[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/zoo/ - Zoophilia

A walk on the wild side

Catalog

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1449104680883.jpg (1.5 MB, 2448x3264, 3:4, 1441491801438-zoo.jpg)

 No.8051

I've got a girl that I want to fuck but I don't know where to start. Does anyone have a guide on how to fuck a female dog without hurting her?

 No.8052

Go to beastforum. They have a lot of tutorials on how to have sex with biches.


 No.8194

the fact that you have to ask means you are either a "thrill seeker", desperate for sex, or a zoonoob.

so lurk more.


 No.8206

>>8194

The fact that he asks means that he cares about his dog.


 No.8211

>>8051

Well, first questions first.

What kind of dog is she? How large? How old?

Is she intact? Has she had puppies? If she's young, how many heat cycles has she had?

What, if anything, have you tried with her? If it involves penetration, what positions are you trying in, and are you using lube?


 No.8246

Not OP, but another question, semi-related to the topic at hand:

So I have a mix breed dog, female, a little over 1 year old, little larger than a chocolate lab, who was spayed as a puppy (sad, but not my choice). Recently I've noticed she likes to hump legs, and when you move your leg up to be rubbing her vag, she REALLY likes it, but whenm I try to use my hand, she jumps away? I'm curious if there is a reason for this, a way to encourage her to let me do it, or if I should just be content with her humping my leg.


 No.8248

>>8246

That's probably dominance behavior, not sexual.


 No.8251

>>8194

>>8206

>>8211

OP here. I recently got in touch with someone who wanted advice on why his dog wasn't interested in sex. He's doing weird shit with her and I want to give him a good WikiHow-type guide on how not to abuse his dog and be a cunt.


 No.8270

>>8251

>why his dog wasn't interested in sex.

all that a "guide" can do is show how you have to do the actual deed. NOT how to get a bitch into the mood.

>He's doing weird shit with her

like what? elaborate?

>how not to abuse his dog and be a cunt.

it saddens me that some people need a guide for what should be instinct/common sense.

i'm talking about "how not to abuse" and not a guide talking about how to fuck.


 No.10154

>it saddens me that some people need a guide for what should be instinct/common sense.

Top kek, you're fucking an animal, there's nothing natural about that.

Just as with, why im here in the first place, but fuck it, as long as you're keeping this on /zoo/ and don't go on the streets with this shit i don't realy care, still it's beyond me why do you even want to fuck lesser being like dog. Like seriously guys... why the fuck?


 No.10176

>>10154

Are you just trolling or are you really that stupid?


 No.10181

>>10176

>Are you just trolling or are you really that stupid?

i'm guessing he's just stupid but i'll (take the bait and) reply anyway as I haven't countertrolled in a while either, so this could be fun

>>10170

>I hate to admit, myself being attracted to bestiality... is that it IS morally wrong,

many people think that the only reason zoosexuality is attractive is because it is a taboo and forbidden.

yet, it has been proven that people can be attracted to the animal itself (regardless if it is a taboo in their location or not).

>humans have this special thing called morals that animals don't have or fully understand,

false. you know nothing about animal cognition and studies into animal morality. animals do have morals but they lack sexual morality,

as sexual morality is a social construct that emerged out of religion (which animals don't waste their time with).

>we set a line where something is and this act, bestiality, is way over that line.

admitting that sexual moral is a social construct and man made. thus, if we simply choose to move the line it would be moral (again)?

ah, I love euthyphros dilemma. eg: did we set the line to make it immoral, or is it immoral so we set the line?

bestiality is either moral or immoral. what we think about it does not change that.

if you feel that its immoral and that is your attracting force, then you are a bestialist and not a zoophile.

this has been discussed at length in various places over plenty of years, but i'll just point it out again for completeness sake.


 No.10183

>>10154

>Top kek, you're fucking an animal, there's nothing natural about that.

First, I only said that it should be obvious (instinct/common sense) how to NOT be abusive.

I never made the claim about anything being natural or unnatural. You should read my posts better.

Second, zoophilia is one of the most natural things ever. It occurs in nature all of the time and is responsible for

a lot of the biological diversity. Including homo sapiens sapiens. Yeah I know you may not like what you read,

but its evolutionary fact that humanity is a hybrid species that resulted from many other species interbreeding.

so... without the concept of interspecies (mating) / heterospecies (intercourse) / zoosexuality, you wouldn't even be here to write about it (not being natural).

Third, humans are animals. so, if you sleep with your girlfriend you are fucking another animal. its just homospecies and not heterospecies.

>and don't go on the streets with this

Oh, but zoophiles already do that. zoopride is a thing you know. there are people formally protesting zoo bans.

>why do you even want to fuck lesser being like dog

a) zoophiles don't "fuck" they "make love". bestialist fuck, sadists torture and kill. do you eat meat?

b) dogs (animals) are not lesser beings. no life form is inherently lesser than any other. they simply evolved into different niches. next to each other,

not above or below one another. so take your shitty anthropocentrism back to your abrahamic denomination. if life forms they have managed to be alive

today, then that means they are great/efficient enough to have an uninterrupted ancestral line going back billions of years. the "lesser" animals,

if anything, are the ones that didn't make it into the present. and through global warming, humans are beginning to deselect themselves.

thus, making any animal that does not destroy the world a "higher" animal. So your question should have been "why you want to fuck higher animals".

the answers is pretty simple. they are beautiful, pristine, sexy, don't lie to you, or exploit you, or destroy the world. they are way less brutal than "man".


 No.10186

>>10181

>>10183

This guy knows what's up. Props for tearing those boobs a few new assholes.


 No.10189

Jesus christ guys, learn to pick your battles.

>>8052

Honestly fuck that, we should steal all their guides and repost them here, so people don't have to suffer beastforum.


 No.10192

>>10189

True.


 No.10203

>>10183

Please don't try to make yourself look better by labeling and libeling other animal lovers.


 No.10206

>>10203

Since when are zoosadists and bestialists considered as "animal lovers"?


 No.10207

>>10189

>Honestly fuck that, we should steal all their guides and repost them here, so people don't have to suffer beastforum.

http://pastebin.com/ZcmdfeU2

http://pastebin.com/iiv2iMC1


 No.10209

>>10179

this sort of fits here.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]