/zoo/ - Zoophilia

Yeah, they don't actually use these with dogs. There is no need. A female dog in heat will let literally anything fuck her. There is also always the owner present to keep her calm if it's her first time. Additionally, most show dogs aren't actually bred traditionally; it's too dangerous and unpredictable. They use a "teaser" bitch to entice the stud to mount, then collect his semen in a tube. His sperm is analyzed, sorted, and then frozen in a liquid nitrogen vat. When the show bitch goes into heat, they inject the semen directly into her uterus via a syringe.

These things are just silly fetish material.

>>6609

> A female dog in heat will let literally anything fuck her.

Well, often. There are many anecdotes on the internet that female dogs sometimes deny male dogs when they are in heat. And if it's only because she doesn't know what's going on..

From what I have heard the people who use them are mostly breeding very aggressive dogs e.g. for dog fighting. Interestingly pitbulls and bulldogs are mentioned most often in the context.

For example here is a guy who tells you he "needs" one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FTTG2zmHeQ. The reply is the same of course: Don't force dogs to have sex if they don't want to, asshole!

The only proper reason they are used is to protect either the male or the female from each other if either one of them is aggressive. It has nothing to do with raping.

I'd love to strap a male dog to one of those and have my way with his tight hole while fondling his sheath. Fuuuuuck. consent is way overblown, this is fine.

also IRL it prevents this.

picture doesn't upload, fuck it

>>6609

>A female dog in heat will let literally anything fuck her.

Bullshit. Female reject male quite often and AI has lesser chance of pregnancy.

It's true though that this... uh... thing isn't used. Tbh, i've never seen one before.

>>6640

>Female reject male quite often

Females are "in heat" for a couple of weeks, but are only maximally fertile for at most three days. They'll may reject the male except for those days because they inherently know it's not the right time.

>AI has lesser chance of pregnancy

Dude, don't even. AI is a virtual guarantee. I've worked for literal champion dog breeders that are millionaires and who rely on it.

>>6648

>Dude, don't even. AI is a virtual guarantee. I've worked for literal champion dog breeders that are millionaires and who rely on it.

Just so you know, you look absolutely pathetic.

>>6649

Why? I only worked for them so I could get fucked by their dogs when they were out of state. It's a perfectly rational thing to do when you're a dogfucker.

>>6654

>needing to work for a dog breeder to get fucked by a dog

you are pathetic.

>>6654

Uh, i meant your post looks pathetic. With all this "champion" and "millionaires" in it. It really does.

>>6654

>I only worked for them so I could get fucked by their dogs when they were out of state.

having a job just to get fucked? wow. what is that called again?

>It's a perfectly rational thing to do when you're a dogfucker.

if you're a "dogfucker" you are a bestialist who doesn't want or can't form an emotional bond with your partner like a zoophile would.

hey, thats fine. but you're taking this thing way further than that. unless i missunderstood >>6659

>needing to work for a dog breeder to get fucked by a dog

meaning you probably don't "own" a dog.

a bestialist is atleast taking care of their "property" / "sex toy".

don't know why you don't own a dog. perhaps lack of skill or you are too lazy and just want the benefits. don't know.

and if you do have a dog... then why fuck other peoples dogs?

also... fucking a millionaires dog is very dangerous. they can afford better lawyers than the "staff" (slaves?) who work for them.

>>6662

At the time I was underage, couldn't get any other "job", and certainly couldn't afford to live in my own house or own a dog. Quite honestly, forming a "bond" was part and parcel when your sexual partner was a 150-pound intact male.

You take this shit way too seriously. Goddamn, call the fucking moral police, someone is not only breaking the law, they're doing it in a way YOU DON'T LIKE!

>>6664

>At the time I was underage, couldn't get any other "job", and certainly couldn't afford to live in my own house or own a dog.

>Quite honestly, forming a "bond" was part and parcel when your sexual partner was a 150-pound intact male.

fair enough.

>someone is not only breaking the law, they're doing it in a way YOU DON'T LIKE!

nah. i don't care what your motivations are.

i'm just sick and tired of the general public not knowing the difference between various forms of zoo.

>>6666

>i'm just sick and tired of the general public not knowing the difference between various forms of zoo

They don't care, either. Much the same with pedophiles.

>>6668

>They don't care, either. Much the same with pedophiles.

that sentence is ambiguous. can you rephrase please?

>>6670

I'm saying, just like they do with pedophiles, the general public doesn't bother separating out the people who have sex with animals with the ones who rape/torture/abuse them. They're only concerned with the "moral" wrongness of the deed, so everyone is equally bad in their eyes, whether they are causing physical harm or not.

If you tried to explain things rationally to them, they'd just say you're a dogfucker and then probably call the police. Human beings cannot be reasoned with on certain issues.

>>6698

Actually i don't think it's true. From my experience most of the normal people view sex with animals as weird fetish/perversion, but not as evil act or crime. Like, "ew dude, find a girl, jesus"

It's the vocal minority equals sexual act and torture. The same people leave all those crazy comments on youtube videos of mating animals, breeding farm animals etc. And i think it's them who are always scream "neuter your pet, you evil bastard" no matter how expensive the breed is.

>>6700

>It's the vocal minority equals sexual act and torture

You people need to stop making these generalizations because it depends HIGHLY on where you live and your surroundings, that's the #1 factor in all of this.

>>6708

goes both ways

I found these, but they aren't exactly rape racks, though they seem to be adequate to the task.

https://media.8ch.net/beast/src/1433982357022-0.jpg

https://media.8ch.net/beast/src/1433982357023-1.jpg

https://media.8ch.net/beast/src/1434154443694-4.jpg

Fucking hot. I'm going to get my sub mindbroken into accepting some dog cock.. and build a rack like that for her to be secured into.

>>6604

you're not alone, i love them too... women in breeding stands.....

furries do nothing for me ... i hate i that there is so much well drawn furrie stuff and not much real drawn beast ( or atleast alot less)

furries literally do 0 for me.. like even a turn off...

i cant be the only one :-s

>>6768

With pictures like that, you're not helping anyone keep it a fantasy.