/k/ - Weapons

>>335870

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Bernthal

He's Jewish

Basically any rifle round .223 or above…

>>334221

Would steel-core 7.62tok be able to do this? I've heard it's notorious for over-penetration on unarmored target, and that even with lead-core bullets it could easily penetrate body armor that most pistol rounds couldn't.

>>335861

I fucking love Micro.

>>335862

>>335870

They got one of the guys from The Walking Dead to play him. He's Jewish, so maybe that's why he's so dark.

>>335613

and SVD missing the stock and barrel, holding one of those standard russian suppressors where the barrel would be

>>335640

Yeah the FS2000 specifically has a long and flimsy transfer bar which was more reminiscent to a reinforced coat hanger. Every other part was quality though. if they put more meat on that part and make it a tighter fit it would do wonders for the trigger pull.

>>335609

How come FN 2000 haven't took off with the Euro nations that loves bullpups? Like in the endwar games. http://endwar.wikia.com/wiki/E3000

>>335757

>pasty snaggletoothed island goblin posts crudely imagined and poorly realized pro-pedophile images he forced an Indian immigrant to make while he beat them with a can tied to a stick

>civilized people look on with dismay but little surprise

>>335464

Forgot to add, the LSAT costs less than $3600, making it cheaper than the M249 when it was first adopted.

>>334795

>tripfag

>right

choose one

>>335464

Will Trump make American small arms Great Again? Yes, i know the LSAT program bought the G11 patents, but this shit is being made here

>>335968

the surefire mags are designed by the man himself jim sulivan and are very reliable. really tall though.

>>332933

Googling "Trump Florida" tells me he got 45%. You're telling me 45% of Florida's republicans are shutin neets?

>>335847

That's a Chetnik song from Драгачевски сабор, those guys are royalists/nationalists…. not communists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chetniks

Their slogan is literally "For king and fatherland; freedom or death".

>>335873

I voted for Paul. I knew he couldn't win, but considered it best for more libertarian leaning and VP possibility if he got a greater percent of the primary.

Also Florida is Rubio's home state.

>>335847

And his name is Joe Biden.

>>333982

quite a number of people have them down here actually, most states you just need to know a station owner thats willing to let you do pest control

>>334340

>Calling me a redneck when i am actually a "Word Of Glory"

if you are so scared of funz man you really need to turn your prospective of life around go out and shoot with someone and talk about the real pressing matters of life like global warming or how you finger bashed that chick at sanctuary last night or Talk about the reasons behind why you want guns illegal not the same instant pre-disposition that these marvellous feats of human engineering are some how always going to lead to some innocent persons death, unfortunately stuff like that does happen but its not the inanimate objects fault it is the user. banning firearms makes as much sense as saying all the iron ore from the earth that made the guns needs to be banned because it can be put into a shape that can kill people and that is a retarded statement.

>>334340

>>334533

>Calling me a redneck when i am actually a "Word Of Glory"

if you are so scared of funz man you really need to turn your prospective of life around go out and shoot with someone and talk about the real pressing matters of life like global warming or how you finger bashed that chick at sanctuary last night or Talk about the reasons behind why you want guns illegal not the same instant pre-disposition that these marvellous feats of human engineering are some how always going to lead to some innocent persons death, unfortunately stuff like that does happen but its not the inanimate objects fault it is the user. banning firearms makes as much sense as saying all the iron ore from the earth that made the guns needs to be banned because it can be put into a shape that can kill people and that is a retarded statement.

see why I might have called you a retard?

soz if your actually smart doe

guns are not the problem its the people who have access them which is everyone! Even people uni understanding of physics and science or someone with a few underground connections and 50 dollarydos. guns don't chose their owners these are not wands from harry-potter m8 if you can get a knife you can get a gun it is that simple it's the 21st century not the 20th were everything could be controlled.

bump

>>335958

If you do that without posting anything people will think it's me.

>>335685

Use download it all

>>335444

>>335445

>>335447

>>335466

>>335641

I used to run a board and never saw such a setting in the setting's page.

>>335705

>>335723

It only works on /v/, /pol/ and no where else.

>>335869

Hover the mouse pointer over the original filename. See how it taunts you, and does not work.

>>335398

>And it's the right thing to do.

No it isn't.

>If your statistic is omitting some information, it's worth jack shit.

Yeah which is why I suggested a "damaged" category.

German data suffers from not enough info and Soviet data suffers from blatantly wrong data. A tank that gets towed out of mud is not destroyed.

>On the flipside, if you record every incident of tank getting penetrated, stuck, internal failures, etc., you get good breakdown about possible problems with it, you have something to work with in terms of improving the machine.

Sure, but classifying them as destroyed is not correct.

I hope you're not implying that the Germans didn't keep any records on tank maintenance.

>Part of the reason Germans did so poorly in WW2 is dishonest statistics reporting, they deluded themselves into thinking they're some unstoppable war machine.

No, it wasn't that fact that Germany was up against an alliance with multiple times the industrial capacity, it must be that Germans are all delusional liars!

Come on now.

>>335403

Well if you read the papers they exceedingly rarely write "destroyed", they write them as "put out of service". It's a grand total of all tanks that were put out of service for any reason. There's separate statistics for different reasons why they were put out.

