/zoo/ - Zoophilia

no, shithead

shithead, no

There's a pretty good reason you've had no luck. It would be like attempting to insert a telephone pole into a coin slot. It's not going to happen, and it's fucked up.

we don't post shit here that results in death or injury to the animal.

where is the report button?

>>7629

fuck off

You folks are assuming that a human penis would not fit inside a cat's anus...lemme ask you: wouldn't you say a kitten+placenta is at least as wide around as a penis?

>>7648

Well, go stick something as wide as a newborn baby in your anus

>>7648

>fit inside a cat's anus... wouldn't you say a kitten+placenta is at least as wide around as a penis?

implying that male cats give birth through their anus.

Love all the idiotic children here. Your IQ levels are what? 4? 5?

I've had several cats, and you can play with their ass (and if female), pussy. My old cat I got 3 fingers into her ass before, and 2 in her vulva, and yes she was neutered too.

She also loved to lap up semen. She purred as she did. But I do not advise cat tongue on penis, hurts like hell.

>>7659

A FEMALE cat pelvis is large enough to pass a kitten.

It's not true for a male.

That is so hot. Do you have that picture in a higher resolution?

If you could get three fingers in your cats ass, didn't you try to get your dick inside her?

I think this should be a legitimate topic as long as the cats aren't hurt. Cats come in a lot of sizes.

Male cats are usually, not always but usually larger than females. I've seen that males often have larger anuses than females do. It has everything to do with their builds.

If the cat is happy, I'm happy.

>>7659

>A cat's pelvic opening is large enough to pass a kitten+placenta with room to spare; ergo it's large enough to safely take in a penis.

so now you are implying that just because the "pelvic opening" is large enough, you can insert a human penis into a cat vagina/butt.

fail. just because the skeleton might be large enough to encompass a penis, does not mean that the actual organ (vagina/rectum) can do so as well.

>Math doesn't lie.

you fail at logic

>>7687

Granted, obviously a penis would not fit inside on your first try. But the anus can stretch to impressive diameters with time with training (eg, goatse, etc.); this is a trait all mammals share.

>>7684

lol Not possible. I'm 7" length and 5.5" in thickness around the middle, wouldn't fit.

And animals don't get hurt when you know what you're doing and know when they say to stop. Animals get hurt when idiots do stuff to them with no knowledge of how things work.

Takes months of training to make an animal's brain and sexual openings capable to fit a human cock, you can't just shove things in there right off the bat.

>>7704

You're likely about 2 inches wide. 5.5" is the circumference. The circumference is very roughly 3.14 times the diameter.

Me, it's damn hot but the only way I'm going to try to slip it in a cat is if it goes in easily and the cat is not doing something like squatting on it, where its weight could push it down too far before it can move away.

I don't even slip fingers in, and my tongue stays outside too. I was with one who my tongue sank into really well, but I stopped at about a fourth of an inch deep. He tried pushing back and squatting on me one time, but I wasn't as optimistic about the likely results as he was.

I've seen some pretty slack anuses on cats before.

>>7706

The circumference increases 3.14 times as fast as the diameter. One inch width equals 3.14 inches circumference, and two inches equals 6.28. Mine would be about 6.28 or slightly less.

I would suppose that if someone dilated an animal's anus by about a sixteenth of an inch per week, on the average, it would take four months for every inch. Measure the entire backside before starting, see if it's at least two and a half inches between the bones. I've certainly seen cats that are more than two inches across in that area. Many are.

>>7709

Their happiness and pleasure make me happier than anything else, even firing big loads of cum up their anuses.

>>7706

I take it he was trying to shit in your mouth?

>>7732

I was rubbing my penis under his tail while he was lying on top of me. He stood up and I felt that donut trying to slide down my cock, so I lifted him off before he could hurt himself. He loved that kind of play but we just weren't going to go that far.

>>7733

How far in did it get? That's pretty hot! Did you ever finger or rim him?

>>7739

It really didn't go in. It felt good where his fur sort of wrapped around the head. I couldn't let him impale himself with no lube and poor control over depth.

I did rim him a couple of times. Fingered him without penetration. Put the head under his tail resting against his hot pucker. He loved that.

>>7701

>the anus can stretch to impressive diameters with time with training (eg, goatse, etc.)

great. now you're proposing a body modification that would not naturally occur. this is precisely the reason

people think badly about zoosexuality. they think zoos stretch bodily orifices (so they can fit),

cut nerve endings (so the animals have no control/sensation), train/beat animals into submission, etc.

so where does the body-mod start and stop? is stretching the anus allowed so you can fit something not meant to go there?

is piercing your dog allowed? earrings? penis piercing? how about tattoos?

true zoos accept their animal friends for who they are, and wont try to modify them simply so they can get off.

