/zoo/ - Zoophilia

I've only these links.

http://nhentai.net/tag/bestiality/

http://www.hentaibedta.net/tag/beastiality/

>>10492

I have to vent about one particular furry site. You might think it's well and good that they block people for "creepy comments" and admitting to real-life bestiality.

But they have the most explicit drawn works in the galaxy, with many humans having sex with animals, including some animals that don't exist.

They also have baby fucking.

But if you say you would like to taste some female depicted there, they block you.

What the fuck?

Too many furries are half-ass and will turn you in to the law if you do what they would like to have the nads to do. But they depict baby fucking, babies being fucked by animals.

>>10493

They also block people for admitting to real-life pedophilia, as well as going into explicit detail what they do or would like to do with real-life partners, humans, and what not, so what's your point?

No one needs to know that you're fucking your dog or what you want to do with said dog. No one needs to know that you're fucking your boyfriend or what you want to do with said boyfriend.

No one needs to know that you're an socially-awkward pervert in the same right.

You want to ''taste' some female depicted there'? That's as creepy to me reading it now AS a zoophile as it probably is to those who aren't. Have some class, mate.

>>>/beast/

>>10496

I don't care about your kind of "class." It's just that it's hypocritical to complain about "creepy comments" when they depict pedophilia.

>>10513

Seriously? You actually said that it was not "classy" to mention wanting to lick out a female furry or beast that someone drew? They depict these females shoving WATERMELONS up their asses and all kinds of gross things. But it's not "classy" to want to lick out a tigress pictured there or here?

Got news. For one thing, this isn't the place to find that kind of "class" and I don't want it. For another, that kind of "class" is a neurotic suppression of genuine appreciation for what I see as a very good thing, licking out non-human females, or males.

Do you have the whole comic you posted in the OP?

>>10522

I didn't post it, but you can find it by Googling KTQ48

>>10515

Oh it's fine to have desires and all it's when you phrase it like someone with absolute social ineptitude that it begins to freak people out - you know, 'creepy comments'?

Also I wasn't talking about here, but the website anon was referencing. This place is an all-out royale whereas the former actually has identifying handles. Which is pretty much why I'm saying anything at all, because god forbid a dissenting opinion exist within the zoophile 'community'.

But as for your actual point, there is a distinction between what an artist is paid to do and what a private entity expresses to represent their own self. I do agree, however, that that particular example is somewhat.. unique.

But yeah, anon was talking about creepy comments and admitting to zoophilia is pretty creepy. Especially on a site where it isn't focused on it. Not sure if you'd understand that given how you just stated eating out a dog is a 'very good thing' - as if not doing so is bad? That's exactly the type of creepy vibe I'm talking about, and the one which you're putting off oh-so-readily.

>>10526

That "vibe" is one of life's greatest pleasures.

>>10529

The furry artists can do some amazing work, but some of them are just passive-aggressive little bitches, showing off sex, just pure FUCK, then whining if someone faps to it.