>>335406

>Well if you read the papers they exceedingly rarely write "destroyed", they write them as "put out of service". It's a grand total of all tanks that were put out of service for any reason. There's separate statistics for different reasons why they were put out.

So just count the unrecoverable losses when comparing to German data.

Problem solved, much ado about nothing.

To be honest, someone should probably write a book analyzing WW2 losses and statistics, maybe even include the primary sources, there would certainly be enough material to go on.

>>335403

> A tank that gets towed out of mud is not destroyed.

But it is made operationally unusable.

If you start with 1000 tanks and 100 get stuck in mud before reaching target, the politicians have to know about it if they're going to make policy changes or approve a new variant.

>>335410

I'd like to see Soviet "unrecoverables" vs German "destroyed".

>>335292

ok I get why you used the therm.

>I probably have lighter skin than you, Huefaggot. People say I look like a fucking chink, and it ain't countrymen who's telling me this.

maybe they told

"you look like a gay, chap"

and you understood " you look like a geisha" kek, take your kimono off faggot.

>>334268

> Liberals don't have shorter gestation or larger litter sizes, nor do they invest less in each of their offspring.

I'm not saying it's true or not, I don't know. But if the races vary, even in gestation, and even r-selected humans are more K than almost any other species, then I bet there are variances between liberals and conservatives. Which one, for instance, is more likely to spend more time interacting with kids and teaching them?

>>334268

Good point. But allot of the other features are observable in populations living in a glut. It could be that humans express this response differently, or that the jew media and modern society in general has corrupted the response.

>>334275

Eh, it is unproven but it is an interesting theory.

>>335019

In the absence of birth control/abortions I'm not sure that would apply. And all the liberal women I knew worked or had others raise their kids, the conservatives I've known usually spent more time with kids. Anecdotal, though.

But I agree that applying it to politics/culture is usually a case of calling things you don't like r-/things you like K-. Comparing liberals and conservatives of different races is much less clear then between the races themselves.

>>335575

Looks like camo at least, now put it up against something that isn't your carpet to see if it works.

>>335810

Dark earth looks like complete ass though.

Aight OP, here is some actual constructive criticism. Your pattern is too detailed and busy. Smaller patterns, like Flecktarn, are better for close ranges, while larger patterns like Woodland are better for longer ranges, sine it blends better with the terrain. Also, your camo is too bright. The only thing that neon green in a temperate area might be ferns or other very young plants. There is a reason it is olive drab not olive neon. Darker colors reflect less light, so it takes longer to spot a person in dark camo. Also, be mindful of what camo you will be wearing while carrying your rifle. Make sure the colors don't clash.

>>332848

Its a Mossberg ### Cruiser, I think. There arent any photos of Trench Guns in the album either.

Bump.

>>332869

That got me wet, adding it tomorrow.

>>332869

If they turn out to not be vaporware I will buy one the moment they hit the US.

I've always wondered why 9mm/.45cal carbines never took off. Must are ugly as man-ass and the really cool ones never sold well or were too expensive for most to actually own.

As for Hi-Point, it seems like they intentionally make their guns ugly so they don't get banned.

>>335275

If I recall the Marlin camp carbine in .45 tended to beat itself to death, no clue on the 9x19 one though.

>>334399

>suggesting calico

>ever

>>334399

>>334412

>>335257

>>335809

>>334448

I actually have 2 Calicos. One's a wood stocked .22 rifle and the other is a 9mm with a collapsible stock. I'll be honest, they're not great. The placement of the 100 rnd mag relative to the rear sight on the .22 makes getting a sight picture difficult, it can be done but it's not comfortable for me with a sight that low to the default cheek rest. The 9mm stock has a tendency to collapse when firing and rounds like to misfeed by getting stuck on the ejector pin when that happens. I've never gotten through a whole 100 rnd mag on the 9mm without a misfeed or the stock sliding in. Also, they use a rubber buffer plate that will get hard over time so that's a part you'll want to have a few extras for when the current one wears out.

I may get a 9mm pistol someday, I think that's the form factor where the concept will really shine but I know it will never be a practical carry gun, it just wasn't ever designed for that application. It was meant to be a police weapon, FA capability with a magazine that makes that practical. It's a real shame that it never took off in that market. C'est la vie.

I'll never get rid of my Calicos and in spite of their problems they are fun guns when they're working right and an interesting concept that was sadly not fully realized. I think the 9mm models could have been significantly improved if the mags were placed over the barrel and fed to the rear of the weapon like a P90 but that would have been impossible with the .22 models. If you're a collector like me you should get one for the weirdness and stick to the fixed stock or pistol versions but if you want a practical rifle you're probably better off with something like an SKS or a cheap blowback 9mm.

>>335800

That's for if they get too close.

http://8ch.net/k/res/323709.html

>>335823

I'll keep that in mind.

>>335796

That said, I'm partial to the Sigma. It's a not-butt-ugly gun and comes in decent cartridges.

>>335796

How are you lumping Makarovs together with hi-points? Makarovs are more than 300 dollars now and they're actually pretty good guns. I think guns similar to the makarov like that Polish radom or whatever it's called are still cheap.

>>335799

>>335800

>>335823

The Mad Balls® are still the premium choice for affordable self-defense. Cheap, easy to make and completely untracable.

Yet I STILL think soap bars are best suited for the task.