>>7743

One thing that I am certain of is that this is NOT the reason why people think badly about zoosexuality. The reason why they think badly about zoosexuality is because they are ignorant assholes and proud of it.

>>7743

The "no true Scotsman" fallacy, such as "no true Scotsman ever put anything in a kitty."

It is up to the owner to decide what body modifications, if any, are appropriate. Some kind of "morality" that suggests that anyone has a right to be offended by such acts does not make a good fit for a zoosexuality board.

Sex, if it does nothing for the animal, is not my thing. I don't love doing anything with an animal who is unwilling or who doesn't love it. I felt a nice warm donut around the head of my cock because the cat loved what we were doing. I couldn't accept the offer, but the offer was made.

You can find out by fingering or probing with a tongue. I live with a cat who loves to have a tongue in her anus. She won't let me lick her vulva but she tries to make me do it to her anus. If I breath on it hot and heavy she loves that, so I don't even have to lick.

>>7751

I would really love to hear from people who have done this without injuring or causing pain to the animal. I would especially love to hear from people who the cats go back to for more loving.

>>7752

Also, because the hypothetical discussion of fucking cats in the ass is saner than any discussion of almost anything that is going on the world today. Literally, truly saner and more reasonable.

>>7749

>The reason why they think badly about zoosexuality is because they are ignorant assholes and proud of it.

and in their ignorance they are perpetuating current zoo stereotypes such as

>stretching bodily orifices (so they can fit), cut nerve endings (so the animals have no control/sensation), train/beat animals into submission (for sex)

and then someone requesting content depicting a canine scrotal piercing, feline anal stretching or other hardcore (bordering on sadism)

content is NOT helping in weakening those stereotypes. it is in fact giving ammunition to the zoophobes, making advances towards acceptance futile.

>>7743

>The "no true Scotsman" fallacy, such as "no true Scotsman ever put anything in a kitty."

you are confusing "true zoo" with "true beasty"

>It is up to the owner to decide what body modifications, if any, are appropriate.

bullshit. this would allow someone to amputate a leg, simply because the "owner" wants a three-legged pet. or take a blowtorch to the eyes, because

they have a thing for blindness and want to modify their pets body in a way to suit their liking. etc.

>Some kind of "morality" that suggests that anyone has a right to be offended by such acts does not make a good fit for a zoosexuality board.

not sure what you where trying to say there, but zoo morals is one of the (if not the) biggest aspects of zoosexuality, how to deal with it,

and getting it decriminalized. immoral treatment of animals belongs on a zoosadism board. and as far as i'm aware, this isn't (supposed to be) one.

>Sex, if it does nothing for the animal, is not my thing... I couldn't accept the offer, but the offer was made.

the offer was regarding anal contact/stimulation, not anal stretching.

>You can find out by fingering or probing with a tongue.

and even if you happen to find a cat that (somehow) consents to anal stretching, its still abusive.

in the same way consensual intercourse between an adult and minor is considered (child) abuse.

ITT: the Welsh

>>7755

>perpetuating current zoo stereotypes

who gives a shit?

>>7629

I would love to see posts from people who want to join the actual topic of this thread, please.

>>7762

People give the shits that they are told to. They don't think on their own and they are so used to being lied to that they think it's a version of the truth.

>>7769

What you do is start with what the woman likes and is comfortable with. She will stop you when she gets uncomfortable. A cat will stop you when it stops enjoying the action. That is why every move builds slowly on the ones before. In my case my tongue would have enlarged my lover and he loved my tongue or penis on him. I worried that he was slowly loosening up from very gentle contact over the years. I had reasons not to try to loosen him up.

>>7762

>who gives a shit?

anyone remotely interested in seeing antizoo laws abolished.

anyone living in fear of being outed and thus loosing their job,

or worse, treat you like matthew shepard.

anyone who hopes for public acceptance one day.

anyone wishing to be out and proud.

anyone who one day wants to walk into a church, marry a goat,

and have friends and family that are happy for the newly weds.

etc

>>7767

>I would love to see posts from people who want to join the actual topic of this thread, please.

not going to happen. what you are requesting is (in zoo communities) considered animal cruelty and abuse.

this type of content you are requesting might not even exist.

and if it did, im sure the creators wont share it (especially here) for obvious reasons.

*you need to go to RZ/AN/ZC/HZF/NZ or where ever the sadists hang out these days.*

you might have better luck there. inb4 link request. no i dont know where they are and don't have any links

>>7773

Nope.

>>7775

Pain and injury to the cat takes all of the fun out of it. Only their pleasure is any fun. Nothing I do with them will go to the point of pain or injury.

Please don't make false accusations.

>>7775

Yeah, like you know all the places but not the links? Come on...

