Virped being suggested by research facilities

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 1 per post.

File: 1456033531260.png (46.34 KB, 240x240, 1:1, ClipboardImage.png)

Virped being suggested by research facilities Anonymous 02/21/16 (Sun) 05:45:29 No.30377

So I just took an anonymous survey for some research center and they concluded it with check out virtuous pedophiles website.

I have not signed up yet but I have heard some serious pro contact stuff from Todd Nickerson. Idk who this guy is but he's notoriously used virped.

Youre the experts /younglove/. Whats the truth about this discussion group? And how much of it is pro contact? Because if it is too much I may tell that to the research center that I just talked to.

Anonymous 02/21/16 (Sun) 17:42:16 No.30381

Link to survey?

Also, I don't think he is pro-contact. I know he used to post on girlchat, and girlchat leans that way, but people do change their opinions over time. I signed up for VP to read the forum a long time ago and they are pretty against everything fun, even lolicon.

Anonymous 02/22/16 (Mon) 00:36:33 No.30389

I've never been really clear on what pro-contact means. If it means sexual contact, then he is not, and virped as a whole is very anti-contact. If it means any contact at all, even non-sexual, then I'm not sure. Virped doesn't seem to be against regular, non-sexual interactions or platonic relationships. I could be wrong about that, but that's the impression I've gotten.

Of course, that is way too much for normies, and not enough for the people who want pedophilia normalized tomorrow, so they kinda get shit on by both sides, and understandably so. I can respect the opinion that all sexual contact with kids is bad, even if I don't agree with it, but to believe that all a pedophile's interaction with kids is dangerous is retarded, and for a pedo to hold that is just a mind-numbing level of cuckoldry and self-loathing.