/zoo/ - Zoophilia

Bestiality should be legal because laws against it are pointless. Existing animal cruelty laws are sufficient to protect the welfare of the animal. Anything else is designed merely to protect custom.

>>7608

But it is because it's icky. Surprise surprise.

The rules you wrote would require some kind of enforcement which would probably lead to an international zoophile register. Or something like that.

I personally would not like to have my name on there.

Once somebody decides that zoophiles are bad again and here we go, he has got a nice long list of all the people he hates. :D

>>7608

You know, I'm not convinced that current cruelty laws are sufficient. I think they should be tightened. But obviously, they should not include sex. Only forced sex /rape.

>>7606

>-Anal isn't an option

Why? Shouldn't it depend on whether the animal enjoys it?

>>7696

Because OP is a shit-eating retard and, like a child with a narrow scoped mind, designed his rules around only a singular species (canines).

>>7698

Don't get me wrong, I'm not into zoophilia myself, I'm here because I like the community. Though from a philosophical standpoint there's nothing wrong with bestiality when it's performed within certain limits.

>>7606

Gr8 subjective shitpost m8

grow up.

>>7606

>they should make bestiality legal if its just like weed, not harmful to anyone and is super pleasurable to people

agreed, but your train of thought is fallacious.

eg you don't choose your sexual orientation, but you do choose what substances you want to use to alter your state of mind.

>but there should be some strict rules when it came to bestiality

no. there should be strict rules when it comes to animal cruelty, not bestiality. this is like proposing to make rules

what two gay men are allowed to do and what not. good job religious sexual mafia.

>If your dog whines

maybe thats a moan. how to tell the difference?

>or tries to move away

part of foreplay involves running away and chasing. especially in dogs

>Anal isn't an option

why? because of its size? the anus is usually about as large as the vaginal tract. especially when not in season (for bitches)

look at the size (circumference) of dog feces, and you will realize that a human can fit rather well.

what about mares/stallions? they have a huge rectum. is anal an option for horse lovers?

>You can have sex with any medium breed or higher

depends of the breed. many smaller breeds have large enough organs.

besides, sex does not always require penetration. also, what about being "taken" by a male that is of a smaller breed?

>anything lower is either able to only give licks

or be the "top". what about manual stimulation?

>if anyone knows that you fucked a small dog breed then it is punishable

only if you hurt the dog, or you raped/forced the dog.

>You must have the dog treated good

well duh. no need for a "bestiality law". this belongs to the animal cruelty sector.

>And so on and so forth.

nope. what you have said so far is already terrible. wouldn't want any more ideas like those.

>I mean shit if people would be willing to not hurt a dog or anything and make sure the dogs enjoying it too then they should make bestiality legal

fallacious. you can't outlaw an entire concept just because some people are bad. you can't outlaw sex just because some people rape.

you can't outlaw the possession of knives, just because some people stab others. bestiality is the same. it should be legal, regardless of bad people

doing bad things to them. those are the minority, and they should be punished for animal cruelty, NOT bestiality.

>and if weed, a drug is legal then bestiality definitely should too

already covered that above.

>i hate people who hurt their dogs just to get a fuck out of it,

>that makes me fucking sick and that's what people who don't know about bestiality think we do to dogs

sure, and?

>It just pisses me off that people go to jail just for getting pleasure and not wanting a person,

fallacious. because someone might argue that is pisses them of for going to jail because of wanting (sadistic zoo) pleasure and not wanting a person.

or, going to jail for getting pleasure not wanting a living person (necro), or going to jail for getting pleasure and not wanting a mature person (pedo)

>if the dogs having fun with it too then i see no reason to not do it.

fallacious again. if the child is having fun too, then... get it? just because something might be mutually fun, is NOT a reason to legalize it.

tl;dr

it seems like you know about as much about zoophilia and animals, than a rock knows about quantum mechanics

>>7608

exactly.

>>7688

>But it is because it's icky

what is considered icky is 99.999% related to how you were raised,

and what you were told you should regard as icky. the only exceptions are

aversions (phobias) that are developed later in life.

>>7691

>which would probably lead to an international zoophile register

it might. it depends on how actively the jews zoos fight for their rights.

>Once somebody decides that zoophiles are bad again and here we go, he has got a nice long list of all the people he hates

yeah, but same with anyone who deliberately outs themselves.

>>7696

>they should not include sex. Only forced sex /rape.

say goodbye to the entire animal agricultural industry who

forces their animals to ejaculate through electric shock,

then forces the females to get pregnant (if they want to or not)

via artificial insemination.

also, animal cruelty laws should only govern... cruelty towards animals.

not if they are forced to do (or not do something).

because if you equate forcing an animal to doing something it wont like (but forcing them

to do so isn't hurting them), then forcing a dog to become a guard dog, drug dog

or simply forcing your dog to NOT bite the mail man is (according to you) bad.

fact is, sometime you have to force an animal to accept something they wont like.

forcing them should not be a criterion of whether its harmful or bad.

i agree from a zoophile perspective that rape is bad. but from a bestialistic perspective, they are

only training their dog to sit down on command hold still for a few minutes

the post title involves legalizing bestiality NOT zoo(phillic)sexuality

>>7825

right. if we allow people to 'use animals for labor, hunting, recreation,

then forbidding using them for sex is hypocritical, fallacious, and a double standard.

whether or not an animal can be used for a particular purpose should depend only

if they have to get hurt during the process. accidents, especially while running in the dog park can happen.

the only way out of this would be to forbid any for of using animals. not going to happen.