>>7786

I'm not willing to look at anything involving deliberate infliction of pain and injury just trying to find where someone may have done the act while the cat enjoyed it. I really do think that some of the larger breeds can take it safely.

>>7775

yeah, someone posted that they actually had to break a cats pelvic bone in order to achieve penetration.

ok, granted the cat was road kill, but if you believe the guy then you realize that sex with a domestic cat is impossible.

(without it either being dead or it getting severely injured in the process)

>>7787

sure, leopards, lions and tigers are definitely capable of anal intercourse.

but you are not going to find a zoo stupid enough to post proof of their big cat relationship.

>>7786

>Yeah, like you know all the places but not the links? Come on...

i came across some of those because of google or people posting links in forums/chans.

but luckily all those places (except ZC) are all dead (thank god or what ever deity you believe in)

and anyone active here for the past few weeks or more will know where to find ZC

>>7785

>Please don't make false accusations.

i never accused you of doing anything abusive.

all i essentially said was that anyone who penetrates a (domestic) cat is being considered abusive by "zoophile" standards.

if you have to modify/change/train an animal for sex, then thats bestiality at best and zoosadism at worst.

<<7783

>Nope.

you can't just nope that away...

perhaps you don't give a shit about your rights, or how people view zoosexuality. but

>anyone wishing to be out and proud.

will disagree

>>7788

You could only know that it was impossible by actually measuring the largest breeds.

The one I was with was so big that I was afraid that I would slip in when I didn't want to or intend to. He wasn't very close to the biggest I've seen in person, or especially online, either. There is wide variation even among the same breed.

>>7796

I don't believe a one of your labels.

>>7803

>The one I was with was so big that I was afraid that I would slip in

i'm going to assume you are telling the truth. if so, then i suppose its not really abuse. but the community

and their consensus probably won't agree.

>by actually measuring the largest breeds.

>There is wide variation even among the same breed.

oh, didnt think of that

>>7805

>I don't believe a one of your labels

>I don't believe in one of your labels?

a) which one

b) why

c) its the communities label not mine

>>7809

Community consensus used to burn people at the stake, and they hated and killed people who understood the sciences. I wouldn't use it as a benchmark.

There were reasons why I stuck with never even introducing a finger, which veterinary guides actually say to do when expressing anal glands. You could know for sure who likes penetration then. I live with one who loves a tongue in there, but there are reasons why I very rarely do that.

I live with a couple of cats who do not want me to touch them back there. So I stopped rubbing them back there. One wants me to as long as it's the anus and not the vulva.

>>7818

>Community consensus used to burn people at the stake

yeah, but only because the consensus was forced upon the community by a/the church.

if the consensus happens naturally, is objective, and based on logic rather than tradition, we get

completely different standards.

>but there are reasons why I very rarely do that.

now im curious

>>7819

>yeah, but only because the consensus was >forced upon the community by a/the church.

>if the consensus happens naturally, is >objective, and based on logic rather than >tradition, we get completely different >standards.

How would we know? Neither of us has seen that in our lifetimes, just the pretense.

I very rarely even tongue out a cat because a clean anus could also attract suspicion and questions, from people who simply aren't that bright, who do not form rational opinions easily. They use my zoophilia against me. See how I remove all the identifying marks from "people"?

If someone tongues them or fingers them, they know what penetration is. Like I said, take it very slowly and do what the cat likes to do.

The cat that I am talking about would actually put his anus on my penis, and he knew what he was doing. He only got the tongue twice, and a lot of careful rubbing. The rubbing was very erotic and habit-forming for both of us.

Both from personal observation and pictures on the net, there are some almost freakishly large cats with large butts out there. Too many breeders went to making cats smaller these days, so the Siamese lost the big butt that used to be characteristic of the breed, but there are breeds out there that have large butts.

You can look at litter mates and see a wide variation just in the sizes of the butts, with any species or breed. I hate the fact that breeding for small butts is a body modification that makes birthing difficult. That hurts the females and compromises their ability to carry on the species. Large butts are a reproductive advantage. They feel good on your lap, too.

Intact males, or males that grew up intact, seem to develop larger butts than females because they are usually larger animals, not every type of cat but a lot of them are.

>>7820

>How would we know? Neither of us has seen that in our lifetimes, just the pretense.

because anything objective value is inherently better than any subjective value.

>clean anus could also attract suspicion and questions

what? you are aware how clean cats are, right? they constantly lick their ass.

>breeding for small butts is a body modification

false. selective breeding changes a species over time, and before they are born.

a body modification changes them after they are born. big difference.

>>7822

I'm not nearly as worried about what to call it as I am about the results. Easy birthing is better for a species.

forceful feline fanny fingering