>>10104 might be an idiot/troll, yet others might still find this post useful. so I might as well post it
>zoos are sick and sad people.
that's an assertion not a fact. sad? absolutely not. sick? probably not. many psychologists already
view zoosexuality as a regular (and thus normal) occurring form of sexuality.
its not even classified as a mental disorder in the DSM (anymore).
>can't you just fuck your girlfriend?
zoophiles do fuck their girlfriends, its just that they are not of the same species. oh, and before
you make the argument that "zoophiles cant get with humans (as they are antisocial/ugly)" oh wait, you already did
then please know that plenty of zoos aren't zooexclusive and do have humans partners. and before you make the argument
that "its just an easier (sexual) outlet (to fuck an animal) then to fuck a human", then consider that using body language
to have a full grown stallion pound you (and not die) is much harder than using words (lies) to get a girl into bed.
never mind all the people who have exotic partners such as bears, wolfs or lions. keeping a relationship ("for sexual outlet")
is much harder with those species than with humans.
>Human's dick is not made for other holes
a) implying that there is a purpose to evolution/life/penis and that we have a creator who gave the penis special purposes.
b) the penis was not designed to be masturbated by your hands, or go into the mouth or anus.
which is known as sodomy (homosexuality is also sodomy). the penis is only "designed" for the vagina...
>we make them happy and stuff doesn't work on me
why not? at least zoos are not making them sad or making them dead like hunters and the animal agricultural industry do :P
>stop pulling out hunters as an analogy just because you don't know what to say.
stop telling me what analogies I can use in a debate simply because you don't know how to refute it.
>I'm pretty sure that if those poor beasts could talk they would say that they don't like it.
a) they can talk, you (apparently) just can't listen. besides, having an orgasm is a pretty clear sign of happiness.
b) they complain about getting killed, getting held in small cages, tortured by the animal agricultural industry, etc
no one seems to care, but fuck one and your enemy #1
also, you can't get a guy hard, having him mount you, and bring him to orgasm if he does not like it...
>Abusing them just because you're horny?
its more like the animals are abusing the zoos when they are horny. Only difference is zoos don't chop their balls off
to control their sexuality. zoos let them experiment with it to their hearts contempt. most of the time anyways.
that awkward family dinner being the exception :)
>this crime (sodomy)
sodomy is not immoral, nor is it a crime in all places. sodomy is slowly loosing its stigmatism, first the oral, then the anal,
then the homosexual and now zoosexuality is receiving more and more scientific attention.
>so i can rip the shit out of you.
aha, your true personality is thus revealed.
>>10145
>a true defense for your horrendous acts.
how is this a horrendous act? you walk in here and make claims, so the burden of proof (its sick, sad, horrendous, etc) is on YOU.
no position needs to be defended until it is attacked. Yet, all arguments of attack against zoosexuality fail at one point or the other.
I have yet to encounter an argument that is at least half good.