO BE SEEN AS A CHILD RAPIST LIKE THOSE OF YOU WHI APPROVE OF CP.

Says the rabid anon who's apparently viewed CP enough to come across hurtcore.


 No.29235

>>29228

ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED???? I SAY I DON'T WATCH. I HAVE READ WHAT YOU BABY RAPIST WATCH!!! YOU ARE DISGUSTING TO APPPROVE OF BABY RAPISTS HIRYIJG CHILDREN. YOU ALL SHOULD DIE. WHY ARE YOU FINE WITH CHILDREN BEING ABUSED??? YOU ARE A SICK HUMAN BEING TO THINK IT IS A RIGHT TO ABUSE CHILDREN. KILL YOURSELF.


 No.29253

Anyone who picks that as a topic to write about is probably a C or D student.


 No.29284

>>29199

OP here, im not LEA and im still working on the damn paper. Think I'm lying, here's the section (draft) im sure you all mainly care about. Also, saying 'CP should be legal' isn't a LEA op, Richard Fakvinge said the same shit himself.

http://pasted.co/8c920a0e


 No.29288

>>29284

> Richard Fakvinge said the same shit himself.

Hm. Well now. And you have met Falkvinge, at some point?


 No.29289

>>29284

In any event, either get yourself a proper email-account (protonmail.ch or sigaint), do the P/GPG-dance or get ignored.


 No.29308

>>29284

The main thing I've taken from the modern safety hysteria that resulted in this shit is that the harder you clamp down on persecuting the consumption of any form of media, the more of a forbidden fruit it will become to the general populace; whether they even like the taste or not.

Good luck, OP.


 No.29325

>>29308

Get off your computer and go to the real world nerd. The general population would kill pedophiles or producers of cp you idiot. The general population is disgusted by it. Idiot.


 No.29326

>>29325

The "general population" has never ever in the history of mankind contributed or produced anything of value to the progress of humanity, so fuck that noise.


 No.29331

>>29325

The real is world is full of computers, chum.

More people know about the deep web now than ever, so they'll hoard knowledge the way humans always end up doing.

Disgusting? These are the types of people who will watch a woman vomit shit into another girls mouth, they don't care if it's disgusting; they just want to see what all the fuss is about.


 No.29333

Not all countries and beliefs find the pleasuring of another human to be an offense. It is only often in strong social influence, that the "do as I say, not as I do", and pretending to agree to things because others believe that is something that may be a source of conflict, is this even an issue. (Which is most political bullshit countries, who thrive off of misinformation.)

Why keep it? Well, if only for the fact that others know it is "A reality that can happen", or "So others can relate", but mostly to learn and control, as desired, as humanity spent thousands of years trying to do, through education of "reality", of which, this is, as is, the reality of murder and death and rape and theft and drugs and general abuse and obviously sex for pleasure as well as this fictitious thing called love (Which is a romanticized illusion per individual, sustained for the benefit of personal gains by another. Love = I want that, this moment, a lot, and may kill to get it or keep it, even if it kills me, unless I find something better to want tomorrow.)

The internet is nothing more than a giant library of information. Something all nations support, though some only allow "censored" information to be available in what they "pay to share", the internet is paid for by us, not them. It is our library and should be allowed to be stocked with information we find relevant to share and discover, for whatever reason.

This is not some freedom of information crap, this is "you don't have to understand, but don't interfere", stuff that goes hand in hand with "you don't own this fucking world, no-one does".

Those who wish not to inform others in their society should remain within walls, censoring the food they feed their slaves. They should not be crawling out of those walls, telling others what to do, who they have no actual care about, or interest in, other than disrupting their lives, for personal bullshit karma.

That is how all wars start. All of them. That is how humanity retards itself, causing eminent demise and devolution, instead of contributing towards its constant expansion, awareness, understanding and evolution.

Don't be part of the pack who keeps humanity, including kids, dumb in the dark, then bitch about them not having the knowledge and information they need to live and love.

That is why nothing should be illegal, but why everything should be regulated. (Regulated = existing in a safe environment, where reduction of harm can actually be assisted. As opposed to being illegal through prohibition, which does nothing but encourage and cause harm to those involved, on both sides of the fence.)

Murder isn't "illegal"… We have wars all the time. We kill prisoners. We kill each other accidentally without reprimand, allowing many crimes of compassion and love… That is "regulation". (Which still needs work.)

We allow rape and prostitution, it's called marriage. Many wives don't want sex, or husbands, but have no real defense for denial in a marriage. They are not told that they can "say no", and thus, don't… and when said, it is rarely ever enforced legally.

Rape a "minor", get life… rape an adult, get a few years, maybe, if she was even able to identify you, or alive, or wasn't blitzed out of her mind on drugs and alcohol, and a nympho-maniac… That is degrading to adults, and sending a wrong message to children… once you are an adult, you are just fucked, enjoy your suppression of sexuality under the protection of ignorance, then fuck-it, you're 18 now… go get raped! (Oh yea, that's what people do in bars, parties, anyplace you are caught off guard, and acting over-sexed, like we made you to be… by starving you of sex… Welcome to child safety!)


 No.29360

>>29347

either my browser's bugging out or somebody got this hot head outta here.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]