No.2877
Some people have been confused by our rule regarding no animal abuse. Let me be clear: any form of animal abuse will not be tolerated on /zoo/. So not only posting images/videos, but also promoting or encouraging it is disallowed.
What does "animal abuse" mean? Any sexual acts an animal is forced into, is visibly struggling/intimidated and/or is making distress calls. Basically, non-consensual sex or rape is a no-go. And it should go without saying, but any sort of violence or harm is also banned.
If you suspect a post contains animal abuse, report it. I'll deal with it as soon as I can.
No.2883
We still need a volunteer or two.
No.2889
I am still offering to volunteer.
No.2893
I'm glad this is being made clear. I don't want to see zoosadism when I'm here.
No.2902
Bravo! And well put!
To that end I'll volunteer as well
No.2907
>>2877
what about necrozoo (sex with dead animals).
I know it sounds weird for some, but it isnt really abuse as long as the animal wasnt killed in order to fuck it. There are a lot of people into it but most of them go for roadkill or animals they killed for meat. (roadkill fucker here.)
i would like to add that it is legal in most countries, even if bestiality isnt (in law: dead animals=/=animals).
No.2909
>>2907
make your own board, dead or injured animals do not belong in /zoo/.
No.2910
>>2909
While we're being morally arbitrary, why not ban scat too?
No.2911
>>2907
BO please don't allow this shit
No.2916
>>2910
OK I am more than happy with that.
No.2917
>>2910
>something that doesn't harm animals is on the levels of something that requires animals to die
No.2918
>>2916
>>2910
I don't think so. Just hide the fucking thread. DO NOT go overboard with the rules, the board is dead enough as it is.
Make it so we have to spoiler fetish stuff of something.
Never the less, thanks for ruling this abuse out, it hurts me to see man's best friend being abused. But still, don't rule everything out.
No.2920
>>2917
So masturbating with a dead animal is abuse, even if tbe anmal is dead already (remember he was speaking of roadkill) ?
What about banging a furcoat ?
Or jizzing on a steak ?
Or stuffing a thanks giving turkey (twice)
?
I am pretty shure the dead animal doesnt mind at all.
I am not into this, but just because i dont like it does not mean it should be banned (same with scat).
This is 8chan not islam.
No.2922
>>2920
We can ban whatever the fuck we want on this board, if you want your precious freedoms go post your meatloaf rape on /b/ or create your own board. /zoo/ is for animals having a good time with humans.
No.2923
>>2922
Why don't YOU create your own board you can rule up with an iron fist. /nazizoo
Oh wait there's already at least FIVE of those dumps around. Wouldn't be too original now would it?
No.2924
>>2877
>What does "animal abuse" mean? Any sexual acts an animal is forced into,
So you're shutting down /zoo?
Come to zoocore peeps
No.2926
>>2924
You're putting a lot of effort into trolling a board that has less than one post per hour
No.2928
No.2931
>>2907
>>2910
i think scat, necro, maybe even some bdsm would be fine if each was contained in it's own thread but this shit is being posted all over the place way too much and it's causing too much drama to make that 1% happy and forcing action to be taken
No.2932
>>2931
>causing too much drama to make that 1% happy and forcing action to be taken
That's in your heads. Ignoring things on the internet is something you should know how to do, or learn. Drama is not a big deal at all. Nothing is being forced. Learn to ignore it and if it's really a problem report it.
No.2933
>>2922
I agree with this, /zoo/ should be for happy animals and happy people.
No.2935
>>2933
Maybe you'd enjoy more a forum like this over a chan board: https://forum.knotty.me
No.2936
>>2922
>/zoo/ is for animals having a good time with humans.
This man gets it.
No.2937
>>2922
>/zoo/ is for animals having a good time with humans.
/thread
No.2938
>>2936
>>2937
Easy on the samefagging.
No.2941
I've decided that necrophilia, "roadkill", et cetera won't be allowed on /zoo/. I try not to make rules based on morality, but shagging a dead animal is just plain disrespectful. I don't imagine it would be very popular here anyway, but those who are into that stuff are free to look for another board.
No.2948
>>2941
What's the difference ?
If people want it, they'll post it. It just won't be up for long.
This sticky is pretty pointless to begin with, they won't just stop posting that stuff. It already got deleted everytime it was posted before this "new" rule even existed.
No.2968
>>2941
I have a video of a living dog getting a penetrated with a sausage (obviously made out of a dead animal). does this classify as disrespectful ?
No.2970
>>2965
>>2948
>>2968
>being this mad about him not changing the status quo
No.2975
>>2970
The status quo has always been hotpockets, yes. Still, hotpockets are not a desirable state for a board. It's no major skin off my back because /horse/ is better and dogs are shit, but it's the truth.
No.2984
>>2975
>I should be able to do what I want! fug le hotpockets xD
Edgy. I take it you're one of le "halfchan" rebels? :^)
No.2987
There's now an alternate board for anyone who gives a damn:
>>>/zoophilia/
No.2988
>>2987
mods pls ban this shill
No.2989
>>2988
If I did that, I'd be violating their "free speech" :^)
I don't see where the problem is. I'm all for free speech on this board, but there's a clear difference between that and animal torture. I'm not prohibiting it because I'm not personally into it--even if I was, I'd still ban it, only because it's unpopular here. If someone wants to make a board dedicated to hurting animals, then I can't stop them. Just stop with the free speech meme.
No.2990
>>2988
Mod suggested looking into other boards ;)
Board also prohibits live animal abuse but has defined rules governing this and all topics.
Nothing more to say here.
No.2994
Right, so far you haven't fucked this up. Pretty much nothing will change but rules made clearer. Just ignore the buttbabby crying about some vegan shit and you'll be fine. The dumbest ones shout the loudest.
Needless to say though this board is pretty much dead through noones fault anyway, sadly :( No new content at all.
No.2995
>>2994
>nothing will change but rules made clearer
what are you talking about. there are no rules written excess this jumbled shit.
No.2998
What if the animal gives consent?
No.2999
>>2998
The entire reason they're able to give informed consent to sex is because there is usually no harm involved.
No.3229