No.2189
I had an sjw actually make a pretty compelling point. We use animals for food, labor, protection, and various other services, it shouldn't be so taboo to use them for sex as well.
As somebody with conservative leanings, I found the idea pretty fucked up, but logically it is consistent and frankly, I eat copious amounts of meat, I've ridden horses, and enjoyed various other activities involving the exploitation of animals, so I don't think I can remain morally consistent by turning around and saying it is morally wrong for a woman to get rutted her livestock or a guy to suck a dog dick.
I can even see the appeal of trying something exotic like that and while I'm still on the fence about someone penetrating an animal, most of the creatures seem like they're enjoying it or at worst unamused.
How do you try something like this out or find out more about this? Is there a collection of reliable information of doing this as safely as possible?
>pic somewhat related
No.2192
Usually people counter saying sex with animals is not an essential human need as opposed to say eating them. Then vegans chime in, following by people who claim veganism is dangerous and vegetarianism leads to poor health, etc etc.
No.2194
Although I personally don't see anything wrong with it myself (not that do it due to it being illegal), I suppose you could say that animals are on a different level to humans, I mean we don't eat humans for food for example. I can totally see where you are coming from though.
No.2196
>>2194Humans aren't consumed because there are better options that don't involve destroying members of our own species.
In times of desperation, anything is food.
No.2207
People already freaks out about sexuality, plus they think their shit smells flowers because they are higher beings than animals. Unless people calm down and consider colored people and/or homosexuals on a more toned ground, there's no way they could acceptance toward zoophilia. People are morons that expect everybody else to life by their standards. Even zoos do.
No.3139
It's nothing new, but it is a compelling point. One that causes a significant amount of cognitive dissonance for anti-zoos.
No.3144
Try being a horsefucker, OP. You can throw the morality shit to the curb when your lover is very easily capable of stomping your shit to pieces if you even begin to piss them off.
No.3146
The problem is that the typical view people have of those who have sex with animals is one where it's male farmers sticking their dicks in livestock because it's the most convenient source of pussy. People somehow view this as abuse despite all the other horrific shit humans do to other species.
Most zoos I've spoken to are either gay men or woman attracted to male animals. Most heterosexual zoophiles have more care and concern for their partners than most heterosexual men have for human women.
The fact that I allow my canine partner to mount me and some people label that as abusing and exploiting him is downright insulting. He WANTS to fuck me. I've had to push him off and tell him no far more times than I've had him inside me. All throughout the animal kingdom cross species sexual activity has been witnessed and recorded. Who hasn't had a dog hump their leg or seen an animal try to mount or be mounted by an object or animal of a different species?
No.6504
>>2192
>sex with animals is not an essential human need
watching movies is not an essential human need. lets ban hollywood.
if we make the argument on "needs" only, then we would need to ban a crapload of other stuff as well.
No.7830